Influence of gender on roles, choices of crop types and value chain upgrading strategies in semi-arid and sub-humid Tanzania
Upgrading strategies for a given product value chain might not result in the intended impact on different gender groups, if gender analysis is not undertaken. This study investigated the gender influence on preferred food and cash crops, as well as upgrading strategies in sub-humid Kilosa and semi-arid Chamwino Districts, Tanzania. A mixed methods research design was used to collect information from 595 respondents, while content analysis was used to qualitatively analyze qualitative data obtained from focus group discussions and key informant interviews. Our findings show that farmers from Kilosa and Chamwino had no differences with respect to preferences expressed by men and women for their first priority cash. Gender differences for choices were evident in relation to the second priority, food crops, in the semi-arid area and the third priority, which was also food crops in the sub-humid area, where women and youth differed from men on their views toward maize versus sorghum in the semi-arid region. Here, youth differed from women and men in how they viewed cassava versus rice. For upgrading strategies, which were only conducted with the first priority crops, most of the strategies preferred by men differed from those preferred by women and youth. In both areas, youth and women preferred upgrading strategies related to crop harvesting, transportation and primary processing, whereas men preferred upgrading strategies for farm inputs and crop marketing. Therefore, it is recommended that site-specific gendered analysis on upgrading strategies in agricultural value chains should be completed prior to introducing an intervention.
KeywordsGender roles Crop types Value chains Upgrading strategies
This paper is a product of the Trans-SEC project. Trans-SEC was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) with co-finance from the Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ). The authors acknowledge the helpful suggestions by the reviewers.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Blackden, M., & Canagarajah, R. S. (2003). Gender and growth in Africa: Evidence and issues. Paper prepared for UNECA Expert Meeting on Pro-Poor Growth, Kampala, Uganda.Google Scholar
- Booth, A., Crouter, A. C., & Shanahan, M. J. (Eds.). (1999). Transitions to adulthood in a changing economy: No work, no family, no future? Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
- Cagley, J. H., Cook, J. & Curran, S. (2010). Gender and cropping: Overview. EPAR brief. https://catalyst.uw.edu/workspace/eparx/7575/36169. Accessed 6 Apr 2016.
- Coles C. & Mitchell J. (2011). Gender and agricultural value chains: a Review of current knowledge and practice and their policy implications. Working Paper No. 5. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization.Google Scholar
- Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Daley, E. (2008). Gender, Uenyeji, wealth, confidence and land in Kinyanambo: the impact of commoditization, rural-urban change and land registration in Mufundi District, Tanzania. In B. Englert, E. Daley (Eds.), Women’s land rights and privatization in eastern Africa. Suffolk: James Curry Publishers.Google Scholar
- Ellis, A., Blackden, M., Cutura, J., MacCulloch, F., & Seebens, H. (2007). Gender and economic growth in Tanzania: creating opportunities for women. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
- FAO (2009). Fact and figures on gender and food security-division of labour, factsheet. Rome, FAO.Google Scholar
- FAO (2011). The state of food and agriculture women in agriculture: closing the gender gap for development (PDF) (2010–11 ed.). Rome: FAO. ISBN 978–92–5-106768-0Google Scholar
- Fontana, M. (2011). The gender effects of Trade liberalization in developing countries: a Review of the literature: gender aspects of the Trade and poverty nexus: a macro-micro approach. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
- Frertas, H., Jenkins, M. and Popjoy, O. (1998). The focus group a qualitative research method: reviewing the theory and providing guidelines to its planning. Working Paper No. 010298. ISRCGoogle Scholar
- Hamdani, S. (2006). Female adolescent rites and the reproductive health of young women in Morogoro, Tanzania. http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/research/takemi/files/RP100.pdf. Accessed 20 Oct 2016.
- Herr, M. L., & Muzira, T. P. (2009). Value chain development for decent work: a guide for development practitioners, governments and private sector initiatives. CH-1211 Geneva 22, Switzerland: ILO.Google Scholar
- Hsieh, H., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 15(9), 1277–1288.Google Scholar
- Hulley, S. B., Cummings, S. R. and Newman, T. B. (2013). Designing cross-sectional and cohost studies book promos. iww.com/up-content/uploads. Accessed 22 Mar 2016.
- Ishengoma, C. G. (2004). Accessibility of resources by gender: the case of Morogoro region in Tanzania. In Gender, Economics, and Entitlement in Africa (pp. 53–66).Google Scholar
- Kaplinsky, R., & Morris, M. (2000). A handbook for value chain research. International Development Research Center: Ottawa.Google Scholar
- Kowalski, P. et al. (2015). Participation of developing countries in global value chains: Implications for trade and trade-related policies. OECD Trade Policy Papers, No. 179, OECD Publishing, Paris.Google Scholar
- Ludena, C. E. (2010). Agricultural productivity growth, efficiency change and technical progress in Latin American and the Caribean. IDB Working papers No. 61. Purdue Universtity.Google Scholar
- Lyimo-Macha, J., & Mdoe, N. (2002). Gender and rural poverty in Tanzania: case of selected villages in Morogoro rural and Kilosa districts. Draft. LADDER Working Paper No. 18.Google Scholar
- Marshall, M. N. (1996). The key informant technique printed Oxford University. Journal of Social Science, 13(1), 92–97.Google Scholar
- Mitchell, J., Coles, C., & Keane, J. (2009). Upgrading along value chains: Strategies for poverty reduction in Latin America. COPLA: Briefing paper.Google Scholar
- Mnenwa, R., & Maliti, E. (2010). A Comparative Analysis of Poverty Incidence in Farming Systems of Tanzania. Special Paper No. 4.REPOA, Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania.Google Scholar
- Moore, D., Notz, W., & Flinger, M. (2013). The basic practice of statistics (6th ed.). New York: Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
- Moyo, M., Mvumi, B. M., Kunzekweguta, M., Mazvimavi, K., Craufurd, P., & Dorward, P. (2015). Farmer perceptions on climate change and variability in semi-arid Zimbabwe in relation to climatology evidence. African Crop Science Journal, 20(2), 317–335.Google Scholar
- Mwololo, J. K., Mugo, S., Okori, P., Tefera, T., Munyiri, S. W. (2010). Genetic diversity for resistance to larger grain borer in maize hybrids and open pollinated varieties in Kenya. In Second RUFORUM Biennial Meeting (pp. 535–539).Google Scholar
- Nakazibwe, P. (2014). Towards a gendered agro-commodity approach. American Sociological Association, 20(2), 229–256.Google Scholar
- Neven, D. (2014). Developing sustainable food value chains. In Guiding principles (pp. 86–89). Rome: (FAO) food and agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
- Nkamleu, G. B., Nyameck, J., & Gockowski, J. (2010). Technology gap and efficiency in cocoa production in west and central Africa: Implication for cocoa sector development. Working papers series No. 104, Africa development bank, Tunis, Tunisia.Google Scholar
- Nweke, F. I., Spencer, D. S. C., & Lynam, J. K. (2002). The cassava transformation: Africa’s best-kept secret. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.Google Scholar
- Quisumbing, A. (2011). Do men and women accumulate assets in different ways? Evidence from rural Bangladesh. IFPRI Discussion paper 1096. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar
- Schneider, I. L., Graef, F., Schindler, J., & Sieber, S. (2014). Cultural and gender differences in assessing upgrading strategies for enhancing food security in Tanzania (pp. 1–5). Tropentag Conference on International Research on Food Security, Natural Resource Management and Rural Development, Prague, Czech Republic.Google Scholar
- Shayo, R & Martin, A. (2009). Gender and diversity situational analysis Tanzania country report: Natural resources Institute (pp. 1–40)Google Scholar
- The World Bank, Food and Agriculture Organization, & International Fund for Agricultural Development. (2009). Gender in agriculture: Sourcebook. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Publications.Google Scholar
- Van Staveren, I., Diane, E., Caren, G. C., & Niluefer, C. (2007). The Feminist Economics of Trade. Routledge IAFFE advances in Feminist Economics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Vigneri, M., & Holmes, R. (2009). When being more productive still Doesn’t pay: Gender inequality and socio-economic constraints in Ghana’s cocoa sector. Paper presented at the FAO-IFAD-ILO workshop on gaps. Rome: Trends and Current Research in Gender Dimensions of Agricultural and Rural Employment.Google Scholar