Phylogenetic analyses in cetacean species of the family Delphinidae using a short wavelength sensitive opsin gene sequence

Abstract

The short wavelength sensitive (SWS) opsin gene is expected to contain informative sites for understanding the speciation of the family Delphinidae, because it is not functional in cetaceans. We determined partial SWS gene sequences from 15 delphinid species of 12 genera and from harbor porpoise for comparison. We found a 39-bp insertion that was shared by six species (the insertion group: Delphinus delphis, Delphinus capensis, Stenella longirostris, Stenella coeruleoalba, Lagenodelphis hosei, and Sousa chinensis) and common base substitutions shared by eight species (Stenella frontalis, Tursiops truncatus, and six species of the insertion group). As these insertions and substitutions are not found in the other seven delphinids or in the cloven-hoofed mammals (which are close to cetaceans), it is suggested that these eight species are more closely related to each other than to the other species. This hypothesis is supported by phylogenetic analyses. The eight species with the substitutions formed a clade containing two sister clades, one consisting of the insertion group and the other consisting of the two other species, in both neighbor-joining and Bayes analyses. Phylogenetic analyses also showed that Lissodelphis borealis and Lagenorhynchus obliquidens are closely related and that their common ancestor diverged from the others at an early stage of delphinid evolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. 1.

    Gaskin DE (1982) The ecology of whales and dolphins. Heinemann, London

  2. 2.

    Berta A, Sumich JL (1999) Marine mammals: evolutionary biology. Academic Press, London

  3. 3.

    Aldridge HDJN, Rautenbach IL (1987) Morphology, echolocation and resource partitioning in insectivorous bats. J Anim Ecol 56:763–778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Neuweiler G (1989) Foraging ecology and audition in echolocating bats. Trends Ecol Evol 4:160–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Ketten DR (1997) Structure and function in whale ears. Bioacoustics 8:103–135

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Sakmar TP, Fahmy K (1996) Properties and photoactivity of rhodopsin mutants. Israel J Chem 35:325–337

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Yokoyama S (2000) Molecular evolution of vertebrate visual pigments. Prog Retin Eye Res 19:385–419

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Peichl L (2005) Diversity of mammalian photoreceptor properties: adaptations to habitat and lifestyle? Anat Rec Part A 287:1001–1012

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Jacobs GH (1993) The distribution and nature of colour vision among the mammals. Biol Rev 68:413–471

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Regan BC, Julliot C, Simmen B, Vienot F, Charles-Dominique P, Mollon JD (2001) Fruits, foliage and the evolution of primate colour vision. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 356:229–283

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Ödeen A, Håstad O (2003) Complex distribution of avian color vision systems revealed by sequencing the SWS1 opsin from total RNA. Mol Biol Evol 20:855–861

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Fasick JI, Cronin TW, Hunt DM, Robinson PR (1998) The visual pigments of the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus). Vis Neurosci 15:643–651

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Fasick JI, Robinson PR (1998) Mechanism of spectral tuning in the dolphin visual pigments. Biochemistry 37:433–438

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Peichl L, Behrmann G, Kroger RHH (2001) For whales and seals the ocean is not blue: a visual pigment loss in marine mammals. Eur J Neurosci 13:1520–1528

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Newman LA, Robinson PR (2005) Cone visual pigments of aquatic mammals. Vis Neurosci 22:873–879

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Levenson DH, Dizon A (2003) Genetic evidence for the ancestral loss of short-wavelength-sensitive cone pigments in mysticete and odontocete cetaceans. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:673–679

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    LeDuc RG, Perrin WF, Dizon AE (1999) Phylogenetic relationships among the delphinid cetaceans based on full cytochrome b sequences. Mar Mamm Sci 15:619–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    May-Callado L, Agnarsson I (2006) Cytochrome b and Bayesian inference of whale phylogeny. Mol Phylogenet Evol 38:344–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Fordyce RE (1994) The evolutionary history of whales and dolphins. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 22:419–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Kingston SE, Rosel PE (2004) Genetic differentiation among recently diverged delphinid taxa determined using AFLP markers. J Hered 95:1–10

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Kumar S, Tamura K, Nei M (2004) MEGA3: integrated software for molecular evolutionary genetics analysis and sequence alignment. Brief Bioinform 5:150–163

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Felsenstein J (1993) PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) 3.5c. University of Washington, Seattle

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F (2001) MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinfomatics 17:754–755

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Irwin DM, Arnason U (1994) Cytochrome b gene of marine mammals: phylogeny and evolution. J Mamm Evol 2:37–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Nikaido M, Rooney AP, Okada N (1999) Phylogenetic relationships among cetartiodactyls based on insertions of short and long interpersed elements: hippopotamuses are the closest extant relatives of whales. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:10261–10266

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Arnason U, Gullberg A, Janke A (2004) Mitogenomic analyses provide new insights into cetacean origin and evolution. Gene 333:27–34

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Perrin WF, Mitchell ED, Mead JG, Caldwell DK, Caldwell MC, Van Bree PJH, Dawbin WH (1987) Revision of the spotted dolphins, Stenella spp. Mar Mamm Sci 3:99–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Perrin WF (1997) Development and homologies of head stripes in the delphinoid cetaceans. Mar Mamm Sci 13:1–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Noriko Tsunehiro and Masahiro Kunimoto of the Environmental Specimen Bank (es-BANK) at the Center for Marine Environmental Studies (CEMS), Ehime University, for helping with tissue handling. We are indebted to Drs. Takanobu Mizuta and Yukiko Tando of the Ocean Research Institute, University of Tokyo for experimental support. We also thank Dr. Koji Inoue for comments on the manuscript. This work was funded by a Sasakawa Scientific Research Grant from The Japan Science Society.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomoko Koito.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koito, T., Kubokawa, K., Tanabe, S. et al. Phylogenetic analyses in cetacean species of the family Delphinidae using a short wavelength sensitive opsin gene sequence. Fish Sci 76, 571–576 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12562-010-0241-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Delphinidae
  • Short wavelength sensitive (SWS) gene
  • Insertion
  • Phylogenetic analysis