The politics of plants
Food security is not a new concern, but has taken on new dimensions in recent years. Here we position food security in a broader context relating to the use and management of global biomass resources, and specifically the push to develop a ‘bio-based economy’. We note a growing focus on plants as a source of innovative solutions to complex problems including food security, energy security, climate change and global environmental health. However, we also note that plants are a renewable but finite resource, and propose that renewed enthusiasm for plants is resulting in an increasingly complicated ‘politics of plants,’ as competition for limited land and biomass resources intensifies—the clash between food security and energy security over biofuels being an obvious example. Plants are a common thread across many policy domains including agriculture, energy, environment, health, and industry, and as such we suggest that they might provide a focal point for joined-up thinking and governance. We identify this broader picture as an important backdrop for discussions regarding food security, and from our proposed framework develop a number of recommendations for further investigation.
KeywordsBioeconomy Biofuels Biotechnology Food security Plant science Research policy
This position paper has been developed through a series of interdisciplinary meetings hosted by the ESRC Genomics Policy and Research Forum between November 2006 and June 2008. We thank all those who have participated in these meetings and discussions, and gratefully acknowledge funding from the UK Economic and Social Research Council.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Anon (2007a) The end of cheap food. The Economist 385:11–12Google Scholar
- Anon (2007b) Cheap food no more. The Economist 385:83–85Google Scholar
- Defra (2006) Food security in the UK: An evidence and analysis paper; https://statistics.defra.gov.uk/esg/reports/foodsecurity/foodsecurity.pdf. Accessed 3 October 2008.
- European Commission (2005) New perspectives on the knowledge-based bio-economy. Conference Report. http://ec.europa.eu/research/conferences/2005/kbb/pdf/kbbe_conferencereport.pdf. Accessed 3 October 2008.
- Fischer F, Black M, eds (1995) Greening environmental policy: The politics of a sustainable future. St. Martin’s, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Food and Agriculture Organization (2006) The state of food insecurity in the world 2006. Report. ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/009/a0750e/a0750e00.pdf. Accessed 16 October 2008.Google Scholar
- Frow EK (2009) A Forum for ‘doing society and genomics’. EMBO Reports (in press)Google Scholar
- International Energy Agency (2004) Biofuels for transport: An international perspective. Report. http://www.iea.org/textbase/nppdf/free/2004/biofuels2004.pdf. Accessed 16 October 2008.
- OECD (2006) The bioeconomy to 2030: Designing a policy agenda. Scoping paper, OECD International Futures Programme. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/48/1/36887128.pdf. Accessed 3 October 2008.
- Schmidhuber J (2007) Biofuels: an emerging threat to Europe’s food security? Impact of an increased biomass use on agricultural markets, prices and food security: a longer-term perspective. Notre Europe Policy Paper. http://www.notre-europe.eu/uploads/tx_publication/Policypaper-Schmidhuber-EN.pdf. Accessed 16 October 2008.
- United States Department of Agriculture (2007) Acreage report, 29 June 2007. http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/nass/Acre//2000s/2007/Acre-06-29-2007.pdf. Accessed 3 October 2008.
- von Braun J (2007a) The world food situation: New driving forces and required actions. Food Policy Report, International Food Policy Research Institute. http://www.ifpri.org/pubs/fpr/pr18.pdf. Accessed 3 October 2008.
- von Braun J (2007b) Responding to the world food crisis: Getting on the right track. 2007–2008 Annual Report Essay, International Food Policy Research Institute. http://www.ifpri.org/pubs/books/ar2007/ar07essay01.pdf. Accessed 3 October 2008.
- World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar