Advertisement

Fisheries Science

, Volume 79, Issue 3, pp 367–373 | Cite as

Re-examination of age and growth of daggertooth pike conger Muraenesox cinereus in the western Seto Inland Sea, Japan

  • Shingo WatariEmail author
  • Minoru Murata
  • Yuichi Hinoshita
  • Kazuki Mishiro
  • Shigeyuki Oda
  • Makoto Ishitani
Original Article Biology

Abstract

Age determination and growth using otolith rings in Muraenesox cinereus was re-examined in the western Seto Inland Sea, Japan. Previous study in this area indicated that new rings were formed annually from March to May, and then from September to October once individuals had achieved four or five rings. In this study, monthly changes in marginal growth rate indicated that the first ring was formed before November in the year following hatching, and from then on another ring was formed annually in July or August. The birth month was determined to be August based on a peak in monthly change in the gonad somatic index. Estimated von Bertalanffy growth functions were L = 806.6{1 − exp[− 0.33(t + 0.06)]} and L = 1264.0{1 − exp[− 0.19(t + 0.15)]} for males and females, respectively. Lengths after 3 years of age in this study were 100 mm longer than those in a previous study for both sexes.

Keywords

Age determination Growth Muraenesox cinereus Otolith Seto inland sea 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Mr. F. Okabe, Mr. H. Watanabe, and Mr. M. Teramoto of the Oita Fisheries Cooperative Association for their cooperation with the sampling. The authors are grateful to Ms. H. Yoshida, Ms. R. Honda and Ms. S. Tsuchiya for their kind assistance. We also thank to Dr. H. Zenitani, Fisheries Research Agency, for valuable suggestions on the manuscript. This work was supported by the Fisheries Research Agency, Japan.

References

  1. 1.
    Yamada U, Tokimura M, Horikawa H, Nakabo T (2007) Fishes and fisheries of the East China and Yellow Sea (in Japanese). Tokai University Press, HadanoGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tanaka E (2012) Fish population analysis (in Japanese). Seizando, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Takai T (1959) Studies on the morphology, ecology and culture of the important apodal fishes, Muraenesox cinereus (Forskål) and Conger myriaster (Brevoort) (in Japanese with English abstract). J Shimonoseki Coll Fish 8:209–555Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ueta Y (2008) Fishery biological informations on daggertooth pike-conger eels, Muraenesox cinereus around Tokushima prefecture (in Japanese with English abstract). Bull Tokushima Pref Fish Res Ins 6:85–90Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Otaki H (1961) The fisheries biology of Muraenesox. V. On the age and growth of the conger eel (Muraenesox cinereus) (in Japanese with English abstract). Bull Seikai Reg Fish Res Lab 21:47–66Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Otaki H (1964) Studies on fishery biology of the sharp toothed eel, Muraenesox cinereus. (Forsskål), in the East China Sea and the Yellow Sea (in Japanese with English abstract). Bull Seikai Reg Fish Res Lab 32:59–123Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Beamish RJ (1979) Differences in the age of Pacific hake (Merluccius productus) using whole otoliths and sections of otoliths. J Fish Res Bd Can 36:141–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Newman SJ, Cappo M, Williams DM (2000) Age, growth, mortality rates and corresponding yield estimates using otoliths of the tropical red snappers, Lutjanus erythropterus, L. malabaricus and L. sebae, from the central Great Barrier Reef. Fish Res 48:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Beamish RJ, Fournier DA (1981) A method for comparing the precision of a set of age determinations. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 38:982–983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kanda T, Mochioka N, Wakamatsu T (1991) Possibility of culture of pike conger Muraenesox cinereus using wild leptocephali (in Japanese with English abstract). Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 57:397–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kaji S, Nishi A, Hashimoto H, Imaizumi H, Adachi J (2008) Trial for rearing pike eel Muraenesox cinereus larvae by applying the Japanese eel larvae rearing method (in Japanese with English abstract). J Fish Tech 1:83–86Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Katayama S, Yamamoto M, Gorie S (2010) Age compositions of flatfish stocks as determined by a new otolithometric method, its application in the estimation of growth, spawning potential and fisheries management. J Sea Res 64:451–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tatara K (1953) Kiisuidouiki no hamo Muraenesox cinereus (Forskal) ni tsuite (I) (Fisheries biology of Muraenesox cinereus (Forskål) in the Kii channel I) (in Japanese). Bull Naikai Reg Fish Res Lab 4:107–117Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sakai T, Yoneda M, Shiraishi T, Tokimura M, Horikawa H, Matsuyama M (2009) Age and growth of the lizardfish Saurida elongata from the Tsushima/Korea Strait. Fish Sci 75:895–902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yamashita H, Sakai T, Katayama S, Tokai T (2011) Re-examination of growth and maturation of red tilefish Branchiostegus japonicus in the East China Sea (in Japanese with English abstract). Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 77:188–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japanese Society of Fisheries Science 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shingo Watari
    • 1
    Email author
  • Minoru Murata
    • 2
  • Yuichi Hinoshita
    • 3
  • Kazuki Mishiro
    • 3
  • Shigeyuki Oda
    • 4
  • Makoto Ishitani
    • 4
  1. 1.National Research Institute of Fisheries and Environment of Inland Sea, Fisheries Research AgencyHatsukaichiJapan
  2. 2.Yamaguchi Prefectural Fisheries Research Center, Inland Sea DivisionYamaguchiJapan
  3. 3.Oita Prefectural Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Research Center, Fisheries Research DivisionBungotakadaJapan
  4. 4.Fukuoka Fisheries and Marine Technology Research Center Buzenkai LaboratoryFukuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations