Journal of Biorheology

, Volume 27, Issue 1–2, pp 18–25 | Cite as

Deformation analysis of microcapsules compressed by two rigid parallel plates

Original Article

Abstract

Alginate-poly(l)lysine-alginate microcapsules with a diameter of 200–300 μm were produced and subjected to compression experiments using two rigid parallel plates. The deformed shape was observed, and the relationship between the applied force and the displacement of the plate was measured. A practical analysis method is proposed for the prediction of mechanical properties of microcapsules, namely, the changes in force, transmural pressure, and deformed shape due to the change in the displacement of the plate. The analysis is based on a microcapsule model comprising an axi-symmetric elastic membrane with a constant capsule volume during deformation. Young’s modulus of the membrane, which is used in the analysis, was determined by applying the Hertz contact theory to the experimental results obtained by using an atomic force microscope. The bending stiffness and permeability of the membrane as well as the frictional force between the membrane and the plate were neglected in the analysis. A non-dimensional relationship between the applied force and the displacement of the plate was shown. The theoretically predicted compression force was smaller than the experimentally measured force in the small displacement region, whereas both forces were in good agreement in the large displacement region. The effects of change in Poisson’s ratio, which varied from 0 to 0.5, on the force, transmural pressure, and deformed shape were shown. Under the same displacement conditions, it was observed that the calculated deformed shape was almost coincident with the shape observed in the experiment.

Keywords

Microcapsule Compression AFM Membrane Modeling Mechanical properties 

References

  1. 1.
    Whateley TJ (ed.), Microencapsulation of drugs. Langhorne, PA: Harwood Academic Publishers; 1992.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yoshida Y, Suzuki R, Oka H, Okada N, Okamoto T, Yoshioka T, Mukai Y, Shibata H, Tsutsumi Y, Nakagawa S, Miyazaki J, Mayumi T. A novel cytomedical vehicle capable of protecting cells against complement. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003;305:353–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schmidt JJ, Rowley J, Kong HJ. Hydrogels used for cell-based drug delivery. J Biomed Mater Res. 2008;87A:1113–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hochmuth RM. Micropipette aspiration of living cells. J Biomech. 2000;33:15–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lulevich VV, Radtchenko IL, Sukhorukov GB, Vinogradova OI. Deformation properties of nonadhesive polyelectrolyte microcapsules studied with the atomic force microscope. J Phys Chem B. 2003;107:2735–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hiramoto Y. Mechanical properties of sea urchin eggs. Exp Cell Res. 1963;32:59–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yoneda M. Tension at the surface of sea urchin eggs on the basis of ‘liquid-drop’ concept. Adv Biophys. 1973;4:153–90.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liu KK, Williams DR, Briscoe BJ. Compressive deformation of a single microcapsule. Phys Rev E. 1996;54:6673–80.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Carin M, Barthès-Biesel D, Edwards-Lévy F, Postel C, Andrei DC. Compression of biocompatible liquid-filled HSA-alginate capsules: determination of the membrane mechanical properties. Biotech Bioeng. 2003;82:207–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Risso F, Carin M. Compression of a capsule: Mechanical laws of membranes with negligible bending stiffness. Physical Rev E. 2004;69:061601-1-7.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Feng WW, Yang WH. On the contact problem of an inflated spherical nonlinear membrane. J Appl Mech. 1973;41:209–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lardner TJ, Pujara P. Compression of spherical cells. Mech Today. 1980;5:161–76.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tai IT, Sun AM. Microencapsulation of recombinant cells: a new delivery system for gene therapy. FASEB J. 1993;7:1061–9.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Joki T, Machluf M, Atala A, Zhu J, Seyfried NT, Dunn IF, Abe T, Carroll RS, Black PM. Continuous release of endostatin from microencapsulated engineered cells for tumor therapy. Nat Biotech. 2001;19:35–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sneddon IN. The relation between load and penetration in the axisymmetric Boussinesq problem for a punch of arbitrary profile. Int J Eng Sci. 1965;3:47–57.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Okada N, Miyamoto H, Yoshioka T, Katsume A, Saito H, Yorozu K, Ueda O, Itoh N, Mizuguchi H, Nakagawa S, Ohsugi Y, Mayumi T. Cytomedical therapy for IgG1 plasmacytosis in human interleukin-6 transgenic mice using hybridoma cells microencapsulated in alginate-poly(l)lysine-alginate membrane. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1997;1360:53–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tao NJ, Lindsay SM, Lees S. Measuring the microelastic properties of biological material. Biophys J. 1992;63:1165–9.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hirotsu S. Softening of bulk modulus and negative Poisson’s ratio near the volume phase transition of polymer gels. J Chem Phys. 1991;94:3949–57.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sun G, Zhang Z. Mechanical properties of melamine-formaldehyde microcapsules. J Microencapsulation. 2001;18:593–602.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wang CX, Wang L, Thomas CR. Modelling the mechanical properties of single suspension-cultured tomato cells. Ann Bot. 2004;93:443–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japanese Society of Biorheology 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering ScienceKansai UniversitySuitaJapan
  2. 2.The Chugoku Electric Power Co., IncNaka-ku, HiroshimaJapan

Personalised recommendations