Advertisement

Cognitive Computation

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 227–240 | Cite as

Meta-KANSEI Modeling with Valence-Arousal fMRI Dataset of Brain

  • Fuqian ShiEmail author
  • Nilanjan Dey
  • Amira S. Ashour
  • Dimitra Sifaki-Pistolla
  • R. Simon Sherratt
Article
  • 80 Downloads

Abstract

Traditional KANSEI methodology is an important tool in the field of psychology to comprehend the concepts and meanings; it mainly focuses on semantic differential methods. Valence-arousal is regarded as a reflection of the KANSEI adjectives, which is the core concept in the theory of effective dimensions for brain recognition. From previous studies, it has been found that brain fMRI datasets can contain significant information related to valence and arousal. In this current work, a valence-arousal-based meta-KANSEI modeling method is proposed to improve the traditional KANSEI presentation. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to acquire the response dataset of valence-arousal of the brain in the amygdala and orbital frontal cortex respectively. In order to validate the feasibility of the proposed modeling method, the dataset was processed under dimension reduction by using kernel density estimation (KDE)–based segmentation and mean shift (MS) clustering. Furthermore, affective norms for English words (ANEW) by IAPS (International Affective Picture System) were used for comparison and analysis. The datasets from fMRI and ANEW under four KANSEI adjectives of angry, happy, sad, and pleasant were processed by the Fuzzy c-means (FCM) algorithm. Finally, a defined distance based on similarity computing was adopted for these two datasets. The results illustrate that the proposed model is feasible and has better stability per the normal distribution plotting of the distance. The effectiveness of the experimental methods proposed in the current work is higher than that in the literature; and central points–based meta-KANSEI model combining with the advantages of a variety of existing intelligent processing methods is expected to shift the KANSEI Engineering (KE) research into the medical imaging field.

Keywords

Meta-KANSEI modeling Valence-arousal Kernel density estimation segmentation Mean shift clustering Fuzzy c-means Affective norms for English words 

Notes

Funding

This study was funded by the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation (LY17F030014).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Muhammad Y, Zhang D. Anatomical pattern analysis for decoding visual stimuli in human brains. Cogn Comput. 2018;10(2):284–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wang S, Fu B, Zhao W, Liu Y, Wei F. Structure, function, and dynamic mechanisms of coupled human–natural systems. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 2018;33:87–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Guerar M, Merlo A, Migliardi M. Completely automated public physical test to tell computers and humans apart: a usability study on mobile devices. Futur Gener Comput Syst. 2018;82:617–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Poria S, Cambria E, Bajpai R, Hussain A. A review of affective computing: from unimodal analysis to multimodal fusion. Inform Fusion. 2017;37:98–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lang PJ, Bradley MM, Cuthbert BN. International affective picture system (IAPS): affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual. Technical Report A-8, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 2008.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mehrabian A. An approach to environmental psychology. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1974.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bellezza FS, Greenwald AG, Banaji MR. Words high and low in pleasantness as rated by male and female college students. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 1986;18(3):299–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bradley MM, Lang PJ. Affective norms for English words (ANEW): instruction manual and affective ratings. Technical Report C-1, The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida, 1999.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nagamachi M. KANSEI engineering: a new ergonomics consumer-oriented technology for product development. Intl J Ind Design. 1995;15(1):3–11.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yeh CT, Chen MC. Applying Kansei engineering and data mining to design door-to-door delivery service. Comput Ind Eng. 2018;120:401–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shieh MD, Li Y, Yang CC. Comparison of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms in hybrid Kansei engineering system for product form design. Adv Eng Inform. 2018;36:31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Takenouchi H, Tokumaru M. Kansei retrieval agent model with fuzzy reasoning. Int J Fuzzy Syst. 2017;19(6):1803–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang D, Li Z, Dey N, Ashour AS, Sherratt RS, Shi F. Case-based reasoning for product style construction and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process evaluation modeling using consumers linguistic variables. IEEE Access. 2017;5:4900–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cao L, Li J, Xu Y, Zhu H, Jiang C. A hybrid vigilance monitoring study for mental fatigue and its neural activities. Cogn Comput. 2016;8(2):228–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Li J, Zhang Z, He H. Hierarchical convolutional neural networks for EEG-based emotion recognition. Cogn Comput. 2018;10(2):368–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Burgués J, Jiménez-Soto JM, Marco S. Estimation of the limit of detection in semiconductor gas sensors through linearized calibration models. Anal Chim Acta. 2018;1013:13–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mayhew SD, Mullinger KJ, Ostwald D, Porcaro C, Bowtell R, Bagshaw AP, et al. Global signal modulation of single-trial fMRI response variability: effect on positive vs negative BOLD response relationship. NeuroImage. 2016;133:62–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Seidel M, King JA, Ritschel F, Boehm I, Geisler D, Bernardoni F, et al. Processing and regulation of negative emotions in anorexia nervosa: an fMRI study. NeuroImage-Clin. 2018;18(1–8).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Xie W, Peng CK, Huang CC, Lin CP, Tsai SJ, Yang AC. Functional brain lateralization in schizophrenia based on the variability of resting-state fMRI signal. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2018;86:114–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kensinger EA, Corkin S. Two routes to emotional memory: distinct neural processes for valence and arousal. PNAS. 2004;101(9):3310–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kensinger EA, Schacter DL. Processing emotional pictures and words: effects of valence and arousal. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosc. 2006;6(2):110–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    He T, Cao L, Balas VE, McCauley P, Shi F. Curvature manipulation of the spectrum of valence-arousal-related fMRI dataset using gaussian-shaped fast fourier transform and its application to fuzzy KANSEI adjectives modeling, Neurocomputing, 2016; 174, Part B, 1049–1059.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wu L, Tang Z, Feng X, Sun X, Qian W, Wang J, et al. Metabolic changes in the bilateral visual cortex of the monocular blind macaque: a multi-voxel proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy study. Neurochem Res. 2017;42(2):697–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Janata P, Birk JL, Van Horn JD, Leman M, Tillmann B, Bharucha JJ. The cortical topography of tonal structures underlying western music. Science. 2002;298(13):2167–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Müller-Bardorff M, Bruchmann M, Mothes-Lasch M, Zwitserlood P, Schlossmacher I, Hofmann D, et al. Early brain responses to affective faces: a simultaneous EEG-fMRI study. NeuroImage. 2018;178:660–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Thibault RT, MacPherson A, Lifshitz M, Roth RR, Raz A. Neurofeedback with fMRI: a critical systematic review. NeuroImage. 2018;172:786–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cherubini A, Caligiuri ME, Péran P, Sabatini U, Cosentino C, Amato F. Importance of multimodal MRI in characterizing brain tissue and its potential application for individual age prediction. IEEE T Biomed Health. 2016;20(5):1232–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sardouie SH, Shamsollahi MB, Albera L, Merlet I. Denoising of ictal EEG data using semi-blind source separation methods based on time-frequency priors. IEEE T Biomed Health. 2015;19(3):839–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Frantzidis CA, Bratsas C, Papadelis CL, Konstantinidis E, Pappas C, Bamidis PD. Toward emotion aware computing: an integrated approach using multichannel neurophysiological recordings and affective visual stimuli. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2010;14(3):589–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Murugappan M, Rizon M, Nagarajan R, Yaacob S. Inferring of human emotional states using multichannel EEG. Eur J Sci Res. 2010;48(2):281–99.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hui T, Sherratt RS. Coverage of emotion recognition for common wearable biosensors. Biosensors. 2018;8:30.  https://doi.org/10.3390/bios8020030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Haben S, Giasemidis G. A hybrid model of kernel density estimation and quantile regression for GEFCom2014 probabilistic load forecasting. Int J Forecast. 2016;32:1017–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Miao S, Xie K, Yang H, Karki R, Tai HM, Chen T. A mixture kernel density model for wind speed probability distribution estimation. Energy Convers Manag. 2016;126:1066–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Yuan Y, Wan J, Wang Q. Congested scene classification via efficient unsupervised feature learning and density estimation. Pattern Recogn. 2016;56:159–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rodrigues GS, Nott DJ, Sisson SA. Functional regression approximate bayesian computation for gaussian process density estimation. Comput Stat Data An. 2016;103:229–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Tao Z, Han B, Chen H. On intuitionistic fuzzy copula aggregation operators in multiple-attribute decision making. Cogn Comput. 2018;10:610–24.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-018-9545-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ren P, Sun W, Luo C, Hussain A. Clustering-oriented multiple convolutional neural networks for single image super-resolution. Cogn Comput. 2018;10(1):165–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ghassabeh YA. On the convergence of the mean shift algorithm in the one-dimensional space. Pattern Recogn Lett. 2013;34:1423–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ibrahim MM, Soraghan JJ, Petropoulakis L. Eye-state analysis using an interdependence and adaptive scale mean shift (iasms) algorithm. Biomed Signal Process. 2014;11:53–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Duong T, Beck G, Azzag H, Lebbah M. Nearest neighbour estimators of density derivatives, with application to mean shift clustering. Pattern Recogn Lett. 2016;80:224–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Chen W, Li Q, Dahal K. ROI image retrieval based on multiple features of mean shift and expectation-maximisation. Digit Signal Process. 2015;40:117–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ai L, Xiong J. Temporal-spatial mean-shift clustering analysis to improve functional MRI activation detection. Magn Reson Imaging. 2016;34:1283–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Ghassabeh YA, Rudzicz F. The mean shift algorithm and its relation to kernel regression. Inf Sci. 2016;348:198–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Dey N, Ashour AS, Beagum S, Pistola DS, Gospodinov M, Gospodinova EP, et al. Parameter optimization for local polynomial approximation based intersection confidence interval filter using genetic algorithm: an application for brain MRI image de-noising. J Imaging. 2015;1:60–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wang D, He T, Li Q, Cao L, Li Z, Dey N, et al. Image features based affective retrieval employing improved parameter and structure identification of adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system. Neural Comput & Applic. 2016;29:1087–102.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2512-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Dey N, Ashour A, Samanta S, Chakraborty S, Sifaki D, Ashour A, et al. Healthy and unhealthy rat hippocampus cells classification: a neural based automated system for alzheimer disease classification. J Adv Microsc Res. 2016;11:1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Information and EngineeringWenzhou Medical UniversityWenzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Department of ITTechno India College of TechnologyKolkataIndia
  3. 3.Department of Electronics and Electrical Communications Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringTanta UniversityTantaEgypt
  4. 4.School of MedicineUniversity of CreteHeraklionGreece
  5. 5.Department of Biomedical EngineeringThe University of ReadingReadingUK

Personalised recommendations