Advertisement

Fisheries Science

, Volume 85, Issue 1, pp 147–155 | Cite as

Evaluation of a single-cell protein as a dietary fish meal substitute for whiteleg shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei

  • Ali Hamidoghli
  • Hyeonho Yun
  • Seonghun Won
  • SuKyung Kim
  • Nathaniel W. Farris
  • Sungchul C. Bai
Original Article Aquaculture

Abstract

A 9-week feeding trial was conducted to evaluate the optimum dietary level of PROTIDE (PRO), a single-cell protein obtained from the bacteria Corynebacterium ammoniagenes, as a substitute for fish meal in the diet of whiteleg shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei. Five diets were formulated that replaced fish meal at 0% (PRO0), 10% (PRO2), 20% (PRO4), 30% (PRO6) and 40% (PRO8). Fifty shrimp averaging 0.15 ± 0.02 g (mean ± SD) body weight were randomly distributed between 20 experimental tanks and fed one of the five experimental diets. At the end of the experiment, final weight, weight gain, specific growth rate and feed conversion ratio of shrimp fed PRO0 and PRO2 diets were significantly improved compared to those fed PRO6 and PRO8 diets (P < 0.05). The proximate composition of muscle and the whole body indicated an increase in crude protein content with an increase in dietary PRO level. These results suggest that, for whiteleg shrimp, the optimum dietary level of PRO when used as a replacement for fish meal should be greater than 10% (PRO2) but less than 20% (PRO4) without any additional dietary amino acid supplementation.

Keywords

Growth performance Crude protein content Optimal diet Feed production Penaeid 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Environmental-friendly Aquaculture Technology using Biofloc project (R20160218) of the National Institute of Fisheries Science, the Animal Biosciences Research Institute, CJ CheilJedang and the Feeds and Foods Nutrition Research Center, Pukyong National University.

References

  1. AOAC (2005) Official methods of analysis, 18th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, GaithersburgGoogle Scholar
  2. Argue BJ, Arce SM, Lotz JM, Moss SM (2002) Selective breeding of Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) for growth and resistance to Taura syndrome virus. Aquaculture 204:447–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bai SC, Kim KW (1997) Effects of dietary animal protein sources on growth and body composition in Korean rockfish, Sebastes schlegeli. J Aquac 10:77–85 (In Korean with English abstract) Google Scholar
  4. Beck H, Gropp J, Koops H, Tiews K (1979) Single cell protein in trout diets. In: Halver JE, Tiews K (eds) Finfish nutrition and fish feed technology, 2nd edn. Heenemann, Berlin, pp 269–280Google Scholar
  5. Bergstrom E (1979) Experiments on the use of single cell proteins in Atlantic salmon diets. In: Halver JF, Tiews K (eds) Finfish nutrition and fish feed technology. Heenemann, Berlin, pp 105–116Google Scholar
  6. Biswas G, Korenaga H, Nagamine R, Kono T, Shimokawa H, Itami T, Sakai M (2012) Immune stimulant effects of a nucleotide-rich baker’s yeast extract in the kuruma shrimp, Marsupenaeus japonicus. Aquaculture 366:40–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Choi SM, Wang XJ, Park GJ, Lim SR, Kim KW, Bai SC, Shin IS (2004) Dietary dehulled soybean meal as a replacement for fish meal in fingerling and growing olive flounder, Paralichthys olivaceus. Aquac Res 35:410–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Christensen H, Larsen L, Frøkiær H (2003) The oral immunogenicity of BioProtein, a bacterial single-cell protein, is affected by its particulate nature. Br J Nutr 90:169–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chumpol S, Kantachote D, Nitoda T, Kanzaki H (2018) Administration of purple nonsulfur bacteria as single cell protein by mixing with shrimp feed to enhance growth, immune response and survival in white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) cultivation. Aquaculture 489:85–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dabrowski K, Hassard S, Quinn J, Pitcher TJ, Flinn AM (1980) Effect of Geotrichum candidum protein substitution in pelleted fish feed on the growth of rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri Rich.) and on utilization of the diet. Aquaculture 21:213–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davies SJ, Wareham H (1988) A preliminary evaluation of an industrial single cell protein in practical diets for Mozambique tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus, Peters). Aquaculture 73:189–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Deng D, Mei C, Mai K, Tan BP, Ai Q, Ma H (2013) Effects of a yeast-based additive on growth and immune responses of white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei (Boone, 1931), and aquaculture environment. Aquac Res 44:1348–1357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. El-Sayed A-FM (1998) Total replacement of fish meal with animal protein sources in Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus (L.), feeds. Aquac Res 29:275–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. FAO (2018) FISHSTAT Plus, universal software for fishery statistical time series. Food and Agriculture Organization, United Nations, Rome (Electronic webpage) Google Scholar
  15. Gamboa-Delgado J, Fernández-Díaz B, Nieto-López M, Cruz-Suárez LE (2016) Nutritional contribution of torula yeast and fish meal to the growth of shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei as indicated by natural nitrogen stable isotopes. Aquaculture 453:116–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gause B, Trushenski J (2011) Replacement of fish meal with ethanol yeast in the diets of sunshine bass. N Am J Aquac 73:97–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Glencross B, Irvin S, Arnold S, Blyth D, Bourne N, Preston N (2014) Effective use of microbial biomass products to facilitate the complete replacement of fishery resources in diets for the black tiger shrimp, Penaeus monodon. Aquaculture 431:12–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gonzalez-Rodriguez B, Abdo de la Parra I (2004) Replacement of fish meal with co-extruded wet tuna viscera and corn meal in diets for white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei Boone). Aquac Res 35:1153–1157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hauptman BS, Barrows FT, Block SS, Gaylord TG, Paterson JA, Rawles SD, Sealey WM (2014) Evaluation of grain distillers dried yeast as a fish meal substitute in practical-type diets of juvenile rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss. Aquaculture 432:7–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kantachote D, Torpee S, Umsakul K (2005) The potential use of anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria for treating latex rubber sheet wastewater. Electron J Biotechnol 8:314–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Karimi K, Taherzadeh MJ (2016) A critical review on analysis in pretreatment of lignocelluloses: degree of polymerization, adsorption/desorption, and accessibility. Bioresour Technol 203:348–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kornochalert N, Kantachote D, Chaiprapat S, Techkarnjanaruk S (2014) Use of Rhodopseudomonas parustris P1 stimulated growth by fermented pineapple extract to treat latex rubber sheet wastewater to obtain single cell protein. Ann Microbiol 64:1021–1032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lara-Flores M, Olvera-Novoa MA, Guzman-Menedez RE, Lopez-Madrid W (2003) Use of the bacteria Streptococcus faecium and Lactobacillus acidophilus, and the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae as growth promoters in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Aquaculture 216:193–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lightner DV, Redman RM, Arce SM, Moss MS (2009) Specific pathogen free shrimp stocks in shrimp farming facilities as a novel method for disease control in crustaceans. In: Shumway SE, Rodrick GE (eds) Shellfish safety and quality. Woodhead, Cambridge, pp 384–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lunger AN, Craig SR, Mclean E (2006) Replacement of fish meal in cobia (Rachycentron canadum) diets using an organically certified protein. Aquaculture 257:393–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Luzzana U, Valfrè F, Mangiarotti M, Domeneghini C, Radaelli G, Moretti VM, Scolari M (2005) Evaluation of different protein sources in fingerling grey mullet Mugil cephalus practical diets. Aquac Int 13:291–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Macchi FD, Shen FJ, Keck RG, Harris RJ (2000) Amino acid analysis, using postcolumn ninhydrin detection, in a biotechnology laboratory. Methods Mol Biol 159:9–30Google Scholar
  28. Moss SM, Arce SM, Argue BJ, Otoshi CA, Calderon FRO, Tacon AGJ (2001) Greening of the blue revolution: efforts toward environmentally responsible shrimp culture. In: Browdy CL, DE Jory (eds) The new wave: proceedings of the special session on sustainable shrimp farming. World Aquaculture Society, Baton Rouge, pp 1–19Google Scholar
  29. Moss DR, Arce SA, Otoshi CA, Doyle RW, Moss SM (2007) Effects of inbreeding on survival and growth of Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei). Aquaculture 27S1:S30–S37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Moss SM, Moss DR, Otoshi CA, Arce SM (2010) An integrated approach to sustainable shrimp farming. Asian Fish Sci 23:591–605Google Scholar
  31. NRC (National Research Council) (2011) Nutrient requirements of fish and shrimp. National Academies, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  32. Oliva-Teles A, Goncalves P (2001) Partial replacement of fishmeal by brewer’s yeast (Saccaromyces cerevisae) in diets for sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) juveniles. Aquaculture 202:269–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Palmegiano GB, Agradi E, Forneris G, Gai F, Gasco L, Rigamonti E, Sicuro B, Zoccarato I (2005) Spirulina as a nutrient source in diets for growing sturgeon (Acipenser baeri). Aquac Res 36:188–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ravinda AP (2000) Value-added food: single cell protein. Biotechnol Adv 18:459–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ribeiro CS, Moreira RG, Cantelmo OA, Esposito E (2014) The use of Kluyveromyces marxianus in the diet of red-stirling tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus, Linnaeus) exposed to natural climatic variation: effects on growth performance, fatty acids, and protein deposition. Aquac Res 45:812–827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rosalesa M, Castilloa S, Pohlenz C, Gatlin DM III (2017) Evaluation of dried yeast and threonine fermentation biomass as partial fish meal replacements in the diet of red drum Sciaenops ocellatus. Anim Feed Sci Technol 232:190–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tlusty M, Rhyne A, Szczebak JT, Bourque B, Bowen JL, Burr G, Marx CJ, Feinberg L (2017) A transdisciplinary approach to the initial validation of a single cell protein as an alternative protein source for use in aquafeeds. PeerJ 3170:1–19Google Scholar
  38. Viola S, Zohar G (1984) Nutrition studies with market size hybrids of tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) in intensive culture. Bamidgeh 36:3–15Google Scholar
  39. Vizcaíno AJ, López G, Sáez MI, Jiménez JA, Barros A, Hidalgo L, Camacho-Rodríguez J, Martínez TF, Cerón-García MC, Alarcón FJ (2014) Effects of the microalga Scenedesmus almeriensis as fishmeal alternative in diets for gilthead sea bream, Sparus aurata, juveniles. Aquaculture 431:34–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. World Bank Commodity (2018) Commodity price data of the World Bank. Washington DC. http://www.worldbank.org/en/research/commodity-markets. Accessed 2018
  41. Xie S, Liu Y, Zeng S, Niu J, Tian L (2016) Partial replacement of fish-meal by soy protein concentrate and soybean meal based protein blend for juvenile Pacific white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei. Aquaculture 464:296–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yamada E, Sgarbieri AVC (2005) Yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) protein concentrate: preparation, chemical composition, and nutritional and functional properties. J Agric Food Chem 53:3931–3936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhao L, Wang W, Huang X, Guo T, Wen W, Feng L, Wei L (2015) The effect of replacement of fish meal by yeast extract on the digestibility, growth and muscle composition of the shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei. Aquac Res 48:311–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japanese Society of Fisheries Science 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ali Hamidoghli
    • 1
  • Hyeonho Yun
    • 2
  • Seonghun Won
    • 1
  • SuKyung Kim
    • 3
  • Nathaniel W. Farris
    • 1
  • Sungchul C. Bai
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Marine Bio-Materials and Aquaculture/Feeds and Foods Nutrition Research Center (FFNRC)Pukyong National UniversityBusanRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Department of Life, Food and IngredientsCJ Cheiljedang CenterSeoulRepublic of Korea
  3. 3.West Sea Fisheries InstituteNational Institute of Fisheries Science (NIFS)IncheonRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations