Food Security

, Volume 6, Issue 4, pp 515–524 | Cite as

Potato breeding in the Netherlands: a successful participatory model with collaboration between farmers and commercial breeders

  • C. J. M. Almekinders
  • L. Mertens
  • J. P. van Loon
  • E. T. Lammerts van Bueren
Case Study


Participatory Plant Breeding (PPB) is mostly considered relevant to smallholder agriculture in developing countries. PPB involves getting farmers to participate in plant breeding to overcome shortcomings in the formal plant breeding system. The potato breeding system in the Netherlands has a long standing tradition of farmer participation in breeding. This PPB differs from the ‘standard’ PPB model as there is substantial private sector involvement and the system is situated in a modern, western context. Since its inception, farmer-breeders have contributed substantially to developing this potato breeding system, which supplies a large diversity of crop varieties that are grown in very varied environmental conditions around the world and for different consumer markets. This paper describes the current organizational structure and practices, provides some historical background and analyses the functions, relations and interactions of the major actors in the system. It argues that a historically international and commercially orientated potato sector was able to prosper because of a supportive political and legal context, which provided public institutional support to private sector potato breeding activities. Farmers’ knowledge and skills are particularly well expressed and vital in breeding in potato—a very heterogeneous and vegetatively-propagated crop. A new PPB initiative called BioImpuls recently emerged and engages organic potato farmers in a search to develop late blight-resistant varieties for the organic sector. This supports the argument that farmers’ knowledge can substantially contribute to modern and diversified breeding. While Dutch potato breeding is a special case in various respects, our analysis identifies several key attributes which could inform the design of successful PPB programmes in developing countries.


Farmer-breeders Farmer knowledge Institutionalization History Potato breeding Participatory plant breeding Solanum tuberosum 



The authors acknowledge the contribution of farmer-breeders and breeders to this publication through the interviews. The authors thank the reviewers for their suggestions and critical comments which enabled further improvement of the analysis.


  1. Almekinders, C. J. M., & Elings, A. (2001). Collaboration of farmers and breeders: participatory crop improvement in perspective. In: A. Elings, C.J.M. Almekinders & P. Stam (eds), Breeding for low-input conditions, and consequences for participatory plant breeding. Euphytica, 122(3), 425–438 (Special Issue).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Almekinders, C., & Hardon, J. (2006). Bringing farmers back into breeding. Experiences with participatory plant breeding and challenges for institutionalisation. Wageningen: Agromisa Special 5. 125 p.Google Scholar
  3. Anonymous (1944). 25 Jaren Z.P.C. Available from the Library, Wageningen University.Google Scholar
  4. Ashby, J. A. (2009). The impact of participatory plant breeding. In S. Ceccarelli, E. Guimares, & E. Weltzien (Eds.), Plant breeding and farmer participation (pp. 649–671). Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
  5. Broekema, C. (1924). First list of recommended cultivars of field crops (Eerste Beschrijvende Rassenlijst voor Landbouwgewassen). Published in ‘De Veldbode’ No. 1133 of Saturday September 13, 1924.Google Scholar
  6. CBS (Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek). Accessed 13 Dec 2013.
  7. De Haan, H. (1953). Potato breeding in the Netherlands. Euphytica, 2, 113–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. De Haan, H. (1963). The history of the plant breeding institute I.V.P. 1912–1962. Euphytica, 12, 130–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dorst, J. C. (1964). Development of potato breeding in the Netherlands in the last half century. Euphytica, 13, 139–146.Google Scholar
  10. FAO (2012). Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations. Accessed 10 Dec 2013.
  11. Gabriel, J., & Torrez, R. (2000). Participatory approaches in potato improvement: experience of PROINPA in Bolivia. In C. J. M. Almekinders & W. S. de Boef (Eds.), Encouraging diversity. The conservation and development of plant genetic resources (p. 1944199). London: Intermediate Technology Publications.Google Scholar
  12. Gibson, R. W., Byamukama, E., Mpembe, I., Kayongo, J., & Mwanga, R. (2008). Working with farmer groups in Uganda to develop new sweet potato cultivars: decentralisation and building on traditional approaches. Euphytica, 159, 217–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grüneberg, W. J., Mwanga, R., Andrade, M., & Espinoza, J. (2009). Chapter 13. Selection methods. Part 5: Breeding clonally propagated crops. In S. Ceccarelli, E. Guimares, & E. Weltzien (Eds.), Plant breeding and farmer participation (pp. 275–322). Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
  14. Harwood, J. (2012). Europe’s green revolution and others since: the rise and fall of peasant-friendly plant breeding. London: Routledge. 269 p.Google Scholar
  15. Hogen Esch, J. A. (1953). Fifteen years of activity of commission for the advancement of potato breeding. Euphytica, 2, 211–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lammerts van Bueren, E. T., & van Loon, J. P. (2011). De praktijk van de kleine kwekers in de aardappelveredeling in Nederland (The practice of the small breeders in the potato breeding in the Netherlands). COGEM report nr. CGM 2011-05 (p. 48). Bilthoven: COGEM.Google Scholar
  17. Lamont, J. T. J. (1993). Export success determinants in the new product development process for exported agricultural products: evidence from the Dutch seed potato industry. Agricultural Systems, 41(4), 455–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Maat, H. (2001). Science cultivating practice: a history of agricultural science in the Netherlands and its colonies, 1863–1986. Wageningen: Ponsen & Looijen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McGuire, S. (2013). Book Review. Jonathan Harwood. Europe’s Green Revolution and others since: the rise and fall of peasant-friendly plant breeding. Food Security, 5, 743–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Morris, M. L., & Bellon, M. R. (2004). Participatory plant breeding research: opportunities and challenges for the international crop improvement system. Euphytica, 136, 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. NIVAP (2013). Netherlands consultative potato foundation. The Hague Accessed 27 Dec 2013
  22. Schneider, J. (2002). Selecting with farmers: the formative years of cereal breeding and public seed in Switzerland (1889–1936). In D. Cleveland & D. Soleri (Eds.), Farmers, scientists and plant breeding. Integrated knowledge and practice (pp. 161–187). Wallingford: CABI Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schuurman, A. (2013). Agricultural policy and the Dutch agricultural institutional matrix during the transition from organized to disorganized capitalism. In P. Moser & T. Varley (Eds.), Integration through subordination (pp. 65–84). Turnhout: Agriculture and the rural population in European industrial societies.Google Scholar
  24. Thijn, G. (1964). The history of distributing starting material by governmental institutes to potato breeders in the Netherlands. Euphytica, 13, 239–244.Google Scholar
  25. Tiemens-Hulscher, M., Lammerts van Bueren, E. T., & Hutten, R. C. B. (2012). Potato: improving organic cultivars including a participatory approach. In E. T. Lammerts van Bueren & J. R. Myers (Eds.), Organic crop breeding (pp. 227–238). Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  26. Tiemens-Hulscher, M., Delleman, J., Eising, J., & Lammerts van Bueren, E. T. (Eds.). (2013). Potato breeding. A practical manual for the potato chain (p. 170). Den Haag: Aardappelwereld BV.Google Scholar
  27. UPOV (1991). Accessed 4 Feb 2014.
  28. Lammerts van Bueren, E.T., Hutten, R., Tiemens-Hulscher, M., Vos, N. (2009). Developing collaborative strategies for breeding for organic potatoes in the Netherlands. In: Z. Hoeschkel (ed), Breeding Diversity, Proceedings of the First International IFOAM Conference on Organic Animal and Plant Breeding, August 25–28, 2009 (pp. 176–181). Santa Fe, New Mexico USA.Google Scholar
  29. Veldman, H., van Royen, E., Vervaart, F. (1999). A powerful partner in Dutch agriculture and horticulture. The hisory of Cebeco-Handelsraad, 1899–1999. Foundation of History of Technology, p 252.Google Scholar
  30. Vernooy, R., Shrestha, P., Ceccarelli, S., Ríos, H., Song, Y., & Humphries, S. (2009). Towards new roles, responsibilities and rules: the case of participatory plant breeding. In S. Ceccarelli, E. Guimares, & E. Weltzien (Eds.), Plant breeding and farmer participation (pp. 613–628). Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
  31. Zingstra, H. (1983). Vijftig jaar bevordering van het aardappelkweekwerk en het onderzoek van aardappelrassen (p. 72). Wageningen: COA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht and International Society for Plant Pathology 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. J. M. Almekinders
    • 1
  • L. Mertens
    • 2
  • J. P. van Loon
    • 3
  • E. T. Lammerts van Bueren
    • 4
  1. 1.Knowledge, Technology and InnovationWageningen UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.De Bolster B.V.EpeThe Netherlands
  3. 3.DrontenThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Louis Bolk InstituteDriebergenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations