Asia Pacific Education Review

, Volume 12, Issue 3, pp 475–483 | Cite as

Quality assurance in Australian higher education: historical and future development



Higher education policies related to quality assurance are implemented in many countries. The purposes of such policies are to ensure the provision for high-quality education, university accountability and transparency in the use of public funding and meeting the needs of the diverse stakeholders. The current Australian Higher Education Quality Assurance Framework was implemented in the year 2000. It can be described that the framework has been enjoyed by universities, academics and other providers in Australia. This paper provides a brief history of quality assurance, its evolution in higher education in Australia and current changes and trends in quality assurance in other developed countries. It then provides an analysis of the success and deficiencies of the current framework used in Australia and suggestions which may be helpful in the development of the new framework. The analysis includes the thoughts of the three authors based on their experience in managing quality and reviews in seven different institutions and the views of more than 40 participants who are staff members from 25 Australian universities.


Quality assurance framework Higher education 


  1. Adams, R. (2008). Self–review for higher education institutions, Australian Universities Quality Agency (AUQA). Australia: Melbourne.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, D., Johnson, R., & Milligan, B. (2000). Quality assurance and accreditation in Australian higher education: An assessment of Australian and international practice, Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs (DETYA). Australia: Canberra.Google Scholar
  3. Australian Education International. (2006). International student survey. Retrieved on November 25, 2009 from
  4. Brennan, J., & Shah, T. (2000). Managing quality in higher education: An international perspective on institutional assessment and change. Philadelphia, USA: OECD and Open University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Commonwealth of Australia. (2000a). The Australian higher education quality assurance framework. Retrieved on November 20, 2009 from
  6. Commonwealth of Australia. (2000b). Quality assurance and accreditation in australian higher education: A national seminar on future arrangements. Retrieved on November 21, 2009 from
  7. Commonwealth of Australia. (2008). Selected higher education statistics. Retrieved on November 25, 2009 from
  8. Dill, D. (2000). Capacity building as an instrument of institutional reform: Improving the quality of tertiary education through academic audits in the UK, New Zealand, Sweden and Hong King. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, Research and Practice, 2, 211–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ewan, C. (2009). Learning and teaching in Australian universities: A thematic analysis of cycle 1 AUQA audits. Sydney, Australia: Australian Learning and Teaching Council.Google Scholar
  10. Grant, H., & Meek, V. L. (2000). Repositioning quality assurance and accreditation in Australia higher education. Canberra, Australia: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs (DETYA).Google Scholar
  11. Gunn, R., & Hill, S. (2008). The impact of league tables on university application rates. Higher Education Quarterly, 62(3), 273–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kristensen, B. (1997). The impact of quality monitoring on institutions: A Danish experience at the Copenhagen Business School. Quality in Higher Education, 3(1), 87–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ramsden, P. (2009). A better student experience: Speech at the group student experience conference, 19 November 2009, United Kingdom. Retrieved on December 16, 2009 from
  14. Scott, G., & Hawke, I. (2003). Using an external quality audit as lever for institutional change. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(3), 323–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Shah, M., & Brown, G. (2009). The rise of private higher education in Australia: Maintaining quality outcomes and future challenges: In Proceedings of the Australian Universities Quality Forum (AUQF). Alice Springs:.AUQA (143–150).Google Scholar
  16. Shah, M., & Grebennikov, L. (2008). External quality audit as an opportunity for institutional change and improvement. In Proceedings of the Australian Universities Quality Forum (AUQF). Canberra: AUQA (98–103).Google Scholar
  17. Shah, M., & Skaines, I. (2008). Strategic planning and reviews in a university: Is it a myth or reality? In Proceedings of the Australian Universities Quality Forum (AUQF). Canberra: AUQA (104–113).Google Scholar
  18. Shah, M., & Stanford, S. (2009). Developing an effective tracking and improvement system for learning and teaching: Achievements and future challenges in maintaining academic standards. In Proceedings of the Australian Association for Institutional Research (AAIR). Adelaide.Google Scholar
  19. Shah, M., & Treloar, K. (2007). External quality audit outcomes in Australia & international and possible benchmarking opportunities. In Proceedings of the Australian Universities Quality Forum (AUQF). Tasmania: AUQA (143–151).Google Scholar
  20. Universities Australia. (2009). University funding and expenditure. Retrieved on November 25, 2009 from
  21. Wickham, S., Coetzee, G., Jones, B., & Metcalfe, A. (2007). HEQC evaluative study of institutional audits 2006. Pretoria: Higher Education Quality Council.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Education Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Manager, Quality and ImprovementUniversity of CanberraCanberraAustralia
  2. 2.University of Western AustraliaPerthAustralia
  3. 3.Southern Cross UniversityLismoreAustralia

Personalised recommendations