Impact of agricultural technology adoption on asset ownership: the case of improved cassava varieties in Nigeria
- 417 Downloads
Using household survey data from a sample of about 850 households selected from six States in south-west Nigeria, this paper analyses the effects of the adoption of improved cassava varieties (ICVs) on asset ownership among smallholder farmers. The results of the linear regression with endogenous treatment effects showed that adoption of ICVs is positively related to asset ownership. The results further showed that ICVs had greater impact on asset ownership among female-headed households. The impact analysis using propensity score matching (PSM) showed a significant and positive effect of adoption of ICVs on asset ownership and a negative effect on asset poverty. The empirical results suggest that improved agricultural technologies can play a key role in strengthening asset ownership of smallholder farmers for increased agricultural productivity and income generation.
KeywordsAdoption Assets Poverty Impact PSM Farmer Cassava Nigeria
JEL ClassificationC14 I32 O32 Q16
Statement of compliance with ethical standard
We hereby declared that this paper is an original manuscript and has not been published in any journal elsewhere. We also have the full consent and permission of IITA to use this data for this publication.
In addition all the authors have contributed meaningfully to this paper.
Conflict of interest
Finally, we declared that there is no conflict of interest.
- Adewunmi, O. I., Adesimi, B., & Ezekiel, O. A. (2011). Non-farm activities and poverty among rural farm households in Yewa division of Ogun State, Nigeria. Journal of Social Science, 26(3), 217–224.Google Scholar
- Akinola, A. A., Alene, A. D., Adeyemi, R., Sanogo, D., & Olanrewaju, A. S. (2009). Economic impact of soil fertility management research in West Africa. African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 3(2), 159–175.Google Scholar
- Chambers, R., & Conway, G. R. (1991). Sustainable rural livelihoods: Practical Concepts for the 21st Century. Institute of Development Studies DP 296, 1991. Brighton: University of Sussex.Google Scholar
- Cochran, W., & Rubin, D. (1973). Controlling bias in observational studies. Sankhyā: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Series A (1961-2002), 35, 417–446.Google Scholar
- David, C. C., & Otsuka, K. (1994). Modern rice technology and income distribution in Asia. Boulder: Lynne Riener Publishers.Google Scholar
- DFID (2000). Sustainable Livelihoods Guidance Sheets. Department for International Development. http://www.livelihoods.org/info/info_guidancesheets.html. Accessed 23 Jul 2008.
- Diagne, A., Adekambi, S. A., Simtowe, F. P., Biaou, G. (2009). The impact of agricultural technology adoption on poverty: the case of Nerica rice varieties in Benin. Paper presented at the 27th Conference of the International Association of Agricultural Economists, Beijing, China, August 16–22.Google Scholar
- Dillon, A., & Quinones, E. (2011). Gender differentiated asset dynamics in Northern Nigeria. Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations ESA working paper 11–06. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
- Dontsop-Nguezet, P. M., Diagne, A., Okoruwa, V. O., & Ojehomon, V. E. T. (2011). Impact of improved rice technology adoption (NERICA varieties) on income and poverty among rice farming households in Nigeria: a local average treatment effect (LATE) approach. Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture, 50(3), 267–291.Google Scholar
- FAO & IFAD. (2005). A review of cassava in Africa with country case studies on Nigeria, Ghana, the United Republic of Tanzania, Uganda and Benin. Proceeding of the Validation Forum on the Global Cassava Development Strategy. Vol. 2.Google Scholar
- Fisher, M., & Weber, W. B. (2004). Does economic vulnerability depend on place of residence? Asset poverty across metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas, USA. The Review of Regional Studies, 34(2), 137–155.Google Scholar
- Foster, J. E. (1984). On economic poverty: A survey of aggregate measures. In R. L. Basmann & G. F. Rhodes, Jr., (Eds.), Advances in Econometrics 3. Greenwich, CN: JAI Press.Google Scholar
- Friedlander, D., Greenberg, D. H., & Robins, P. K. (1997). Evaluating government training programs for the economically disadvantaged. Journal of Economic Literature, XXXV, 1809–1855.Google Scholar
- Greene, W. H. (2012). Econometric analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Guo, S., & Fraser, W. M. (2009). Propensity score analysis: Statistical methods and applications. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Haveman, R., & Wolff, E. (2000). Who are the asset poor? Trends and composition, 1983–1998. Working paper 00–12. St Louis: Washington University Center for Social Development.Google Scholar
- Heckman, J., Lalonde, R., Smith, J. (1999). The economics and econometrics of active labour market programs. In O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (Eds.) Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. III, Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Igbalajobi, O., Fatuase, A. I., & Ajibefun, I. (2013). Determinants of poverty incidence among rural farmers in Ondo State, Nigeria. American Journal of Rural Development, 1(5), 131–137.Google Scholar
- La Flamme, M., & Davies, J. (2007). Developing a shared model for sustainable aboriginal livelihoods in natural- cultural resource management, CRC–Desert knowledge. http://www.desertknowledgecrc.com.au/research/inlandpublications.html. Accessed 29 Aug 2011.
- Lin, J. Y. (1999). Technological change and agricultural household income distribution: theory and evidence from China. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 43(3), 179–194.Google Scholar
- Moser, C. O. N. (2006). Asset-based approaches to poverty reduction in a globalised context: an introduction to asset accumulation policy and summary of workshop findings. Brookings global economy and development working paper #01.Google Scholar
- Omonona, B. T. (2001). Poverty and its correlates among rural farming households in Kogi State, Nigeria. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Ibadan, Ibadan. Nigeria.Google Scholar
- Oyekale, A. S., Adepoju, A. O., & Balogun, A. M. (2012). Determinants of poverty among riverine rural households in Ogun State, Nigeria. Studies of Tribes and Tribals, 10(2), 99–105.Google Scholar
- Rosenbaum, P., & Rubin, D. (1985). Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. The American Statistician, 3, 33–38.Google Scholar
- Roy, A. D. (1951). Some thoughts on the distribution of earnings. Oxford Economic Papers, 3, 135–146.Google Scholar
- Rubin, D. B. (1973). The use of matched sampling and regression adjustment to remove bias in observational studies. Biometrics, 29(1), 184–203.Google Scholar
- Schultz, T. W. (1982). Investing in people: the economics of population quality. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Scoones, I. (1998). Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: A framework for analysis. In Institute of Development Studies Working Paper 72. Brighton: University of Sussex.Google Scholar
- Sherraden, M. (1991). Assets and the poor. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe, INC.Google Scholar
- STATAcorp (2013). Endogenous treatment effects. http://www.stata.com/stata13/endogenous-treatment-effects/. Accessed 18 Feb 2015.
- Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data, XXIII (p. 752). Cambidge: MIT press.Google Scholar
- Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data (2nd ed.). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar