Analysis of maize biomass use in Ethiopia and its implications for food security and the bioeconomy
- 110 Downloads
Using Ethiopia’s maize production as a case study, this paper examines the uses of maize biomass as a bioeconomy crop, and its implications and challenges for household food security. In the context of this study, bioeconomy refers to the production and utilization of biological resources or biomass to provide products, processes and services. The study followed a mixed methods approach that involved a household survey covering 322 randomly selected farmers, key informant interviews and focus group discussions in Ethiopia. We examined the implication of intensity of biomass use on farm household food security using an endogenous switching regression model. The study found multiple areas of use of maize biomass, although many of them were underdeveloped and underutilized. Model results further showed a positive and significant effect of diversification of use of biomass on the food security of farm households. Raising the quantity of maize biomass is important to enhance farm household food security as it allows farm households to increase the amount of biomass allocated for individual use and also to use it for diverse purposes. Yet, a broad set of factors including lack of market access, limited information and extension support on the uses of biomass, and a lack of biomass value-adding technologies have restricted the full potential of biomass utilization. Therefore, this study highlights the importance of provision of these factors in order to unlock the potential of biomass for food security and advance the development of the bioeconomy.
KeywordsBiomass production Biomass use Food security Endogenous switching regression Markets and extension Institutional innovation
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
We, the authors of this manuscript, declare that there is no conflict of interest.
- Abass, A. (2014). Is Africa " ready " for an integrated bioeconomy approach? Rural, 21, 32–33.Google Scholar
- Alemu, D., Rashid, S., & Tripp, R. (2010). Seed system potential in Ethiopia: Constraints and opportunities for enhancing the seed sector. Diagnostic report, International Food Policy Research Institute, IFPRI. Retrieved from https://www.ifpri.org/publication/seed-system-potential-ethiopia. Accessed 16 Jan 2016.
- Börner, J., Kuhn, A., & von Braun, J. (2017). Bio-economy in developing countries. ZEF, Center for Development Research, University of Bonn, Policy Brief, 25, 1–8.Google Scholar
- Von Braun, J. (2014). Bioeconomy and sustainable development – Dimensions. Rural 21, 6–9.Google Scholar
- Calkins, S. (1983). The new merger guidelines and the Herfindahl-Hirschman index. California Law Review, 71 402 Retrived from http://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/californialawreview/vol71/iss2/6
- CSA. (2011). Report on Crop and livestock product Utilization (Volume VII). The Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia. Central Statistical Agency, June 2011, Addis Ababa.Google Scholar
- CSA. (2013). Report on livestock and livestock Characterstics (volume II). Central statistical agency, April 2013, Addis Ababa.Google Scholar
- CSA. (2014). Report on crop and livestock product utilization (volume VII ). Central statistical agency, September 2014, Addis Ababa.Google Scholar
- FAO. (2008). An introduction to the basic concepts of food security I. Social Indicators Research, 95(1), 215–230.Google Scholar
- Feeny, S., & Rogers, M. (1999). Market share, concentration and diversification in firm profitability. Melbourne Institute Working Paper No., 20(/99), 1–40.Google Scholar
- German Bioeconomy Council. (2015). Bioeconomy policy (part II): Synopsis of National Strategies around the world. A report from the German bioeconomy council. Retrieved from: http://biooekonomierat.de/fileadmin/international/Bioeconomy-Policy_Part-II.pdf
- Lule, D., Kaba, W., Degefa, A., Degefa, K., Negash, M., Mekonnen, K., et al. (2012). Optimizing livelihood and environmental benefits from crop residues in smallholder crop–livestock systems in western Oromia. International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), (11), 31.Google Scholar
- Maddala, G. S. (1983). Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in economics (pp. 257–291). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Minot, N. (2013). Grain export bans in theory and in practice. REAP policy note. International food policy research institute (IFPRI), Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://ebrary.ifpri.org/cdm/ref/collection/p15738coll2/id/127951
- MOA & ATA. (2017). Seed System Development Strategy Vision, Systemic Challenges, and Prioritized Interventions. Working strategy document. Ministry of Agriculture and the Agricultural Transformation Agency of Ethiopia.Google Scholar
- Müller, A., Weigelt, J., Götz, A., Schmidt, O., Alva, L. I., Matuschke, I., & Beringer, T. (2015). The role of biomass in the sustainable development goals: A reality check and governance implications. Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies (IASS). IASS Working paper, 1–35.Google Scholar
- Powers, D. (2007). Censored regression, sample selection, endogenous switching, and treatment-effect regression models, 1–29.Google Scholar
- Rashid, S., Getnet, K., & Lemma, S. (2010). Maize Value Chain Potential in Ethiopia. Constraints and opportunities for enhancing the system. Diagnostic report, the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Retrieved from http://www.ifpri.org/publication/maize-value-chain-potential-ethiopia
- Taffesse, A. S., Dorosh, P., & Asrat, S. (2011). Crop production in Ethiopia : Regional patterns and trends. Ethiopian strategy support program( ESSP II). Working paper no. 0016 (pp. 53–82. Retrieved from). International Food Policy Research Institute http://essp.ifpri.info/files/2011/02/ESSP2_WP16_Crop-Production-in-Ethiopia-Regional-Patterns-and-Trends.pdf.
- Tegegne, A., Gebremedhin, B., Hoekstra, D., Belay, B. & Mekasha, Y. (2013). Smallholder dairy production and marketing systems in Ethiopia: IPMS experiences and opportunities for market-oriented development. IPMS (improving productivity and market success) of Ethiopian farmers project working paper 31. Nairobi: ILRI.Google Scholar
- Virchow, D., Beuchelt, T., Denich, M., Loos, T. K., Hoppe, M., & Kuhn, A. (2014). The value web approach – So that the south can also benefit from the bioeconomy. Rural 21, 48(3), 16–18.Google Scholar
- Von Braun, J. (2009). Food-Security Risks Must Be Comprehensively Addressed. IFPRI Annual Report Essay 2008–2009, 1–12. International Food Policy Reserch Institute,(IFPRI). https://doi.org/10.2499/0896299236AR0809E
- Warner, J., Stehulank, T., & Kassa, L. (2015). Woreda -level crop production rankings in Ethiopia : A pooled data approach. In International food policy research institute (IFPRI ) research report. Addis: Ababa. Retrieved from http://www.ifpri.org/publication/woreda-level-crop-production-rankings-ethiopia-pooled-data-approach.
- WB. (2010). Handbook on impact evaluation. In Quantitative methods and practices. World Bank: Washington DC. USA.Google Scholar
- Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar