Fisheries Science

, Volume 86, Issue 1, pp 35–41 | Cite as

Age estimation by DNA methylation in the Antarctic minke whale

  • Atsushi Tanabe
  • Risa Shimizu
  • Yui Osawa
  • Machi Suzuki
  • Saki Ito
  • Mutsuo Goto
  • Luis A. Pastene
  • Yoshihiro Fujise
  • Hiroeki SaharaEmail author
Original Article Biology


Determining the age of wild animals is very important in the study of their ecology and for stock assessment and management. In baleen whales, the most common approach for age estimation is by counting the growth layers appearing in earplugs. Although this method is actually considered the most reliable tool for age determination in whales, it cannot be performed on free-ranging individuals. A recent study reported that the CpG methylation frequency of specific genes (GRIA2 and CDKN2A) correlated significantly with age in humpback whales. The implication of this result is that DNA analysis based on biopsy samples is a potentially useful approach for age estimation in free-ranging whales. In this study, we investigated whether the age-related CpG sites in the GRIA2 and CDKN2A genes found in humpback whales are also found in Antarctic minke whales. Results showed that the CpG methylation frequency of the GRIA2 gene correlated positively with age in Antarctic minke whales, although the CpG sites were different from those in humpback whales. These findings suggest that age-related CpGs (AR-CpGs) can differ even between closely related species, and that it is necessary to find species-specific AR-CpGs for estimating animal age from DNA methylation patterns.


Whale Epigenetics DNA methylation Age-related CpG 



  1. Gabriele CM, Lockyer C, Straley JM, Jurasz CM, Kato H (2010) Sighting history of a naturally marked humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) suggests ear plug growth layer groups are deposited annually. Mar Mammal Sci 26:443–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Gonzalez-Zulueta M, Bender CM, Yang AS, Nguyen T, Beart RW, Van Tornout JM et al (1995) Methylation of the 5' CpG island of the p16/CDKN2 tumor suppressor gene in normal and transformed human tissues correlates with gene silencing. Cancer Res 55(20):4531–4535PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Grönniger E, Weber B, Heil O, Peters N, Stäb F, Wenck H, Korn B, Winnefeld M, Lyko F (2010) Aging and chronic sun exposure cause distinct epigenetic changes in human skin. PLoS Genet 6:e1000971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hannum G, Guinney J, Zhao L, Zhang L, Hughes G, Sadda S, Klotzle B, Bibikova M, Fan JB, Gao Y, Deconde R, Chen M, Rajapakse I, Friend S, Ideker T, Zhang K (2013) Genome-wide methylation profiles reveal quantitative views of human aging rates. Mol Cell 49:359–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Horvath S (2013) DNA methylation age of human tissues and cell types. Genome Biol 14:R115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jarman SN, Polanowski AM, Faux CE, Robbins J, De Paoli-Iseppi R, Bravington M, Deagle BE (2015) Molecular biomarkers for chronological age in animal ecology. Mol Ecol 24(19):4826–4847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jones MJ, Goodman SJ, Kobor MS (2015) DNA methylation and healthy human aging. Aging Cell 14(6):924–932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Koch CM, Wagner W (2011) Epigenetic-aging-signature to determine age in different tissues. Aging (Albany NY) 3:1018–1027. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Koch CM, Suschek CV, Lin Q, Bork S, Goergens M, Joussen S, Pallua N, Ho AD, Zenke M, Wagner W (2011) Specific age-associated DNA methylation changes in human dermal fibroblasts. PLoS One 6(2):e16679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Krugers HJ, Hoogenraad CC, Groc L (2010) Stress hormones and AMPA receptor trafficking in synaptic plasticity and memory. Nat Rev Neurosci 11:675–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lockyer C (1984) Age determination by means of the earplug in baleen whales. Rep Int Whal Comm 34:692–696Google Scholar
  12. Maegawa S, Hinkal G, Kim HS, Shen L, Zhang L, Zhang J et al (2010) Widespread and tissue specific age-related DNA methylation changes in mice. Genome Res 20(3):332–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mead AN, Stephens DN (2003) Involvement of AMPA receptor GluR2 subunits in stimulus-reward learning: evidence from glutamate receptor gria2 knock-out mice. J Neurosci 23:9500–9507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Polanowski AM, Robbins J, Chandler D, Jarman SN (2014) Epi-genetic estimation of age in humpback whales. Mol Ecol Resour 14:976–987PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Serrano M, Hannon GJ, Beach D (1993) A new regulatory motif in cell-cycle control causing specific inhibition of cyclin D/CDK4. Nature 366(6456):704–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Smeds J, Berggren P, Ma X, Xu Z, Hemminki K, Kumar R (2002) Genetic status of cell cycle regulators in squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus: the CDKN2A (p16(INK4a) and p14(ARF)) and p53 genes are major targets for inactivation. Carcinogenesis 23(4):645–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Su AI, Wiltshire T, Batalov S, Lapp H, Ching KA, Block D, Zhang J, Soden R, Hayakawa M, Kreiman G, Cooke MP, Walker JR, Hogenesch JB (2004) A gene atlas of the mouse and human protein-encoding transcriptomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:6062–6067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Thompson MJ, vonHoldt B, Horvath S, Pellegrini M (2017) An epigenetic aging clock for dogs and wolves. Aging (Albany NY) 9(3):1055–1068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Zhang Y, Xiong Y (2001) Control of p53 ubiquitination and nuclear export by MDM2 and ARF. Cell Growth Differ 12(4):175–186PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japanese Society of Fisheries Science 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of BiologyAzabu University School of Veterinary MedicineSagamiharaJapan
  2. 2.Institute of Cetacean ResearchTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations