Advertisement

Food Security

, Volume 8, Issue 5, pp 909–920 | Cite as

Ghana’s evolving protein economy

  • James SumbergEmail author
  • John Jatoe
  • Ulrich Kleih
  • Justin Flynn
Original Paper

Abstract

This paper provides an initial analysis of Ghana’s protein economy in the light of current debates about nutritional transition and livestock revolution. Ghana’s strong economic growth and reducing levels of poverty make it a particularly interesting case. Protein-rich foods, including fish and livestock products, supply 20–40 % of protein consumed. Overall fish is becoming less important and poultry more important; but there are also large differences in household expenditure on protein-rich foods across wealth categories, regions and areas. Specifically, the protein element of the nutritional transition and the consumption side of the livestock revolution would appear to be unfolding at different speeds and in different ways, along an axis that is urban–south–non-poor at one end, and rural–north–poor at the other. We explore the policy and political economy dimensions of these changes.

Keywords

Self-sufficiently Food security Imports Ghana living standards survey (GLSS) 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Funding

This paper reflects works supported by the ESRC STEPS Centre and the Market Development (MADE) in Northern Ghana programme.

References

  1. Biederlack, L., & Rivers, J. (2009). Comprehensive Food Security & Vulnerability Analysis (CFSVA) Ghana. Rome: World Food Programme.Google Scholar
  2. Brown, L. R. (2001). Eco-Economy: Building an Economy for the Earth. New York: W. W. Norton & Co..Google Scholar
  3. Delgado, C., Rosegrant, M., Steinfeld, H., Ehui, S., & Courbois, C. (1999). Livestock to 2020: The Next Food Revolution. Discussion Paper 28. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI)Google Scholar
  4. Ghana Statistical Service (2008). Ghana Living Standards Survey: Report of the Fifth Round (GLSS 5). Accra: Ghana Statistical Service.Google Scholar
  5. Ghana Statistical Service (2014). Ghana Living Standards Survey Round 6 (GLSS 6:) Main Report. Accra: Ghana Statistical Service.Google Scholar
  6. Ghana Statistical Service, Ghana Health Service, & ICF International (2015). Ghana Demographic and Health Survey 2014. Rockville, MD: GSS, GHS, and ICF International.Google Scholar
  7. Ghana Statistical Service, Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research, & ICF Macro (2004). Ghana Demographic and Health Survey 2003. Calverton, Maryland: GSS, NMIMR and ORC Macro.Google Scholar
  8. Government of Ghana (2013). National Nutrition Policy National Nutrition Policy, 2014–2017. Accra: Government of Ghana.Google Scholar
  9. Hardin, C. M. (1979). Conditions and trends in the world protein economy. Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society, 56(3), 173–177.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Heinbuch, U. (1994). Animal Protein Sources for Rural and Urban Populations in Ghana, Technical Report N° 58, September 1994. Cotonou: FAO.Google Scholar
  11. Hjelm, L., & Dasori, W. (2012). Comprehensive Food Security & Vulnerability Analysis, Ghana 2012: Focus on Northern Ghana. Rome: World Food Programme and MOFA.Google Scholar
  12. Jerven, M. (2013). The Political Economy of Agricultural Statistics and Input Subsidies: Evidence from India, Nigeria and Malawi. Journal of Agrarian Change, doi: 10.1111/joac.12025.
  13. Keeley, J., & Scoones, I. (1999). Understanding environmental policy processes: a review. In IDS Working Paper 89. Brighton: IDS.Google Scholar
  14. Keeley, J., & Scoones, I. (2003). Understanding Environmental Policy Processes: Cases from Africa. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  15. McKay, A., Pirttilä, J., & Tarp, F. (2015). Ghana: Poverty reduction over thirty years. In WIDER Working Paper 2015/052. Helsinki, Finland: UNU-WIDER.Google Scholar
  16. McLaren, D. S. (1974). The great protein fiasco. The Lancet, 304(7872), 93–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McLaren, D. S. (2000). The great protein fiasco revisited. Nutrition, 16, 464–465.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Ministry of Food and Agriculture (2007). Food and Agriculture Sector Development Policy (FASDEP II). Accra: Republic of Ghana.Google Scholar
  19. Ministry of Food and Agriculture (2010). Medium Term Agriculture Sector Investment Plan (METASIP): 2011–2015. Accra: Republic of Ghana.Google Scholar
  20. Mosley, P. (1992). Policy-making without facts: a note on the assessment of structural adjustment policies in Nigeria, 1985–1990. African Affairs, 91(363), 227–240.Google Scholar
  21. Osei-Asare, Y. B., & Eghan, M. (2014). Meat consumption in Ghana, evidence from household micro-data. The Empirical Economics Letters, 13(2), 141–153.Google Scholar
  22. Pasiakos, S. M., Agarwal, S., Lieberman, H. R., & Fulgoni, V. L. (2015). Sources and Amounts of Animal, Dairy, and Plant Protein Intake of US Adults in 2007–2010. Nutrients, 7(8), 7058–7069. doi: 10.3390/nu7085322.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Popkin, B. M. (1993). Nutritional patterns and transitions. Population and Development Review, 19(1), 138–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Popkin, B. M. (1998). The nutrition transition and its health implications in lower-income countries. Public Health Nutrition, 1(1), 5–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Republic of Ghana (n.d.). Fisheries and Aquaculture Sector Development Plan, 2011 to 2016.Google Scholar
  26. Smit, E., Nieto, F. J., Crespo, C. J., & Mitchell, P. (1999). Estimates of Animal and Plant Protein Intake in US Adults. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 99(7), 813–820. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(99)00193-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Sumberg, J., Awo, M., & Kwadzo, G. T.-M. (2016). Poultry and policy in Ghana: Lessons from the periphery of an agricultural policy system. Development Policy Review (in press)Google Scholar
  28. Swaminathan, S., Vaz, M., & Kurpad, A. V. (2012). Protein intakes in India. British Journal of Nutrition, 108(SupplementS2), S50-S58, doi: 10.1017/S0007114512002413.
  29. Team, K. N. O. T. S. (2006). Understanding policy processes: A review of IDS research on the environment. Institute of Development Studies (IDS): Brighton.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht and International Society for Plant Pathology 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • James Sumberg
    • 1
    Email author
  • John Jatoe
    • 2
  • Ulrich Kleih
    • 3
  • Justin Flynn
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Development Studies (IDS)BrightonUK
  2. 2.University of GhanaLegonGhana
  3. 3.Natural Resource InstituteUniversity of GreenwichGreenwichUK

Personalised recommendations