Asia Pacific Education Review

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 53–64 | Cite as

Chinese high school students’ perceptions of freedom of expression: implications for researching emerging civil liberties in global educational contexts

Article

Abstract

This study explored attitudes and perceptions of Chinese high school students regarding freedom of expression in their country. A survey capturing perceptions over various forms of free speech (e.g., student publication, dress code) was administered to a sample of 838, which included students from both urban and rural areas within Shaanxi Province in northwest China. A factor analysis and CFA model were administered to confirm survey validity and reliability. A factorial MANOVA was then used to explore differences across gender, grade, and region groups. The findings revealed students largely supported free speech rights but their responses varied to some degree by setting and student age. In general, urban students reported more positive attitudes about their school environment regarding expression and older participants were more likely to be supportive of free speech. All in all, findings suggest that free speech rights are important matters for adolescents in both modern and traditional settings in China. Implications for comparative research regarding civil liberties in diverse contexts are discussed.

Keywords

China education Student civil liberties Free speech rights Freedom of expression High schools 

References

  1. Archard, D. (2004). Children: Rights and childhood (2nd ed). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Bell, D. A. (2015). The China model: Political meritocracy and the limits of democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berger, D. L. (2008). Relational and intrinsic moral roots: A brief contrast of Confucian and Hindu concepts of duty. Dao, 7(2), 157–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bian, Y., & Logan, J. R. (1996). Market transition and the persistence of power: The changing stratification system in urban China. American Sociological Review, 61(5), 739–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Biegel, S. (2012). Education and the Law, 3rd ed. St. Paul: West.Google Scholar
  6. Bond, M. H. (2002). Reclaiming the individual from Hofstede’s ecological analysis—a 20 year odyssey: comment on Oyserman et al. (2002). Psychological Bulletin, 128, 73–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bond, M. H., & Hwang, K. (1986). The social psychology of Chinese people. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Cai, X., & Wu, P. (1999). A study of the modernity of social concept of younger students in China. Psychological Science (China), 22, 148–152.Google Scholar
  9. Chen, H., & Su, L. (2001). Child protection and development in China. International Society for the Study of Behavioral Development Newsletter, 2, 7–8.Google Scholar
  10. Cherney, I., & Perry, N. W. (1996). Children’s attitudes toward their rights. Monitoring Children’s Rights, 241–250.Google Scholar
  11. Claeskens, G., & Hjort, N. L. (2008), Model selection and model averaging, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd edn.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  13. Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 10(7), 1–9.Google Scholar
  14. Daniel, Phillip T.K. (1998). Violence and the public Schools: Student rights having been weighed in the balance an found wanting. Journal of law and education, 27, 573–614.Google Scholar
  15. Day, D., Peterson-Badali, M., & Ruck, M. D. (2006). The relationship between maternal attitudes toward children’s rights. Journal of Adolescence, 29, 193–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Declaration of the rights of man – 1789 (2008). The Avalon Project: Documents in Law, History, and Diplomacy. Retrieved from the Yale Law School at http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/rightsof.asp.
  17. Fang, N. (2015). China insights: China’s democracy path. London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS: Introducing statistical method (3rd edn.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  19. Gong, W., Li, Z. G., & Li, T. (2004). Marketing to china’s youth: A cultural transformation perspective. Business Horizons, 47(6), 41–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Greenhalgh, S., & Winckler, E. (2005). Governing China’s population: From leninist to neoliberal biopolitics (p. 160). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. He, B. (2006). Participatory and deliberative institutions in China. In The search for deliberative democracy in China (pp. 175–196). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Helwig, C. C. (1997). The role of agent and social context in judgments of freedom of speech and religion. Child Development, 68(3), 484–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Helwig, C. C. (2002). Canadian adolescents’ and young adults’ judgments of decision making procedures. Unpublished raw data.Google Scholar
  24. Helwig, C. C. (2006). The development of personal autonomy throughout cultures. Cognitive Development, 21(4), 458–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Helwig, C. C., Arnold, M. L., Tan, D., & Boyd, D. (2003). Chinese adolescents’ reasoning about democratic and authority-based decision making in peer, family, and school contexts. Child Development, 74(3), 783–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Helwig, C. C., Yang, S., Tan, D., Liu, C., & Shao, T. (2011). Urban and rural Chinese adolescents’ judgments and reasoning about personal and group jurisdiction. Child Development, 82, 701–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Howe, R. B., & Covell, K. (2005). Empowering children: Children’s rights education as a pathway to citizenship. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hwang, K. (2013). Educational modes of thinking in neo-confucianism: A traditional lens for rethinking modern education. Asia Pacific Education Review, 14(2), 243–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. James, A., & James, A. L. (2004). Constructing childhood: Theory, policy, and social practice. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. James, A., & Prout, A. (1990). Constructing and reconstructing childhood. London: Falmer.Google Scholar
  31. James, A., & Prout, A. (1997a). Constructing and reconstructing childhood. Contemporary issues in the sociological study of childhood (2nd edn.). London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  32. Jenco, L. (2010). “Rule by Man” and “Rule by Law” in early Republican China: Contributions to a theoretical debate. The Journal of Asian Studies, 69(1), 181–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Johnson, D. (1992). Cultural and regional pluralism in the drafting of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. In FREEMAN M. & VEERMAN P. (Eds.), The Ideologies of children’s rights. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  34. Johnson, E. M. (2014). Examining blasphemy: International law, national security and the US foreign policy regarding free speech. AFL Rev, 71, 25.Google Scholar
  35. King, M. (2007). The sociology of childhood as scientific communication observations from a social systems perspective. Childhood, 14(2), 193–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. King, G., Pan, J., & Roberts, M. E. (2013). How censorship in China allows government criticism but silences collective expression. American Political Science Review, 107(02), 326–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kipnis, A. (2006). Suzhi: A keyword approach. The China Quarterly, 186, 295–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd edn.). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  39. Krotoszynski, R.J. (2015). Free speech paternalism and free speech exceptionalism: Pervasive distrust of government and the contemporary First Amendment. Ohio State Law Journal, 76, 659–690Google Scholar
  40. Lahat, A., Helwig, C. C., Yang, S., Tan, D., & Liu, C. (2009). Mainland Chinese adolescents’ judgments and reasoning about self-determination and nurturance rights. Social Development, 18(3), 690–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lau, S. (1992). Collectivism’s individualism: Value preference, personal control, and the desire for freedom among Chinese in mainland China, Hong Kong, and Singapore. Personality and Individual Difference, 13(3), 361–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lin, C. Y. C., & Fu, V. R. (1990). A comparison of child rearing practices among Chinese, immigrant Chinese, and Caucasian-American parents. Child Development, 61, 429–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mayall, B. (2000). The sociology of childhood in relation to children’s rights. The International Journal of Children s Rights, 8(3), 243–259.Google Scholar
  44. Melton, G. (1980). Children’s concepts of their rights. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 9, 186–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mooney, P., Maudsley, C., & Hatherly, G. (2005). Xi’an, Shaanxi and the terracotta army. Hong Kong: Odyssey.Google Scholar
  46. Naftali, O. (2009). Empowering the child: Children’s rights, citizenship and the state in contemporary China. The China Journal, 79–103.Google Scholar
  47. Naftali, O. (2014). Children, rights and modernity in China: Raising self-governing citizens, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Neff, K. D., & Helwig, C. C. (2002). A constructivist approach to understanding the development of reasoning about rights and authority within cultural contexts. Cognitive Development, 17, 1429–1450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Nucci, L., Camino, C., & Sapiro, C. M. (1996). Social class effects on northeastern brazilian children’s conceptions of areas of personal choice and social regulation. Child Development, 67(3), 1223–1242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Nucci, L. P. (2001). Education in the moral domain Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Nussbaum, M. (2000a). Women and human development: The capabilities approach. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pallant, J. (2007), SPSS Survival Manual (3rd Ed.). Crows West: New South Wales.Google Scholar
  53. Peerenboom, R. (2002). China’s long march toward rule of law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Peterson-Badali, M., Morine, S., & Ruck, M. D. (2008). Studying children`s perspective on self-determination and nurturance rights: issues and challenges. Journal of Social Issues, 64, 749–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Peterson-Badali, M., Morine, S. L., Ruck, M. D., & Slonim, N. (2004). Predictors of maternal and early adolescent attitudes toward children’s nurturance and self-determination rights. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 24, 159–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ross, H., & Ran, Z. (2006). Guest Editors’ introduction-the limits and possibilities of responsive justice. Chinese Education and Society, 39(4), 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ruck, M. D., Abramovitch, R., & Keating, D. P. (1998). Children and adolescents’ understanding of rights: Balancing nurturance and self-determination. Child Development, 64, 404–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Shaanxi Statistical Yearbook (2013). National Bureau of Statistics of China. Retrieved from http://www.shaanxitj.gov.cn/upload/2013/indexce.htm.
  59. Shen, H. (2000). On quality: Contemplating the concept of self and the subject (In Chinese). Beijing: Huayi Press.Google Scholar
  60. Shirk, S. L. (2011). Changing media, changing China. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Smetana, J. G. (2002). Culture, autonomy, and personal jurisdiction in adolescent-parent relationships. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 29, 52–89.Google Scholar
  62. Smetana, J. G. (2006). Social-cognitive domain theory: Consistencies and variations in children’s moral and social judgments. Handbook of moral development (pp. 119–153). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, PublishersGoogle Scholar
  63. Student’s speech against education system causes sensation, ChinaDaily, 2012-04-15, http://usa.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2012-04/15/content_15051967.htm.
  64. Sturgeon, L.R. (2014). Chinas homegrown free-speech tradition: Imperial past and modern present and post-modern future? Retrieved from: http://works.bepress.com/roy_sturgeon/doctype.html.
  65. Such, E., & Walker, R. (2005). Young citizens or policy objects? children in the ‘rights and responsibilities’ debate. Journal of Social Policy, 34(01), 39–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Symonides, J. (2000). Human rights: Concepts and standards. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  67. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th edn.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  68. Tang, M., Woods, D., & Zhao, J. (2009). The attitudes of the Chinese middle class towards democracy. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 14(1), 81–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Triandis, H. C. (1989). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96, 506–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tsai, K. S. (2007). Capitalism without democracy: The private sector in contemporary China. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Turiel, E. (1983). The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Turiel, E. (1998). The development of morality. In W. Damon (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development (5th ed) (pp. 863–932). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  73. Turiel, E. (2002). The culture of morality: Social development, context, and conflict. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Ullman, J. B. (2001). Structural equation modeling. In B. G. Tabachnick &amp, L. S. Fidell (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th edn.; pp. 653–771). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  75. Wainryb, C. (2005). Moral development in culture: Diversity, tolerance, and justice. In M. Killen & J. Smetana (Eds.), Handbook of moral development (pp. 211–240). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.Google Scholar
  76. Wu, D. Y. H. (1996). Parental control: Psychocultural interpretations of Chinese patterns of socialization. In S. Lau (Ed.), Growing up the Chinese way: Chinese child and adolescent development (pp. 1–28). Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Wu, W., Chang, Y., & Pan, H. (2016). Does China’s middle class prefer (liberal) democracy? Democratization, 1–20.Google Scholar
  78. Xu, X., & Peng, L. (2001). Reflection on parents’ educational beliefs in the new century. Theory and Practice of Education, 21, 62–63.Google Scholar
  79. Yang, M., & Chau, A. W. L. (2011). Social involvement and development as a response to the campus student culture. Asia Pacific Education Review, 12(3), 393–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Yau, J., & Smetana, J. G. (2003b). Adolescent–parent conflict in Hong Kong and Shenzhen: A comparison of youth in two cultural contexts. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 27, 201–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Yin, H. (2013). Societal culture and teachers’ responses to curriculum reform: Experiences from china. Asia Pacific Education Review, 14(3), 391–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Zhang, X., Zheng, X., & Wang, L. (2003). Comparative research on individual modernity of adolescents between town and countryside in China. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 6, 61–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Zhang, Y. (2016). China and liberal hierarchies in global international society: Power and negotiation for normative change. International Affairs, 92(4), 795–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Zhao, D., & Barakat, B. (2015). The increasingly long road to school in rural China: The impacts of education network consolidation on broadly defined schooling distance in Xinfeng county of rural China. Asia Pacific Education Review, 16(3), 413–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Zhu, C., Devos, G., & Li, Y. (2011). Teacher perceptions of school culture and their organizational commitment and well-being in a chinese school. Asia Pacific Education Review, 12(2), 319–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Zick, T. (2010). Territoriality and the First Amendment: Free speech at—and beyond—our borders. Notre Dame Law Review, 85, 1543–1628.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Education Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Texas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations