Advertisement

Food Security

, Volume 4, Issue 1, pp 41–58 | Cite as

Moving from traditional government to new adaptive governance: the changing face of food security responses in South Africa

  • Laura M. PereiraEmail author
  • Shaun Ruysenaar
Original Paper

Abstract

The food system faces increasing pressure from dynamic and interactive, environmental, political and socio-economic stressors. Tackling the complexity that arises from such interactions requires a new form of 'adaptive governance'. This paper provides a review of various conceptions of governance from a monocentric or politicotechnical understanding of governance through to adaptive governance that is based in complex adaptive systems theory. The review is grounded by a critique of the existing institutional structures responsible for food security in South Africa. The current Integrated Food Security Strategy and tasked governmental departments are not sufficiently flexible or coordinated to deal with an issue as multi-scalar and multidisciplinary as food security. However, actions taken in the non-governmental sector signal the emergence of a new type of governance. Apart from an increasing recognition of food security as an issue of concern in the country, there is also evidence of a changing governance structure including collaboration between diverse stakeholders. We review these governance trends with an understanding of the food system as a complex adaptive socio-ecological system where actors in the food system self-organize into more flexible networks that can better adapt to uncertain pressures.

Keywords

Food security Governance Adaptation Institutions South Africa 

References

  1. Ackerman, G. (2011). Ensuring Africa’s food security needs a sustainable approach, Johannesburg: Pick n Pay. Available at: http://www.iol.co.za/business/opinion/ensuring-africa-s-food-security-needs-a-sustainable-approach-1.1173389 [Accessed November 20, 2011].
  2. Ahrens, J. (2006). Governance in the process of economic transformation. Goettingen: Private University of Applied Sciences Goettingen.Google Scholar
  3. Alahi, S. (2010). Conceptions of fairness and forming the common ground. In Business Planning for Turbulent Times: New Methods for Applying Scenarios (pp. 223–242). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  4. Altman, M., Hart, T., & Jacobs, P. (2009). Household food security status in South Africa. Agrekon, 48(4), 345–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Andrews, K. R. (1973). Can the best corporations be made moral? Harvard Business Review, 57–64.Google Scholar
  6. Backsberg Wine Estate (2010). Interview at Backsberg wine estate, Stellenbosch, January 2010.Google Scholar
  7. Beddington, J. (2009). Beddington: World faces “perfect storm” of problems by 2030 | Science | guardian.co.uk. Guardian.co.uk. Available at: http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2009/mar/18/perfect-storm-john-beddington-energy-food-climate [Accessed December 17, 2009].
  8. Berkes, F., Folke, C., & Colding, J. (2003). Navigating social–ecological systems: Building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. BFAP (2010). The South African Agricultural Baseline, Pretoria: Bureau for Food and Agricultural Policy. Available at: http://www.bfap.co.za/FINAL%20Agricultural%20Outlook.pdf [Accessed December 18, 2010].
  10. Brooks, N., Adger, W., & Kelly, P. (2005). The determinants of vulnerability and adaptive capacity at the national level and the implications for adaptation. Global Environmental Change, 15, 151–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bohle, H., Etzold, B., & Keck, M. (2009). Resilience as agency. IHDP Update, 2, 8–13.Google Scholar
  12. Boko, M., Niang, I., Nyong, A., Vogel, C., Githeko, A., Medany, M., et al. (2007). Africa. Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. In M. L. Parry, O. F. Canziani, J. P. Palutikof, P. J. van der Linden, & C. E. Hanson (Eds.), Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 433–467). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Cash, D., et al. (2006). Scale and cross-scale dynamics: governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecology and Society, 11(2), 8.Google Scholar
  14. Checkland, P. (1984). Systems thinking in management: the development of soft systems methodology and its implications for social science. In H. Ulrich & G. J. B. Probst (Eds.), Self-organisation and management of social systems. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  15. Checkland, P. (2005). Webs of significance: the work of Geoffrey Vickers. Systems Research and Behavioural Science, 22(4), 285–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Competition Commission (2010). Commission appeals bread cartel penalty, Johannesburg: Competition Commission. Available at: http://www.compcom.co.za/assets/Uploads/AttachedFiles/MyDocuments/Commission-appeals-bread-cartel-penalty.pdf [Accessed March 22, 2010].
  17. Cromwell, E., & Chintedza, A. (2005). Neo-patrimonialism and policy processes: lessons from the Southern African Food crisis. IDS Bulletin, 36(2), 103–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Department of Agriculture (1992). Report of the committee for the development of a food and nutrition strategy for South Africa.Google Scholar
  19. Dorward, A., Kydd, J., & Poulton, C. (2005). Beyond liberalisation: “developmental coordination” policies for African smallholder agriculture. IDS Bulletin, 36(2), 80–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Drimie, S. (2004). The underlying causes of the food crisis in the Southern African region - Malawi, Mozambique, Zambia and Zimbabwe. London: Oxfam-GB.Google Scholar
  21. Drimie, S., & Ruysenaar, S. (2010). The integrated food security strategy of South Africa: an institutional analysis. Agrekon, 49(3), 316–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Drimie, S. & Verduijn, R. (2007). Input for The Presidency position paper on food security. Draft document, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  23. Drimie, S., & Ziervogel, G. (2006). Food Insecurity in South Africa: Monitoring and managing, the realities of integrating local information and experience into national policy and practice.Google Scholar
  24. Duit, A., & Galaz, V. (2008). Governance and complexity emerging issues for governance theory. Governance, 21(3), 311–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Eakin, H., & Lemos, M. (2006). Adaptation and the state: Latin America and the challenge of capacity-building under globalization. Global Environmental Change, 16(1), 7–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Eakin, H. et al. (2010). Food, violence and human rights. In Food Security and Global Environmental Change (pp. 245–271). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  27. Economic Development Department. (2010). The new growth path: The framework. Pretoria: Economic Development Department.Google Scholar
  28. Emergy, F., & Trist, E. (1965). The causal texture of organizational environments. Human Relations, 18, 21–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ericksen, P. (2008a). Conceptualizing food systems for global environmental change research. Global Environmental Change, 18, 234–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ericksen, P. (2008b). What is the vulnerability of a food system to global environmental change. Ecology and Society, 13, 14–31.Google Scholar
  31. Ericksen, P. J., Ingram, J. S. I., & Liverman, D. M. (2009). Food security and global environmental change: emerging challenges. Environmental Science & Policy, 12(4), 373–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. FAO. (1996). Rome declaration on world food security and World Food Summit Plan of Action. In World Food Summit. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization.Google Scholar
  33. FAO (2008). OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2008–2017”, February 2008. Available at, OECD/FAO. Available at: http://www.agri-outlook.org/dataoecd/54/15/40715381.pdf.
  34. FAO. (2009). State of world food insecurity 2009. Rome: Food and Agricultural Organisation.Google Scholar
  35. Farjoun, M., & Starbuck, W. (2007). Organising at and beyond the limits. Organizational Studies, 28(4), 541–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Folke. (2006). Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change, 16, 253–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Folke, C., Hahn, T., et al. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30(1), 441–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Food Security Working Group (1997). Food security policy for South Africa: a discussion document.Google Scholar
  39. GECAFS (2011). Global Environmental Change and Food Systems - GECAFS. Global Environmental Change and Food Systems: A food-secure future for those most vulnerable to environmental stress. Available at: http://www.gecafs.org/ [Accessed December 5, 2011].
  40. Gordon Institute of Business Science. (2009). What will it take to ensure sustainable food security? Johannesburg: Gordon Institute of Business Science.Google Scholar
  41. Gorges, M. (2001). New institutionalist explanations for institutional change: a note of caution. Politics, 21(2), 137–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Grindle, M. S. (2011). Good enough governance revisited. Development Policy Review, 29, s199–s221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Grindle, M. S. (2004). Good enough governance: poverty reduction and reform in developing countries. Governance, 17(4), 525–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hagendijk, R., & Irwin, A. (2006). Public deliberation and governance: engaging with science and technology in contemporary Europe. Minerva, 44(2), 167–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hajer, M., & Wagenaar, H. (Eds.). (2003). Deliberative policy analysis: Understanding governance in the network society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Hamann, R., & Kapelus, P. (2005). Local governance as a complex system: lessons from mining in South África, Mali and Zambia. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 18((Summer 2005).Google Scholar
  47. Hamid, G. (2005). The effective co-ordination and implementation of the IFSNP, DraftIssue Paper. Rome, FAO. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization.Google Scholar
  48. Heinrichs, T. (2006). On the Role of Scenarios in GECAFS Decision-Support, Available at: http://www.gecafs.org/publications/index.html [Accessed November 22, 2011].
  49. Hettne, B. (2009). Thinking about development. London: Zed.Google Scholar
  50. Hewitt de Alcantara, C. (1998). Uses and abuses of the concept of governance. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 105–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hill, C. J., & Lynn, L. (2004). Is hierarchical governance in decline? Evidence from empirical research. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15, 173–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hindle, R. E. (1990). The World Bank approach to food security analysis. IDS Bulletin, 21(3), 62–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Holling, C. (2001). Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems, 4, 390–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Homer-Dixon, T. (2006). The upside of down. Washington DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  55. Huddleston, B. (1990). FAO’s overall approach and methodology for formulating national food security programmes in developing countries. IDS Bulletin, 21(3).Google Scholar
  56. Ingram, J. (2011). A food systems approach to researching food security and its interactions with global environmental change. Food Security. Available at: http://www.springerlink.com/index/ 10.1007/s12571-011-0149-9 [Accessed December 5, 2011].
  57. IoD. (1994). King I: The King Code of Governance for South Africa. Johannesburg: Institute for Directors.Google Scholar
  58. IoD. (2002). King II: The King Code of Governance for South Africa. Johannesburg: Institute for Directors.Google Scholar
  59. IoD. (2009). King III: The King Code of Governance for South Africa. Johannesburg: Institute for Directors.Google Scholar
  60. Ison, R. L., Maiteny, P. T., & Carr, S. (1997). Systems methodologies for sustainable resources research and development. Agricultural Systems, 55(2), 257–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Jessop, B. (1998). The rise of governance and the risks of failure: the case of economic development. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 29–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Jessop, B. (2003). The governance of complexity and the complexity of governance: Preliminary remarks on some problems and limits of economic guidance. Lancaster: Department of Sociology, Lancaster University.Google Scholar
  63. Jooma, M. (2005). Southern Africa assessment: food security and HIV/AIDS. African Security Review, 14(1), 59–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Jordan, A., Wurzel, R. K. W., & Zito, A. (2005). The rise of “new” policy instruments in comparative perspective: has governance eclipsed government? Political Studies, 53(3), 477–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Keeley, J., & Scoones, I. (1999). Understanding environmental policy processes: A review. Sussex: Institute for Development Studies.Google Scholar
  66. Kok, K., & Veldkamp, T. (2011). Scale and governance: conceptual considerations and practicalimplications. Ecology and Society, 16(2), 23.Google Scholar
  67. Kooiman, J. (1993). Modern governance: New government–society interactions. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  68. Lambrechts, K., & Barry, S. (2003). Why is Southern Africa Hungry? The roots of Southern Africa’s food crisis., Christian Aid.Google Scholar
  69. Lee, M. (2003). Conceptualizing the newgovernance: a new institution of social coordination. In Political Theory and Policy Analysis. May 3–5, Institutional Analysis Development Mini-conference. Bloomington: Indiana University.Google Scholar
  70. Liverman, D. M., Ericksen, P. J., & Ingram, J. S. I. (2009). Governing food systems in the context of global environmental change. IHDP Update, 3, 59–64.Google Scholar
  71. Lyall, C., Papaioannou, T., & Smith, J. (Eds.). (2009). The limits to governance: The challenge of policy-making for the new life sciences. Farnham; Burlington VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  72. Makenete, A., Lemmer, W., & Kupka, J. (2007). The impact of biofuel production on food security: A briefing paper with a particular emphasis on maize-to-ethanol production. Johannesburg: South African Biofuels Association.Google Scholar
  73. Makhura, M. T. (1998). The development of food security policy for South Africa (SAFSP): a consultative process. Food Policy, 23(6), 571–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Mathekga, R. (2006). Participatory government and the challenge of inclusion: The Case of Local Government Structures in Post Apartheid South Africa. Colombia: Colombia Internacional. Available at: http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?pid=S0121-56122006000100005&script=sci_arttext [Accessed May 14, 2010].
  75. Maxwell, S. (1990). Food security in developing countries: issues and options for the 1990s. IDS Bulletin, 21(3), 2–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Maxwell, S. (2001). Organisational issues in food security planning. In Food Security in Sub-Saharan Africa (pp. 294–315). Pietermaritzburg: University of Natal Press.Google Scholar
  77. Maxwell, S., & Slater, R. (2003). Food policy old and new. Development Policy Review, 21(5–6), 531–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. May, J. (1999). Food security, livelihoods and the State: the South African Experience. In Not by bread alone: Food security and governance in Africa (pp. 85–101). Johannesburg: Wits University Press/Toda Institute for Global Peace and Policy Research.Google Scholar
  79. McLennan, A., & Ngoma, W. (2004). Quality governance for sustainable development? Progress in Development Studies, 4(4), 279–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Midgley, G., & Richardson, K. (2007). Systems thinking for community involvement in policy analysis. Complexity and Organization Emergence, 9(1–2), 167–193.Google Scholar
  81. Misselhorn, A. (2006). Food insecurity in Southern Africa: Causes and emerging responses options from evidence at regional, provincial and local scales. Unpublished PhD. Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand.Google Scholar
  82. Mohamed Salih, M. (2009). Governance of food security in the 21st century. Facing Global Environmental Change, 4(V), 501–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Mosse, D. (2004). Is good policy unimplementable? Reflections on the ethnography of aid policy and practice. Development and Change, 35(4), 639–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. National Department of Agriculture. (2002). The integrated food security strategy for South Africa. Pretoria: National Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
  85. North, D. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  86. O’Brien, K., & Leichenko, R. M. (2000). Double exposure: assessing the impacts of climate change within the context of economic globalization. Global Environmental Change, 10, 221–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Ostrom, E. (2003). Institutions as rules-in-use. In Foundations of social capital. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  88. Paarlberg, R. (2002). Governance and food security in an age of globalization. Washington D.C: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).Google Scholar
  89. Peters, B. G. (2011). Governance as political theory. Critical Policy Studies, 5(1), 63–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Pick ‘n Pay (2009). Interview with Pick n Pay, Johannesburg.Google Scholar
  91. Pick ‘n Pay (2010). Interview at Pick’n Pay, Cape Town.Google Scholar
  92. Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence and the study of politics. The Amercian Political Science Review, 94, 251–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Pieterse, J., & van Wyk, B. (2005). What’s cooking: AIDS review 2005. Pretoria: University of Pretoria: Centre for the study of AIDS.Google Scholar
  94. Plowman, D., et al. (2007). The role of leadershipin emergent, self-organization. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(2007), 341–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Poltzer, T., & Schüring, E. (2003). To eat is an everlasting thing: An evaluation of the Food Emergency Scheme in Bohlabela District, Limpopo Province, South Africa. Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand.Google Scholar
  96. Ramalingam, B., et al. (2008). Exploring the science of complexity: ideas and implications for development and humanitarian efforts. London: Overseas Development Institute.Google Scholar
  97. Ramírez, R., Selsky, J., & ven der Heijden, K. (2010). Conceptual and historical overview. In Business Planning for Turbulent Times: New Methods for Applying Scenarios (pp. 17–30). Oxford: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  98. Rep. South Africa (1996). The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, Pretoria: Government Printer. Available at: www.info.gov.za/documents/constitution/index.htm.
  99. Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The new governance: governing without government. Political Studies, 44(4), 652–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Rhodes, R. A. (1997). Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, reflexivityand accountability. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  101. Roggema, R. (2010). Swarm planning: a new design paradigm dealing with long-term problems associated with turbulence. In Business Planning for Turbulent Times: New Methods for Applying Scenarios (pp. 103–130). Oxford: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  102. Roussouw, G. (2005). Business ethics and corporate governance in Africa’ business society. Business Society, 44, 94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Roussouw, G., van der Watt, A., & Malan, D. (2002). Corporate governance in South Africa. Journal of Business Ethics, 37, 289–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Sahley, C. et al. (2005). The Governance Dimensions of Food Security in Malawi, Research report sponsored by USAID.Google Scholar
  105. Schilpzand, R. et al. (2010). Governance beyond the state: non-state actors and food systems. In Food Security and Global Environmental Change (pp. 272–300). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  106. Schmidhuber, J., & Tubiello, F. (2007). Global food security under climate change. Proceedings of the Natural Academy of Sciences, 104, 19703–19708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Scoones, I. (2005). Sustainable rural livelihoods: A framework for analysis. Sussex: Institute for Development Studies.Google Scholar
  108. Scott, W. (2001). Institutions and organizations (2nd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  109. Selsky, J., & McCann, J. E. (2010). Managing disruptive change and turbulence through continuous change thinking and scenarios. In Business Planning for Turbulent Times: New Methods for Applying Scenarios (pp. 103–130). Oxford: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  110. Sen, A. (1981). Poverty and famines: An essay on entitlement and deprivation. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  111. Stacey, R. (1993). Strategy as order emerging from chaos. Long Range Planning, 26(1), 10–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Stoker, G. (1998). Governance as theory: five propositions. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Swilling, M., Simone, A., & Khan, F. (2002). “My soul I can see”: the limits of governing African cities in a context of globalisation and complexity. In Democratising local government. The South African experiment (pp. 305–327). Cape Town: University of Cape Town Press.Google Scholar
  114. Termeer, C., Dewulf, A., & Van Lieshout, M. (2010). Disentangling scale approaches in governance research: comparing monocentric, multilevel, and adaptive governance. Ecology and Society, 15(4), 29.Google Scholar
  115. Terry, L. D. (2005). The thinning of administrative institutions in the hollow state. Administration & Society, 37(4), 426–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Thompson, J., & Scoones, I. (2009). Addressing the dynamics of agri-food systems: an emerging agenda for social science research. Environmental Science and Policy, 12(4), 386–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Tiger Brands (2009). Interview at Tiger Brands. Johannesburg, September 2009.Google Scholar
  118. Ulrich, W. (1987). Critical heuristics of social systems design. European Journal of Operational Research, 31(3), 276–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. UN. (2009). Food sustainability: A guide to private sector action’. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  120. UNECA. (2007). An overview of corporate governance and accountability in Southern Africa. Addis Ababa: United Nations Economic Commission for Southern Africa.Google Scholar
  121. Van Kersbergen, K., & Van Waarden, V. (2004). Governance as a bridge between disciplines: crossdisciplinaryinspiration regarding shifts ingovernance and problems of governability, accountability and legitimacy. European Journal of Political Research, 43, 143–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Van Zyl, J., & Kirsten, J. (1992). Food security in South Africa. Agrekon, 31(4), 170–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Vink, N., & Kirsten, J. (2002). Pricing behabiour in the South African food and agricultural sector: a report to National Treasury. Pretoria: National Treasury.Google Scholar
  124. Von Braun, J., & Diaz-Bonilla, E. (2008). Globalisation of food and agriculture and the poor. New Dehli: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  125. Walker, B., et al. (2002). Resilience management in social–ecological systems: a working hypothesis for a participatory approach. Conservation Ecology, 6(1), 14.Google Scholar
  126. Watkinson E. (2003). Overview of the current food security crisis in South Africa, National Labour and Economic Development Institute (NALEDI). Available at: http://www.sarpn.org.za/documents/d0000222/watkinson/Watkinson_SA_food_crisis.pdf. [Accessed December 5, 2006].
  127. Watkinson, E., & Makgetla, N. (2002). South Africa’s food security crisis. Johannesburg: National Labour & Economic Development Institute (NALEDI).Google Scholar
  128. Wood, S. et al. (2010). Lessons learned from international experience. In Global Environmental Changeand Food Systems (pp. 46–63). London: EarthscanGoogle Scholar
  129. Woolworths (2009). The Good Business Journey, Annual Report, Woolworths Holdings Ltd. Available at: http://woolworthsholdings.co.za/downloads/whl_good_business_journey_2009.pdf [Accessed January 10, 2012].
  130. Woolworths (2010). Interview with Woolworths. Cape Town.Google Scholar
  131. Young, E. (2004). Globalization and food security: novel questions in a novel context? Progress in Development Studies, 4(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Zito, A., Radaelli, C., & Jordan, A. eds. (2003). Introduction to the symposium on ‘new’ policy instrumentsin the European union. Public Administration, 81(3), 509–511.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. & International Society for Plant Pathology 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of OxfordOxfordUK
  2. 2.University of EdinburghEdinburghScotland

Personalised recommendations