Advertisement

Food Security

, Volume 6, Issue 3, pp 359–368 | Cite as

Application of the TOA-MD model to assess adoption potential of improved sweet potato technologies by rural poor farm households under climate change: the case of Kabale district in Uganda

  • John Ilukor
  • Fredrick Bagamba
  • Bernard Bashaasha
Original Paper

Abstract

Sweet potato technologies that increase productivity, such as drought resistant varieties and virus free planting material are being promoted in order to reduce the vulnerability of poor farm households to climate change. In this paper, the Trade-off Analysis, Minimum Data Model Approach (TOA-MD) was used to assess the adoption potential of these technologies by resource poor farmers under climate change in Uganda. The model was calibrated and validated using household survey data collected in 2009 from Kabale district. To simulate adoption potential, the base system data was generated from household data and adjusted to reflect impact of climate change on crop yields and prices by 2050. The percentage increase in yields resulting from the use of climate resilient sweet potato technologies were used to estimate yields for alternative systems based on the results from sweet potato trials by the National Agricultural Research Organization (NARO), Uganda. Adoption potential of sweet potato technologies varied across altitudes. Compared with the high and lower altitudes, adoption potential is lowest at moderate altitude despite higher yields and lower costs of production. Paying farmers to adopt new sweet potato technologies is economically rational at the higher and moderate altitudes but not at the lower altitudes. The provision of free planting material (subsidy) for the evaluated technologies resulted in a modest increase of 2 % in adoption potential. Therefore, providing this as a way of increasing adoption of sweet potato technologies to reduce vulnerability of poor farm households to climate change will have a very small impact. Instead, climate change adaptation policy should focus on creating enabling environments for farmers to market their produce so as to raise returns and reduce the opportunity costs of climate change adaptation strategies.

Keywords

Drought resistant varieties and Virus free planting material TOA-MD 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was part of a research project on participatory development and testing of strategies to reduce climate vulnerability of poor farm households in East Africa through innovations in potato and sweet potato technologies and enabling policies. It was implemented by Makerere University in collaboration with the International Potato Center (CIP) with funding from GIZ. We acknowledge Professor John Antle and Jetse Stoorvogel for training in the application of the TOA-MD model. We would also like to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their useful comments and for taking time to read our work.

References

  1. Ames, T., Smit, N. E. J., Braun, A., Sullivan, J. N., & Skoglund, L. (1997). Sweetpotato: Major pests, diseases, and nutritional disorders. Lima: Internation Potato Center (CIP).Google Scholar
  2. Antle, J., & Capalbo, S. (2001). Econometric-process models for integrated assessment of agricultural production systems. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, (40). http://ajae.oxfordjournals.org/content/83/2/389.short.
  3. Antle, J., & Diagana, B. (2003). Creating incentives for the adoption of sustainable agricultural practices in developing countries: the role of soil carbon sequestration. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 85(5), 1178–1184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Antle, J. M., & Valdivia, R. O. (2006). Modelling the supply of ecosystem services from agriculture: a minimum-data approach*. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 50(1), 1–15. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8489.2006.00315.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bashaasha, B. (2009). Impact assessment of the National Agricultural Research Organization (NARO). Kampala Uganda p. 121.Google Scholar
  6. Buckles, D. (1999). Adoption of mucuna in the farming systems of northern Honduras. Agroforestry Systems, pp. 67–91. Retrieved from http://www.springerlink.com/index/LJ4GGX5676111116.pdf.
  7. Claessens, L., Antle, J. M., Stoorvogel, J. J., Valdivia, R. O., Thornton, P. K., & Herrero, M. (2012). A method for evaluating climate change adaptation strategies for small-scale farmers using survey, experimental and modeled data. Agricultural Systems, 111, 85–95. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2012.05.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fuglie, K. O., Zhang, L., Salazar, L., & Walker, T. S. (1999). Economic impact of virus free sweetpotato planting material in Shandong Province, China (p. 27). Lima: International Potato center (CIP).Google Scholar
  9. Gasura, E., Mashingaidze, A., & Mukasa, S. (2008). Genetic variability for tuber yield, quality, and virus disease complex traits in Uganda sweetpotato germplasm. African Crop Science Journal, 16(2), 147–160.Google Scholar
  10. Gibson, R. W. (2005). Working with farmers to control sweet potato virus disease in East Africa. Natural Resources Institute, University of Greenwich UK. http://r4d.dfid.gov.uk/Project/3640/.
  11. Gibson, R. W., Byamukama, E., Mpembe, I., Kayongo, J., & Mwanga, R. O. M. (2007). Working with farmer groups in Uganda to develop new sweet potato cultivars: decentralisation and building on traditional approaches. Euphytica, 159(1–2), 217–228. doi: 10.1007/s10681-007-9477-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gutierrez, D., Fuentes, S., & Salazar, L. (2003). Sweetpotato virus disease (SPVD): distribution, incidence, and effect on sweetpotato yield in Peru. Plant Disease, (D). http://apsjournals.apsnet.org/doi/abs/10.1094/PDIS.2003.87.3.297.
  13. Hall, A. (2009). Optimising institutional arrangements for demand-driven post-harvest research, delivery, uptake and impact on the livelihoods of the poor, through public and private patnership. Natural Resources Institute University of Greenwich, UK. http://r4d.dfid.gov.uk/PDF/Outputs/CropPostHarvest/R7502_FTR.pdf.
  14. Immerzeel, W., Stoorvogel, J., & Antle, J. (2008). Can payments for ecosystem services secure the water tower of Tibet? Agricultural Systems, 96(1–3), 52–63. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2007.05.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. IPCC. (2001). Regional climate information-evaluation and projections. In Climate change 2001: The scientific basis (pp. 584–638). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. http://epic.awi.de/4973/.
  16. IPCC. (2007). Africa. In P. J. van der Linden, C. E. H. M. L. Parry, O. F. Canziani, & J. P. Palutikof (Eds.), Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability: Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (pp. 490–530). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Jan, L. (2000). Prospects for sustaining potato and sweetpotato cropping systems in the densely populated high lands of South Western Uganda. Lima Peru. http://www.cipotato.org/library/pdfdocs/SW59032.pdf.
  18. Khanna, M., Epouhe, O. F., & Hornbaker, R. (1999). Site-specific crop management: adoption patterns and incentives. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 21(2), 455–472. doi: 10.2307/1349891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Khanna, M., Isik, M., & Winter-Nelson, A. (2000). Investment in site-specific crop management under uncertainty: implications for nitrogen pollution control and environmental policy. Agricultural Economics, 24(1), 9–12. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2000.tb00089.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lindblade, K. A., Walker, E. D., Onapa, A. W., Katungu, J., & Wilson, M. L. (2000). Land use change alters malaria transmission parameters by modifying temperature in a highland area of Uganda. Tropical Medicine & International Health: TM & IH, 5(4), 263–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mukasa, S. B., Rubaihayo, P. R., & Valkonen, J. P. T. (2006). Interactions between a crinivirus, an ipomovirus and a potyvirus in coinfected sweetpotato plants. Plant Pathology, 55(3), 458–467. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2006.01350.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mwanga, R., & Odongo, B. (2009). “NASPOT 7”,NASPOT 8”,NASPOT 9 O”,NASPOT 10 O’, and “Dimbuka-Bukulula”Sweetpotato. HortScience, 44(3), 828–832. http://hortsci.ashspublications.org/content/44/3/828.full.Google Scholar
  23. NAADS. (2008). Performance evaluation of: National agricultural advisory services. p. 149. http://www.naads.or.ug/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/NAADS-evaluation.ITAD_.pdf.
  24. Neill, S., & Lee, D. (2001). Explaining the adoption and disadoption of sustainable agriculture: the case of cover crops in Northern Honduras*. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 49(4), 793–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nelson, G., Rosegrant, M., Koo, J., Robertson, R., Susler, T., Zhu, T., … Lee, D. (2009). Climate change: Impact on agriculture and costs of adaptation. IFPRI Publications. http://www.ifpri.org/sites/default/files/publications/pr21.pdf.
  26. Nkonya, E., Edward, K., Crespo, S., Place, F., Pender, J., Majaliwa, M., … Sibir, T. (2012). Climate risk management through sustainable land management in Sub-Saharan Africa, IFPRI Discussion paper 01126. http://www.ifpri.org/sites/default/files/publications/ifpridp01126.pdf.
  27. Nome, C. F., Nome, S. F., Guzmán, F., Conci, L., & Laguna, I. G. (2007). Localization of sweet potato chlorotic stunt virus (SPCSV) in synergic infection with potyviruses in sweet potato. Biocell: Official Journal of the Sociedades Latinoamericanas de Microscopía Electronica … et. al, 31(1), 23–31.Google Scholar
  28. Okonya, J. S., & Kroschel, J. (2013). Indigenous knowledge of seasonal weather forecasting: a case study in six regions of Uganda. Agricultural Sciences, 04(12), 641–648. doi: 10.4236/as.2013.412086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Orindi, V., & Eriksen, S. (2005). Mainstreaming adaptation to climate change in the development process in Uganda. Acts Press, African Centre for Technology Studies. Oxfarm. (2008) p. 29.Google Scholar
  30. Oxfam. (2008). Turning up the heat: Climate change and poverty in Uganda. OXfarm. Retrieved from http://www.satnet.org.ug/downloads/OXFAM.
  31. Papiernik, S. K., Lindstrom, M. J., Schumacher, J. A., Farenhorst, A., Stephens, K. D., & Schumacher, T. E. (2005). Variation in soil properties and crop yield across an eroded prairie landscape. 60(6), 388–395.Google Scholar
  32. Ringler, C., Zhu, T., Cai, X., Koo, J., & Wang, D. (2010). Climate change impacts on food security in Sub-Saharan Africa: Insights from comprehensive climate change scenarios. IFPRI discussion paper 01042, (December).Google Scholar
  33. Sadler, E. J., Systems, C., Quality, W., Evans, D. E., Gerwig, B. K., Millen, J. A., … Conservation, W. (2005). Severity, Extent and persistence of spatial yield variation in production fields in the SE US coastal plain, 379–398.Google Scholar
  34. Stäubli, B., Wenger, R., & Wymann Von Dach, S. (2008). Potatoes and climate change. InfoResources Focus No 1/08, (1), 1–16.Google Scholar
  35. Su, Z.-A., Zhang, J.-H., & Nie, X.-J. (2010). Effect of soil erosion on soil properties and crop yields on slopes in the Sichuan Basin, China. Pedosphere, 20(6), 736–746. doi: 10.1016/S1002-0160(10)60064-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tanya, S. (2005). Promotion of sustainable sweet potato production and post-harvest management through farmer field schools in East Africa. p. 39. Retrieved from http://r4d.dfid.gov.uk/Project/3055/.
  37. Thornton, P. K., Boone, R. B., Galvin, K. A., BurnSilver, S. B., Waithaka, M. M., Kuyiah, J., & Herrero, M. (2007). Coping strategies in livestock-dependent households in east and southern Africa: a synthesis of four case studies. Human Ecology, 35(4), 461–476. doi: 10.1007/s10745-007-9118-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Thornton, P. K., van de Steeg, J., Notenbaert, A., & Herrero, M. (2009). The impacts of climate change on livestock and livestock systems in developing countries: a review of what we know and what we need to know. Agricultural Systems, 101(3), 113–127. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2009.05.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Triomphe, B., & Sain, G. (2004). Mucuna Use by Hillside Farmers of Northern Honduras. In M. Eilittä, J. Mureithi, & R. Derpsch (Eds.), Green Manure/Cover Crop Systems of Smallholder Farmers SE - 3 (pp. 65– 97). Springer Netherlands. doi: 10.1007/1-4020-2051-1_3.
  40. Yaggen, D., & Nagujja, S. (2005). Analysis of producer and consumer preferences for sweetpotato varieties in Uganda: implications for research and extension efforts to promote orange- fleshed sweetpotato vitamin A deficiency. African Crop Science Society, 7, 807–808.Google Scholar
  41. Zeller, M., Diagne, A., & Mataya, C. (1998). Market access by smallholder farmers in Malawi: implications for technology adoption, agricultural productivity and crop income. Agricultural Economics, 19(1–2), 219–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht and International Society for Plant Pathology 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Ilukor
    • 1
    • 3
  • Fredrick Bagamba
    • 2
  • Bernard Bashaasha
    • 2
  1. 1.Makerere University Business SchoolKampalaUganda
  2. 2.Department of Agribusiness and Natural Resource EconomicsMakerere University, College of Agricultural SciencesKampalaUganda
  3. 3.Institute of Agricultural Economics and Social Sciences in the Tropics and SubtropicsUniversity of HohenheimStuttgartGermany

Personalised recommendations