Advertisement

Food Security

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 571–587 | Cite as

On developing a scale to measure chronic household seed insecurity in semi-arid Kenya and the implications for food security policy

  • Megan Mucioki
  • Bernard Pelletier
  • Timothy Johns
  • Lutta W. Muhammad
  • Gordon M. Hickey
Original Paper
  • 116 Downloads

Abstract

Seed security is complementary and relational to food security; having access to seed that produces meaningful and resilient yields of culturally appropriate food is an integral aspect of food security for smallholder farmers. However, essential components of smallholder seed security continue to be underemphasized in food and seed policy. In this study, we analyze household and farm-level characteristics that may predict chronic seed insecurity in semi-arid eastern Kenya. In the process, we also present and test the Household Seed Insecurity Assessment Scale (HSIAS) designed to measure household chronic seed insecurity. Results suggest that mild chronic seed insecurity continues to be a problem in most households, hampering their ability to produce food. We found that older and more experienced farmers were more seed insecure and that farmer adoption of new varieties was associated with seed insecurity. Obtaining seed through local markets and informal giving was done evenly by all farmers while using agroshops was associated with greater seed insecurity in some instances. Key attributes of household seed (in)security identified in this study are used to inform seed and food policies that better support smallholder farmers in Kenya. With further development, the HSIAS has the potential to enhance local monitoring systems and government food and seed policy responses.

Keywords

Food policy Agriculture policy Seed security Smallholder farmers Survey scale development Generalized ordered logit model 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful for the time and expertise contributed from anonymous participants in this study as well as dedicated enumerators and translators. We also would like to thank all the reviewers who provided insightful comments and suggestions through the evolution of this study and manuscript. This work was carried out with the aid of a grant from the International Development Research Centre (IDRC), Ottawa, Canada, and with the financial support of the Government of Canada provided through Global Affairs Canada (GAC) and various direct and indirect contributions by the Government of the Republic of Kenya through the Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization (KALRO). This research was completed as part of a project titled: Enhancing Ecologically Resilient Food Security in the Semi-Arid Midlands of Kenya, led by McGill University and KALRO (Principal Investigators: Gordon M. Hickey and Lutta W. Muhammad).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

References

  1. Abella, P. B., Atengdem, N. J. B., Mondain-Monval, J., Ray, D., del Rosario, B. P., & Winton, S. A. (1984). The farming system in Tharaka: strategies for subsistence in a marginal area of Kenya. ICRA Bulletin, International Course for Development Oriented Research in Agriculture, The Netherlands (15), 55.Google Scholar
  2. Agarwal, S., Sethi, V., Gupta, P., Jha, M., Agnihotri, A., & Nord, M. (2009). Experiential household food insecurity in an urban underserved slum of North India. Food Security, 1(3), 239–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bellon, M. R., Berthaud, J., Smale, M., Aguirre, J. A., Taba, S., Aragon, F., Diaz, J., & Castro, H. (2003). Participatory landrace selection for on-farm conservation: an example from the central valleys of Oaxaca, Mexico. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 50, 401–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Folke, C. (2000). Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecological Applications, 10(5), 1251–1262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bickel, G., & Cook, J. (2000). Guide to measuring household food security. Alexandria: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service.Google Scholar
  6. Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2007). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences, second edition. New Jersey: Lawerence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  7. Brush, S. B. (2004). The measure of crop diversity. In Farmers’ bounty: Locating crop diversity in the contemporary world (pp. 46–68). New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cannarella, C., & Picioni, V. (2011). Traditiovations: creating innovation from the past and antique techniques for rural areas. Technovation, 31(12), 689–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cavatassi, R., Lipper, L., & Narloch, U. (2011). Modern variety adoption and risk management in drought prone areas: insights from the sorghum farmers of eastern Ethiopia. Agricultural Economics, 42, 279–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chou, Y.-T., & Wang, W.-C. (2010). Checking dimensionality in item response models with principal component analysis on standardized risiduals. Education and Psychological Measurement, 70(5), 717–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. CIAT, CRS, Caritas, KARI, World Vision & University of East Anglia. (2011). Seed system security assessment, eastern and coastal Kenya. Nairobi: Catholic Relief Services and International Center for Tropical Agriculture.Google Scholar
  12. Coates, J., Wilde, P. E., Webb, P., Rogers, B. L., & Houser, R. F. (2006). Comparision of a qualitative and quanitative approach to developing household food insecurity scale for Bangladesh. The Journal of Nutrition, 136(5), 1420S–1430S.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Coates, J., Swindale, A., & Bilinsky, P. (2007). Household food insecurity access scale (HFIAS) for measurement of food access: Indicator guide (v. 3). Washington, D.C.: Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance Project, Academy for Educational Development.Google Scholar
  14. Deitchler, M., Ballard, T., Swindale, A., & Coates, J. (2010). Validation of a measure of household hunger for cross-cultural use. Washington, D.C.: Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance II Project (FANTA-2), AED.Google Scholar
  15. Deitchler, M., Ballard, T., Swindale, A., & Coates, J. (2011). Introducing a simple measure of household hunger for cross-cultural use. Washington, D.C.: Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance II Project, AED.Google Scholar
  16. Di Falco, S., & Chaves, J.-P. (2008). Rainfall shocks, resilience, and the effects of crop biodiversity on agroecosystem productivity. Land Economics, 84(1), 83–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Di Falco, S., Bezabih, M., & Yesuf, M. (2010). Seeds for livelihood: crop biodiversity and food production in Ethiopia. Ecological Economics, 69(8), 1695–1702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fan, S., Brzeska, J., Keyzer, M., & Halsema, A. (2013). From subsistence to profit: Transforming smallholder farms. Washington, D.C.: International Food Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar
  19. FAO. (2015). Building capacity for seed security assessments: Household seed security concepts and indicators. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
  20. Government of Kenya. (2004). Strategy for revitalisation of agriculture. Nairobi, Kenya: Government of Kenya.Google Scholar
  21. Government of Kenya. (2010a). Agricultural sector development strategy 2010–2020. Nairobi, Kenya: Government of Kenya.Google Scholar
  22. Government of Kenya. (2010b). National seed policy. Nairobi, Kenya: Government of Kenya.Google Scholar
  23. Government of Kenya. (2011). National food and nutrition security policy. Nairobi, Kenya: Government of Kenya.Google Scholar
  24. Government of Kenya. (2012). The 2012–2013 short rains season assessment report. Nairobi: Kenya Food Security Steering Group (KFSSG).Google Scholar
  25. Government of Kenya. (2013a). Crops act. Nairobi: Government of Kenya.Google Scholar
  26. Government of Kenya. (2013b). The seeds and plant varieties (Amendment) act, 2012. Nairobi: Government of Kenya.Google Scholar
  27. Government of Kenya. (2013c). County government of Tharaka-Nithi County first county integrated development plan 2013–2017. Nairobi: Government of Kenya.Google Scholar
  28. Government of Kenya. (2013d). Makueni county first county integrated development plan 2013–2017. Nairobi: Government of Kenya.Google Scholar
  29. Government of Kenya. (2015). Machakos integrated county development plan. Nairobi, Kenya: Government of Kenya.Google Scholar
  30. Harkness, J. (2003). Cross-cultural survey methods. In J. A. Harkness, F. J. R. Van de Vijver, & P. P. Mohler (Eds.), Questionnaire translation (pp. 35–56). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  31. Hunn, E. (1982). The utilitarian factor in folk biological classification. American Anthropologist, 84(4), 830–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jaetzold, R., Schmidt, H., Hornetz, B., & Shisanya, C. (2006). Farm management handbook of Kenya Vol. II: Natural conditions and farm management information, 2nd edition, part C East Kenya, subpart C1 Eastern Province. Management (Vol. II). Nairobi: Ministry of Agriculture, Kenya with the Germany Agency for Technical Cooperation.Google Scholar
  33. Jarvis, D. I., Brown, A. H. D., Hung, P., Collado-Panduro, L., Latournerie-Moreno, L., Gyawali, S., Tanto, T., et al. (2008). A global perspective of the richness and evenness of traditional crop-variety diversity maintained by farming communities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(14), 5326–5331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jarvis, D. I., Hodgkin, T., Sthapit, B. R., Fadda, C., & Lopez-Noriega, I. (2011). An heuristic framework for identifying multiple ways of supporting the conservation and use of traditional crop varieties within the agricultural production system. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 30(1–2), 125–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kilanowski, J. F., & Lin, L. (2012). Rasch analysis of U.S. household food security survey module in Latino migrant farmworkers. Journal of Hunger and Environmental Nutrition, 7(2–3), 178–191.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Linacre, J. M. (2016a). Winsteps® Rasch measurement computer program. Beaverton: Winsteps.com.Google Scholar
  37. Linacre, J. M. (2016b). Winsteps® Rasch measurement computer program user’s guide. Beaverton: Winsteps.com.Google Scholar
  38. Louwaars, N. P., de Boef, W. S., & Edeme, J. (2013). Integrated seed sector development in Africa: a basis for seed policy and law. Journal of Crop Improvement, 27(2), 186–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Maxwell, D., Coates, J., & Vaitla, B. (2013). How do different indicators of household food security compare? Empirical evidence from Tigray. Medford: Feinstein International Center.Google Scholar
  40. McGuire, S., & Sperling, L. (2011). The links between food security and seed security: facts and fiction that guide response. Development in Practice, 21(4), 467–481.Google Scholar
  41. McGuire, S., & Sperling, L. (2013). Making seed systems more resilient to stress. Global Environmental Change, 23(3), 644–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McGuire, S., & Sperling, L. (2016). Seed systems smallholder farmers use. Food Security, 8(1), 179–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Meng, E. C. H., Smale, M., Bellon, M., & Grimanelli, D. (1998). Definition and measurement of crop diversity for economic analysis. In Farmers, gene banks, and crop breeding: Economic analyses of diversity in wheat maize and rice (pp. 19–31). Boston: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Misselhorn, A. A. (2005). What drives food insecurity in southern Africa? A meta-analysis of household economy studies. Global Environmental Change, 15, 33–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mucioki, M., Mucioki, S. K., & Johns, T. (2014). Intraspecific diversity and seed management of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) in Tharaka, Kenya: a persistent and valued traditional food crop. Economic Botany, 68(4), 397–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mucioki, M., Johns, T., & Mucioki, S. (2016a). Gendered food-and-seed-producing traditions for pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) in Tharaka-Nithi County, Kenya. In L. Brownhill, E. Njuguna, K. L. Bothi, B. Pelletier, L. Muhammad, & G. M. Hickey (Eds.), Food security, gender and resilience: Improving smallholder and subsistence farming (pp. 73–89). Oxford: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  47. Mucioki, M., Hickey, G. M., Muhammad, L., & Johns, T. (2016b). Supporting farmer participation in formal seed systems: lessons from Tharaka, Kenya. Development in Practice, 26(2), 137–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Munyi, P. (2015). Plant variety protection regime in relation to relevant international obligations: Implications for smallholder farmers in Kenya. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 18(1–2), 65–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Munyi, P., & De Jonge, B. (2015). Seed systems support in Kenya: consideration for an integrated seed sector development approach. Journal of Sustainable Development, 8(2), 161–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Na, M., Gross, A. L., & West Jr., K. P. (2015). Validation of the food access survey tool to assess household food insecurity in rural Bangladesh. BMC Public Health, 15(1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Na, M., Gross, A. L., Wu, L. S. F., Caswell, B. L., Talegawkar, S. A., & Palmer, A. C. (2016). Internal validity of the food access survey tool in assessing household food insecurity in rural Zambia. Food Security, 8(3), 679–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Odame, H., & Muange, E. (2011). Can agro-dealers deliver the green revolution in Kenya? ISD Bulletin, 42(4), 78–89.Google Scholar
  53. Oon, P.-T., & Subramaniam, R. (2011). Rasch modeling of a scale that explores the take-up of physics among school students from the perspective of teachers. (119-139). In R. F. Cavanagh & R. F. Waugh (Eds.), Application of the Rasch measurement in learning environments research, volume 2. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  54. Pallant, J. F., & Tennant, A. (2007). An introduction to the Rasch measurement model: an example using the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS). British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 46, 1–18.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Recha, C. W., Makokha, G. L., Traore, P. S., Shisanya, C., Lodoun, T., & Sako, A. (2012). Determination of seasonal rainfall variability, onset and cessation in semi-arid Tharaka district, Kenya. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 108(3–4), 479–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sadiki, M., Jarvis, D., Rijal, D., Bajracharya, J., Hue, N. N., Camacho-Villa, T. C., et al. (2007). Variety names: an entry point to crop genetic diversity and distribution in agroecosystems? In D. I. Jarvis, C. Padoch, & H. D. Cooper (Eds.), Managing biodiversity in agricultural ecosystems (pp. 34–76). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Shumsky, S. A., Hickey, G. M., Pelletier, B., & Johns, T. (2014a). Understanding the contribution of wild edible plants to rural social-ecological resilience in semi-arid Kenya. Ecology and Society, 19(4), 34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Shumsky, S., Hickey, G. M., Johns, T., Pelletier, B., & Galaty, J. (2014b). Institutional factors affecting wild edible plant (WEP) harvest and consumption in semi-arid Kenya. Land Use Policy, 38, 48–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sinclair, T. R., Purcell, L. C., & Sneller, C. H. (2004). Crop transformation and the challenge to increase yield potential. Trends in Plant Science, 9(2), 70–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Smale, M., Diakité, L., & Keita, N. (2012). Millet transactions in market fairs, millet diversity and farmer welfare in Mali. Environment and Development Economics, 17(5), 523–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Smith, A. B., Rush, R., Fallowfield, L. J., Velikova, G., & Sharpe, M. (2008). Rasch fit statistics and sample size considerations for polytomous data. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, 33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  62. Smucker, T. (2002). Land tenure reform and changes in land-use and land management in semi-arid Tharaka, Kenya. LUCID Working Paper Series, 11.Google Scholar
  63. Smucker, T. A., & Wisner, B. (2008). Changing household responses to drought in Tharaka, Kenya: vulnerability, persistence, and challenge. Disasters, 32(2), 190–215.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Sperling, L., & McGuire, S. (2010). Understanding and strengthening informal seed markets. Exploratory Agriculture, 46(2), 119–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sperling, L., & McGuire, S. (2012). Fatal gaps in seed security strategy. Food Security, 4(4), 569–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sperling, L., Cooper, H. D., & Remington, T. (2008). Moving towards more effective seed aid. Journal of Development Studies, 44(4), 586–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Teshome, A., Baum, B. R., Fahring, L., Torrance, J. K., Arnason, T. J., & Lambert, J. D. (1997). Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) landrace variation and classification in north Shewa and south Welo, Ethiopia. Euphytica, 97, 225–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. The World Bank. (2013). Agribusiness indicators. Kenya: The World Bank Group.Google Scholar
  69. Thuo, M., Bell, A. A., Bravo-Ureta, B. E., Lachaud, M. A., Okello, D. K., Okoko, E. N., Kidula, N. L., Deom, C. M., & Puppala, N. (2014). Effects of social network factors on information acquisition and adoption of improved groundnut varieties: the case of Uganda and Kenya. Agriculture and Human Values, 31, 339–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tripp, R. (2002). Seed regulatory reform. Journal of New Seeds, 4(1–2), 103–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. United Nations. (2005). Designing household survey samples: Practical guidelines. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  72. Vianna, R. P. T., Hromi-Fiedler, A. J., Segall-Correa, A. M., & Pérez-Escamilla, R. (2012). Household food insecurity in small municipalities in northeastern Brazil: a validation study. Food Security, 4(2), 295–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Williams, R. (2006). Generalized ordered logit/partial proportional odds models for ordinal dependent variables. The Stata Journal, 6(1), 58–82.Google Scholar
  74. Williams, R. (2016). Understanding and interpreting generalized ordered logit models. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 40(1), 7–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wisner, B. (1977). Constriction of a livelihood system: the peasants of Tharaka division, Meru district, Kenya. Economic Geography, 53(4), 353–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature and International Society for Plant Pathology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Plant Science DepartmentMcGill UniversityQuebecCanada
  2. 2.Department of Natural Resource Sciences, Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental SciencesMcGill UniversityQuebecCanada
  3. 3.School of Dietetics and Human Nutrition, Macdonald-Stewart BuildingMcGill UniversityQuebecCanada
  4. 4.Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research OrganizationNairobiKenya

Personalised recommendations