Food Security

, Volume 1, Issue 2, pp 221–232 | Cite as

Plant pathogens as agroterrorist weapons: assessment of the threat for European agriculture and forestry

  • Frédéric SuffertEmail author
  • Émilie Latxague
  • Ivan Sache
Original Paper


Malevolent use of plant pathogens in an act of agroterrorism represents a potential threat for European agriculture and forestry. We investigated the risk of agroterrorism sensu lato, which is raising debates among the community of plant pathologists. In the absence of a previous unambiguous definition of agroterrorism we characterized the risk for Europe by taking into account the multiplicity of the threat, of the perpetrator’s objectives, and of potential modus operandi. To this end, we have applied a three-step methodology involving: (1) the building of a list of candidate pathogens, (2) a scenario-based exploration of potential agroterrorist acts, and (3) the design of a risk evaluation scheme (RES), derived from the standard pest risk analysis (PRA). We adopted a congruent risk assessment strategy consisting of coupling the foresight exercise (assignment of nine key pathogens extracted from the list to nine scenarios and comparison of different intrinsic criteria) to the analytical assessment (application of the RES to the nine key pathogens and qualitative analysis resulting in a pentagonal star plot representing risk profiles). Analysis was performed by non-experts on the selected diseases, and thus enabled a comparison between crops or pathogens on the basis of the characterization of the threat. The risk, considered in its hybrid dimension (both factual because it refers to crop protection and an effective stake, and also irrational because it refers to bioterrorism, a vague and unobservable concept) was characterized exhaustively for the selected plant pathogens and the success of a malevolent act appeared to be much more uncertain than believed. However, agroterrorism should be considered as a plausible threat, potentially more important by the consequences of the securitization of the concept, which could imply disruption of regulations and trade, than by direct damaging consequences on European crops. There is probably not a single short-list of threatening pathogens: different pathogens would be most threatening for different purposes, for different perpetrators, and for different target crops.


Agroterrorism Anti-crop bioweapons, Crop biosecurity Foresight Plant pathogens Risk assessment 



This work has been supported by the European Commission (6th PCRD grant, contract CT-2004-6403) in the framework of the EU project “CropBioterror”. We thank Jean Pinon and Marc Barbier for their scientific contribution. The content of the present article only reflects the opinion of its authors, and not the opinions of either the European Commission or INRA.


  1. Anderson PK, Cunningham AA, Patel NG, Morales FJ, Epstein PR, Daszak P (2004) Emerging infectious diseases of plants: pathogen pollution, climate change and agrotechnology drivers. Trends Ecol Evol 19(10):535–544PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brasier CM (2008) The biosecurity threat to the UK and global environment from international trade in plants. Plant Pathol 57(5):792–808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Buzan B, Wæver O, de Wilde J (1998) Security: a new framework for analysis. Lynne Rienner, Boulder, UKGoogle Scholar
  4. Byrne R (2007) Horizon scanning rural crime—agroterrorism an emerging threat to UK agriculture? International Journal of Rural Crime 1:62–78Google Scholar
  5. Castonguay S (2005) Biorégionalisme, commerce agricole et propagation des insectes nuisibles et des maladies végétales : les conventions internationales phytopathologiques. Ruralia 16/17:137–152Google Scholar
  6. Cochrane H, Haslett D (2002) Deliberate release—what are the risks? NZ J For 47(2):16–17Google Scholar
  7. Connick WJ, Daigle DJ, Pepperman AB, Hebbar KP, Lumsden RD, Anderson TW, Sands DC (1998) Preparation of stable, granular formulations containing Fusarium oxysporum pathogenic to narcotic plants. Biol Control 13(2):79–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cupp OS, Walker DE, Hillison J (2004) Agroterrorism in the US: key security challenge for the 21st century. Biosecurity and Bioterrorism: Biodefense Strategy, Practice, and Science 2(2):97–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Desprez-Loustau ML, Robin C, Buée M, Courtecuisse R, Garbaye J, Suffert F et al (2007) The fungal dimension of biological invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 22(9):472–480PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. EPPO (2007) PM 5/3 (3) Decision-support scheme for quarantine pests. Accessed 23 January 2008
  11. Fletcher J, Bender C, Budowle B, Cobb WT, Gold SE, Ishimaru CA et al (2006) Plant pathogen forensics: capabilities, needs, and recommendations. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 70(2):450–471PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Foxwell J (2001) Current trends in agroterrorism (antilivestock, anticrop, and antisoil bioagricultural terrorism) and their potential impact on food security. Stud Confl Terror 24:107–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gullino ML, Fletcher J, Gamliel A, Stack J (2008) Crop biosecurity: assuring our global food supply. Springer, Dordrecht, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  14. Heather NW, Hallman GJ (2008) Agricultural warfare and bioterrorism using invasive species. In: Heather NW, Hallman GJ (eds) Pest management and phytosanitary trade barriers. CABI, Wallingford, UK, pp 1–13Google Scholar
  15. IPPC (2004) Pest risk analysis for quarantine pests, including analysis of environmental risks and living modified organisms. International Standard for Phytosanitary Measures no. 11. Accessed 23 January 2008
  16. Jelsma M (2001) Vicious circle: the chemical and biological war on drugs. Accessed 23 January 2008
  17. Junior P (2006) Terrorismo biológico. Veja 1961:60–63Google Scholar
  18. Khetarpal RK, Gupta K (2007) Plant biosecurity in India—status and strategy. Asian Biotechnology and Development Review 9(2):83–107Google Scholar
  19. Klinkowski M (1961) Blue mould (Peronospora tabacina Adam). Dtsch Landwirtsch 12:229–239Google Scholar
  20. Latxague E, Sache I, Pinon J, Andrivon D, Barbier M, Suffert F (2007) A methodology for assessing the risk posed by the deliberate and harmful use of plant pathogens in Europe. EPPO Bull 37(2):427–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Line RF, Griffith CS (2001) Research on the epidemiology of stem rust of wheat during the Cold War. In: Peterson PD (ed) Stem rust of wheat: from ancient enemy to modern foe. APS, St. Paul, MN, USA, pp 83–118Google Scholar
  22. Madden LV, Van Den Bosch F (2002) A population-dynamics approach to assess the threat of plant pathogens as biological weapons against annual crops. BioScience 52(1):65–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Madden LV, Wheelis M (2003) The threat of plant pathogens as weapons against US crops. Annu Rev Phytopathol 41:155–176PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Major E, Asch D, Cordey-Hayes M (2001) Foresight as a core competence. Futures 33(2):91–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Miller N, Estoup A, Toepfer S, Bourguet D, Lapchin L, Derridj S et al (2005) Multiple transatlantic introductions of the western corn rootworm. Science 310(5750):992PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nutter FW (2004) Crop biosecurity and safety of grain based foods. International Quality Grains Conference Proceedings, 19–22 July 2004, Indianapolis, USA.∼grainlab/IQGC1/proc/pdf/nutter.pdf. Accessed 23 January 2008
  27. O’Neill NR, Jennings JC, Bailey BA, Farr DF (2000) Dendryphion penicillatum and Pleospora papaveracea, destructive seedborne pathogens and potential mycoherbicides for Papaver somniferum. Phytopathology 90(7):691–698PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pasquali M (2006) Biosecurity research and agroterrorism: are there ethical issues at stake? In: Kaiser M, Lien ME (eds) Ethics and the politics of food. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp 203–206Google Scholar
  29. Ploetz RC (2008) Assessing threats that are posed by destructive banana pathogens. Acta Horticulturae (in press).
  30. Russell R, Paterson M (2006) Fungi and fungal toxins as weapons. Mycol Res 110(9):1003–1010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rogers P, Whitby S, Dando M (1999) Biological warfare against crops. Sci Am 280(6):70–75PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schaad NW, Frederick RD, Shaw J, Schneider WL, Hickson R, Petrillo MD (2003) Advances in molecular-based diagnostics in meeting crop biosecurity and phytosanitary issues. Annu Rev Phytopathol 41:305–324PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schaad NW, Abrams J, Madden LV, Frederick RD, Luster DG, Damsteegt VD et al (2006) An assessment model for rating high-threat crop pathogens. Phytopathology 96(6):616–621PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schrader G, Unger JG (2003) Plant quarantine as a measure against invasive alien species: the framework of the International Plant Protection Convention and the plant health regulations in the European Union. Biological Invasions 5(4):357–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schwägerl C (2005) La recherché sur le bioterrorisme ne mérite pas tant d’argent. Courrier International 752:56Google Scholar
  36. Stack J, Cardwell K, Hammerschmidt R, Byrne J, Loria R, Snover-Clift K et al (2006) The National Plant Diagnostic Network. Plant Dis 90(2):128–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Suffert F (2003) L’utilisation volontaire d’agents phytopathogènes contre les cultures. L’agroterrorisme et ses conséquences sur notre approche de la lutte contre les maladies des plantes. Phytoma 563:8–12Google Scholar
  38. Suffert F, Barbier M, Sache I, Latxague E (2008) Biosécurité des cultures et agroterrorisme. Une menace, des questions scientifiques et une opportunité : réactiver un dispositif d’épidémiovigilance. Le Courrier de l’environnement de l’INRA 56:67–86Google Scholar
  39. Turvey CG, Mafoua E, Schilling B, Onyango B (2003) Economics, hysteresis and agroterrorism. Canadian Agricultural Economics Society Annual Meeting, July 27–30, 2003, Montreal, Canada. Accessed 23 January 2008
  40. Waage JK, Mumford JD (2007) Agricultural biosecurity. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 363:863–876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wheelis M, Casagrande R, Madden LV (2002) Biological attack on agriculture: low-tech, high-impact bioterrorism. Bioscience 52(7):569–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Whitby S (2002) Biological warfare against crops. Palgrave, Basingstoke, UKGoogle Scholar
  43. WTO (1995) The WTO agreement on the application of sanitary and phytosanitary measures. SPS Agreement. Accessed 23 January 2008
  44. Young JM, Allen C, Coutinho T, Denny T, Elphinstone J, Fegan M et al (2008) Plant-pathogenic bacteria as biological weapons—real threats? Phytopathology 98(10):1060–1065PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zilinskas RA (1999) Cuban allegations of biological warfare by the United States: assessing the evidence. CRC Crit Rev Microbiol 25(3):173–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. & International Society for Plant Pathology 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frédéric Suffert
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Émilie Latxague
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
  • Ivan Sache
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.INRA, UMR1290 BIOGER-CPPBiologie et Gestion des Risques en Agriculture–Champignons Pathogènes des PlantesThiverval-GrignonFrance
  2. 2.AgroParisTechUMR1290 BIOGER-CPPThiverval-GrignonFrance
  3. 3.INRA, UMR1099 BiO3PBiologie des Organismes et des Populations appliquée à la Protection des PlantesLe RheuFrance
  4. 4.Agrocampus RennesUMR1099 BiO3PLe RheuFrance
  5. 5.INRA, UAR1241 Prospective147 rue de l’UniversitéParisFrance

Personalised recommendations