Advertisement

A critical look into the discourse of educational neutrality: the crisis of democratic education in South Korea

  • Wonseok KimEmail author
Article

Abstract

This paper presents an analysis of the ways in which the concept of educational neutrality is used in South Korea. It focuses in particular on the discursive use of educational neutrality. Drawing on selected editorials published by the Donga-Ilbo, I explore complex interlinkages between linguistic and socio-political elements that constitute the discourse of educational neutrality. The findings are that the Korean use of educational neutrality is related not only to the war-political context in which critical engagement in social and political issues is treated as a subversive political act but also to the neoliberal restructuring of education. The paper concludes by outlining some implications for democratic education.

Keywords

South Korea Educational neutrality Discourse War-politics Neoliberalism Democratic education 

Abbreviations

APEC

Asia–Pacific Economic Cooperation

CDA

Critical discourse analysis

KCTU

Korean Confederation of Trade Unions

KTU

Korean Teachers and Educational Workers Union

MoE

Ministry of Education

NHRC

National Human Rights Commission

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper is a short version of Wonseok Kim, 2018, A Critical Investigation into The Discourse of Educational Neutrality in South Korea (19872017), Unpublished PhD Thesis, Department of Sociology, University of Warwick. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 19th International Conference on Education Research held in the Seoul National University on 17–19 October 2018.

References

  1. ABC. (2014, May 19). South Korean President Park Geun-Hye apologises over handling of Sewol ferry disaster, dismantles coastguard.Google Scholar
  2. Advisory Group on Citizenship. (1998). Education for Citizenship and the Teaching of Democracy in Schools. The Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.Google Scholar
  3. Althusser, L. (1971). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses, in Lenin and philosophy and other essays. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  4. Apple, M. W. (1993). Official knowledge: Democratic education in a conservative age. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Bae, S. Y. (2013). A Study on Educational Autonomy, Professionalism, and Political Neutrality in the Constitution of the Republic of Korea. Master’s Thesis, Department of Law, Yonsei University.Google Scholar
  6. Biesta, G. J. J. (2011). Learning democracy in school and society: Education, lifelong learning, and the politics of citizenship. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carr, W., & Hartnett, A. (1996). Education and the struggle for democracy. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Cho, H. Y. (2008). ‘The politics in the period of neo-liberal globalization’, and the neo-conservative government: The meaning prospect and tasks of the neo- conservative government. Journal of Korean Social Trends and Perspectives, 72, 146–181.Google Scholar
  9. Choi, J. H., & Han, D. S. (2012). the partisanship of media and the media intervention in political-power creation in Korea: Focusing on the analysis of the major newspapers’ editorial articles during the 13–17th Presidential Election Campaigns. Journal of Communication Science, 12(2), 534–571.Google Scholar
  10. CNN. (2014, April 17). South Korean shipwreck survivors: Passengers told ‘don’t move’ as ship sank.Google Scholar
  11. Counts, G. S. (1932). Dare the school build A. new social order?. New York: The John Day Company.Google Scholar
  12. Crittenden, P. J. (1980). Neutrality in education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 12(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Donga-Ilbo. (1990, February 14). Outdated Inertia of the Ministry of Education. Editorial.Google Scholar
  14. Donga-Ilbo. (1991, July 6). Education Autonomy and the Election of Education Committee, Editorial.Google Scholar
  15. Donga-Ilbo. (1996, November 16). The appointment of the Superintendent of Education is not good. Editorial.Google Scholar
  16. Donga-Ilbo. (1998, November 5). The legalization of the KTU that matters.Google Scholar
  17. Donga-Ilbo, (2004, October 7). Revising History Textbooks with Cold-blooded Decisiveness. Editorial.Google Scholar
  18. Donga-Ilbo (2005a, October 28). What is the Government’s Stance on the KTU’s Anti-APEC. Editorial.Google Scholar
  19. Donga-Ilbo (2005b, November 4). Do not take students as hostages. Editorial.Google Scholar
  20. Donga-Ilbo. (2008a, June 25). The Power of the Teacher. Editorial.Google Scholar
  21. Donga-Ilbo. (2008b, July 28). Top Educator Should Work for National Future not Union. Editorial.Google Scholar
  22. Donga-Ilbo. (2009a, March 13). Punish all the KTU teachers rejecting evaluation by students. Editorial.Google Scholar
  23. Donga-Ilbo. (2009b, March 13). The KTU’s absurd declaration. Editorial.Google Scholar
  24. Donga-Ilbo. (2010, February 5). The risk of KTU teachers joined the Democratic Labor Party. Editorial.Google Scholar
  25. Elliott, J. (1995). The values of the neutral teachers. In D. Bridges & P. Scrimshaw (Eds.), Values and authority in schools (pp. 103–120). London: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
  26. Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Malden: Polity.Google Scholar
  27. Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). Edinburgh: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
  28. Fairclough, N., & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as social interaction (pp. 258–284). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  29. Foucault, M. (1970). The order of discourse. In R. Young (Ed.), 1981, untying the text: A post-structuralist reader (pp. 51–78). Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  30. Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality 1: The will to knowledge. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  31. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  32. Freire, P. (1990). Interview: Paulo Freire, OMNI, 74–94. Retrieved February, 2048, from http://www.acervo.paulofreire.org:8080/jspui/bitstream/7891/2497/3/FPF_OPF_07_061.pdf.
  33. Galston, W. A. (1991). Liberal purposes: Goods, virtues, and diversity in the liberal state. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gardner, P. (1989). Neutrality in education. In R. E. Goodin & A. Reeve (Eds.), Liberal neutrality (pp. 106–129). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Giroux, H. A. (1983). Theory and resistance in education. Massachusetts: Bergin & Gravery Publishers.Google Scholar
  36. Giroux, H. A. (1988). Schooling for democracy: Critical pedagogy in the modern age. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Giroux, H. A. (2011). On critical pedagogy. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  38. Giroux, H. A. (2016). Authoritarian Politics in the Age of Civic Illiteracy, counterpunch. Retrieved May, 2017, from https://www.counterpunch.org/2016/04/15/authoritarian-politics-in-the-age-of-civic-illiteracy/accessed.
  39. Gramsci, A. (1971). Selection from the Prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
  40. Hall, S., Critcher, C., Jefferson, T., Clarke, J., & Roberts, B. (1978). Policing the crisis: Mugging, the state, and law and order (pp. 53–77). London: The Macmillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hooks, B. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. New York: Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
  42. Hwang, B. J. (2005). The national charter of education and Park Jung-hee’s ruling discourse. Critical Studies on Modern Korean History, 15, 129–175.Google Scholar
  43. Im, C. M. (2012). The Korean National Defense Student Defense Corps and the manufacturing of warrior-type students in its incipient days. International Journal of Korean History, 17(1), 141–169.Google Scholar
  44. Im, S. M. (2011). The argument presented by the conservative and progressive seen through controversy over the free Elementary School Meal Project: Centering on the framing of the newspaper media. Korean Journal of Politics, 45(2), 251–279.Google Scholar
  45. Izadi, F., & Saghaye-Biria, H. (2007). A discourse analysis of elite American Newspaper editorials: The case of Iran’s Nuclear Program. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 31(2), 140–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Jeon, J. H. (2014). A study on the ideological character of Korean conservativism in the 2000s: With a focus on the new right. Journal of Contemporary Politics, 7(1), 165–193.Google Scholar
  47. Ji, J. H. (2011). The origin and formation of neoliberalism in South Korea. Seoul: Chaeksesang.Google Scholar
  48. Ji, J. H. (2014). The neoliberalization of South Korea after the 1997 economic crisis: A cultural political economy of crisis discourse and management. In F. Panizza & G. Phillip (Eds.), Moments of truth: The politics of financial crises in comparative perspective (pp. 60–81). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  49. Jones, P. (1989). The ideal of the neutral state. In R. E. Goodin & A. Reeve (Eds.), Liberal neutrality (pp. 9–38). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  50. Kang, J. W. (2015). Disciplinary anti-communist education through the prism of colonial legacy and the Korean War. Journal of History Education, 56, 271–306.Google Scholar
  51. Kang, Y. W. (1984). Educational autonomy and political neutrality. Gosi-Law, 20, 257–258.Google Scholar
  52. Kelly, T. E. (1986). Discussing controversial issues: Four perspectives on the teacher’s role. Theory and Research in Social Education, 14(2), 113–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kelly, D. M., & Brandes, G. M. (2001). Shifting Out of “Neutral”: Begging Teachers’ Struggles with Teaching for Social Justice. Canadian Journal of Education, 26(4), 437–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kim, D. C. (2009). The unending Korean War: A social history. California: Tamal Vista Publications.Google Scholar
  55. Kim, D. C. (2011). War-politics in korea under the cold war and anticommunist order: State violence and limit of the rule of law. Economy and Society, 89, 333–366.Google Scholar
  56. Kim, D. C. (2013a). War-politics: South Korea’s political mechanism and state violence. Seoul: Gil.Google Scholar
  57. Kim, D. Y. (2014). Ideological polarization in education-related news articles of Korean conservative newspapers. Korean Journal of History of Education, 36(1), 183–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kim, G. S. (2007). 20 Years after the 1987 Great Workers Struggle and Future Tasks. Retrieved June, 2016, from http://klsi.org.
  59. Kim, M. J. (2013b). The matter of educational neutrality in the process of textbook certification: Focused on high-school law and politics textbooks. Law Education Studies, 8(3), 57–81.Google Scholar
  60. Kim, S. J. (2006). A study on neutrality and professionalism in developing the national curriculum: Centered on discussion on integration of social studies. History Education, 98, 1–33.Google Scholar
  61. Kim, S. E. (2010). The similarity and difference of korean conservative newspapers: An analysis of ideologiy in Chosun-Jungang-donga Dailies’ editorial. Media, Gender, & Culture, 15, 37–78.Google Scholar
  62. Kim, Y. J. (1987). A comparative awareness of the concept of political neutrality of education. Gosi-Law, 362, 330–332.Google Scholar
  63. Klosko, G. (2003). Reasonable rejection and neutrality of justification. In S. Wall & G. Klosko (Eds.), Perfectionism and neutrality (pp. 167–190). Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  64. Korea Audit Bureau of Certification. (2017). The daily newspapers’ net-paid circulation.Google Scholar
  65. Kwon, J. W. (2016). Politics is dirty? School is pure? Uri Education, 264, 50–57.Google Scholar
  66. Kyunghyang. (2014, September 17). Is wearing the yellow ribbon too political? Editorial.Google Scholar
  67. Laclau, E. (2014). The rhetoical foundations of society. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  68. Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  69. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1981). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  70. Lamore, C. (1987). Patterns of moral complexity. In E. Wall & G. Klosko (Eds.), (2003). Perfectionism and neutrality (pp. 47–60). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  71. Lazzarato, M. (2009). Neoliberalism in action: Inequality, insecurity and the reconstitution of the social. Theory, Culture & Society, 26(6), 109–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Lee, G. S. (2007). A history of Korean Education in the 20th Century. KyeongKi: JipmoonDang.Google Scholar
  73. Lee, D. H. (2016). Education and politics: Inside and outside of political neutrality. Seoul: EduFactory.Google Scholar
  74. McLaren, P. (2009). Critical pedagogy: A look at the major concepts. In A. Darder, M. Baltodano, & R. Torres (Eds.), The critical pedagogy reader (pp. 61–83). New York: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
  75. Ministry of Education (MoE). (2014a, September 16). A request for teachers’ proper behaviours and proper operation of special lesson.Google Scholar
  76. Ministry of Education (MoE). (2014b, September 18). An explanation of the prohibition of wearing yellow ribbons.Google Scholar
  77. Ministry of Education (MoE). (2018, December 13). The comprehensive plan to invigorate democratic citizenship education.Google Scholar
  78. Mouffe, C. (2005). The return of the political. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  79. National Human Rights Commission (NHRC). (2015, March 18). A case of the prohibition of wearing yellow ribbons with regards to the Sewol ferry.Google Scholar
  80. Oh, S. C. (2003). Park Jung-hee’s statist education and economic development. Critical Studies on Modern Korean History, 11, 53–80.Google Scholar
  81. Oktar, L. (2001). The ideological organization of representational processes in the presentation of us and them. Discourse & Society, 12(3), 313–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Pang, H. K. (2013). The 2008 Candlelight Protest in South Korea: Articulating the Paradox of Resistance in Neoliberal Globalization, PhD Thesis, Department of Communication, University of South Florida.Google Scholar
  83. Park, J. S. (2016). The implications of the 1987 June Uprising. History for Tomorrow, 63, 176–190.Google Scholar
  84. Presidential Commission on Education Reform. (1997). Education Reform for the 21st Century: To Ensure Leadership in the information and Globalization Era.Google Scholar
  85. Segye-Ilbo. (2009, June 29). The KTU Making Schools Political Battlefields. Editorial.Google Scholar
  86. Shin J. C. (1987). Political neutrality of education. Gosi-Law, 88(1), 286–288.Google Scholar
  87. Shin, J. W. (2008). The conceptual structure of ideologies of Korean Conservative Associations, 2000–2006. Economy & Society, 78, 163–193.Google Scholar
  88. Shor, I. (1992). Empowering education: Critical teaching for social change. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Shor, I., & Freire, P. (1987). A pedagogy for liberation: Dialogues on transforming education. Westport: Bergin & Garvery Publishers.Google Scholar
  90. Smyth, J. (2011). Critical pedagogy for social justice. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  91. Song, J. S. (1995). Philosophical implications of political neutrality of education. Hannam Journal of Educational Research, 3, 175–195.Google Scholar
  92. Sontag, S. (1989). Illness as metaphor and AIDS and its metaphors. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  93. Stenhouse, L. (1968). The humanities curriculum project. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 1(1), 26–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Stenhouse, L. (1971). The Humanities curriculum project: The Rationale. Theory into Practice, 10(3), 154–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Strike, K. A. (1988). Democracy, civic education and the problem of neutrality. Theory into Practice, 27(4), 256–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Sung, K. S. (2011). Does educational nuetrality exist (pp. 42–51). Spring: Uri Education.Google Scholar
  97. Temperman, J. (2010). State neutrality in public school education: An analysis of the interplay between the neutrality principle, the right to adequate education, children’s right to freedom of religion or belief, parental liberties, and the position of teachers. Human Rights Quarterly, 32(4), 865–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. van Dijk, T. A. (1992). Racism and argumentation: Race riot rhetoric in tabloid editorials. In F. H. van Eemeren, et al. (Eds.), Argumentation illuminated (pp. 243–257). Amsterdam: International Centre for the Study of Argumentation (SICSAT).Google Scholar
  99. van Dijk, T. A. (1998). News analysis: Case studies of International and National News in the Press. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
  100. van Dijk, T. A. (1999). Discourse analysis as ideology analysis. In C. Schäffner & A. L. Wenden (Eds.), Language and peace (pp. 17–33). Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  101. van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and context: A sociocognitive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Waldren, M. S. (2013). Why liberal neutralists should accept educational neutrality. Ethical Theory Moral Practice, 16(1), 71–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Weekly Kyunghyang. (2009, December 17). The current government thinks of unions as evils.Google Scholar
  105. Whitney, D. C. (2004). News media production: Individuals, Organizations, and institutions. In J. D. H. Downing, et al. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of media studies (pp. 393–410). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Wodak, R. (2009). The discourse of politics in action: Politics as usual. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2009). Methods of critical discourse analysis (2nd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  108. Won-seok Kim. (2018). A Critical Investigation into The Discourse of Educational Neutrality in South Korea (1987–2017). Unpublished PhD Thesis, Department of Sociology, University of Warwick.Google Scholar
  109. Zeichner, K. (1983). Alternative paradigms in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 34(3), 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Education Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.SungKongHoe UniversitySeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations