Impact of a participatory agroecological development project on household wealth and food security in Malawi
- 484 Downloads
This paper presents the impacts of a participatory agroecological development project on food security and wealth levels. The Malawi Farmer to Farmer Agroecology project (MAFFA) encourages farmer experimentation, community involvement and farmer-to-farmer teaching on agroecology, nutrition and gender equity. Recent international assessments of agriculture have highlighted the urgent need for changes in farming practices in Sub-Saharan Africa, due to land degradation, high levels of food insecurity and anticipated climate change impacts. Agroecological approaches have shown great potential to address these multiple needs. Using a longitudinal panel survey data and propensity score matching to account for selection bias in project participation, we analyzed the impact of the project on household income and food security in Malawi in 2012 (Wave 1 = 1200 households) and in 2014 (Wave 2 = 1000 households). We used the Household Food Insecurity Access Scale (HFIAS) for impact evaluation. Estimates of average treatment-effects using difference in difference methods showed that participating in MAFFA has led to a significant increase in household wealth (β = 3.54, p = 0.01) and a large reduction in food insecurity (β = −3.21, p = 0.01) compared to non-participants, after 2 years, even after accounting for covariates and selection bias. These results indicate that agroecological methods combined with farmer led knowledge exchanges can be welfare enhancing, both in terms of food security and in terms of income for family farm households. Agroecological approaches should be promoted through upscaling of farmer-to-farmer knowledge exchanges, community involvement and attention to nutrition and social equity to enhance farmer learning and household welfare benefits.
KeywordsAgroecology Food insecurity Household wealth Impact analysis Malawi
This paper is based on data from the Malawi Farmer-to-Farmer Agroecology project, with insight from the long-term work of the Soils, Food and Healthy Communities organization in Malawi. The authors gratefully acknowledge funding support from Global Affairs Canada of the Government of Canada, the Canadian Food Grains Bank, and Presbyterian World Service and Development. These sponsors have had no role in the study design, data analysis and interpretation, writing the report, and the decision to submit the report for publication.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest statement
We have No Conflicts of interest to disclose.
- Agyeman, J. (2005). Sustainable communities and the challenge of environmental justice. NYU Press.Google Scholar
- Alkon, A. H., & Agyeman, J. (2011). Cultivating food justice: Race, class, and sustainability. MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Bacon, C., Getz, C., Kraus, S., Montenegro, M., & Holland, K. (2012). The social dimensions of sustainability and change in diversified farming systems. Ecology and Society, 17(4), 41.Google Scholar
- Becquey, E., Martin-Prevel, Y., Traissac, P., Dembélé, B., Bambara, A., & Delpeuch, F. (2010). The household food insecurity access scale and an index-member dietary diversity score contribute valid and complementary information on household food insecurity in an urban West-African setting. The Journal of nutrition, 140(12), 2233–2240.Google Scholar
- Bezner Kerr, R. (2014). Lost and found crops: agrobiodiversity, indigenous knowledge, and a feminist politicalecology of sorghum and finger millet in northern Malawi. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 104(3), 577–593.Google Scholar
- Bezner Kerr, R. (2016). Gender and Agrarian Inequalities: from Global systems to Household Relations. In: Agricultural Systems: Agroecology and Rural Development. 2nd edition. S.S. Snapp and B. Pound (eds). Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Bezner Kerr, R., Snapp, S. S., Shumba, L., & Msachi, R. (2007). Participatory research on legume diversification with Malawian smallholder farmers for improved human nutrition and soil fertility. Experimental Agriculture, 43(04), 437–453.Google Scholar
- Blackie, M. J. (2014). Restructuring agricultural delivery systems in sub-Saharan Africa: A case study of Zimbabwe. Retrieved from: https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/123456789/4553.
- Chirwa, E., & Dorward, A. (2013a). Agricultural input subsidies: The recent Malawi experience (p. 320). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Chirwa, E., & Dorward, A. (2013b). Agricultural input subsidies: The recent Malawi experience. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Chirwa, E., Matita, M., & Dorward, A. (2010). Targeting agricultural input subsidy coupons in Malawi. Retrieved from: http://eprints.soas.ac.uk/16732/1/Chirwa-Matita-Dorward%202010%20Targeting%20Subsidy%20Coupons%20in%20Malawi%20.pdf
- Dorward, A., & Chirwa, E. (2009). The agricultural input subsidy programme 2005 to 2008: achievements and challenges. Retrieved from: http://eprints.soas.ac.uk/8897/1/Issues%20Paper%2010%20Jun%20Rev%20A.pdf
- FAO. (2014). International Symposium on Agroecology for Food Security and Nutrition. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/about/meetings/afns/en/ on 09/09/2016.
- FAO and USAID. (2007). Food insecurity access scale (HFIAS) for measurement of food access; Indicator Guide Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/eufao-fsi4dm/doc-training/hfias.pdf on 27/02/2015.
- GFSI (2016) The Global Food Security Index. Retrieved from http://foodsecurityindex.eiu.com/ on 14/09/2016.
- Girard, AW, J. Self, C McAuliffe and O Olude. 2012. The effect of agricultural strategies to improve household food production on the health and nutrition outcomes of women and young children: A systematic review. The FASEB Journal 26:653.1.Google Scholar
- Gliessman, S. R. (2007). Agroecology: The ecology of sustainable food systems (2 nd ed.). Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
- Gómez, J. A., Burguet, M., Castillo, C., de Luna, E., Guzmán, G., Lora, Á., … & Taguas, E. V. (2015). Measuring, understanding and implementing (or at least trying) soil and water conservation in agricultural areas in Mediterranean conditions. In EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts (Vol. 17, p. 15819).Google Scholar
- Graeub, B.E., M.J. Chappell, H. Wittman, S. Ledermann, R. Bezner Kerr and B. Gemmill-Herren. 2016. The state of family farms in the world. World Development 87:1–15 doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.05.012
- Holden, S. and Lunduka, H. 2012. Who benefits from Malawi’s Targeted Farm Input Subsidy Program?. Forum for Development Studies, DOI: 10.1080/08039410.2012.6 88858, 1–25
- Jones, A. D., Ickes, S. B., Smith, L. E., Mbuya, M. N., Chasekwa, B., Heidkamp, R. A., et al. (2014). World health organization infant and young child feeding indicators and their associations with child anthropometry: A synthesis of recent findings. Maternal & Child Nutrition, 10(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kidoido, M., & Korir, L. (2015). Do low-income households in Tanzania derive income and nutrition benefits from dairy innovation and dairy production? Food Security, 73(3), 681–692.Google Scholar
- Kremen, C., & Miles, A. (2012). Ecosystem services in biologically diversified versus conventional farming systems: Benefits, externalities, and trade-offs. Ecology and Society, 17(4), 40.Google Scholar
- Leuven, E., & Sianesi, B. (2015). PSMATCH2: Stata module to perform full Mahalanobis and propensity score matching, common support graphing, and covariate imbalance testing. Statistical Software Components. Retrieved from: https://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s432001.html.
- Littig, B., & Grießler, E. (2005). Social sustainability: a catchword between political pragmatism and social theory. International journal of sustainable development, 8(1–2), 65–79.Google Scholar
- Lowder, S. K., Skoet, J., & Singh, S. (2014). What do we really know about the number and distribution of farms and family farms in the world?. Background paper for The State of Food and Agriculture, 8.Google Scholar
- Margulis, M. (2014). The World Trade Organization and food security after the global food crises (p. 236). Linking Global Trade and Human Rights: New Policy Space in Hard Economic Times.Google Scholar
- Méndez, V. E., Bacon, C. M., & Cohen, R. (2013). Agroecology as a transdisciplinary, participatory, and action-oriented approach. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 37(1), 3–18.Google Scholar
- National Statistical Office (NSO) and ICF Macro. (2011). Malawi Demographic and Health Survey 2010. Zomba, Malawi, and Calverton: Maryland NSO and ICF Macro..Google Scholar
- Niang, I., Ruppel, O. C., Abdrabo, M. A., Essel, C., Lennard, C., Padgham, J., … & Descheemaeker, K. (2014). Africa. In Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part B: Regional Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment (pp. 1199–1265). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Nicoletti, C. K. (2011). Rural prosperity initiative: Propensity-score analysis of income and crop production effects from a comprehensive micro-irrigation program in Zambia. Colorado State University: Doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
- Nyantakyi-Frimpong, H., J. Kangmennaang, R. Bezner Kerr, I. Luginaah, L. Dakishoni, E. Lupafya, L. Shumba, M. Katundu. (2016). Agroecology, improved food security and human health in semi-humid tropical Africa: participatory research with vulnerable households in Malawi. Acta Tropica Accepted for publication October 24, 2016. doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2016.10.022
- Orr, A., & Mausch, K. (2014). How can we make smallholder agriculture in the semi-arid tropics more profitable and resilient? ICRISAT, Patancheru: Socioeconomics White Paper.Google Scholar
- Qaim, M. (2014). Evaluating nutrition and health impacts of agricultural innovations (No. 46). Global Food Discussion Papers.Google Scholar
- Ricker-Gilbert, J. (2011) Household-level impacts of fertilizer subsidies in Malawi, Unpublished PhD thesis, Michigan State University.Google Scholar
- Scherr, S., McNeely, J. A., Shames, S., Galizzi, P., & Herklotz, A. (2008). Ecoagriculture: Agriculture, environmental conservation, and poverty reduction at a landscape scale. The role of the environment in poverty alleviation, 64–86.Google Scholar
- Seufert, V., & Ramankutty, N. (2011, December). Shedding light on the organic yield debate: A meta-analysis. In AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts, 1, 04.Google Scholar
- Seufert, V., Ramankutty, N., & Foley, J. A. (2012). Comparing the yields of organic and conventional agriculture. Nature, 485(7397), 229–232.Google Scholar
- Wezel, A., Bellon, S., Doré, T., Francis, C., Vallod, D., & David, C. (2009). Agroecology as a science, a movement and a practice. A review. Agronomy for sustainable development, 29(4), 503–515.Google Scholar
- Wood, B., Nelson, C., Kilic, T., & Murray, S. (2013). Up in smoke? Agricultural commercialization, rising food prices and stunting in Malawi. In World Bank policy research working paper 6650. Washington: World Bank.Google Scholar