Food Security

, Volume 4, Issue 3, pp 355–367 | Cite as

Knowledge integration and the adoption of new agricultural technologies: Kenyan perspectives

  • Colleen M. Eidt
  • Gordon M. Hickey
  • Mark A. Curtis
Original Paper

Abstract

Despite gains in agricultural yields, access to food remains a serious challenge in many parts of the world. It is now recognized that improving food security requires a more integrated understanding of food systems and that key under-explored areas of these systems are likely to be crucial in developing effective policy change. In Kenya, institutional changes have occurred to facilitate knowledge integration within the agricultural sector. Drawing on the experiences and understandings of key stakeholders in Kenya, this paper aims to identify and better understand the barriers to knowledge integration for improved agricultural technologies and their adoption. A number of barriers to the flow of knowledge to and from those working to develop new agricultural technologies and farmers are identified. The results of this study suggest a potential link between farmers’ levels of community organization and levels of trust with levels of knowledge integration surrounding agricultural technologies and their adoption. The findings suggest that increasing the planning and follow-up of newly introduced agricultural technologies has the potential to encourage interdisciplinary approaches and improve food security outcomes.

Keywords

Knowledge integration Food policy Innovation Sustainable development East Africa 

References

  1. Babbie, E. (2001). The practice of social research (9th ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  2. Boeije, H. (2002). A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews. Quality and Quantity, 36, 391–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cavatassi, R., Lipper, L., & Narloch, U. (2011). Modern variety adoption and risk management in drought prone areas: insights from the sorghum farmers of eastern Ethiopia. Agricultural Economics, 42, 279–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cooksey, R. W. (2011). Yours, mine or ours: what counts as innovation? The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 17(3), 283–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cornwall, A. (2008). Unpacking ‘participation’: models, meanings and practices. Community Development Journal, 43(3), 269–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Darr, D., & Pretzsch, J. (2008). Mechanisms of innovation diffusion under information abundance and information scarcity – on the contribution of social networks in group vs. individual extension approaches in semi-arid Kenya. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 14(3), 231–248.Google Scholar
  7. Davis, K., Franzel, S., Hildebrand, P., Irani, T., & Place, N. (2011). Extending technologies among small-scale farmers in Meru, Kenya: ingredients for success in farmer groups. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 10(2), 53–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ellis, K., Baugher, T. A., & Lewis, K. (2010). Results from survey instruments used to assess technology adoption for tree fruit production. HortTechnology, 20(6), 1043–1048.Google Scholar
  9. Ericksen, P. J. (2008). Conceptualizing food systems for global environmental change research. Global Environmental Change, 18(1), 234–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. FAO. (2009). The State of Food Insecurity in the world: Economic crises – impacts and lessons learned. Rome, Italy: FAO.Google Scholar
  11. FAO. (2010a). Gross Food Production per Capita Index. FAOSTAT. http://faostat.fao.org/site/612/DesktopDefault.aspx?PageID=612#ancor. Accessed 4 April 2011.
  12. FAO. (2010b). The State of Food Insecurity in the world: Addressing food insecurity in protracted crises. Rome, Italy: FAO.Google Scholar
  13. FAO. (2011). Kenya. Country Briefs. http://www.fao.org/countries/55528/en/ken/. Accessed 5 April 2011.
  14. Foley, J. A., DeFries, R., Asner, G. P., Barford, C., Bonan, G., Carpenter, S. R., et al. (2005). Global consequences of land use. Science, 309(5734), 570–574.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gibbons, M. (2000). Context-sensitive science. Science and Public Policy, 27(3), 159–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, USA: Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  17. Government of Kenya. (2010). Agricultural Sector Development Strategy 2010–2020. http://www.kilimo.go.ke/kilimo_docs/pdf/ASDS_Final.pdf. Accessed 4 April 2011.
  18. Gregory, P. J., & Ingram, J. S. I. (2008). Climate change and the current ‘food crisis’. CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources, 3(99), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grove, R. W. (1988). An analysis of the constant comparative method. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 1(3), 273–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hickey, G. M., & Muhammad, L. W. (2011). Enhancing Ecologically Resilient Food Security through Innovative Farming Systems in the Semi-Arid Midlands of Kenya. Project 106510–002 funded through the Canadian International Food Security Research Fund, International Development Research Centre (IDRC) and the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA), Ottawa.Google Scholar
  21. KFSSG. (2010). The short rains season assessment report. Nairobi, Kenya: Government of Kenya.Google Scholar
  22. Kristjanson, P., Reid, R. S., Dickson, N., Clark, W. C., Romney, D., Puskur, R., et al. (2009). Linking international research knowledge with action for sustainable development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(13), 5047–5052.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lal, R. (2009). Soils and world food security. Soil Tillage Research, 102(1), 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Llewellyn, R. S. (2007). Information quality and effectiveness for more rapid adoption decisions by farmers. Field Crops Research, 104, 148–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Malthus, T. R. (1798). An essay on the principle of population, as it affects the future improvement of society with remarks on the speculations of Mr. Godwin, M. Condorcet, and Other Writers. London, England: J. Johnson.Google Scholar
  26. Mati, B. M., Wanjogu, R., Odongo, B., & Home, P. G. (2011). Introduction of the system of rice intensification in Kenya: experiences from Mwea Irrigation Scheme. Paddy and Water Environment, 9, 145–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Matson, P. A., Parton, W. J., Power, A. G., & Swift, M. J. (1997). Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties. Science, 277(5325), 504–509.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, USA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  29. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). An expanded sourcebook: Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, USA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  30. Nah, S. L., & Chau, C. F. (2010). Issues and challenges in defeating world hunger. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 21, 544–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Neef, A., & Neubert, D. (2011). Stakeholder participation in agricultural research projects: a conceptual framework for reflection and decision making. Agriculture and Human Values, 28, 179–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ngigi, S. N. (2003). What is the limit of up-scaling rainwater harvesting in a river basin? Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 28, 943–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pretty, J. (1995). Participatory learning for sustainable agriculture. World Development, 23(8), 1247–1263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Qiu, J. (2008). Is China ready for GM rice? Nature, 455, 850–852.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stringer, L. C. (2009). Reviewing the links between desertification and food insecurity: from parallel challenges to synergistic solutions. Food Security, 1, 113–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Suri, T. (2011). Selection and comparative advantage in technology adoption. Econometrica, 79(1), 159–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sutherland, A. J., Irungu, J. W., Kang’ara, J., Muthamia, J., & Ouma, J. (1999). Household food security in semi-arid Africa – the contribution off participatory adaptive research and development to rural livelihoods in Eastern Kenya. Food Policy, 24, 369–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Taylor, S. J., & Bogdan, R. (1998). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource (3rd ed.). New York, USA: John Wiley & Sons Incorporated.Google Scholar
  39. Tilman, D. (1999). Global environmental impacts of agricultural expansion: the need for sustainable and efficient practices. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 96(11), 5995–6000.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tilman, D., Cassman, K. G., Matson, P. A., Naylor, R., & Polasky, S. (2002). Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature, 418, 671–677.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Todt, O. (2011). The limits of policy: public acceptance and the reform of science and technology. Technological Forcasting and Social Change, 78, 902–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tonkiss, F. (2004). Using Focus Groups. In C. Seale (Ed.), Researching society and culture (2nd ed., pp. 193–206). London, England: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  43. UN General Assembly. (2000). United Nations Millennium Declaration (A/RES/55/2). The Millennium Summit of the United Nations. http://www.un.org/millennium/summit.htm. Accessed April 5 2011.
  44. von Braun, J. (2009). Addressing the food crisis: governance, market functioning, and investment in public goods. Food Security, 1, 9–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Weiss, R. S. (1994). Learning from strangers: The art and method of qualitative interview studies. New York, USA: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  46. White, S. C. (1996). Depoliticising development: the uses and abuses of participation. Development in Practice, 6(1), 6–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. California, USA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. & International Society for Plant Pathology 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Colleen M. Eidt
    • 1
  • Gordon M. Hickey
    • 1
  • Mark A. Curtis
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Natural Resource Sciences, Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental SciencesMcGill UniversitySte. Anne de BellevueCanada

Personalised recommendations