An Information Analysis of In-Air and On-Surface Trajectories in Online Handwriting
- 264 Downloads
This paper is aimed at analysing, from an information theory perspective, the gestures produced by human beings when handwriting a text. Modern capturing devices allow the gathering of data not only from the on-surface movements of the hand, but also from the in-air trajectories performed when the hand moves in the air from one stroke to the next. Our past research with isolated uppercase words clearly suggests that both types of trajectories have a biometric potential to perform writer recognition and that they can be effectively combined to enhance the recognition accuracy. With samples from the BiosecurID database, we have analysed the entropy of each kind of trajectories, as well as the amount of information they share, and the difference between intra- and inter-writer measures of the mutual information. The results show that when pressure is not taken into account, the amount of information is similar in both types of trajectories. Furthermore, even if they share some information, in-air and on-surface trajectories appear to be notably non-redundant.
KeywordsHandwriting Biometrics Information theory
This work has been supported by FEDER and MEC, TEC2009-14123-C04-04. We also want to acknowledge the SIX (CZ.1.05/2.1.00/03.0072), CZ.1.07/2.3.00/20.0094, VG20102014033 and KONTAKT ME10123 projects for providing Jiri’s support.
- 10.Viñals Carrera F, Puente Balsells ML. Grafología criminal. Herder, Barcelona, 2009.Google Scholar
- 11.Puente Balsells ML, Viñals Carrera F. Grafología y ciencia: validación con ciento cincuenta tesis doctorales, 1a en lengua caellana ed., Uoc, Barcelona, 2010.Google Scholar
- 12.Vielhauer C. Biometric user authentication for it security from fundamentals to handwriting. Boston, MA: Springer Science + Business Media Inc; 2006.Google Scholar
- 16.Impedovo D, Pirlo G. Automatic signature verification: the state of the art. IEEE Trans Syst., Man and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews). 2008;38:609–35.Google Scholar
- 18.Srihari S, Sung-Hyuk C, Sangjik L, Establishing handwriting individuality using pattern recognition techniques. In: Proceedings of the sixth international conference on document analysis and recognition. 2001;1195–204.Google Scholar
- 19.Zhang B, Srihari S, Analysis of handwriting individuality using word features. In Proceedings of the seventh international conference on document analysis and recognition. 2003;1142–6.Google Scholar
- 20.Hook C, Kempf J, Scharfenberg G, A novel digitizing pen for the analysis of pen pressure and inclination in handwriting biometrics, biometric authentication workshop, Prague 2004, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 2004;3087:283–94.Google Scholar
- 21.Chapran J. Biometric writer identification: feature analysis and classification. Int J Pattern Recogn Artif Intell. 2006;20:483–503.Google Scholar
- 22.Sesa-Nogueras E, Faundez-Zanuy M. Writer recognition by means of stroke categorization based on self-organizing maps. In: Apolloni B, Bassis S, Esposito A, Morabito CF, editors. Neural nets WIRN11. Volume 234 of Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications. IOS Press; 2011. ISBN:978-1-60750-971-4. http://www.iospress.nl/book/neural-nets-wirn11/.
- 23.Shannon CE. A mathematical theory of communication. New York: American Telephone and Telegraph Co.; 1948.Google Scholar
- 27.MacKay DJC. Information theory, inference, and learning algorithms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003.Google Scholar
- 28.Fierrez-Aguilar J, Galbally J, Ortega-Garcia J, Freire M, Alonso-Fernandez F, Ramos D, et al. BiosecurID: a multimodal biometric database. Pattern Anal Appl 2010;13.Google Scholar