Emotion: A Unified Mechanistic Interpretation from a Cognitive Architecture
- 734 Downloads
This paper reviews a project that attempts to interpret emotion, a complex and multifaceted phenomenon, from a mechanistic point of view, facilitated by an existing comprehensive computational cognitive architecture—CLARION. This cognitive architecture consists of a number of subsystems: the action-centered, non-action-centered, motivational, and metacognitive subsystems. From this perspective, emotion is, first and foremost, motivationally based. It is also action-oriented. It involves many other identifiable cognitive functionalities within these subsystems. Based on these functionalities, we fit the pieces together mechanistically (computationally) within the CLARION framework and capture a variety of important aspects of emotion as documented in the literature.
KeywordsEmotion Cognitive architecture Psychology Computational
This work has been supported in part by the ONR Grants N00014-08-1-0068 and N00014-13-1-0342.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Ron Sun, Nick Wilson, and Michael Lynch declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008 (5). Additional informed consent was obtained from all patients for which identifying information is included in this article.
Human and Animal Rights
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
- 4.Clark LA, Watson D. Temperament: a new paradigm for trait psychology. In: Pervin LA, John OP, editors. Handbook of personality: theory and research. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press; 1999. p. 399–423.Google Scholar
- 5.Damasio A. Descartes’ error: emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Penguin; 1994.Google Scholar
- 6.Dorner D. The mathematics of emotion. In: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on cognitive modeling. Germany: Bamberg; 2003. p. 75–79.Google Scholar
- 7.Ekman P. Basic emotions. In: Dalgleish T, Power M, editors. Handbook of cognition and emotion. Sussex: Wiley; 1999.Google Scholar
- 8.Evans J, Frankish K, editors. In two minds: dual processes and beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.Google Scholar
- 9.Flavell J. Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In: Resnick B, editor. The nature of intelligence. Hillsdale: Erlbaum; 1976.Google Scholar
- 10.Frijda N. The emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1986.Google Scholar
- 11.Gross JJ, editor. Handbook of emotion regulation. New York: Guilford Press; 2007.Google Scholar
- 14.Hudlicka E. A computational model of emotion and personality: applications to psychotherapy research and practice. In: Proceedings of the 10th annual cybertherapy conference: a decade of virtual reality. Switzerland: Basel; 2005.Google Scholar
- 15.Hull C. Essentials of behavior. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1951.Google Scholar
- 18.Lazarus RS. Relational meaning and discrete emotions. In: Scherer KR, Schorr A, Johnstone T, editors. Appraisal processes in emotion. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001.Google Scholar
- 19.Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer; 1984.Google Scholar
- 22.Lewis M. Bridging emotion theory and neurobiology through dynamic systems modeling. Behav Brain Sci. 2004.Google Scholar
- 25.Maslow A. Motivation and personality. 3rd ed. New York: Harper and Row; 1987.Google Scholar
- 26.Miceli M, Castelfranchi C. Expectancy and emotion. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.Google Scholar
- 28.Mueller ET, Dyer MG. Daydreaming in humans and computers. In: Proceedings of the ninth international joint conference on artificial intelligence. Los Angeles: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc.; 1985. p. 18–24.Google Scholar
- 30.Murray H. Explorations in personality. New York: Oxford University Press; 1938.Google Scholar
- 33.Reder L, editor. Implicit memory and metacognition. Mahwah: Erlbaum; 1996.Google Scholar
- 36.Rumelhart D, McClelland J, PDP Research Group. Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructures of cognition. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1986.Google Scholar
- 39.Scherer KR. Emotion and emotional competence: conceptual and theoretical issues for modelling agents. In: Scherer K, Banziger T, Roesch E, editors. A blueprint for affective computing. New York: Oxford University Press; 2010. p. 3–20.Google Scholar
- 40.Scherer KR, Schorr A, Johnstone T, editors. Appraisal processes in emotion. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001.Google Scholar
- 43.Smith CA, Lazarus RS. Emotion and adaptation. In: Pervin LA, editor. Handbook on personality: theory and research. New York: Guilford; 1990. p. 609–37.Google Scholar
- 44.Sun R. Duality of the mind. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2002.Google Scholar
- 45.Sun R. A tutorial on CLARION 5.0. Technical report, Cognitive Sciences Department, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy. 2003. http://www.cogsci.rpi.edu/~rsun/sun.tutorial.pdf.
- 49.Sun R. Anatomy of the mind. New York: Oxford University Press; 2016.Google Scholar
- 51.Sun, R, Mathews R. Implicit cognition, emotion, and meta-cognitive control. Mind Soc. Special issue on Dual Processes Theories of Thinking (edited by D. Over, L. Macchi, and R. Viale), 2012;11(1):107–119.Google Scholar
- 56.Toates F. Motivational systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1986.Google Scholar
- 57.Tolman EC. Purposive behavior in animals and men. New York: Century; 1932.Google Scholar
- 58.Tyrell T. Computational mechanisms for action selection. Ph.D. Thesis, Oxford: Oxford University; 1993.Google Scholar
- 59.Watkins C. Learning with delayed rewards. Ph.D. Thesis, Cambridge: Cambridge University; 1989.Google Scholar
- 61.Wilson NR. Towards a psychologically plausible comprehensive computational theory of emotion. Ph.D Thesis, Cognitive Sciences Department, Troy: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; (2012).Google Scholar
- 62.Wilson N, Sun R. Coping with bullying: a computational emotion-theoretic account. In: Proceedings of the annual conference of cognitive science society, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada. p. 3119–24. Published by Cognitive Science Society, Austin, Texas (2014).Google Scholar
- 64.Wilson N, Sun R, Mathews R. A motivationally based computational interpretation of social anxiety induced stereotype bias. In: Proceedings of the annual conference of cognitive science society, Oregon: Portland. p. 1750–55; 2010.Google Scholar
- 66.Wright IP, Sloman A. MINDER1: an implementation of a proto-emotional agent architecture. Technical Report CSRP-97-1, University of Birmingham, School of Computer Science; 1997.Google Scholar