Assessment of Coliphage Surrogates for Testing Drinking Water Treatment Devices
Test protocols have been developed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and the World Health Organization (WHO) to test water treatment devices/systems that are used at the individual and home levels to ensure the removal of waterborne viruses. The goal of this study was to assess if coliphage surrogates could be used in this testing in place of the currently required use of animal or human enteric viruses. Five different coliphages (MS-2, PRD1, ΦX-174, Qβ, and fr) were compared to the removal of poliovirus type 1 (LSc-2ab) by eight different water treatment devices/systems using a general case and a challenge case (high organic load, dissolved solids, and turbidity) test water as defined by the USEPA. The performance of the units was rated as a pass/fail based on a 4 log removal/inactivation of the viruses. In all cases, a failure or a pass of the units/system for poliovirus also corresponded to a pass/fail by all of the coliphages. In summary, in using pass/fail criteria as recommended under USEPA guidelines for testing water treatment device/systems, the use of coliphages should be considered as an alternative to reduce cost and time of testing such devices/systems.
KeywordsDrinking water Water treatment devices Coliphages Surrogates Poliovirus Point-of-use treatment
This study was supported in part by a grant from the National Science Foundation Water Environmental Technology Center at the University of Arizona.
- Abbaszadegan, M., Hasan, M. N., Gerba, C. P., Roessler, P. F., Wilson, B. R., Kuennen, R., & Van Dellen, E. (1997). The disinfection efficacy of a point-of-use water treatment system against bacterial, viral and protozoan waterborne pathogens. Water Research, 3, 1574–1582.Google Scholar
- APHA (American Public Health Association). (2012). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (Vol. 22). Washington, DC: APHA.Google Scholar
- Drinking water health effects task force. (1989). Health effects of drinking water treatment technologies. Chelsea, MI: Lewis Publishers.Google Scholar
- Gerba, C. P. (2014). Disinfection. In I. L. Pepper, C. P. Gerba, & T. J. Gentry (Eds.), Environmental microbiology (pp. 645–662). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Gerba, C. P., Naranjo, J. E., & Hasan, M. E. (1997). Evaluation of a combined portable reverse osmosis and iodine resin drinking water treatment system for control of enteric waterborne pathogens. Journal of Environmental Science and Health., 32, 2337–2354.Google Scholar
- NSF (National Sanitation Foundation). (2006). NSF protocol P248 emergency military operations microbiological water purifiers. An Arbor, MI: NSF.Google Scholar
- Roessler, P. F., & Severin, B. F. (1996). Ultraviolet light disinfection of water and wastewater. In C. J. Hurst (Ed.), Modeling disease transmission and its prevention by disinfection (pp. 313–368). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Smith, E. M., & Gerba, C. P. (1982). Laboratory methods for the growth and detection of animal viruses. In C. P. Gerba & S. M. Goyal (Eds.), Methods in environmental virology (pp. 15–47). New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
- USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). (1987). Guide standard and protocol for testing microbiological water purifiers. Federal Register, 54, 34067.Google Scholar
- WHO (World Health Organization). (2011). Evaluating household water treatment options: Health based targets and microbiological performance specifications. Geneva: Switzerland.Google Scholar