Food Security

, Volume 2, Issue 1, pp 49–70

Evolution of the international regulation of plant pests and challenges for future plant health

  • Alan MacLeod
  • Marco Pautasso
  • Mike J. Jeger
  • Roy Haines-Young
Original Paper

Abstract

Plant pathogens and invertebrates harmful to plants, collectively referred to as plant pests, continue to threaten food security. International cooperation and regulatory systems to inhibit the spread of plant pests began formally in 1878. Initially seven countries worked together and agreed phytosanitary measures against grape phylloxera, Phylloxera vastatrix (=Daktulosphaira vitifoliae). There are now 172 countries that are contracting parties to the International Plant Protection Convention, a treaty that aims to prevent the introduction and spread of pests of plants and plant products, and to promote appropriate measures for their control. Apparently contradictory interests between international trade, which has facilitated the spread of plant pests, and the protection of plants are mutually recognised in global trade and phytosanitary agreements. The principle that risk management measures should provide an appropriate level of protection without undue interference in trade was established within the plant protection agreements at the beginning of the 20th Century and is still fundamental to risk management policy today. Globally ten Regional Plant Protection Organizations facilitate more local cooperation and recommend the regulation of over 1,000 named quarantine plant pests. Member States of the European Union work together and regulate imported plant material on the grounds of plant health with each Member State taking into account the plant health concerns of every other Member State. However, decision making can be slow and border inspections poorly targeted. Close relationships between regulatory scientists and policy makers, focussed on agricultural and horticultural production, are changing to take a broader stakeholder community into consideration as decisions regarding the environment seek to draw upon a wider knowledge base. Challenges that impede the success of limiting international pest movement include increased international trade and climate change. International guidelines designed to prevent pest spread present challenges of their own if they remain difficult to implement.

Keywords

Pest risk analysis Phytosanitation Plant biosecurity Quarantine Regulatory science 

References

  1. Aalen FH, Whelan K, Stout M (1997) (eds) Atlas of the Irish rural landscape. UP, Cork, 352 ppGoogle Scholar
  2. Ainsworth GC (1981) An introduction to the history of plant pathology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 315 ppGoogle Scholar
  3. Akerlof G (1970) The market for lemons: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Q J Econ 84:488–500Google Scholar
  4. Ambler-Edwards S, Bailey K, Kiff A, Lang T, Lee R, Marsden T, Simons D, Tibbs H (2009) Food futures: rethinking UK strategy. Chatham House Report, 52 pp. http://www.chathamhouse.org.uk/files/13248_r0109foodfutures.pdf. Accessed 1st July 2009
  5. Anderson K, McRae C, Wilson D (2001) The economics of quarantine and the SPS agreement, Centre for International Economic Studies, Adelaide & AFFA Biosecurity, Australia, 414 ppGoogle Scholar
  6. Anderson PK, Cunningham AA, Patel NG, Morales FJ, Epstein PR, Daszak P (2004) Emerging infectious diseases of plants: pathogen pollution, climate change and agrotechnology drivers. Trends Ecol Evol 19:535–544PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Anon (1977) Council Directive of 21 December 1976 on protective measures against the introduction into Member States of harmful organisms of plants or plant products (77/93/EEC). Official Journal of the European Communities 20(L26):20–54Google Scholar
  8. Anon (2004) Trade and the global economy: the role of international trade in productivity, economic reform and growth. HM Treasury. 38 pp. www.hm-treasury.gov.uk
  9. Anon (2005) Plant health strategy for England. Defra publication PB11158 15 pp http://www.defra.gov.uk/planth/strategy/strategy05.pdf. Accessed 1st June 2009
  10. Anon (2006) Scientific advice, risk and evidence based policy making. House of Commons Science and Technology Committee, Seventh Report of Session 2005–06, Volume I. HC 900-I The Stationery Office Limited, London 118p. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmselect/cmsctech/900/900-i.pdf
  11. Anon (2008) SPS Capacity building program. Australian Government. Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry. http://www.daffa.gov.au/animal-plant-health/plant/sps. Accessed 1st June 2009
  12. Ashby SJ, Ward MG, Burgess R, Smith L, Baker RHA (2005) The challenge of legislating against non-native species. BCPC International Congress, Crop Science and Technology 2005. Proceedings of an international congress, SECC, Glasgow, 31 Oct.–2 Nov. 2005, 749–756Google Scholar
  13. Australian Academy of Science (2003) Submission to the review of the Australian quarantine inspection service, March 1996. http://www.science.org.au/reports/aqiscont.htm. Accessed 1st June 2009
  14. Baker CRB, Pemberton AW (1993) Plant health historical review, 1978–1993. In: Ebbels D (ed) Plant health and the European single market. BCPC, BCPC Monograph No. 54, Farnham, pp 3–11Google Scholar
  15. Baker R, MacLeod A (2005) Pest risk assessments: tools, resources and key challenges, p106–109. In: IPPC Secretariat Identification of risks and management of invasive alien species using the IPPC framework, Proceedings of the workshop on alien species and the International Plant Protection Convention, Braunschweig, Germany, 22–26 September 2003. Rome, Italy, FAO, xii + 301 ppGoogle Scholar
  16. Baker RHA, MacLeod A, Cannon RJC, Jarvis CH, Walters KFA, Barrow EM, Hulme M (1998) Predicting the impacts of a non-indigenous pest on the UK potato crop under global climate change: reviewing the evidence for the Colorado beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata. Proceedings of the Brighton Crop Protection Conference—Pests and Diseases, Brighton, November 17–19, 1998, 979–984Google Scholar
  17. Baker RHA, Cannon RJC, MacLeod A (2003) Predicting the potential distribution of alien pests in the UK under global climate change: Diabrotica virgifera virgifera. Proceedings of the British Crop Protection Conference—Crop Science and Technology, Glasgow, November 10–12, 2003, 1201–1208Google Scholar
  18. Baker RHA, Cannon RJC, Bartlett PW, Barker I (2005) Novel strategies for assessing and managing the risks posed by invasive alien species to global crop production and biodiversity. Ann Appl Biol 146:177–191Google Scholar
  19. Bandyopadhyay B, Frederiksen RA (1999) Contemporary global movement of emerging plant diseases. Ann N Y Acad Sci 894:28–36PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Barling D (2007) Food supply chain governance and public health externalities: upstream policy interventions and the UK State. J Agric Environ Ethics 20(3):285–300Google Scholar
  21. Bartlett PW (1979) Preventing the establishment of Colorado beetle in England and Wales, 247–257. In: Ebbels DL, King JE (eds) Plant health: the scientific basis for administrative control of plant diseases and pests. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, 322 ppGoogle Scholar
  22. Bartlett PW (1993) Lessons from plant health experiences, 223–232. In: Ebbels DL (ed) Plant health and the European single market. BCPC, BCPC Monograph No. 54, FarnhamGoogle Scholar
  23. Bartlett PW (1994) Plant health in the European single market—a UK view of the first year. British Crop Protection Conference—Pests and Diseases 1994(1):167–174Google Scholar
  24. Bartlett PW (2000) New pests and diseases in European Community plant health legislation. The BCPC Conference—Pests and Diseases 2000(3):1159–1166Google Scholar
  25. de Bary A (1861) Die gegenwatig herrschende Kartoffelkrankheit, ihre Ursache und ihre Verhutung (Leipzig). (from Tarr 1972)Google Scholar
  26. de Bary A (1865) Mber. Dt. Akad. Wiss. Berl., 15. (from Tarr, 1972)Google Scholar
  27. Boardman AE, Greenberg DH, Vining AR, Weimer DL (1996) Cost-benefit analysis: concepts and practice. Prentice-Hall, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  28. Boonham N, Glover R, Tomlinson J, Mumford R (2008) Exploiting generic platform technologies for the detection and identification of plant pathogens. Eur J Plant Pathol 121:355–363Google Scholar
  29. Brasier CM (2008) The biosecurity threat to the UK and global environment from international trade in plants. Plant Pathol 57(5):792–808Google Scholar
  30. Bryant RL, Wilson GA (1998) Rethinking environmental management. Prog Hum Geogr 22(3):321–343Google Scholar
  31. Burgess J, Harrison CM, Filius P (1998) Environmental communication and the cultural politics of environmental citizenship. Environ Plan A 30(8):1445–1460Google Scholar
  32. Butterworth MH, Semenov MA, Barnes A, Moran D, West JS, Fitt BDL (2009) North–South divide: contrasting impacts of climate change on crop yields in Scotland and England. J R Soc Interface 7:123–130PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Campbell C (2004) Phylloxera: how wine was saved for the world. Collins, 256 ppGoogle Scholar
  34. Campbell CL, Peterson PD, Griffith CS (Eds) (1999) The formative years of plant pathology in the United States. APS, 427 ppGoogle Scholar
  35. Cannon RJC (1998) The implications of predicted climate change for insects pests in the UK, with emphasis on non-indigenous species. Glob Chang Biol 4:785–796Google Scholar
  36. Cannon RJC, Pemberton AW, Bartlett PW (1999) Appropriate measures for the eradication of unlisted pests. EPPO Bull 29:29–36Google Scholar
  37. Cannon RJC, Matthews L, Collins DW (2007) A review of the pest status and control options for Thrips palmi. Crop Prot 26(8):1089–1098Google Scholar
  38. Caton BP, Dobbs TT, Brodel CF (2006) Arrivals of hitchhiking insect pests on international cargo aircraft at Miami International Airport. Biol Invasions 8:765–785Google Scholar
  39. CBD (2000) Cartagena protocol on biosafety to the convention on biological diversity: text and annexes. 29 January 2000. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. Montreal, 30 ppGoogle Scholar
  40. CBD (2002) Sixth ordinary meeting of the conference of the parties to the convention on biological diversity (COP 6) Decision VI/23 Alien species that threaten ecosystems, habitats or species. http://www.cbd.int/decision/cop/?id=7197. Accessed 31st December 2009
  41. Chapman S (1992) Merchant Enterprise in Britain: From the Industrial Revolution to World War I. Cambridge University Press, 339 ppGoogle Scholar
  42. Cheatham MR, Rouse MN, Esker PD, Igancio S, Pradel W, Raymundo R, Sparks AH, Forbes GA, Gordon TR, Garrett KA (2009) Beyond yield: plant disease in the context of ecosystem services. Phytopathology 99(11):1228–1236PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Chock AK (1979) The international plant protection convention, 1–11. In: Ebbels DL, King JE (eds) Plant health: the scientific basis for control of plant diseases and pests. Blackwell Scientific Pubs, 322 ppGoogle Scholar
  44. Colautti RI, MacIsaac HJ (2004) A neutral terminology to define ‘invasive’ species. Divers Distrib 10:135–141Google Scholar
  45. Committee on World Food Security (2005) Background Document, Special Event on Impact of Climate Change, Pests and Diseases on Food Security and Poverty Reduction, 31st Session of the Committee on World Food Security. 23-26 May 2005, FAO, 10 pp. ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/meeting/009/j5411e.pdf. Accessed 24th December 2009
  46. Cook RJ (2000) Advances in plant health management in the 20th century. Annu Rev Phytopathol 38:95–116PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Cooney R, Lang ATF (2007) Taking uncertainty seriously: adaptive governance and international trade. Eur J Int Law 18(3):523–551Google Scholar
  48. Crowl TA, Crist TO, Parmenter RR, Belovsky G, Lugo AE (2008) The spread of invasive species and infectious disease as drivers of ecosystem change. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 6(5):238–246Google Scholar
  49. Danson JW, Kimani M, Mbogori M (2006) Detection of Bacillus thuringiensis genes in transgenic maize by the PCR method and FTA paper technology. Afr J Biotechnol 5(22):2345–2349Google Scholar
  50. Defra (2005) Helping to prevent the spread of invasive non-native species. Horticultural code of practice. Defra, LondonGoogle Scholar
  51. Defra (2006) Food security and the UK: an evidence and analysis paper, Food Chain Analysis Group, Defra, London. 93 pp. https://statistics.defra.gov.uk/esg/reports/.../foodsecurity.doc. Accessed 31st May 2009
  52. Defra (2008a) Ensuring the UK’s Food Security in a Changing World. A Defra Discussion Paper, HMSO London, 32ppGoogle Scholar
  53. Defra (2008b) Code of practice for the management of agricultural and horticultural waste http://www.fera.defra.gov.uk/plants/publications/plantHealth/documents/copManagementWaste.pdf. Accessed 7th August 2009
  54. DeGraaf J (1994) Plant health and international trade in seed potatoes. Can J Plant Pathol 16:146–149Google Scholar
  55. Delos M, Hervieu F, Folcher L, Micoud A, Eychenne N (2007) Biological surveillance programme for the monitoring of crop pests and indicators, French devices and European approach compared. Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety 2(suppl 2):16–24Google Scholar
  56. Desprez-Loustau M-L, Courtecuisse R, Robin C, Husson C, Moreau PA, Blancard D, Selosse MA, Lung-Escarmant B, Piou D, Sache I (2010) Species diversity and drivers of spread of alien fungi (sensu lato) in Europe with a particular focus on France. Biol Invasions 12:157–172Google Scholar
  57. Donaldson A, Lowe P, Ward N (2002) Virus-crisis-institutional change: the foot and mouth actor network and the governance of rural affairs in the UK. Sociol Ruralis 42(3):201–214Google Scholar
  58. Downie DA (2002) Locating the sources of an invasive pest, grape phylloxera, using amitochondrial DNA gene genealogy. Mol Ecol 11:2013–2026PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Dubin HJ, Brennan JP (2009) Combating stem and leaf rust of wheat, historical perspective, impacts, and lessons learned. IFPRI Discussion Paper 00910, November 2009 64 pages. http://www.ifpri.org/sites/default/files/publications/ifpridp00910.pdf. Accessed 30th December 2009
  60. Durand S, Chiaradia-Bonsquet JP (1999) New principles of phytosanitary legislation. FAO Legislative Study 62, FAO Rome, 90 ppGoogle Scholar
  61. Ebbels DL (1993) Preface, x–xi. In: Ebbels DL (ed) Plant health and the European single market. BCPC, BCPC Monograph No. 54, Farnham, 416 ppGoogle Scholar
  62. Ebbels DL (2003) Principles of plant health and quarantine. CAB International, 302 ppGoogle Scholar
  63. Ebbels DL, King JE Eds (1979) Plant Health: The scientific basis for control of plant diseases and pests. Blackwell Scientific Pubs.322 ppGoogle Scholar
  64. EEA (2001) Late lessons from early warnings: the precautionary principle 1896–2000. European Environment Agency. Environmental issue report No. 22, EEA Copenhagen, 212 ppGoogle Scholar
  65. Epstein P (1997) The threatened plague. People Planet 6(3):14–17PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. EPPO (1951) Convention for the establishment of the European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization of 18 April 1951. EPPO, ParisGoogle Scholar
  67. EPPO (1996) Situation of Diabrotica virgifera in Serbia (YU). From International Workshop “Western Corn Rootworm in Europe 95”, Gödöllö (HU), 1995-11-08. EPPO Resporting Service (1996/006)Google Scholar
  68. EPPO (2007) European and Mediterranean plant protection organisation, Plant Quarantine Retrieval System, Version 4.6, July 2007Google Scholar
  69. EPPO (2008) Diabrotica virgifera. http://www.eppo.org/QUARANTINE/Diabrotica_virgifera/diabrotica_virgifera.htm. Accessed 25th June 2009
  70. EPPO (2009) Index of the EPPO Reporting Service 2009/226. Tuta absoluta http://archives.eppo.org/EPPOReporting/Reporting_Archives.htm. Accessed 22nd December 2009
  71. Ereshefsky M (2009) Defining ‘health’ and ‘disease’. Stud Hist Philos Sci C 40:221–227Google Scholar
  72. FAO (1997) International plant protection convention (new revised text approved by the FAO Conference at its 29th Session—November 1997) https://www.ippc.int/servlet/BinaryDownloaderServlet/13742_1997_English.pdf?filename=/publications/13742.New_Revised_Text_of_the_International_Plant_Protectio.pdfandrefID=13742. Accessed 15th May 2009
  73. FAO (2001) The state of food and agriculture 2001. FAO Agriculture Series No. 33, FAO Rome, 298 ppGoogle Scholar
  74. FAO (2002) Guide to the international plant protection convention. FAO Rome, 20 ppGoogle Scholar
  75. FAO (2003) Analysis of environmental risk. Supplement No.1 to ISPM No. 11. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  76. FAO (2004) International Standards for Phytosanitary Measures, ISPM No. 11 Pest risk analysis for quarantine pests, including analysis of environmental risks and living modified organisms, FAO, Rome, 27 ppGoogle Scholar
  77. FAO (2006) International Standards for Phytosanitary Measures, ISPM No. 1 Phytosanitary principles for the protection of plants and the application of phytosanitary measures in international trade, FAO, Rome, 10 ppGoogle Scholar
  78. FAO (2008) A short history of the FAO. http://www.fao.org/about/short-history/en/. Accessed 15th October 2008
  79. FAO (2009) International standards for phytosanitary measures, ISPM No. 5 Glossary of phytosanitary terms, FAO, Rome, 24 ppGoogle Scholar
  80. FCEC (Food Chain Evaluation Consortium) (2008) Evaluation of the Community acquis on the marketing of seed and plant propagating material (SandPM). Final Report http://ec.europa.eu/food/plant/propagation/evaluation/s_pm_evaluation_finalreport_en.pdf. Accessed 4th August 2009
  81. Frow E, Ingram D, Powell W, Steer D, Vogel J, Yearley S (2009) The politics of plants. Food Security 1:17–23Google Scholar
  82. Fry WE (1982) Principles of plant disease management. Academic, London, 378 ppGoogle Scholar
  83. Ghini R, Hamada E, Bettiol W (2008) Climate change and plant diseases. Sci Agric 65:98–107Google Scholar
  84. Goh G (2006) Tipping the apple cart: the limits of science and law in the SPS agreement after Japan-Apples. J World Trade 40(4):655–687Google Scholar
  85. Gregory PJ, Johnson SN, Newton AC, Ingram JSI (2009) Integrating pests and pathogens into the climate change/food security debate. J Exp Bot 60:2827–2838PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Gullino ML, Garibaldi A (2007) Critical aspects in management of fungal diseases of ornamental plants and directions in research. Phytopathol Mediterr 46:135–149Google Scholar
  87. Hadidi A, Khetarpal RK, Koganezawa H (eds) (1998) Plant virus disease control. APS, St Paul. 684ppGoogle Scholar
  88. Hallman GJ (2007) Phytosanitary measures to prevent the introduction of invasive species, 367–384. In: Nentwig W (ed) Biological invasions. Springer, Berlin, pp 367–384Google Scholar
  89. Harwood TD, Xu X, Pautasso M, Jeger MJ, Shaw MW (2009) Epidemiological risk assessment using linked network and grid based modelling: Phytophthora ramorum and P. kernoviae in the UK. Ecol Modell 220:3353–3361Google Scholar
  90. Hedley J (1992) The implications of plant quarantine principles. FAO Plant Protect Bull 40(4):131–147Google Scholar
  91. Hoagland KE (1996) The taxonomic impediment and the convention of biodiversity. Association of Systematics Collections Newsletter 24(5):61–62, 66–67Google Scholar
  92. Holdenrieder O, Pautasso M, Weisberg PJ, Lonsdale D (2004) Tree diseases and landscape processes: the challenge of landscape pathology. Trends Ecol Evol 19:446–452PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Holmes TP, Bell KP, Byrne B, Wilson JS (2008) Economics aspects of invasive forest pest management. In: Holmes TP, Prestemon JP, Abt KL (eds) The economics of forest disturbances—wildfires, storms, and invasive species. Springer, Berlin, pp 381–406Google Scholar
  94. House of Commons Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee (2009) Securing food supplies up to 2050: the challenges faced by the UK, Fourth Report of Session 2008–09, Volume I, House of Commons Report, July. Available at: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200809/cmselect/cmenvfru/213/213i.pdf Accessed 24th July 2009
  95. Hughes KJD, Lane CR, Cook RTA (1997) Development of a rapid method for the detection and identification of Colletotrichum acutatum. Diagnosis and Identification of Plant Pathogens: Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium of the European Foundation for Plant Pathology. Bonn, Germany, September 9–12, 1996. Kluwer Academic, Boston, pp 113–116Google Scholar
  96. ICPM (2004) Report on the Phytosanitary Capacity Evaluation Tool, Interim Commission on Phytosanitary Measures, Sixth Session Rome, 29 March–2 April 2004 Agenda Item 11.1 of the Provisional Agenda. https://www.ippc.int/file_uploaded/1073577402495_ICPM04_INF_14.pdf. Accessed 24th December 2009
  97. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2007) Climate change 2007 synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland. pp 104 http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/ar4-syr.htm
  98. IPPC Secretariat (2005a) IPPC workshop on the practical application of ISPM No 15, Vancouver, Canada, 28 February–4 March 2005. Presentations and outputs available at https://www.ippc.int/index.php?id=49127&tx_publication_pi1[showUid]=38569&frompage=49127&type=publication&subtype=&L=0#item. Accessed 24th December 2009
  99. IPPC Secretariat (2005b) Identification of risks and management of invasive alien species using the IPPC framework, Proceedings of the workshop on alien species and the International Plant Protection Convention, Braunschweig, Germany, 22–26 September 2003. Rome, Italy, FAO, xii + 301 ppGoogle Scholar
  100. IPPC Secretariat (2006) International plant health risk analysis workshop 24–28 October 2005, Niagara Falls, Canada. Presentations and outputs available at https://www.ippc.int/index.php?id=58455. Accessed 26th December 2009
  101. IPPC (2007) Independent evaluation of the workings of the International Plant Protection Convention and its institutional arrangements. FAO, Rome, 73ppGoogle Scholar
  102. Irwin A (1995) Citizen science: a study of people, expertise and sustainable development. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  103. Irwin A (2001) Constructing scientific citizen: science and democracy in the biosciences. Public Underst Sci 10(1):1–18Google Scholar
  104. Jeger MJ, Pautasso M (2008) Plant disease and global change—the importance of long-term data sets. New Phytol 177:8–11PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. Jeger MJ, Pautasso M, Holdenrieder O et al (2007) Modelling disease spreadand control in networks: implications for plant sciences. New Phytol 174:279–297PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. Jones DR, Baker RHA (2007) Introductions of non-native plant pathogens into Great Britain, 1970–2004. Plant Pathol 56:891–910Google Scholar
  107. Kapoor I (2001) Towards participatory environmental management? J Environ Manage 63:269–279PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. Kates RW, Clark WC, Corell R, Hall JM, Jaeger CC, Lowe I, McCarthy JJ, Schellnhuber HJ, Bolin B, Dickson NM, Faucheux S, Gallopin GC, Grübler A, Huntley B, Jäger J, Jodha NS, Kasperson RE, Mabogunje A, Matson P, Mooney H, Moore B III, O’Riordan T, Svedin U (2001) Sustainability science. Science 292:641–642, URL: www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/292/5517/641/DC1. Accessed 23rd February 2009PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. Kelly EC, Bliss JC (2009) Healthy forests, healthy communities: an emerging paradigm for natural resource-dependent communities? Soc Nat Resour 22:519–537Google Scholar
  110. Kenis M, Rabitsch W, Auger-Rozenberg M-A, Roques A (2007) How can alien species inventories and interception data help us prevent insect invasions? Bull Entomol Res 97:489–502PubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. Koeman JH, Zadoks JC (1999) History and future of plant protection policy, from ancient times to WTO-SPS, 21–48. In: Meester G, Woittiez RD, de Zeeuw A (eds) Plants and politics. Wageningen, Wageningen, 256 ppGoogle Scholar
  112. Koo W, Mattson W (Eds) (2004) Economics of detection and control of invasive species: Workshop Highlights. Centre for Agricultural Policy and Trade Studies: Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics. North Dakota State University. Special Report 04-2. http://www.ag.ndsu.nodak.edu/capts/documents/SpecialReport04-2P.pdf
  113. Kushalappa AC, Eskes AB (1989) (Eds) Coffee rust: epidemiology, resistance and management. CRC, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  114. Lane CR, Hobden E, Walker L, Barton VC, Inman AJ, Hughes KJD, Swan H, Colyer A, Barker I (2007) Evaluation of a rapid diagnostic field test kit for identification of Phytophthora species, including P. ramorum and P. kernoviae at the point of inspection. Plant Pathol 56(5):828–835Google Scholar
  115. Large EC (1940) The advance of the fungi. Jonathan Cape Ltd., London, 488 ppGoogle Scholar
  116. Lawton JH (2007) Ecology, politics and policy. J Appl Ecol 44:465–474Google Scholar
  117. Leung B, Lodge DM, Finnoff D, Shogren JF, Lewis MA, Lamberti G (2002) An ounce of prevention or a pound of cure: bioeconomic risk analysis of invasive species. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B 269:2407–2413Google Scholar
  118. Lopian R (2005) The International Plant protection Convention and alien invasive species. p6–16, In: IPPC Secretariat (2005). Identification of risks and management of invasive alien species using the IPPC framework, Proceedings of the workshop on alien species and the International Plant Protection Convention, Braunschweig, Germany, 22–26 September 2003. Rome, Italy, FAO, xii + 301 ppGoogle Scholar
  119. Mack RN (as chair of the Committee on the scientific basis for predicting the invasive potential of nonindigenous plants and plant pests in the Unites States) et al (2002) Predicting invasions of nonindigenous plants and plant pests. National Academy Press, Washington. 194p.Google Scholar
  120. MacLeod A (2007) The benefits and costs of specific phytosanitary campaigns in the UK: Examples that illustrate how science and economics support policy decision making. In: Lansink AO (ed) new approaches to the economics of plant health. Wageningen Ur Frontis S., v20. Kluwer Academic Pubs, 200 ppGoogle Scholar
  121. MacLeod A, Baker RHA (1998) Risk assessment to support and strengthen legislative control of a quarantine thrips : the case of Thrips palmi. Proceedings of the Brighton Crop Protection Conference—Pests and Diseases, Brighton, pp 199–204. November 17–19, 1998. BCPCGoogle Scholar
  122. MacLeod A, Evans HF, Baker RHA (2002) An analysis of pest risk from an Asian longhorn beetle (Anoplophora glabripennis) to hardwood trees in the European Community. Crop Prot 21(8):635–645Google Scholar
  123. MacLeod A, Head J, Gaunt A (2004) An assessment of the potential economic impact of Thrips palmi on horticulture in England and the significance of a successful eradication campaign. Crop Prot 23(7):601–610Google Scholar
  124. MacLeod A, Baker RHA, Hoddinott R (2005) The analysis of detections in consignments to identify and target pests’ entry pathways. Proceedings of the British Crop Protection Council International Congress, Crop Science and Technology, Glasgow, pp 1013–1018. October 31–November 2, 2005, BCPCGoogle Scholar
  125. Madden LV, Wheelis M (2003) The threat of plant pathogens as weaponsagainst US crops. Annu Rev Phytopathol 41:155–176PubMedGoogle Scholar
  126. MAFF (1998) Code of practice for the management of agricultural and horticultural waste. MAFF, WOAD, SOAFD. 12ppGoogle Scholar
  127. Magarey RD, Colunga-Garcia M, Fieselmann DA (2009) Plant biosecurity in the Unites States: roles, responsibilities, and information needs. Bioscience 59(10):875–884Google Scholar
  128. Mathys G, Baker EA (1980) An appraisal of the effectiveness of quarantines. Annu Rev Phytopathol 18:85–101Google Scholar
  129. Maynard GV, Hamilton GJ, Grimshaw JF (2004) Quarantine—phytosanitary, sanitary and incursion management: an Australian entomological perspective. Aust J Entomol 43:318–328Google Scholar
  130. McCullough DG, Work TT, Cavey JF, Liebhold AM, Marshall D (2006) Interceptions of nonindigenous plant pests at US ports of entry and border crossings over a 17-year period. Biol Invasions 8:611–630Google Scholar
  131. McNeely JA (1999) The great reshuffling: how alien species help feed the global economy, 11–31. In: Sandlund OT et al (eds) Invasive species and biodiversity management. Kluwer Academic, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  132. McRae CF, Wilson D (2002) Plant health as a trade policy issue. Australas Plant Pathol 31(2):103–105Google Scholar
  133. Meester G, Woittiez RD, de Zeeuw A (eds) (1999) Plants and politics. Wageningen, Wageningen, 256 ppGoogle Scholar
  134. Meyerson LA, Reaser JK (2003) Bioinvasions, bioterrorism, and biosecurity. Front Ecol Environ 1(6):307–314Google Scholar
  135. Miraglia M, Marvin HJP, Kleter GA, Battilani P et al (2009) Climate change and food safety: an emerging issue with special focus on Europe. Food Chem Toxicol 47:1009–1021PubMedGoogle Scholar
  136. Mohamed RA (2003) Role of open quarantine in regional germplasm exchange. In: Legg JP, Hillocks RJ (eds) Cassava brown streak virus disease: past, present and future. Proceedings of an International Workshop, Mombasa, Kenya, 27–30 October 2002. Natural Resources International Ltd., Aylesford, pp 63–65, 100ppGoogle Scholar
  137. Moll P, Zander U (2006) Managing the interface. From knowledge to action in global change and sustainability science. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research. Oekom VerlagGoogle Scholar
  138. Moslonka-Lefebvre M, Pautasso M, Jeger MJ (2009) Disease spread in small-size directed networks: epidemic threshold, correlation between links to and from nodes, and clustering. J Theor Biol 260:402–411PubMedGoogle Scholar
  139. Mulders JM (1977) The international plant protection convention—25 years old. FAO Plant Protect Bull 25:149–151Google Scholar
  140. Nairn ME, Allen PG, Inglis AR, Tanner C (1996) Australian quarantine: a shared responsibility. Department of Primary Industries and Energy, Canberra, 284 ppGoogle Scholar
  141. Nielsen-Gammon JW (2007) An Inconvenient truth: the scientific argument. GeoJournal 70(1):21–26Google Scholar
  142. Noble R, Elphinstone JG, Sansford CE, Budge GE, Henry CM (2009) Management of plant health risks associated with processing of plant-based wastes: a review. Bioresour Technol 100(14):3431–3446PubMedGoogle Scholar
  143. Nowotny H, Scott P, Gibbons M (2001) Re-thinking science, knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. OxfordGoogle Scholar
  144. Ntawuruhunga P, Legg J (2007) New spread of Cassava Brown Streak Virus disease and its implications for the movement of cassava germplasm in the East and Central African region. Crop Crisis Control Project (C3P) publication, 6 pp. http://c3project.iita.org/Doc/A25-CBSDbriefMay6.pdf Accessed August 1st 2009
  145. Oerke EC, Dehne HW, Schonbeck F, Weber A (1994) Crop production and crop protection—estimated losses in major food and cash crops. London, Elsevier, 808 ppGoogle Scholar
  146. OIE (2009) Health standards: commodity-based approach. http://www.oie.int/eng/normes/en_commodity.htm. Accessed 21st December 2009
  147. O’Riordan T (ed) (2000) Environmental science for environmental managers, 2nd edn. Pearson Education Limited, HarlowGoogle Scholar
  148. Ostry ME, Laflamme G (2009) Fungi and diseases—natural components of healthy forests. Botany 87:22–25Google Scholar
  149. Otieno W (2008) Discussion paper submitted by KEPHIS to the Open ended working group, Building national phytosanitary capacity, IPPC. 8–12 December 2008, FAO headquarters, Rome, Italy. https://www.ippc.int/servlet/CDSServlet?status=ND0yMDQxNjQuMjA4NDg2JjY9ZW4mMzM9cHVibGljYXRpb25zJjM3PWluZm8∼. Accessed 4th August 2009
  150. Pennington H (2003) When food kills: BSE, E-coli and disaster science. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  151. Perrings C, Williamson M, Dalmazzone S (2000) The economics of biological invasions. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  152. Perrings C, Williamson M, Barbier EB, Delfino D, Dalmazzone S, Shogren J, Simmons P, Watkinson A (2002) Biological invasion risks and the public good: an economic perspective. Conservation Ecology 6(1):1Google Scholar
  153. Petter F, Brunel S, Suffert M (2010) Pest risk analysis as applied to plant pathogens. In: Strange RN, Gullino ML (eds) The role of plant pathology in food safety and food security, plant pathology in 21st Century, 3, doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-8932-9_12, Springer Science + Business Media
  154. Pimentel D (Ed) (2002) Biological invasions: economic and environmental costs of alien plant, animals and microbial species. CRC, 384ppGoogle Scholar
  155. Pinstrup-Andersen P (2009) Food security: definition and measurement. Food Security 1:5–7Google Scholar
  156. Potschin M, Haines-Young RH (2006) Rio+10, Sustainability science and landscape ecology. Landsc Urban Plan 75(3–4):162–174Google Scholar
  157. Prévost IB (1807) Memoir on the immediate cause of bunt or smut of wheat, and of several other diseases of plants, and on preventives of bunt. Paris. 80 pp. English translation by G.W. Keitt. 1939. Phytopath. Classics 6:1–95Google Scholar
  158. Rodoni B (2009) The role of plant biosecurity in preventing and controlling emerging plant virus disease epidemics. Virus Res 141:150–157PubMedGoogle Scholar
  159. Rogers AGL (1914) The international phytopathological conference. Ann Appl Biol 1:113–117Google Scholar
  160. Roy AS (2009) The importance of certification schemes and quarantine measures in European horticulture. Acta Hortic 817:373–374Google Scholar
  161. Ruiz GM, Carlton JT (2003) Invasion vectors: a conceptual framework for management. In: Ruiz GM, Carlton JT (eds) Invasive species: vectors and management strategies. Island, Washington, pp 459–504Google Scholar
  162. Russo NL, Burr TJ, Breth DI, Aldwinckle HS (2008) Isolation of streptomycin-resistant isolates of Erwinia amylovora in New York. Plant Dis 92:714–718Google Scholar
  163. Salaman R (1985) The history and social influence of the potato, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UKGoogle Scholar
  164. Sansford CE (1998) Detection of Tilletia indica Mitra in the US: Potential risk to the UK and EU. Bunts & Smuts of Wheat: An International Symposium, August 17–20, 1997, North Carolina, USA 273–302Google Scholar
  165. Sansford CE (1999) Pest risk analysis in the UK: its use to identify research opportunities for exotic plant pathogens Proceedings of the National Office of Animal and Plant Health, Austria Workshop, Plant Health in the New Global Trading Environment: Management Exotic Insects, Weeds and Pathogens, 23–24 February 1999, 99–111Google Scholar
  166. Sansford CE, Baker RHA, Brennan JP, Ewert F, Gioli B, Inman A, Kinsella A, Magnus HA, Miglietta F, Murray GM, Porta-Puglia A, Porter JR, Rafoss T, Riccioni L, Thorne F (2008) The new Pest Risk Analysis for Tilletia indica, the cause of Karnal bunt of wheat, continues to support the quarantine status of the pathogen in Europe. Plant Pathol 57(4):603–611Google Scholar
  167. Savage DE (1993) The EC and external border controls. In: Ebbels DL (ed) Plant health and the European single market. BCPC, BCPC Monograph No. 54, Farnham, pp 47–50Google Scholar
  168. Scherm H (2004) Climate change: can we predict the impacts on plant pathology and pest management? Can J Plant Pathol 26:267–273Google Scholar
  169. Schmidt A (2006) An assessment of the implications and challenges of the accession of Turkey to the EU for agricultural policy and farming. Berichte ueber Landwirtschaft 84(1):128–143Google Scholar
  170. Scholthof KBG (2003) One foot in the furrow: linkages between agriculture, plant pathology, and public health. Annu Rev Public Health 24:153–174PubMedGoogle Scholar
  171. Schrader G, Unger J-G (2003) Plant Quarantine as a measure against invasive alien species: the framework of the international plant protection convention and the plant health regulations in the European Union. Biol Invasions 5(4):357–364Google Scholar
  172. Schumann GL (1991) Plant diseases: their biology and social impact. APS, St. Paul, 397 ppGoogle Scholar
  173. Scott A, Christie M, Midmore P (2004) Impact of the 2001 foot-and-mouth disease outbreak in Britain: implications for rural studies. J Rural Stud 20(1):1–14Google Scholar
  174. Shine C (2007) Invasive species in an international context: IPPC, CBD, European strategy on invasive alien species and other legal instruments. EPPO Bull 37(1):103–113Google Scholar
  175. Shogren J (2000) Risk reduction strategies against the ‘explosive invader’. In: Perrings C, Williamson M, Dalmazzone S (eds) The economics of biological invasions. Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 56–69Google Scholar
  176. Simberloff D (2006) Invasional meltdown 6 years later: important phenomenon, unfortunate metaphor or both? Ecol Lett 9:912–919PubMedGoogle Scholar
  177. Smith IM (1979) EPPO: The work of a regional plant protection organization, with particular reference to phytosanitary regulations. In: Ebbels DL, King JE (eds) Plant health: the scientific basis for control of plant diseases and pests. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, pp 13–22Google Scholar
  178. Smith IM (1999) Reflections on Chapter IV. In: Meester G, Woittiez RD, de Zeeuw A (eds) Plants and politics. Wageningen, Wageningen, pp 165–170Google Scholar
  179. Smith JJ, Waage J, Woodhall JW, Bishop SJ, Spence NJ (2008) The challenge of providing plant pest diagnostic services for Africa. Eur J Plant Pathol 121:365–375Google Scholar
  180. Stokstad E (2004) Nurseries may have shipped Sudden Oak Death pathogen nationwide. Science 303:1959PubMedGoogle Scholar
  181. Strange RN, Scott PR (2005) Plant disease: a threat to global food security. Annu Rev Phytopathol 43:83–116PubMedGoogle Scholar
  182. Sutherland WJ et al (2008) Future novel threats and opportunities facing UKbiodiversity identified by horizon scanning. J Appl Ecol 45:821–833Google Scholar
  183. Sutherst RW, Baker RHA, Coakley SM, Harrington R, Kriticos DJ, Scherm H (2007) Pests under global change—meeting your future landlords? In: Canadell JG, Pataki DE, Pitelka LF (eds) Terrestrial ecosystems in a changing world. Springer, Berlin, pp 211–226Google Scholar
  184. Tarr SAJ (1972) Principles of plant pathology. Macmillan, London, p 632Google Scholar
  185. Taylor BW, Irwin RE (2004) Linking economic activities to the distribution of exotic plants. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A 101(51):17725–17730Google Scholar
  186. Temple ML, Gladders P, Blood-Smyth JA, Crabb J, Mumford JD, Quinlan MM, Makuch Z, Mourato SM (2000) An economic evaluation of MAFF’s plant health programme. A report prepared for MAFF Economics (Resource Use) Division by ADAS Consulting Ltd. and Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, 195 ppGoogle Scholar
  187. Tkacz B, Moody B, Castillo JV, Fenn ME (2008) Forest health conditionsin North America. Environ Pollut 155:409–425PubMedGoogle Scholar
  188. Tollefsen P, Rypdal K, Torvanger A, Rive N (2009) Air pollution policies in Europe: efficiency gains from integrating climate effects with damage costs to health and crops. Environ Sci Policy 12:870–881Google Scholar
  189. Trevelyan, G.M. (1993). The role of government in plant health. In: Ebbels DL (ed) Plant health and the European single market. BCPC, BCPC Monograph No. 54, Farnham, pp 251–258Google Scholar
  190. US Census Bureau (2009) International database, World population: 1950–2050 http://www.census.gov/ipc/www/idb/worldpopgraph.php. Accessed 23rd December 2009
  191. USDA (2000) Regulated plant pest list, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. Available at http://www.invasivespecies.org/NewInitiatives.html. Accessed 11th August 2009
  192. Usinger RL (1964) The role of Linnaeus in advancement of entomology. Annu Rev Entomol 9:1–17Google Scholar
  193. Vallat B, Mallet E (2006) Ensuring good governance to address emerging and re-emerging animal disease threats: supporting the Veterinary Services of developing countries to meet OIE international standards on quality. Rev Sci Tech (International Office of Epizootics) 25(1):389–401Google Scholar
  194. van der Graaff NA (1999) The international plant protection convention, Chapter IV. In: Meester G, Woittiez RD, de Zeeuw A (eds) Plants and politics. Wageningen, NL. 256 ppGoogle Scholar
  195. van Zwanenburg P, Millstone E (2005) BSE: risk, science, and governance. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 303 ppGoogle Scholar
  196. Vanzyl DJ (1984) Phylloxera vastatrix in the Cape Colony, 1886–1900—occurrence, distribution and economic consequences. S Afr Hist J 16:26–48Google Scholar
  197. Vereecke M (1993) The European single market: a new strategy in the field of plant health. In: Ebbels DL (ed) Plant health and the European single market. BCPC, BCPC Monograph No. 54, Farnham, pp 33–38Google Scholar
  198. Vos E (2000) EU food safety regulation in the aftermath of the BSE crisis. J Consum Policy 23:227–55Google Scholar
  199. Waage JK, Mumford JD (2008) Agricultural biosecurity. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 363:863–876Google Scholar
  200. Waage JK, Woodhall JW, Bishop SJ, Smith JJ, Jones DR, Spence NJ (2008) Patterns of plant pest introductions in Europe and Africa. Agric Syst 99:1–5Google Scholar
  201. Ward MG (1993) The role of the plant health and seeds inspectorate of England and Wales in the single European market. In: Ebbels DL (ed) Plant health and the European single market. BCPC, BCPC Monograph No. 54, Farnham, pp 261–266Google Scholar
  202. Williamson M (1996) Biological invasions. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  203. Wilson GA, Bryant RL (1997) Environmental management—new directions for the 21st Century. UCL, LondonGoogle Scholar
  204. Woods A (2005) A manufactured plague. The History of Foot-and-mouth disease in Britain. Earthscan publications, London. 208 ppGoogle Scholar
  205. WTO (1995) Agreement on the application of sanitary and phytosanitary measures, (the SPS Agreement) In: The results of the Uruguay round of multilateral trade negotiations: the legal texts. WTO Secretariat, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  206. WTO (1999) Preparations for the 1999 Ministerial Conference. Negotiations on agriculture. Communication from Norway p2, WT/GC/W/238Google Scholar
  207. WTO (2007) World trade statistics, 2007. World Trade Organization, Geneva, 262 pp. http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/its2007_e/its2007_e.pdf
  208. Xu X, Harwood TD, Pautasso M, Jeger MJ (2009) Spatio-temporal analysis of an invasive plant pathogen (Phytophthora ramorum) in England and Wales. Ecography 32:504–516Google Scholar
  209. Zilinskas RA, Hope B, North DW (2004) A discussion of findings and their possible implications from a workshop on bioterrorism threat assessment and risk management. Risk Anal 24(4):901–908PubMedGoogle Scholar
  210. Zocca A, Zanini C, Aimi A, Frigimelica G, La Porta N, Battisti A (2008) Spread of plant pathogens and insect vectors at the northern range margin of cypress in Italy. Acta Oecol 33(3):307–313Google Scholar

Copyright information

© British Crown Copyright 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alan MacLeod
    • 1
  • Marco Pautasso
    • 2
  • Mike J. Jeger
    • 2
  • Roy Haines-Young
    • 3
  1. 1.The Food and Environment Research AgencyYorkUK
  2. 2.Division of BiologyImperial College LondonAscotUK
  3. 3.Centre for Environmental Management, School of GeographyUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations