Journal of Earth Science

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 1–11 | Cite as

Fractals and spatial statistics of point patterns

Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

The relationship between fractal point pattern modeling and statistical methods of parameter estimation in point-process modeling is reviewed. Statistical estimation of the cluster fractal dimension by using Ripley’s K-function has advantages in comparison with the more commonly used methods of box-counting and cluster fractal dimension estimation because it corrects for edge effects, not only for rectangular study areas but also for study areas with curved boundaries determined by regional geology. Application of box-counting to estimate the fractal dimension of point patterns has the disadvantage that, in general, it is subject to relatively strong “roll-off” effects for smaller boxes. Point patterns used for example in this paper are mainly for gold deposits in the Abitibi volcanic belt on the Canadian Shield. Additionally, it is proposed that, worldwide, the local point patterns of podiform Cr, volcanogenic massive sulphide and porphyry copper deposits, which are spatially distributed within irregularly shaped favorable tracts, satisfy the fractal clustering model with similar fractal dimensions. The problem of deposit size (metal tonnage) is also considered. Several examples are provided of cases in which the Pareto distribution provides good results for the largest deposits in metal size-frequency distribution modeling.

Key Words

fractal point pattern spatial statistics roll-off effect cluster dimension Pareto distribution 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References Cited

  1. Agterberg, F. P., 1981. Geochemical Crustal Abundance Models. Transactions, Society of Mining Engineers of AIME, 268: 1823–1830Google Scholar
  2. Agterberg, F. P., 1993. Calculation of the Variance of Mean Values for Blocks in Regional Resource Evaluation Studies. Nonrenewable Resources, 2(1): 312–324 doi:10.1007/BF02257541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agterberg, F. P., 1994. FORTRAN Program for the Analysis of Point Patterns with Correction for Edge Effects. Computers & Geosciences, 20(2): 229–245 doi:org/10.1016/0098-3004(94)90008-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Agterberg, F. P., 1995. Multifractal Modeling of the Sizes and Grades of Giant and Supergiant Deposits. International Geology Review, 37(1): 1–8, doi:10.1080/00206819509465388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Agterberg, F. P., 2011. Principles of Probabilistic Regional Mineral Resource Estimation. Earth Science-Journal of China University of Geosciences, 36(2): 189–200, doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2011.020Google Scholar
  6. Agterberg, F. P., 2012. Sampling and Analysis of Chemical Element Concentration Distribution in Rock Units and Orebodies. Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics, 19: 23–44, doi:10.5194/npg-19-23-2012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Agterberg, F. P., Cheng, Q. M., Wright, D. F., 1993. Fractal Modelling of Mineral Deposits. In: Elbrond, J., Tang, X., eds., Proceedings APCOM XX1V, International Symposium on the Application of Computers and Operations Re search in the Mineral Industries, Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum, Montreal. 1: 43–53Google Scholar
  8. Agterberg, F. P., Chung, C. F., Fabbri, A. G., et al., 1972. Geomathematical Evaluation of Copper and Zinc Potential of the Abitibi Area, Ontario and Quebec. Geological Survey of Canada Paper. Dept. of Energy, Mines and Resources, YukonGoogle Scholar
  9. Baddeley, A., Turner, R., 2012. Package ‘Spatstat’, Manual, Version 1.30.0 (Released 2012-12-23) [PDF]. http://140.247.115.171 Google Scholar
  10. Baddeley, A., Møller, J., Pakes, A. G., 2008. Properties of Residuals for Spatial Point Processes. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 60(3): 627–649 doi:10.1007/s10463-007-0116-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Baddeley, A., 2007. Spatial Point Processes and Their Applications. Lecture Notes in Mathematics: 1–75 doi:10.1007/978-3-540-38175-4_1Google Scholar
  12. Barton, C. C., La Pointe, P. R., 1995. Fractals in Petroleum Geology and Earth Processes. Plenum, New York. 317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Blenkinsop, T. G., 1995. Fractal Measures for Size and Spatial Distributions of Gold Mines: Economic Implications. In: Blenkinsop, T. G., Tromp, P. L., eds., Sub-Saharan Economic Geology. Special Publication Geological Society of Zimbabwe, 3: 177–186Google Scholar
  14. Carlson, C. A., 1991. Spatial Distribution of Ore Deposits. Geology, 19(2): 111–114 doi:10.1130/0091-7613(1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cheng, Q. M., 1994. Multifractal Modeling and Spatial Analysis with GIS: Gold Mineral Potential Estimation in the Mitchell-Sulphurets Area, Northwestern British Columbia: [Dissertation]. University of Ottawa, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  16. Cheng, Q. M., 2008. Non-Linear Theory and Power-Law Models for Information Integration and Mineral Resources Quantitative Assessments. Mathematical Geoscience, 40(5): 195–225 doi:10.1007/s11004-008-9172-6Google Scholar
  17. Cheng, Q. M., 2005. A New Model for Incorporating Spatial Association and Singularity in Interpolation of Exploratory Data. Quantitative Geology and Geostatistics, 14(5): 1017–1025 doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-3610-1_106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cheng, Q. M., 2012. Multiplicative Cascade Processes and Information Integration for Predictive Mapping. Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics, 19: 57–68, doi:10.5194/npg-19-57-2012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cheng, Q. M., Agterberg, F. P., 1995. Multifractal Modelling and Spatial Point Processes. Mathematical Geology, 27(7): 831–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cheng, Q. M., Agterberg, F. P., 2009. Singularity Analysis of Ore-Mineral and Toxic Trace Elements in Stream Sediments. Computers & Geosciences, 35(2): 234–244, doi:org/10.1016/j.cageo.2008.02.034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cressie, N. A. C., 2001. Statistics for Spatial Data. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Diggle, P. J., 1983. Statistical Analysis of Spatial Point Patterns. Academic Press, London. 72Google Scholar
  23. Falconer, K. J., 2003. Fractal Geometry: Mathematical Foundations and Applications. Wiley, ChichesterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Feder, J., 1988. Fractals. Plenum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Gupta, V. K., Troutman, B. M., Dawdy, D. R., 2007. Towards a Nonlinear Geophysical Theory of Floods in River Networks: An Overview of 20 Years of Progress. In: Tsonis, A. A., Elsner, J. B., eds., Nonlinear Dynamics in Geosciences. Springer, New York. 121–150 doi:10.1007/978-34918-3-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Korvin, G., 1992. Fractal Models in the Earth Sciences. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  27. Lovejoy, S., Schertzer, D., 2007. Scaling and Multifractal Fields in the Solid Earth and Topography. Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics, 14(4): 465–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Malamud, B. D., Morein, G., Turcotte, D. L., 1998. Forest Fires: An Example of Self-Organized Critical Behavior. Science, 281(5384): 1840–1842, doi:10.1126/science.281.5384.1840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mandelbrot, B. B., 1975. Les Objects Fractals: Forme, Hazard et Dimension. Flammarion, Paris. 1–19Google Scholar
  30. Mandelbrot, B. B., 1983. The Fractal Geometry of Nature. Freeman, San Francisco. 262Google Scholar
  31. Mandelbrot, B. B., 1995. The Statistics of Natural Resources and the Law of Pareto. In: Barton, C. C., La Pointe, P. R., eds., Fractals in Petroleum Geology and the Earth Sciences. Plenum, New York. 1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mandelbrot, B. B., 1999. Multifractals and 1/f Noise. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Park, N. W., Chi, K. H., 2008. Quantitative Assessment of Landslide Susceptibility Using High-Resolution Remote Sensing Data and a Generalized Additive Model. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 29(1): 247–264 doi:10.1080/01431160701227661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pickering, G., Bull, J. M., Sanderson, D. J., 1995. Sampling Power-Law Distributions. Tectonophysics, 248(1–2): 1–20 doi:org/10.1016/0040-1951(95)00030-QCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Quandt, R. E., 1966. Old and New Methods of Estimation and the Pareto Distribution. Metrica, 10(1): 55–82, doi:10.1007/BF02613419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Raines, G. L., 2008. Are Fractal Dimensions of the Spatial Distribution of Mineral Deposits Meaningful? Natural Resources Research, 17(2): 87–97 doi:10.1007/s11053-008-9067-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ripley, B. D., 1976. The Second-Order Analysis of Stationary Point Processes. Journal of Applied Probability, 13(2): 255–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ripley, B. D., 1981. Spatial Statistics. Wiley-Interscience, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ripley, B. D., 1988. Statistical Inference for Spatial Processes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511624131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rowlingson, B. S., Diggle, P. J., 1991. Estimating the KFunction for a Univariate Spatial Point Process on an Arbitrary Polygon. Lancaster University Mathematics Department Technical Report MA91/58. Lancaster University, Lancaster. 1–15Google Scholar
  41. Rowlingson, B. S., Diggle, P. J., 1993. Spalncs: Spatial Point Pattern Analysis Code in S-Plus. Computers & Geosciences, 19(5): 627–655 doi:org/10.1016/0098-3004(93)90099-QCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rundle, J. B., Turcotte, D. L., Shcherbakov, R., et al., 2003. Statistical Physics Approach to Understanding the Multiscale Dynamics of Earthquake Fault Systems. Reviews of Geophysics, 41: 1019 doi:10.1029/2003 RG000135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sharma, A. S., 1995. Assessing the Magnetosphere’s Nonlinear Behavior: Its Dimension is Low, Its Predictability, High. Reviews of Geophysics, 33(S1): 645 doi:10.1029/95RG00495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Singer, D., Menzie, W. D., 2010. Quantitative Mineral Resource Assessments: An Integrated Approach. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  45. Stoyan, D., Kendall, W. S., 1987. Stochastic Geometry and Its Applications. Wiley, Chichester. 125Google Scholar
  46. Turcotte, D. L., 1997. Fractals and Chaos in Geology and Geophysics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Uritsky, V. M., Donovan, E., Klimas, A. J., 2008. Scale-Free and Scale-Dependent Modes of Energy Release Dynamics in the Night Time Magnetosphere. Geophysical Research Letters, 35 (21): L21101, 1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Walsh, J., Watterson, J., Yielding, G., 1991. The Importance of Small-Scale Faulting in Regional Extension. Nature, 351: 391–393 doi:10.1038/351391a0CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© China University of Geosciences and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Geological Survey of CanadaOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations