Internal validity of the Food Access Survey Tool in assessing household food insecurity in rural Zambia
- First Online:
- 440 Downloads
We assessed the internal validity of the Food Access Survey Tool (FAST) using data from households (n = 907) enrolled in an efficacy trial of biofortified maize in rural Zambia. This scale assesses food insecurity over a 6-month recall period. A Rasch partial credit model was used to evaluate item performance. Unidimensionality was assessed by principal component analysis, monotonicity was assessed by non-parametric methods, and differential item functioning (DIF) by several characteristics was assessed by cumulative ordinal logistic regression models. One item (frequency of consuming three square meals) did not fit the partial credit model. The remaining eight items fit in a primary single statistical dimension and item category severity increased monotonically with increasing severity of food insecurity. We identified statistically significant DIF in three subgroup comparisons, but effect sizes of total DIF were considered practically insignificant (<2 %). After excluding the item on “square meals,” the FAST serves as an internally valid tool to measure household food insecurity in rural Zambia.
KeywordsFood insecurity Internal validation Item response theory Rasch model Zambia
- Coates, J., Webb, P., & Houser, R. (2003). Measuring food insecurity: Going beyond indicators of income and anthropometry. Washington: Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance Project (FANTA), Academy of Educational Development.Google Scholar
- Coates, J., Swindale, A., & Bilinsky, P. (2007). Household food insecurity access scale (HFIAS) for measurement of food access: Indicator guide (version 3). Washington: Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance Project, Academy for Educational Development.Google Scholar
- Deitchler M., Ballard T., Swindale A., & Coates J. (2010). Validation of a measure of household hunger for cross-cultural use. Washington, DC: Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance II Project (FANTA-2).Google Scholar
- FAO (2002). The state of food insecurity in the world 2001. Rome.Google Scholar
- FAO, IFAD, & WFP. (2014). The state of food insecurity in the world 2014. Strengthening the enabling environment for food security and nutrition. Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
- Gulliford, M.C., Mahabir, D., & Rocke, B. (2004). Reliability and validity of a short form household food security scale in a Caribbean community. BMC Public Health, 422. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-4-22.
- Hackett, M., Melgar-Quinonez, H., & Uribe, M.C. (2008). Internal validity of a household food security scale is consistent among diverse populations participating in a food supplement program in Colombia. BMC Public Health, 8175. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-8-175.
- Maxwell D., & Caldwell R. (2008). Coping strategies index: Field methods manual. second edition. Cooperative for Assistance and Relief Everywhere, Inc (CARE).Google Scholar
- Menon, P., Ruel, M., Arimond, M., & Ferrus, A. (2002). Childcare, nutrition, and health in the Central Plateau of Haiti: The role of community, household, and caregiver resources. Haiti: Report of the IFPRI-Cornell World Vision Baseline Survey.Google Scholar
- Nanama, S., & Frongillo, E. A. (2012). Altered social cohesion and adverse psychological experiences with chronic food insecurity in the non-market economy and complex households of Burkina Faso. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 74(3), 444–451. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.11.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nord M., & Bickel G. (2002). Measuring children’s food security in U.S. households, 1995–99. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture; Report No.: Food Assistance and Nutrition Research Report No. 25.Google Scholar
- Palmer, A.C., Siamusantu, W., Chileshe, J., Schulze, K.J., Barffour M., Craft, N.E., Molobeka, N., Kalungwana, N., Arguello, M.A., Mitra, M., Caswell, B.L., Klemm, R.D.W., & West, K. P. (2016). Provitamin A biofortified maize raises serum β-carotene, but not retinol, in marginally nourished children: a cluster-randomized trial in rural Zambia. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. In Submission.Google Scholar
- Perez-Escamilla, R., Segall-Correa, A. M., Kurdian Maranha, L., Sampaio Md Mde, F., Marin-Leon, L., & Panigassi, G. (2004). An adapted version of the U.S. Department of Agriculture Food Insecurity module is a valid tool for assessing household food insecurity in Campinas, Brazil. The Journal of Nutrition, 134(8), 1923–1928.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Psaki, S., Bhutta, Z. A., Ahmed, T., Ahmed, S., Bessong, P., Islam, M., John, S., Kosek, M., Lima, A., Nesamvuni, C., Shrestha, P., Svensen, E., McGrath, M., Richard, S., Seidman, J., Caulfield, L., Miller, M., Checkley, W., & MALED Network Investigators. (2012). Household food access and child malnutrition: results from the eight-country MAL-ED study. Population Health Metrics, 10(1), doi:10.1186/1478-7954-10-24.
- Radimer, K.L., Olson, C.M., Greene, J.C., Campbell, C.C., & Habicht, J. (1992). Understanding hunger and developing indicators to assess it in women and children. Journal of Nutrition Education, 24(1, Supplement 1), 36S–44S.Google Scholar
- Sahn D.E. (1989). Seasonal variability in third world agriculture: The consequences for food security. Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
- Smith, A. B., Rush, R., Fallowfield, L. J., Velikova, G., & Sharpe, M. (2008). Rasch fit statistics and sample size considerations for polytomous data. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 833-2288-8-33.doi:10.1186/1471-2288-8-33.
- Stochl, J., Jones, P. B., & Croudace, T. J. (2012). Mokken scale analysis of mental health and well-being questionnaire item responses: a non-parametric IRT method in empirical research for applied health researchers. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 12(1), 74. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-12-74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Wu M., & Adams R. (2007). Applying the rasch model to psycho-social measurement: A practical approach. Educational Measurement Solutions Melbourne.Google Scholar
- Zumbo, B. D. (1999). A handbook on the theory and methods of differential item functioning (DIF): Logistic regression modeling as a unitary framework for Binary and Likert-type (ordinal) item scores. Ottawa, ON: Directorate of Human Resources Research and Evaluation, Department of National Defense.Google Scholar