Impact and Solutions of Seawater Heterogeneity on Wide-Angle Tomographic Inversion of Crustal Velocities in Deep Marine Environments—Numerical Studies
- 37 Downloads
The seawater column is typically taken as a homogeneous velocity layer in wide-angle crustal seismic surveys in marine environments. However, heterogeneities in salinity and temperature throughout the seawater layer result insignificant lateral variations in its seismic velocity, especially in deep marine environments. Failure to compensate for these velocity inhomogeneities will introduce significant artifacts in constructing crustal velocity models using seismic tomography. In this study, we conduct numerical experiments to investigate the impact of heterogeneous seismic velocities in seawater on tomographic inversion for crustal velocity models. Experiments that include lateral variation in seawater velocity demonstrated that the modeled crustal velocities were contaminated by artifacts from tomographic inversions when assuming a homogeneous water layer. To suppress such artifacts, we propose two strategies: 1) simultaneous inversion of water velocities and the crustal velocities; 2) layer-stripping inversion during which to first invert for seawater velocity and then correct the travel times before inverting for crustal velocities. The layer-stripping inversion significantly improves the modeling of variation in seawater velocity when preformed with seismic sensors deployed on the ocean bottom and in the water column. Such strategies improve crustal modeling via wide-angle seismic surveys in deep-marine environment.
Key wordsdeep water seismic tomography wide-angle seismic survey water heterogeneity OBS vertical cable
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41230318), the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (No. ZR2014DM006), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2015M582138), and the Scientific Research Foundation for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars, Ministry of Education. The final publication is available at Springer via https://doi.org/10.1007/s12583-017-0816-7.
- Biescas, B., Ruddick, B. R., Nedimovic, M. R., et al., 2014. Recovery of Temperature, Salinity, and Potential Density from Ocean Reflectivity. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 119(5): 3171–3184. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013jc009662Google Scholar
- Gailler, A., Klingelhoefer, F., Olivet, J. L., et al., 2009. Crustal Structure of a Young Margin Pair: New Results Across the Liguro–Provencal Basin from Wide-Angle Seismic Tomography. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 286(1/2): 333–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2009.07.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- MacKay, S., Fried, J., 2002. Removing Distortions Caused by Water Velocity Variations: Method for Dynamic Correction. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 21: 2074–2077. https://doi.org/ 10.1190/1.1817110Google Scholar
- Makris, J., Papoulia, J., McPherson, S., et al., 2012. Mapping of Sediments and Crust Offshore Kenya, East Africa: A Wide Aperture Refraction/Reflection Survey. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 31: 1–5. https://doi.org/ 10.1190/segam2012-0426.1Google Scholar
- Yang, Y., He, G., Zhu, K. et al., 2016. Classification of Seafloor Geological Types of Qianyu Seamount from Mid Pacific Seamounts Using Multibeam Backscatter Intensity Data. Earth Science—Journal of China University of Geosciences, 41(4): 718–728 (in Chinese with English Abstract)CrossRefGoogle Scholar