Advertisement

Fisheries Science

, Volume 77, Issue 1, pp 35–40 | Cite as

Productive efficiency of the sandfish Arctoscopus japonicus coastal gillnet fishery using stochastic frontier analysis

  • Do-Hoon Kim
  • Kyoung-Hoon LeeEmail author
  • Bong-Seong Bae
  • Seong-Wook Park
Original Article Fisheries

Abstract

It is important to estimate the productive efficiencies of industries, especially the fishing industry, in order to determine policies that can improve business conditions. In this study, the productive efficiency of the sandfish coastal gillnet fishery on the east coast of Korea has been estimated using stochastic frontier analysis (SFA). A translog production function wherein the inefficiency was represented by a truncated-normal distribution was established; the output variable was the trip production quantity, the input variables were physical production factors directly related to the fishing activities of vessels, such as tonnage, horsepower, and the number of employed fishers. The average productive efficiency of the sample was 0.59 [0.40–0.79], which implied that productive inefficiency occurs in sandfish coastal gillnet vessels. Moreover, it was verified that there are no differences among the average productive efficiencies of fishing vessels of different tonnages.

Keywords

Productive efficiency Stochastic frontier analysis Coastal gillnet fishery Sandfish Productivity 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the captains of the fishing vessels for their assistance in providing necessary information. This study was supported in part by a grant (RP-2010-EC-005) promoted by the National Fisheries Research & Development Institute of the Republic of Korea.

References

  1. 1.
    Fried H, Lovell C, Schmidt S (1993) The measurement of productive efficiency: techniques and applications. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hofmarcher M, Paterson I, Riedel M (2002) Measuring hospital efficiency in Austria: a DEA approach. Health Care Manag Sci 5:7–14Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hwang S, Chang T (2003) Using data envelopment analysis to measure hotel managerial efficiency change in Taiwan. Tour Magt 24:357–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Madlener R, Antunes C, Dias L (2009) Assessing the performance of biogas plants with multi-criteria and data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 197:1084–1094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Olesen O, Petersen N (2002) The use of data envelopment analysis with probabilistic assurance regions for measuring hospital efficiency. J Prod Anal 17:83–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tortosa-Ausina E (2002) Bank cost efficiency and output specification. J Prod Anal 18:199–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sharma K, Leung P (1999) Technical efficiency of the longline fishery in Hawaii: an application of a stochastic production frontier. Mar Res Econ 13:259–274Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kirkley J, Squires D, Strand I (1995) Assessing technical efficiency in commercial fisheries: the Mid-Atlantic sea scallop fishery. Am J Agric Econ 77:686–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    García del hoyo J, Castilla Espino D, Jiménez T (2004) Determination of the technical efficiency of fisheries by stochastic frontier models: a case on the Gulf of Cádiz (Spain). ICES J Mar Sci 61:416–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    FAO (2004) Measuring and assessing capacity in fisheries: issues and methods. FAO Fisheries Report 433(2). RomeGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kim D (2006) Measurement of fishing capacity of offshore fisheries in Korea. J Fish Bus Admin 37(1):1–24 (in Korean with English abstract)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kirkley J, Fare R, Grosskopf S, McConnell K, Squires D, Strand I (2001) Assessing capacity and capacity utilization in fisheries when data are limited. North Am J Fish Manag 21:482–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Castilla Espino D, García del hoyo J, Sharp B (2005) Capacity and capacity utilization of the “Voracera” fleet in the Strait of Gibraltar. Mar Res Econ 20:367–384Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tsitsika E, Maravelias C, Wattage P, Haralabous J (2008) Fishing capacity and capacity utilization of purse seiners using data envelopment analysis. Fish Sci 74:730–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Battese G (1992) Frontier production functions and technical efficiency: a survey of empirical applications in agricultural economics. Agric Econ 7:185–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ferrier G, Lovell C (1990) Measuring cost efficiency in banking: econometric and linear programming evidence. J Econ 46:229–245Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Førsund F, Lovell C, Schmidt P (1980) A survey of frontier production functions and of their relationship to efficiency measurement. J Econ 13:5–25Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sharma K, Leung P, Zaleski H (1997) Productive efficiency of the swine industry in Hawaii: stochastic frontier vs. data envelopment analysis. J Prod Anal 8:447–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Charnes A, Cooper W, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2:429–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cooper W, Seiford L, Tone K (2007) Data envelopment analysis: a comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-Solver software. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kumbhakar S, Lovell C (2000) Stochastic frontier analysis. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Minh N, Long G, Thang B (2007) Technical efficiency of small and medium manufacturing firms in Vietnam: parametric and non-parametric approach. Kor Econ Rev 23:187–221Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Aigner D, Lovell C, Schmidt P (1977) Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. J Econ 6:21–37Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jondrow J, Lovell C, Materov I, Schmidt P (1982) On the estimation of technical inefficiency in the stochastic frontier production function model. J Econ 19:239–285Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Battese G, Coelli T (1988) Prediction of farm-level technical efficiencies with a generalized frontier production function and panel data. J Econ 38:387–399Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Stevenson R (1980) Likelihood functions for generalized stochastic frontier estimation. J Econ 13:343–366Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Meeusen W, Van Den Broeck J (1977) Efficiency estimation from Cobb–Douglas production functions with composed error. Int Econ Rev 18:435–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kirkley J, Squires D, Strand I (1998) Characterizing managerial skill and technical efficiency in a fishery. J Prod Anal 9:145–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japanese Society of Fisheries Science 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Do-Hoon Kim
    • 1
  • Kyoung-Hoon Lee
    • 2
    Email author
  • Bong-Seong Bae
    • 3
  • Seong-Wook Park
    • 2
  1. 1.Technology Management CenterNational Fisheries Research and Development InstituteBusanKorea
  2. 2.Fisheries System Engineering DivisionNational Fisheries Research and Development InstituteBusanKorea
  3. 3.Aquaculture Industry DivisionEast Sea Fisheries Research InstituteGangneungKorea

Personalised recommendations