CEAS Space Journal

, Volume 2, Issue 1–4, pp 51–58 | Cite as

Implementation of concurrent engineering to Phase B space system design

  • R. Findlay
  • A. Braukhane
  • D. Schubert
  • J. F. Pedersen
  • H. Müller
  • O. Essmann
Original Paper

Abstract

Concurrent engineering (CE) has been in use within the space industry since the mid-1990s for the development of robust, effective design solutions within a reduced period of time; to date, however, such applications have focussed on Phase 0/A feasibility studies, with the potential for application in later phases not yet demonstrated. Applications at the DLR Institute of Space Systems have addressed this gap with practical attempts made on three satellite projects. The use of Phase 0/A CE techniques, such as dedicated CE sessions, online trade-offs, and design iterations and consolidation, was taken and augmented with more novel practices such as online requirements engineering. Underlying these practices was a suite of tools coming from both external and internal sources. While it is noted that the traditional time and cost benefits expected from Phase 0/A use are less likely to be achieved for Phase B applications, the resulting solutions demonstrated an increased robustness and performance.

Keywords

Concurrent engineering System engineering: Phase B Small satellite Space mission design 

References

  1. 1.
    Smith, J.L.: Concurrent engineering in the Jet Propulsion Laboratory Project Design Center. In: Aerospace Manufacturing Technology Conference & Exposition, Long Beach, CA, 2–4 June 1998Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wall, S.D.: Use of concurrent design in space mission design. In: European Systems Engineering Conference, Munich, 13 Sep 2000Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    ESA/CDF: The ESA Concurrent Design Facility: concurrent engineering applied to space mission assessments. Noordwijk, http://esamultimedia.esa.int/docs/cdf/CDF_INFOPACK_2010.pdf (2010) (unpublished)
  4. 4.
    Miro, J.: Evolution of concurrent engineering in Phases B/C/D. In: 2nd Concurrent Engineering for Space Applications Workshop, Noordwijk, 19–20 Nov 2006Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Findlay, R., Spietz, P., Pedersen, J.F., and Gerené, S.: Concurrent engineering through the stages: AsteroidFinder (Phase B). In: 4th International Workshop on System & Concurrent Engineering for Space Applications, Lausanne, 13–15 Oct 2010Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Romberg, O., Braukhane, A., Schumann, H.: Status of the Concurrent Engineering Facility at DLR Bremen. In: DGLR Congress, Darmstadt, 23–25 Sep 2008Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bandecchi, M., Melton, B., Gardini, B., and Ongaro, F.: The ESA/ESTEC Concurrent Design Facility. In: 2nd European Systems Engineering Conference, Munich, 13–15 Sep 2000Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Biesbroek, R.: Sustainable satellite design activities in the ESTEC CDF. In: 4th International Workshop on System & Concurrent Engineering for Space Applications, Lausanne, 13–15 Oct 2010Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Astrium GmbH: Application of lean engineering principles to space mission development, contract ESTEC 22118/08/NL/AF. Prepared for the European Space Agency. Friedrichshafen, Germany (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© CEAS 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Findlay
    • 1
  • A. Braukhane
    • 1
  • D. Schubert
    • 1
  • J. F. Pedersen
    • 1
  • H. Müller
    • 1
  • O. Essmann
    • 1
  1. 1.DLR, Institute of Space SystemsBremenGermany

Personalised recommendations