Journal of Earth Science

, Volume 21, Issue 4, pp 365–381 | Cite as

Modeling the contemporary stress field and deformation pattern of eastern Mediterranean

  • S. K. DwivediEmail author
  • D. Hayashi


The contemporary stress field in the earth’s crust is important and provides insights into mechanisms that drive plate motions. In this study, elastic plane stress finite element modeling incorporating realistic rock parameters was used to calculate the stress field, displacement field, and deformation of the plate interactions in the eastern Mediterranean. Modeled stress data for the African-Arabian-Anatolian plate interactions with fixed European platform correlate well with observed contemporary stress indicator from the world stress map (WSM) and focal mechanism of earthquakes; while displacement field agrees qualitatively well with GPS vectors and sense of motion indicated by focal mechanisms for large crustal earthquakes (M s>6) and plate motion models. Modeling result shows the direction of maximum horizontal compressive stress (σ Hmax) toward the direction of absolute motion of these plates. Large perturbations in σ Hmax orientations are shown to occur in and around tectonic boundaries between those plates. It is observed that, although the African plate acts mostly as indenter, which transmits the collisional motion from the Arabian plate to the Anatolian plate, in the current situation, the far-field stress, probably from the subduction in Aegean Arc, is needed to satisfy the contemporary stress field in Anatolia.

Key Words

finite element model maximum horizontal stress seismicity crustal deformation Anatolia eastern Mediterranean 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References Cited

  1. Ambraseys, N. N., Jackson, J. A., 1998. Faulting Associated with Historical and Recent Earthquakes in the Eastern Mediterranean. Geophysical Journal International, 133(2): 390–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Angelier, J., 1979. Néotectonique de l’arc Egéen. Soc. Geol. du Nord, 3Google Scholar
  3. Armijo, R., Meyer, B., Hubert, A., et al., 1999. Westward Propagation of the North Anatolian Fault into the Northern Aegean: Timing and Kinematics. Geology, 27: 267–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arpat, E., Saroglu, F., 1972. The East Anatolian Fault System: Thoughts on Its Development. Bulletin of the Mineral Research and Exploration Institute of Turkey, 78: 33–39Google Scholar
  5. Barka, A., 1992. The North Anatolian Fault Zone. Annales Tectonicae, 6(Suppl.): 164–195Google Scholar
  6. Barka, A. A., Kadinsky-Cade, K., 1988. Strike-Slip Fault Geometry in Turkey and Its Influence on Earthquake Activity. Tectonics, 7(3): 663–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bozkurt, E., 2001. Neotectonics of Turkey: A Synthesis. Geodinamica Acta, 14(1–3): 3–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bozkurt, E., Kocyigit, A., 1996. The Kazova Basin: An Active Negative Flower Structure on the Almus Fault Zone, a Splay Fault System of the North Anatolian Fault Zone, Turkey. Tectonophysics, 265(3–4): 239–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chu, D. Z., Gordon, R. G., 1998. Current Plate Motions across the Red Sea. Geophysical Journal International, 135(2): 313–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cianetti, S., Gasperini, P., Boccaletti, M., et al., 1997. Reproducing the Velocity and Stress Fields in the Aegean Region. Geophysical Research Letters, 24(16): 2087–2090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cianetti, S., Gasperini, P., Giunchi, C., et al., 2001. Numerical Modelling of the Aegean-Anatolian Region: Geodynamical Constraints from Observed Rheological Heterogeneities. Geophysical Journal International, 146(3): 760–780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clark, S. P. Jr., 1966. Handbook of Physical Constants. Geological Society of America Memoir 97, New York. 587Google Scholar
  13. Davies, R., England, P., Parsons, B., et al., 1997. Geodetic Strain of Greece in the Interval 1892–1992. Journal of Geophysical Research, 102(B11): 24571–24588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. DeMets, C., Gordon, R. G., Argus, D. F., et al., 1990. Current Plate Motions. Geophysical Journal International, 101(2): 425–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. DeMets, C., Gordon, R. G., Argus, D. F., et al., 1994. Effect of Recent Revisions to the Geomagnetic Reversal Time Scale on Estimates of Current Plate Motions. Geophysical Research Letters, 21(20): 2191–2194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dewey, J. F., Hempton, M. R., Kidd, W. S. F., et al., 1986. Shortening of Continental Lithosphere: The Neotectonics of Eastern Anatolia, a Young Collision Zone. Geological Society Special Publications, 19: 3–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dewey, J. F., Pitman, W. C., Ryan, W. B. F., et al., 1973. Plate Tectonics and the Evolution of the Alpine System. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 84(12): 3137–3180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Doutsos, T., Kokkalas, S., 2001. Stress and Deformation Patterns in the Aegean Region. Journal of Structural Geollogy, 23(2–3): 455–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dwivedi, S. K., Hayashi, D., 2009. Numerical Modeling of the Development of Southeastern Red Sea Continental Margin. Earthquake Science, 22(3): 239–249. doi: 10.1007/s11589-009-0239-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dwivedi, S. K., Hayashi, D., 2008. FE Modeling of Contem porary Stress Field in Northeast Africa: Implications for the Kinematics of Suez Rift. Boll. Geofís. Teor. Appl., 49(Suppl. 2): 318–323Google Scholar
  21. Fischer, K. D., 2006. The Influence of Different Rheological Parameters on the Surface Deformation and Stress Field of the Aegean-Anatolian Region. International Journal of Earth Sciences, 95(2): 239–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Garfunkel, Z., Ben-Avraham, Z., 1996. The Structure of the Dead Sea Basin. Tectonophysics, 266(1–4): 155–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gephart, J. W., Forsyth, D. W., 1984. An Improved Method for Determining the Regional Stress Tensor Using Earthquake, Focal Mechanism Data: Application to the San Fernando Earthquake Sequence. Journal of Geophysical Research, 89(B11): 9305–9320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hayashi, D., 2008. Theoretical Basis of FE Simulation Software Package. Bull. Fac. Sci. Univ. Ryukyus, 85: 81–95 ( Scholar
  25. Heidbach, O., Tingay, M., Barth, A., et al., 2008. The 2008 Release of the World Stress Map (Available Online at Scholar
  26. Hempton, M. R., 1987. Constraints on Arabian Plate Motion and Extensional History of the Red Sea. Tectonics, 6(6): 687–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jackson, J., 1994. Active Tectonics of the Aegean Region. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 22: 239–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jackson, J., Haines, J., Holt, W., 1995. The Accommodation of Arabia-Eurasia Plate Convergence in Iran. Journal of Geophysical Research, 100(B8): 15205–15219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jackson, J., McKenzie, D., 1984. Active Tectonics of the Alpine-Himalayan Belt between Western Turkey and Pakistan. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 77(1): 185–264Google Scholar
  30. Joffe, S., Garfunkel, Z., 1987. Plate Kinematics of the Circum Red Sea: A Reevaluation. Tectonophysics, 141(1–3): 5–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kahle, H. G., Cocard, M., Peter, Y., et al., 2000. GPS-Derived Strain Rate Field within the Boundary Zones of the Eurasian, African, and Arabian Plates. Journal of Geophysical Research, 105(B10): 23353–23370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kahle, H. G., Muller, M. V., Geiger, A., et al., 1995. The Strain Field in NW Greece and the Ionian Islands: Results Inferred from GPS Measurements. Tectonophysics, 249: 41–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kempler, D., Garfunkel, Z., 1994. Structures and Kinematics in the Northeastern Mediterranean: A Study of an Irregular Plate Boundary. Tectonophysics, 234(1–2): 19–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kiratzi, A. A., 1993. A Study on the Active Crustal Deformation of the North and East Anatolian Fault Zones. Tectonophysics, 225(3): 191–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kiratzi, A. A., Papazachos, C. B., 1995. Active Crustal Deformation from the Azores Triple Junction to the Middle East. Tectonophysics, 243(1–2): 1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kocyigit, A., 1989. Susehri Basin: An Active Fault-Wedge Basin on the North Anatolian Fault Zone, Turkey. Tectonophysics, 167(1): 13–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Le Pichon, X., Angelier, J., 1979. The Hellenic Arc and Trench System: A Key to the Neotectonic Evolution of the Eastern Mediterranean Area. Tectonophysics, 60(1–2): 1–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Le Pichon, X., Chamot-Rooke, N., Lallemant, S., 1995. Geodetic Determination of the Kinematics of Central Greece with Respect to Europe: Implications for Eastern Mediterranean Tectonics. Journal of Geophysical Research, 100(B7): 12675–12690Google Scholar
  39. Le Pichon, X., Gaulier, J. M., 1988. The Rotation of Arabia and the Levant Fault System. Tectonophysics, 153(1–4): 271–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lundgren, P., Giardini, D., Russo, R. M., 1998. A Geodynamic Framework for Eastern Mediterranean Kinematics. Geophysical Research Letters, 25(21): 4007–4010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lyberis, N., 1988. Tectonic Evolution of the Gulf of Suez and the Gulf of Aqaba. Tectonophysics, 153(1–4): 209–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McClusky, S., Balassanian, S., Barka, A., et al., 2000. Global Positioning System Constraints on Plate Kinematics and Dynamics in the Eastern Mediterranean and Caucasus. Journal of Geophysical Research, 105(B3): 5695–5719Google Scholar
  43. McClusky, S., Reilinger, R., Mahmoud, S., et al., 2003. GPS Constraints on Africa (Nubia) and Arabia Plate Motions. Geophysical Journal International, 155(1): 126–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McKenzie, D. P., 1970. Plate Tectonics of the Mediterranean Region. Nature, 226(5242): 239–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McKenzie, D. P., 1972. Active Tectonics of the Mediterranean Region. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 30(2): 109–185Google Scholar
  46. McKenzie, D. P., 1976. The East Anatolian Fault: A Major Structure in the Eastern Turkey. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 29(1): 189–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Meijer, P. T., Wortel, M. J. R., 1996. Temporal Variation in the Stress Field of the Aegean Region. Geophysical Research Letters, 23(5): 439–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Meijer, P. T., Wortel, M. J. R., 1997. Present-Day Dynamics of the Aegean Region: A Model Analysis of the Horizontal Pattern of Stress and Deformation. Tectonics, 16(6): 879–895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Neves, S. P., Silva, J. M. R., Mariano, G., 2005. Oblique Lineations in Orthogneisses and Supracrustal Rocks: Vertical Partitioning of Strain in a Hot Crust, Eastern Borborema Province, NE Brazil. Journal of Structural Geology, 27(8): 1513–1527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Nyst, M., Thatcher, W., 2004. New Constraints on the Active Tectonic Deformation of the Aegean. Journal of Geophysical Research, 109(B11406), doi:10.1029/2003JB002830Google Scholar
  51. Otsubo, M., Hayashi, D., 2003. Neotectonics in Southern Ryukyu Arc by Means of Paleostress Analysis. Bull. Fac. Sci. Univ. Ryukyus, 76: 1–73Google Scholar
  52. Papazachos, C. B., 1999. Seismological GPS Evidence for the Aegean-Anatolia Interaction. Geophysical Research Letters, 26(17): 2653–2656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Papazachos, C. B., Kiratzi, A. A., 1992. A Formulation for Reliable Estimation of Active Crustal Deformation and Its Application to Central Greece. Geophysical Journal International, 111(3): 424–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Papazachos, C. B., Kiratzi, A. A., 1996. A Detailed Study of the Active Crustal Deformation in the Aegean and Surrounding Area. Tectonophysics, 253(1–2): 129–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rebai, S., Philip, H., Taboada, A., 1992. Modern Tectonic Stress Field in the Mediterranean Region: Evidence for Variation in Stress Directions at Different Scales. Geophysical Journal International, 110(1): 106–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Reilinger, R., McClusky S., Oral, M., et al., 1997. Global Positioning System Measurements of Present-Day Crustal Movements in the Arabia-Africa-Eurasia Plate Collision Zone. Journal of Geophysical Research, 102(B5): 9983–9999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Scordilis, E. M., Karakaisis, G. F., Karakostas, B. G., et al., 1985. Evidence for Transform Faulting in the Ionian Sea: The Cephalonia Island Earthquake Sequence of 1983. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 123(3): 388–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sengör, A. M. C., 1979. The North Anatolian Transform Fault: Its Age, Offset and Tectonic Significance. Journal of the Geological Society, 136: 269–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sengör, A. M. C., 1987. Cross-Faults and Differential Stretching of Hanging Walls in Regions of Low-Angle Normal Faulting: Examples from Western Turkey. Geological Society Special Publications, 28: 575–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Steckler, M. S., Berthelot, F., Lyberis, N., et al., 1988. Subsidence in the Gulf of Suez: Implications for Rifting and Plate Kinematics. Tectonophysics, 153(1–4): 249–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tatar, O., Piper, J. D. A., Gursoy, H., et al., 1996. Regional Significance of Neotectonic Counterclockwise Rotation in Central Turkey. International Geology Review, 38(8): 692–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Taymaz, T., Eyidogan, H., Jackson, J., 1991. Source Parameters of Large Earthquakes in the East Anatolian Fault Zone (Turkey). Geophysical Journal International, 106(3): 537–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Toksoz, M. N., Shakal, A. F., Michael, A. I., 1979. Space-Time Migration of Earthquakes along the North Anatolian Fault Zone and Seismic Gaps. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 117(6): 1258–1270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Vidal, N., Alvarez-Marron, J., Klaeschen, D., 2000. The Structure of the Africa-Anatolia Plate Boundary in the Eastern Mediterranean. Tectonics, 19(4): 723–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Westaway, R., 1994. Present-Day Kinematics of the Middle East and Eastern Mediterranean. Journal Geophysical Research, 99(B6): 12071–12090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wortel, M. J. R., Spakman, W., 2000. Subduction and Slab Detachment in the Mediterranean-Carpathian Region. Science, 290(5498): 1910–1917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Yin, Z. M., Ranalli, G., 1992. Critical Stress Differences, Fault Orientation and Slip Direction in Anisotropic Rocks under Non-Andersonian Stress Systems. Journal of Structural Geology, 14(2): 237–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zheng, Y., D., Wang, T., Ma, M. B., et al., 2004. Maximum Effective Moment Criterion and the Origin of Low-Angle Normal Faults. Journal of Structural Geology, 26(2): 271–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Zheng, Y. D., Wang, T., Zhang, J. J., 2009. Structural Analysis of Mylonitic Rocks in the Cougar Creek Complex, Oregon-Idaho Using the Porphyroclast Hyperbolic Distribution Method, and Potential Use of SC-Type Extensional Shear Bands as Quantitative Vorticity Indicators: Discussion. Journal of Structural Geology, 31(5): 541–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Zitter, T. A. C., Woodside, J. M., Mascle, J., 2000. Ongoing Deformation along the Western Branch of the Cyprus Arc. European Geophysical Society XXV General Assembly, Nice, France, 25–29 April 2000, Geophysical Research Abstracts, 2, 16Google Scholar
  71. Zoback, M. L., 1992. First- and Second-Order Patterns of Stress in the Lithosphere: The World Stress Map Project. Journal of Geophysical Research, 97(B8): 11703–11728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zoback, M. L., Zoback, M. D., 1980. State of Stress in the Conterminous United States. Journal of Geophysical Research, 85(B11): 6113–6156CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© China University of Geosciences and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Simulation Tectonics Laboratory, Faculty of ScienceUniversity of the RyukyusOkinawaJapan

Personalised recommendations