Journal of Biorheology

, Volume 26, Issue 1–2, pp 29–37 | Cite as

Load-dispersing design with twined-spring geometry of a distensible intracranial stent for cerebral aneurysms

  • Yasuhiro Shobayashi
  • Satoshi Tateshima
  • Kazuo Tanishita
Original Article

Abstract

Endovascular stents are increasingly being used to treat cerebral aneurysms. Mechanically, a cerebrovascular stent must have a low radial stiffness to prevent vessel dissection and rupture. To minimize these complications, we need to consider a stent design that has a low radial force and disperses the load within the stented artery. Therefore, highly distensible, load-dispersion stent designs are desirable for intracranial stenting. This study focused on closed-cell stent geometries and calculated the differences in stress within the artery because of the structure by using finite-element modeling. The results showed that the design with hexagonal cell geometry stretched in the circumferential direction had lower radial and circumferential stresses than did the other models. Comparing the maximum radial stress of our models, stress reduction of 35% was obtained with this design. Moreover, its radial stress was 47 kPa, which was similar to the critical stress of 42 kPa assumed in this study. This stent model was characterized by narrow strut spacing and a large surface area, which was dominated by the twined-spring geometry. It had low radial and circumferential stresses and a dispersed stress distribution compared with the other models. Therefore, this design is a desirable load-dispersing design for cerebrovascular treatment.

Keywords

Cerebral aneurysm Stent–vessel interactions Stent Flexibility Radial stiffness 

References

  1. 1.
    Sani S, Jobe KW, Lopes DK. Treatment of wide-necked cerebral aneurysms with the Neuroform2 Treo stent. Neurosurg Focus. 2005;18(2):E4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rhee K, Han MH, Cha SH. Changes of flow characteristics by stenting in aneurysm models: influence of aneurysm geometry and stent porosity. Ann Biomed Eng. 2002;30:894–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Knuckey NW, Haas R, Jenkins R, Epstein MH. Thrombosis of difficult intracranial aneurysms by the endovascular placement of platinum-Dacron microcoils. J Neurosurg. 1992;77:43–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lövblad KO, Yilmaz H, Chouiter A, San Millan Ruiz D, Abdo G, Bijlenga P, de Tribolet N, Ruefenacht DA. Intracranial aneurysm stenting: follow-up with MR angiography. J Magn Reson. 2006;24:418–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pumar JM, Lete I, Pardo MI, Vazquez-Herrero F, Blanco M. LEO stent monotherapy for the endovascular reconstruction of fusiform aneurysms of the middle cerebral artery. Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29:1775–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lylyk P, Miranda C, Ceratto R, Ferrario A, Scrivano E, Luna HR, Berez AL, Tran Q, Nelson PK, Fiorella D. Curative endovascular reconstruction of cerebral aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device: the Buenos Aires experience. Neurosurgery. 2009;64(4):632–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Turowski B, Macht S, Kulcsár Z, Hänggi D, Stummer W. Early fatal hemorrhage after endovascular cerebral aneurysm treatment with a flow diverter (SILK-Stent). Neuroradiology. 2011;53:37–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Howington JU, Hanel RA, Harrigan MR, Levy EI, Guterman LR, Hopkins LN. The Neuroform stent, the first microcatheter-delivered stent for use in the intracranial circulation. Neurosurgery. 2004;54:2–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kreutzer J, Rome JJ. Open-cell design stents in congenital heart disease: a comparison of IntraStent vs. Palmaz stents. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2002;56(3):400–9.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tateshima S, Murayama Y, Villablanca JP, Morino T, Nomura K, Tanishita K, Viñuela F. In vitro measurement of fluid-induced wall shear stress in unruptured cerebral aneurysms harboring blebs. Stroke. 2003;34:187–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stoeckel D, Bonsignore C, Duda S. A survey of stent designs. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2002;11(4):137–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ebrahimi N, Claus B, Lee CY, Biondi A, Benndorf G. Stent conformity in curved vascular models with simulated aneurysm necks using flat-panel CT: an in vitro study. AJNR. 2007;28:823–9.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Patel NV, Gounis MJ, Wakhloo AK, Noordhoek N, Blijd J, Babic D, Takhtani D, Lee SK, Norbash A. Contrast-enhanced angiographic cone-beam CT of cerebrovascular stents: experimental optimization and clinical application. Am J Neuroradiol. 2010;31(1):137–44.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shobayashi Y, Tanoue T, Tateshima S, Tanishita K. Mechanical design of an intracranial stent for treating cerebral aneurysms. Med Eng Phys. 2010;32:1015–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Henkes H, Miloslavski E, Lowens S, Reinartz J, Liebig T, Kühne D. Treatment of intracranial atherosclerotic stenoses with balloon dilatation and self-expanding stent deployment (WingSpan). Neurology. 2005;47:222–8.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wu W, Wang W, Yang D, Qi M. Stent expansion in curved vessel and their interactions: a finite element analysis. J Biomech. 2007;40:2580–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mortier P, Holzapfel GA, De Beule M, De Santis G, Verhegghe B. A novel simulation strategy for stent insertion and deployment in curved coronary bifurcations: comparison of three drug-eluting stents. Ann Biomed Eng. 2010;33:88–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Smith JFH, Canham PB, Barbaro NM, Starkey J. Orientation of collagen in the tunica adventitia of the human cerebral artery measured with polarized light and the universal stage. J Ultrastruct Res. 1981;77:133–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Monson KL, Goldsmith W, Barbaro NM, Manley GT. Significance of source and size in the mechanical response of human cerebral blood vessels. J Biomech. 2005;38:737–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Flueckiger F, Sternthal H, Klein GE, Aschauer M, Szolar D, Kleinhappl G. Strength, elasticity, and plasticity of expandable metal stents: in vitro studies with three types of stress. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1994;5:745–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Thériault P, Terriault P, Brailovski V, Gallo R. Finite element modeling of a progressively expanding shape memory stent. J Biomech. 2006;39:2837–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhang B, Fugleholm K, Day LB, Ye S, Weller RO, Day INM. Molecular pathogenesis of subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Biochem Cell Biol. 2003;35:1341–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gao H, Jong Q. Effects of varied lipid core volume and fibrous cap thickness on stress distribution in carotid arterial plaques. J Biomech. 2008;41(14):3053–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Petrini L, Migliavacca F, Massarotti P, Schievano S, Dubini G, Auricchio F. Computational studies of shape memory alloy behavior in biomedical applications. J Biomech Eng. 2003;127:16–25.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lally C, Dolan F, Prendergast PJ. Cardiovascular stent design and vessel stresses: a finite element analysis. J Biomech. 2005;38:1574–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fiorella D, Albuquerque FC, Han P, McDougall CG. Preliminary experience using the Neuroform stent for the treatment of cerebral aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 2004;54(1):6–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hayashi K, Handa H, Nagasawa S, Okumura A, Moritake K. Stiffness and elastic behavior of human intracranial and extracranial arteries. J Biomech. 1980;13(2):175–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japanese Society of Biorheology 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yasuhiro Shobayashi
    • 1
    • 3
  • Satoshi Tateshima
    • 2
  • Kazuo Tanishita
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Integrated Design Engineering, Graduate School of Keio UniversityKeio UniversityYokohamaJapan
  2. 2.Division of Interventional Neuroradiology, David Geffen, School of Medicine at UCLAUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  3. 3.Department of System Design EngineeringKeio UniversityYokohamaJapan

Personalised recommendations