Advertisement

Food Security

, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 141–150 | Cite as

Relevance of informal institutions for achieving sustainable crop intensification in Uganda

  • Mastewal YamiEmail author
  • Piet van Asten
Original Paper

Abstract

Informal institutions play an important role in the socio-cultural lives of rural communities in Uganda. However, little attention is given in research and development to understanding the influence of informal institutions in efforts to achieve Sustainable Crop Intensification (SCI). Such evidence is, however, pertinent to addressing low crop productivity by designing and implementing interventions that take into account the socio-cultural and institutional barriers and opportunities for SCI. This paper analyzes the influence of informal institutions on farmers’ access to land resources, financial resources, and farm inputs. The analysis is based on qualitative and quantitative data collected between January and May 2015 using 61 in-depth interviews, field surveys with 120 farmers and 18 gender-segregated focus group discussions in Eastern and Southwestern Uganda. Results indicate that informal institutions play a central role in enhancing farmers’ investment in SCI interventions by facilitating access to land through inheritance, land rentals, and labor sharing arrangements, although they are biased against non-clan members and female members of the communities. Informal institutions also enable access to financial resources by farmers at lower transaction cost compared to formal financial institutions. Yet, the informal institutions face challenges related to poor rule enforcement and limited financial reserves. The contribution of informal institutions in improving farmers’ access to (i) external farm inputs, (ii) serving as forums for knowledge sharing and (iii) regulating quality of farm inputs is minimal. Findings imply that development interventions could benefit from using informal institutions as entry points for investment in SCI and building on institutions’ strengths in influencing access to land and financial resources. Policies and programs that promote the SCI approach need to recognize the role of informal institutions for increased implementation and impact.

Keywords

Crop productivity Customary land tenure Gender equity Governance Rule enforcement Sub Saharan Africa 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The study is part of a Policy Action for Sustainable Intensification of Ugandan Cropping Systems (PASIC) project funded by the Embassy of the Kingdom of the Netherlands in Uganda. We would like to thank all the participants for their kind cooperation. We also appreciate the support of Happy Providence, Elizabeth Asiimwe, Stella Nalule, and Richard Nabigunda in data collection, and Dennis Ochola in mapping the study areas. We would like to acknowledge the CGIAR Research Programs on Humid tropics and Roots, Tubers, and Bananas (RTB) for providing the institutional support and embedding the research.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

We would like to confirm that there are no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Ahmed, M. M., Gebremedhin, B., Benin, S., & Ehui, S. (2002). Measurement and sources of technical efficiency of land tenure contracts in Ethiopia. Environment and Development Economics, 7(03), 507–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ajayi, O. C., & Kwesiga, F. (2003). Implications of local policies and institutions on the adoption of improved fallows in eastern Zambia. Agroforestry Systems, 59(3), 327–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashour, M., Billings, L., Gilligan, D., Hoel, J. B., & Karachiwalla, N. (2016). Do beliefs about agricultural inputs counterfeiting correspond with actual rates of counterfeiting?: Evidence from Uganda. IFPRI Discussion Paper No. 1552. Washington, D.C.: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).Google Scholar
  4. Bernard, R. (2006). Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. USA: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
  5. Binswanger-Mkhize, H. P., & Savastano, S. (2016). Agricultural intensification: The status in six African countries. Food Policy, 67, 26–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chartres, C. J., & Noble, A. (2015). Sustainable intensification: Overcoming land and water constraints on food production. Food Security, 7(2), 235–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Collier, P., & Dercon, S. (2014). African agriculture in 50Years: Smallholders in a rapidly changing world? World Development, 63, 92–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dawson, N., Martin, A., & Sikor, T. (2016). Green revolution in sub-Saharan Africa: Implications of imposed innovation for the wellbeing of rural smallholders. World Development, 78, 204–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deininger, K., & Castagnini, R. (2006). Incidence and impact of land conflict in Uganda. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 60(3), 321–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Doornbos, M. (2001). Good governance’: The rise and decline of a policy metaphor? The Journal of Development Studies, 37(6), 93–108.  https://doi.org/10.1080/713601084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Doss, C., Meinzen-Dick, R., & Bomuhangi, A. (2014). Who owns the land? Perspectives from rural Ugandans and implications for large-scale land acquisitions. Feminist Economics, 20(1), 76–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Frankema, E. (2014). Africa and the green revolution a global historical perspective. NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 70, 17–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Frelat, R., Lopez-Ridaura, S., Giller, K. E., Herrero, M., Douxchamps, S., Djurfeldt, A. A., et al. (2016). Drivers of household food availability in sub-Saharan Africa based on big data from small farms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(2), 458–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fulginiti, L. E., Perrin, R. K., & Yu, B. (2004). Institutions and agricultural productivity in sub-Saharan Africa. Agricultural Economics, 31(2–3), 169–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Godfray, H. C. J. (2015). The debate over sustainable intensification. Food Security, 7(2), 199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Godfray, H. C. J., & Garnett, T. (2014). Food security and sustainable intensification. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 369(1639), 20120273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hassenforder, E., Ferrand, N., Pittock, J., Daniell, K. A., & Barreteau, O. (2015). A participatory planning process as an arena for facilitating institutional bricolage: Example from the Rwenzori region, Uganda. Society & Natural Resources, 28(9), 995–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Holden, S. T., & Otsuka, K. (2014). The roles of land tenure reforms and land markets in the context of population growth and land use intensification in Africa. Food Policy, 48, 88–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jama, B., & Pizarro, G. (2008). Agriculture in Africa: Strategies to improve and sustain smallholder production systems. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1136(1), 218–232.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Janaiah, A., Hossain, M., & Otsuka, K. (2006). Productivity impact of the modern varieties of rice in India. The Developing Economies, 44(2), 190–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kijima, Y., Otsuka, K., & Sserunkuuma, D. (2011). An inquiry into constraints on a green revolution in sub-Saharan Africa: The case of NERICA rice in Uganda. World Development, 39(1), 77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ksoll, C., Lilleør, H. B., Lønborg, J. H., & Rasmussen, O. D. (2016). Impact of village savings and loan associations: Evidence from a cluster randomized trial. Journal of Development Economics, 120, 70–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lecoutere, E. (2011). Institutions under construction: Resolving resource conflicts in Tanzanian irrigation schemes. Journal of Eastern African Studies, 5(2), 252–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lillesø, J. P. B., Harwood, C., Derero, A., Graudal, L., Roshetko, J. M., Kindt, R., et al. (2017). Why institutional environments for agroforestry seed systems matter. Development Policy Review, 1–24.  https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12233.
  25. Loos, J., Abson, D. J., Chappell, M. J., Hanspach, J., Mikulcak, F., Tichit, M., & Fischer, J. (2014). Putting meaning back into “sustainable intensification”. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 12(6), 356–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Marambanyika, T., Beckedahl, H., & Ngetar, N. S. (2017). Community strategies to promote sustainable wetland-based food security in rural areas of Zimbabwe. GeoJournal, 82(5), 1–17.Google Scholar
  27. Maurer, K. (2014). Where is the risk? Is agricultural banking really more difficult than other sectors? In D. Köhn (Ed.), Finance for food: Towards new agricultural and rural finance (pp. 139–165). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  28. McGuire, S., & Sperling, L. (2016). Seed systems smallholder farmers use. Food Security, 8(1), 179–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McKenzie, F. C., & Williams, J. (2015). Sustainable food production: Constraints, challenges and choices by 2050. Food Security, 7(2), 221–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mowo, J., Masuki, K., Lyamchai, C., Tanui, J., Adimassu, Z., & Kamugisha, R. (2016). By-laws formulation and enforcement in natural resource management: Lessons from the highlands of eastern Africa. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods, 25(2), 120–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nakayi, R., & Twesiime-Kirya, M. (2017). The legal, policy and institutional framework of land governance in Uganda: a critical analysis. Working Paper No. 38. Makerere University, pp. 96.Google Scholar
  32. North, D. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ostrander, S. A. (1993). “Surely you’ are not in this just to be helpful” access, rapport, and interviews in three studies of elites. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 22(1), 7–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ostrom, E. (2005). Self-governance and forest resources. In P. Shah & V. Maitra (Eds), Terracotta reader: A market approach to the environment (pp. 131–155). New Delhi: Academic Foundation.Google Scholar
  35. Otsuka, K., & Kalirajan, K. P. (2006). Rice green revolution in Asia and its transferability to Africa: An introduction. The Developing Economies, 44(2), 107–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Otsuka, K., & Larson, D. F. (2013). Towards a green revolution in sub-Saharan Africa. In K. Otsuka & D. F. Larson (Eds.), An African Green Revolution: Finding ways to boost productivity on small farms (pp. 281–300). Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  37. Pelling, M., O’Brien, K., & Matyas, D. (2015). Adaptation and transformation. Climatic Change, 133(1), 113–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Peters, P. E. (2010). “Our daughters inherit our land, but our sons use their wives' fields”: Matrilineal-matrilocal land tenure and the new land policy in Malawi. Journal of Eastern African Studies, 4(1), 179–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pretty, J. N. (1997). The sustainable intensification of agriculture. Natural Resources Forum, 21(4), 247–256.Google Scholar
  40. Sanginga, P. C., Kamugisha, R. N., & Martin, A. M. (2010). Strengthening social capital for adaptive governance of natural resources: A participatory learning and action research for bylaws reforms in Uganda. Society and Natural Resources, 23(8), 695–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Singh, C. P., & Sharma, H. I. (2013). Peasants of Manipur: Agrarian change, land tenure and emerging patterns of re-peasantization in India. Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy, 2(3), 291–314.Google Scholar
  42. Smith, D. R., Gordon, A., Meadows, K., & Zwick, K. (2001). Livelihood diversification in Uganda: Patterns and determinants of change across two rural districts. Food Policy, 26(4), 421–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Thi Ut, T. R. A. N., & Kajisa, K. (2006). The impact of green revolution on rice production in Vietnam. The Developing Economies, 44(2), 167–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Toenniessen, G., Adesina, A., & DeVries, J. (2008). Building an alliance for a green revolution in Africa. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1136(1), 233–242.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Uphoff, N., & Wijayaratna, C. M. (2000). Demonstrated benefits from social capital: The productivity of farmer organizations in gal Oya, Sri Lanka. World Development, 28(11), 1875–1890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Van Leeuwen, M. (2014). Renegotiating customary tenure reform–land governance reform and tenure security in Uganda. Land Use Policy, 39, 292–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vanlauwe, B., Coyne, D., Gockowski, J., Hauser, S., Huising, J., Masso, C., et al. (2014). Sustainable intensification and the African smallholder farmer. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 8, 15–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Watson, E. E. (2003). Examining the potential of indigenous institutions for development: A perspective from Borana, Ethiopia. Development and Change, 34(2), 287–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Yami, M. (2013). Sustaining participation in irrigation systems of Ethiopia: What have we learned about water user associations? Water Policy, 15(6), 961–984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yami, M., Vogl, C., & Hauser, M. (2009). Comparing the effectiveness of informal and formal institutions in sustainable common pool resources management in sub-Saharan Africa. Conservation and Society, 7(3), 153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Yami, M., Vogl, C., & Hauser, M. (2011). Informal institutions as mechanisms to address challenges in communal grazing land management in Tigray, Ethiopia. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 18(1), 78–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Yami, M., Mekuria, W., & Hauser, M. (2013). The effectiveness of village bylaws in sustainable management of community-managed exclosures in northern Ethiopia. Sustainability Science, 8(1), 73–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature and International Society for Plant Pathology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA)KampalaUganda
  2. 2.Olam International LtdKampalaUganda

Personalised recommendations