Journal of Earth Science

, Volume 27, Issue 1, pp 9–14 | Cite as

Application of advection-diffusion routing model to flood wave propagation: A case study on Big Piney River, Missouri USA

Article

Abstract

Flood wave propagation modeling is of critical importance to advancing water resources management and protecting human life and property. In this study, we investigated how the advection-diffusion routing model performed in flood wave propagation on a 16 km long downstream section of the Big Piney River, MO. Model performance was based on gaging station data at the upstream and downstream cross sections. We demonstrated with advection-diffusion theory that for small differences in watershed drainage area between the two river cross sections, inflow along the reach mainly contributes to the downstream hydrograph’s rising limb and not to the falling limb. The downstream hydrograph’s falling limb is primarily determined by the propagated flood wave originating at the upstream cross section. This research suggests the parameter for the advectiondiffusion routing model can be calibrated by fitting the hydrograph falling limb. Application of the advection diffusion model to the flood wave of January 29, 2013 supports our theoretical finding that the propagated flood wave determines the downstream cross section falling limb, and the model has good performance in our test examples.

Key Words

advection-diffusion equation hydrograph flood wave propagation recession limb 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adamowski, J. F., 2008. Development of a Short-Term River Flood Forecasting Method for Snowmelt Driven Floods Based on Wavelet and Cross-Wavelet Analysis. Journal of Hydrology, 353(3/4): 247–266. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.02.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrews, E. D., 1980. Effective and Bankfull Discharges of Streams in the Yampa River Basin, Colorado and Wyoming. Journal of Hydrology, 46(3/4): 311–330. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(80)90084-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Biggin, D. S., 1996. A Comparison of ERS-1 Satellite Radar and Aerial Photography for River Flood Mapping. Water and Environment Journal, 10(1): 59–64. doi:10.1111/j.1747-6593.1996.tb00009.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brakenridge, G. R., Nghiem, S. V., Anderson, E., et al., 2005. Space-Based Measurement of River Runoff. EOS, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 86(19): 185–188. doi:10.1029/2005eo190001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brutsaert, W., 2005. Hydrology: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burn, D. H., 1999. Perceptions of Flood Risk: A Case Study of the Red River Flood of 1997. Water Resources Research, 35(11): 3451–3458. doi:10.1029/1999wr900215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Campolo, M., Andreussi, P., Soldati, A., 1999. River Flood Forecasting with a Neural Network Model. Water Resources Research, 35(4): 1191–1197. doi:10.1029/1998wr900086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cao, Z. X., Yue, Z. Y., Pender, G., 2011. Landslide Dam Failure and Flood Hydraulics. Part II: Coupled Mathematical Modelling. Natural Hazards, 59(2): 1021–1045. doi:10.1007/s11069-011-9815-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Criss, R. E., Winston, W. E., 2008. Properties of a Diffusive Hydrograph and the Interpretation of Its Single Parameter. Mathematical Geosciences, 40(3): 313–325. doi:10.1007/s11004-008-9145-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Criss, R. E., Osburn, G. R., House, R. S., 2009. The Ozark Plateaus: Missouri, in Caves and Karst of the USA. National Speleological Society, Huntsville ALGoogle Scholar
  11. Di Baldassarre, G., Montanari, A., 2009. Uncertainty in River Discharge Observations: A Quantitative Analysis. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 13(6): 913–921. doi:10.5194/hess-13-913-2009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gillham, R. W., Sudicky, E. A., Cherry, J. A., et al., 1984. An Advection-Diffusion Concept for Solute Transport in Heterogeneous Unconsolidated Geological Deposits. Water Resources Research, 20(3): 369–378. doi:10.1029/wr020i003p00369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Järvelä, J., 2002. Flow Resistance of Flexible and Stiff Vegetation: A Flume Study with Natural Plants. Journal of Hydrology, 269(1/2): 44–54. doi:10.1016/s0022-1694(02)00193-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kirchner, J. W., Feng, X. H., Neal, C., 2001. Catchment-Scale Advection and Dispersion as a Mechanism for Fractal Scaling in Stream Tracer Concentrations. Journal of Hydrology, 254(1–4): 82–101. doi:10.1016/s0022-1694(01)00487-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kumar, A., Jaiswal, D. K., Kumar, N., 2010. Analytical Solutions to One-Dimensional Advection-diffusion Equation with Variable Coefficients in Semi-Infinite Media. Journal of Hydrology, 380(3/4): 330–337. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.11.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu, Y. B., Gebremeskel, S., De Smedt, F., et al., 2003. A Diffusive Transport Approach for Flow Routing in GISBased Flood Modeling. Journal of Hydrology, 283(1–4): 91–106. doi:10.1016/s0022-1694(03)00242-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McDonnell, J. J., Beven, K., 2014. Debates—The Future of Hydrological Sciences: A (common) Path Forward? A Call to Action Aimed at Understanding Velocities, Celerities and Residence Time Distributions of the Headwater Hydrograph. Water Resources Research, 50(6): 5342–5350. doi:10.1002/2013wr015141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Meire, D., De Doncker, L., Declercq, F., et al., 2010. Modelling River-Floodplain Interaction during Flood Propagation. Natural Hazards, 55(1): 111–121. doi:10.1007/s11069-010-9554-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Middelmann-Fernandes, M. H., 2010. Flood Damage Estimation beyond Stage-Damage Functions: An Australian Example. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 3(1): 88–96. doi:10.1111/j.1753-318x.2009.01058.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Milzow, C., Kinzelbach, W., 2010. Accounting for Subgrid Scale Topographic Variations in Flood Propagation Modeling Using MODFLOW. Water Resources Research, 46(10): W10521. doi:10.1029/2009wr008088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Saint-Venant, B., 1871. Theory of Unsteady Water Flow, with Application to River Floods and to Propagation of Tides in River Channels. French Academy of Science, 73: 148–154Google Scholar
  22. Sakkas, J. G., Strelkoff, T., 1976. Dimensionless Solution of Dam-Break Flood Waves. Journal of the Hydraulics Division, 102(2): 171–184Google Scholar
  23. Singh, V. P., 1995. Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology. Water Resources Publications. Highlands Ranch, ColoGoogle Scholar
  24. Vineyard, J. D., Feder, G. L., 1982. Springs of Missouri: Revised Edn. WR29. Missouri Geological Survey and Water Resources, Jefferson City, MOGoogle Scholar
  25. Wurbs, R. A., James, W. P., 2002. Water Resources Engineering. Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  26. Yang, Y., Endreny, T. A., 2013. Watershed Hydrograph Model Based on Surface Flow Diffusion. Water Resources Research, 49(1): 507–516. doi:10.1029/2012wr012186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Yen, B. C., Tsai, C. W. S., 2001. On Noninertia Wave versus Diffusion Wave in Flood Routing. Journal of Hydrology, 244(1/2): 97–104. doi:10.1016/s0022-1694(00)00422-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Younis, J., Anquetin, S., Thielen, J., 2008. The Benefit of High-Resolution Operational Weather Forecasts for Flash Flood Warning. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 12(4): 1039–1051. doi:10.5194/hess-12-1039-2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© China University of Geosciences and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yang Yang
    • 1
  • Theodore A. Endreny
    • 2
  • David J. Nowak
    • 3
  1. 1.USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station & the Davey InstituteSyracuseUSA
  2. 2.Environmental Resource Engineering, SUNY ESFSyracuseUSA
  3. 3.USDA Forest Service Northern Research StationSyracuseUSA

Personalised recommendations