Food Security

, Volume 6, Issue 6, pp 879–894 | Cite as

Addressing food security and nutrition by means of a territorial approach

  • Vito Cistulli
  • Andrés Rodríguez-Pose
  • Germán Escobar
  • Stefano Marta
  • Alexander Schejtman
Original Paper

Abstract

This paper argues that a territorial approach provides an effective analytical framework to address the structural and emerging issues of food security and nutrition (FSN), including widening within-country inequalities and disparities, in so far as they allow the exploration of the multi-dimensional, multi-actor and multi-level nature of FSN. By recognizing the diversity of territories and their distinct capacity to react to shocks (external and internal), a territorial approach is also suitable for tackling the sources of inequality. This involves putting local institutions at the forefront of the battle against FSN problems in order to ensure the achievement of the triple objective of equity, economic efficiency and environmental sustainability. The paper acknowledges that following a territorial approach is complex and often connected to a number of prerequisites that are sometimes not available in developing countries. These include efficient governance systems, access to information, and capacities of actors, organizations and institutions at all levels. Notwithstanding this, our examples indicate that the chances of success of territorial approaches in developing countries are not necessarily lower than for other countries, if appropriate actions are taken.

Keywords

Food security and nutrition Hunger Inequality Development Territorial strategies Spatially-blind strategies 

References

  1. Acemoglu, D., & Johnson, S. H. (2006). Unbundling institutions. J Polit Econ, 113(5), 949–995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barca, F. (2009). An agenda for a reformed cohesion policy: A place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  3. Barca, F., McCann, P., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2012). The case for regional development intervention: place-based versus place-neutral approaches. J Reg Sci, 52(1), 134–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. CEPAL (2010). La hora de la igualdad. Brechas por cerrar, caminos por abrir. Trigésimo tercer período de sesiones de la CEPAL. Brasilia, 30 de mayo al 1 de junio. Santiago, Chile. http://www.cepal.org/publicaciones/xml/0/39710/100604_2010-114-SES.33-3_La_hora_de_la_igualdad_doc_completo.pdf
  5. Crescenzi, R., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2011). Reconciling top-down and bottom-up development policies. Environment and Planning A, 43, 773–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De Janvry A., & Sadoulet, E. (2004). Toward a territorial approach to rural development. Paper prepared for the Fourth Regional Thematic Forum in Latin America and the Caribbean, on Harvesting Opportunities: Rural Development in the 21st century, Costa Rica, 19–21 October.Google Scholar
  7. Duranton, G., & Puga, D. (2000). Diversity and specialisation in cities: why, where and when does it matter? Urban Stud, 37(3), 533–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ezcurra, R., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2013). Does economic globalization affect regional inequality? A cross-country analysis. World Dev, 52, 92–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fan, S. (2012). Improving Food and Nutrition Security Information for Better Measurement and Effective Decision-making. International Scientific Symposium on Food and Nutrition Security: From Valid Measurement to Effective Decision Making, Rome, 17–18 January, 2012.Google Scholar
  10. FAO. (2010). The State of Food Insecurity in the World (SOFI). Addressing food insecurity in protracted crises. FAO: Rome.Google Scholar
  11. FAO, (2014). The State of Food Insecurity in the World. Strengthening the enabling environment for food security and nutrition. FAO. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i4030e.pdf
  12. Frenken, K., Van Oort, F., & Verburg, T. (2007), Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth. Regional Studies,41(5), 685–697.Google Scholar
  13. Glaeser, E. L. (1999). Learning in cities. J Urban Econ, 46(2), 254–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hirschman, A. O. (1958). The Strategy of Economic Development. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Marsden, T. (2013). From post-productionism to reflexive governance: contested transitions in securing more sustainable food futures. J Rural Stud, 29, 123–134.Google Scholar
  16. McCann, P. (2008). Globalization and economic geography: the world is curved, Not flat. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 1(3), 351–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McCann, P., & Rodriguez-Pose, A. (2011). Why and when development policy should be placebased. OECD Regional Outlook 2011: Building Resilient Regions for Stronger Economies, 201–213. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  18. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. OECD. (2009a). How Regions Grow. Paris: Organisation for Economic Growth and Development.Google Scholar
  20. OECD. (2009b). Regions Matter: Economic Recovery, Innovation and Sustainable Growth. Paris: Organisation for Economic Growth and Development.Google Scholar
  21. Parkinson, M., Meegan, R., Karecha, J., Evans, R., Jones, G., Toscis, I., Gertheis, A., et al. (2012). Second-tier cities in Europe: In an age of austerity why invest beyond the capitals? Liverpool: Liverpool John Moores University.Google Scholar
  22. Peck, J., & Sheppard, E. (2010). Worlds apart? engaging with the world development report 2009: reshaping economic geography. Econ Geogr, 86, 331–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pike, A., Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Tomaney, J. (2007). What kind of local and regional development and for whom? Reg Stud, 41(9), 1253–1269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Riley, L., & Legwegoh, A. (2014). Comparative urban food geographies in Blantyre and Gaborone. African Geographical Review, 33(1), 52–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rocha, C. (2006). Food Insecurity as Market Failure: A Contribution from Economics. Toronto: Centre for Studies in Food Security, Ryerson University.Google Scholar
  26. Roelen, K. (2011). Social protection to address the drivers of vulnerability: a bridge too Far? IDS Bull, 42(6), 35–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2010). Economic geographers and the limelight: the reaction to the world development report 2009. Econ Geogr, 86, 361–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2012). Trade and regional inequality. Econ Geogr, 88(2), 109–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2013). Do institutions matter for regional development? Reg Stud, 47, 1034–1047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Tijmstra, S. A. R. (2007). Local economic development in Sub-Saharan Africa. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 25, 516–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A., & Trebbi, F. (2004). Institutions rule: the primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development. J Econ Growth, 9(2), 131–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schejtman, A., & Barsky, O. (Eds.). (2009). El Desarrollo Rural de la Argentina:Un Enfoque Territorial. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI Editores Argentina.Google Scholar
  33. Schejtman, A., & Berdegué, J. (2008). Towards a Territorial Approach for Rural Development (Discussion Paper Series (17)). IPPG: University of Manchester.Google Scholar
  34. Storper, M., & Venables, A. J. (2004). Buzz: face-to-face contact and the urban economy. J Econ Geogr, 4, 351–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tabellini, G. (2010). Culture and institutions: economic development in the regions of Europe. J Eur Econ Assoc, 8, 677–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Theil, H. (1967). Economics and Information Theory. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
  37. Tomaney, J. (2010). Place-based approaches to regional development: global trends and Australian implications. Sydney: Australian Business Foundation.Google Scholar
  38. Tomaney, J., Pike, A., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2010). Local and regional development in times of crisis. Environment and Planning A, 42(4), 771–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. UN System Task Team on the post-2015 UN development agenda (2012). Realizing the future we want for all: Report to the Secretary-General. June 2012, New York.Google Scholar
  40. World Bank. (2008). World Development Report 2008: Agriculture for Development. Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. World Bank. (2009). World Development Report 2009: Reshaping Economic Geography. Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. World Bank (2012). Resilience, Equity and Opportunity The World Bank 2012.2022 Social Protection and Labour Strategy.Google Scholar
  43. World Food Programme. (2008). Annual Report by the Regional Bureau for Latin America and the Caribbean. Rome: WFP.Google Scholar
  44. World Food Programme, Minstry of Agriculture (Ghana). (2012). Comprehensive Food Security & Vulnerability Analysis: Focus on Northern Ghana. Rome: WFP.Google Scholar

Interviews

  1. Lewis Dijkstra (2012), Deputy Head of Unit, Economic and Quantitative analysis, European Commission, DG Regio. Brussels.Google Scholar
  2. Enrique Garcilazo (2012), Head of Unit - Rural and Regional Programme Regional Development Policy Division, Directorate for Public Governance and Territorial Development, OECD. Paris.Google Scholar
  3. Indermit Gill (2012), Chief Economist of the Europe and Central Asia Region of the World Bank and Director of the World Development Report 2009: Reshaping Economic Geography. Washington DC.Google Scholar
  4. Philip McCann (2012), Special Adviser to Johannes Hahn, EU Commissioner for Regional Policy and Professor at the Department of Economic Geography, Faculty of Spatial Sciences, University of Groningen.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht and International Society for Plant Pathology 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vito Cistulli
    • 1
  • Andrés Rodríguez-Pose
    • 2
  • Germán Escobar
    • 3
  • Stefano Marta
    • 1
  • Alexander Schejtman
    • 3
  1. 1.UN FAORomeItaly
  2. 2.Department of Geography and EnvironmentLondon School of EconomicsLondonUK
  3. 3.Latin American Centre for Rural Development RIMISPSantiagoChile

Personalised recommendations