Statistics in Biosciences

, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 91–126 | Cite as

Modeling High-Dimensional Multichannel Brain Signals

  • Lechuan Hu
  • Norbert J. Fortin
  • Hernando OmbaoEmail author


Our goal is to model and measure functional and effective (directional) connectivity in multichannel brain physiological signals (e.g., electroencephalograms, local field potentials). The difficulties from analyzing these data mainly come from two aspects: first, there are major statistical and computational challenges for modeling and analyzing high-dimensional multichannel brain signals; second, there is no set of universally agreed measures for characterizing connectivity. To model multichannel brain signals, our approach is to fit a vector autoregressive (VAR) model with potentially high lag order so that complex lead-lag temporal dynamics between the channels can be captured. Estimates of the VAR model will be obtained by our proposed hybrid LASSLE (LASSO \(+\) LSE) method which combines regularization (to control for sparsity) and least squares estimation (to improve bias and mean-squared error). Then we employ some measures of connectivity but put an emphasis on partial directed coherence (PDC) which can capture the directional connectivity between channels. PDC is a frequency-specific measure that explains the extent to which the present oscillatory activity in a sender channel influences the future oscillatory activity in a specific receiver channel relative to all possible receivers in the network. The proposed modeling approach provided key insights into potential functional relationships among simultaneously recorded sites during performance of a complex memory task. Specifically, this novel method was successful in quantifying patterns of effective connectivity across electrode locations, and in capturing how these patterns varied across trial epochs and trial types.


Electroencephalograms Local field potentials Brain effective connectivity Multivariate time series Vector autoregressive model Partial directed coherence 



N.J. Fortin’s research was supported in part by the National Science Foundation (Awards IOS-1150292 and BCS-1439267), the Whitehall Foundation (Award 2010-05-84), and the University of California, Irvine. H. Ombao’s work was supported in part by grants from the US NSF Division of Mathematical Sciences (DMS 15-09023) and the Division of Social and Economic Sciences (SES 14-61534).


  1. 1.
    Allen TA, Morris AM, Mattfeld AT, Stark CEL, Fortin NJ (2014) A sequence of events model of episodic memory shows parallels in rats and humans. Hippocampus 24(10):1178–1188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Allen TA, Morris AM, Stark SM, Fortin NJ, Stark CEL (2015) Memory for sequences of events impaired in typical aging. Learn Mem 22(3):138–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Allen TA, Salz DM, McKenzie S, Fortin NJ (2016) Nonspatial sequence coding in CA1 neurons. J Neurosci 36(5):1547–1563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baccalá LA, Sameshima K (2001) Partial directed coherence: a new concept in neural structure determination. Biol Cybern 84(6):463–474CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baccalá LA, Sameshima K (2014) Partial directed coherence. In: Methods in brain connectivity inference through multivariate time series analysis, pp 57–73. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boucquey VK, Allen TA, Huffman DJ, Fortin NJ, Stark CEL (2015) A cross-species sequence memory task reveals hippocampal and medial prefrontal cortex activity and interactions in humans. Hippocampus (submitted)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fiecas M, Ombao H (2011) The generalized shrinkage estimator for the analysis of functional connectivity of brain signals. Ann Appl Stat 1102–1125Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fiecas M, Ombao H, Linkletter C, Thompson W, Sanes J (2010) Functional connectivity: shrinkage estimation and randomization test. NeuroImage 49(4):3005–3014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fortin NJ, Asem JSA, Ng CW, Quirk CR, Allen TA, Elias GA (2016) Distinct contributions of hippocampal, prefrontal, perirhinal and nucleus reuniens regions to the memory for sequences of events. In: Society for Neuroscience Abstracts (San Diego, CA)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R (2010) Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent. J Stat Softw 33(1):1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Han F, Liu H (2013) A direct estimation of high dimensional stationary vector autoregressions. arXiv:1307.0293 Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hesterberg T, Choi NH, Meier L, Fraley C et al (2008) Least angle and l1 penalized regression: a review. Stat Surv 2:61–93MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ivanov V, Kilian L et al (2005) A practitioner’s guide to lag order selection for var impulse response analysis. Studies Nonlinear Dyn Econom 9(1):1–34zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kamiński M, Ding M, Truccolo WA, Bressler SL (2001) Evaluating causal relations in neural systems: Granger causality, directed transfer function and statistical assessment of significance. Biol Cybern 85(2):145–157CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kirch C (2007) Resampling in the frequency domain of time series to determine critical values for change-point tests. Stat Decis 25(3/2007):237–261MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kolmogorov AN (1933) Sulla determinazione empirica delle leggi di probabilita. Giorn Ist Ital Attuari 4:1–11Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kreiss J-P (1992) Bootstrap procedures for ar (co)-processes. In: Bootstrapping and related techniques: proceedings of an international conference held in Trier, FRG, June 4–8, 1990, vol 376, pp 107. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Liu H, Bin Y et al (2013) Asymptotic properties of LASSO + MLS and LASSO + Ridge in sparse high-dimensional linear regression. Electron J Stat 7:3124–3169MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mairal J, Yu B (2012) Complexity analysis of the lasso regularization path. arXiv:1205.0079Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ombao H, Van Bellegem S (2008) Evolutionary coherence of nonstationary signals. IEEE Trans Signal Process 56(6):2259–2266MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Paparoditis E (2002) Frequency domain bootstrap for time series. In: Empirical process techniques for dependent data, pp 365–381. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Politis DN et al (2003) The impact of bootstrap methods on time series analysis. Stat Sci 18(2):219–230MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Shao X (2010) The dependent wild bootstrap. J Am Stat Assoc 105(489):218–235MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shumway RH, Stoffer DS (2006) Time series analysis and its applications: with R examples. Springer, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tibshirani R (1996) Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Methodol) 267–288Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wenjiang J, Fu WJ (1998) Penalized regressions: the bridge versus the LASSO. J Comput Graph Stat 7(3):397–416MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zhao P, Rocha G, Yu B (2009) The composite absolute penalties family for grouped and hierarchical variable selection. Ann Stat 3468–3497Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zhao P, Yu B (2006) On model selection consistency of lasso. J Mach Learn Res 7:2541–2563Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Chinese Statistical Association 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of StatisticsUniversity of CaliforniaIrvineUSA
  2. 2.Department of Neurobiology and BehaviorUniversity of CaliforniaIrvineUSA
  3. 3.Statistics ProgramKing Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST)ThuwalSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations