Food Security

, Volume 1, Issue 1, pp 17–23 | Cite as

The politics of plants

  • Emma Frow
  • David Ingram
  • Wayne Powell
  • Deryck Steer
  • Johannes Vogel
  • Steven Yearley
Original paper


Food security is not a new concern, but has taken on new dimensions in recent years. Here we position food security in a broader context relating to the use and management of global biomass resources, and specifically the push to develop a ‘bio-based economy’. We note a growing focus on plants as a source of innovative solutions to complex problems including food security, energy security, climate change and global environmental health. However, we also note that plants are a renewable but finite resource, and propose that renewed enthusiasm for plants is resulting in an increasingly complicated ‘politics of plants,’ as competition for limited land and biomass resources intensifies—the clash between food security and energy security over biofuels being an obvious example. Plants are a common thread across many policy domains including agriculture, energy, environment, health, and industry, and as such we suggest that they might provide a focal point for joined-up thinking and governance. We identify this broader picture as an important backdrop for discussions regarding food security, and from our proposed framework develop a number of recommendations for further investigation.


Bioeconomy Biofuels Biotechnology Food security Plant science Research policy 



This position paper has been developed through a series of interdisciplinary meetings hosted by the ESRC Genomics Policy and Research Forum between November 2006 and June 2008. We thank all those who have participated in these meetings and discussions, and gratefully acknowledge funding from the UK Economic and Social Research Council.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. Anon (2007a) The end of cheap food. The Economist 385:11–12Google Scholar
  2. Anon (2007b) Cheap food no more. The Economist 385:83–85Google Scholar
  3. Briggs SP (1998) Plant genomics: more than food for thought. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:1986–1988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Defra (2006) Food security in the UK: An evidence and analysis paper; Accessed 3 October 2008.
  5. European Commission (2005) New perspectives on the knowledge-based bio-economy. Conference Report. Accessed 3 October 2008.
  6. European Plant Science Organization (2005) European plant science: a field of opportunities. J Exp Bot 56(417):1699–1709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fargione J, Hill J, Tilman D, Polasky S, Hawthorne P (2008) Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. Science 319:1235–1238PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fischer F, Black M, eds (1995) Greening environmental policy: The politics of a sustainable future. St. Martin’s, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Food and Agriculture Organization (2006) The state of food insecurity in the world 2006. Report. Accessed 16 October 2008.Google Scholar
  10. Frow EK (2009) A Forum for ‘doing society and genomics’. EMBO Reports (in press)Google Scholar
  11. Huang J, Pray C, Rozelle S (2002) Enhancing crops to feed the poor. Nature 418:678–684PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. International Energy Agency (2004) Biofuels for transport: An international perspective. Report. Accessed 16 October 2008.
  13. Morris CE, Sands DC (2006) The breeder’s dilemma—yield or nutrition? Nat Biotechnol 24(9):1078–1080PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. OECD (2006) The bioeconomy to 2030: Designing a policy agenda. Scoping paper, OECD International Futures Programme. Accessed 3 October 2008.
  15. Rubin EM (2008) Genomics of cellulosic biofuels. Nature 454:841–845PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Russo G (2006) Bio bonanza. Nature Jobs 444:648–649. doi: 10.1038/nj7119-648a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Schmidhuber J (2007) Biofuels: an emerging threat to Europe’s food security? Impact of an increased biomass use on agricultural markets, prices and food security: a longer-term perspective. Notre Europe Policy Paper. Accessed 16 October 2008.
  18. Searchinger T, Heimlich R, Houghton RA, Dong F, Elobeid A, Fabiosa J, Tokgoz S, Hayes D, Yu T-H (2008) Use of U.S. croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science 319:1238–1240PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tilman D, Cassman KG, Matson PA, Naylor R, Polasky S (2002) Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 418:671–677PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. United States Department of Agriculture (2007) Acreage report, 29 June 2007. Accessed 3 October 2008.
  21. von Braun J (2007a) The world food situation: New driving forces and required actions. Food Policy Report, International Food Policy Research Institute. Accessed 3 October 2008.
  22. von Braun J (2007b) Responding to the world food crisis: Getting on the right track. 2007–2008 Annual Report Essay, International Food Policy Research Institute. Accessed 3 October 2008.
  23. Waltz E (2007) Will the current biofuels boom go bust? Nat Biotechnol 25:491–492PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. & International Society for Plant Pathology 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emma Frow
    • 1
  • David Ingram
    • 1
  • Wayne Powell
    • 2
  • Deryck Steer
    • 3
  • Johannes Vogel
    • 4
  • Steven Yearley
    • 1
  1. 1.ESRC Genomics Policy and Research ForumUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
  2. 2.Institute of Biological, Environmental and Rural SciencesAberystwyth UniversityCeredigionUK
  3. 3.Joint Nature Conservation CommitteePeterboroughUK
  4. 4.Natural History MuseumLondonUK

Personalised recommendations