Cognitive Computation

, Volume 3, Issue 1, pp 5–24 | Cite as

Clustering of Gaze During Dynamic Scene Viewing is Predicted by Motion

  • Parag K. Mital
  • Tim J. Smith
  • Robin L. Hill
  • John M. Henderson
Article

Abstract

Where does one attend when viewing dynamic scenes? Research into the factors influencing gaze location during static scene viewing have reported that low-level visual features contribute very little to gaze location especially when opposed by high-level factors such as viewing task. However, the inclusion of transient features such as motion in dynamic scenes may result in a greater influence of visual features on gaze allocation and coordination of gaze across viewers. In the present study, we investigated the contribution of low- to mid-level visual features to gaze location during free-viewing of a large dataset of videos ranging in content and length. Signal detection analysis on visual features and Gaussian Mixture Models for clustering gaze was used to identify the contribution of visual features to gaze location. The results show that mid-level visual features including corners and orientations can distinguish between actual gaze locations and a randomly sampled baseline. However, temporal features such as flicker, motion, and their respective contrasts were the most predictive of gaze location. Additionally, moments in which all viewers’ gaze tightly clustered in the same location could be predicted by motion. Motion and mid-level visual features may influence gaze allocation in dynamic scenes, but it is currently unclear whether this influence is involuntary or due to correlations with higher order factors such as scene semantics.

Keywords

Eye movements Dynamic scenes Features Visual attention Clustering 

References

  1. 1.
    Findlay JM. Eye scanning and visual search. In: Henderson JM, Ferreira F, editors. The interface of language, vision, and action: eye movements and the visual world. New York, NY, US: Psychology Press; 2004. p. 134–59.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Findlay JM, Gilchrist ID. Active vision: the psychology of looking and seeing. Oxford: University Press; 2003.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Henderson JM. Regarding scenes. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2007;16(4):219–22.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wolfe JM, Horowitz TS. What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004;5:1–7.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Buswell GT. How people look at pictures: a study of the psychology of perception in art. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1935.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yarbus AL. Eye movements and vision. New York: Plenum Press; 1367.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Baddeley RJ, Tatler BW. High frequency edges (but not contrast) predict where we fixate: a Bayesian system identification analysis. Vision Res. 2006;46:2824–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Henderson JM, et al. Visual saliency does not account for eye movements during visual search in real-world scenes. In: van Gompel RPG, et al., editors. Eye movements: a window on mind and brain. Oxford: Elsevier; 2007. p. 537–62.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Krieger G, et al. Object and scene analysis by saccadic eye-movements: an investigation with higher-order statistics. Spat Vis. 2000;13(2–3):201–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mannan S, Ruddock KH, Wooding DS. Automatic control of saccadic eye movements made in visual inspection of briefly presented 2-D images. Spat Vis. 1995;9(3):363–86.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mannan SK, Ruddock KH, Wooding DS. The relationship between the locations of spatial features and those of fixations made during visual examination of briefly presented images. Spat Vis. 1996;10(3):165–88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mannan SK, Ruddock KH, Wooding DS. Fixation sequences made during visual examination of briefly presented 2D images. Spat Vis. 1997;11(2):157–78.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Parkhurst DJ, Niebur E. Scene content selected by active vision. Spat Vis. 2003;6:125–54.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Reinagel P, Zador AM. Natural scene statistics at the centre of gaze. Netw Comput Neural Syst. 1999;10:1–10.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tatler BW, Baddeley RJ, Gilchrist ID. Visual correlates of fixation selection: effects of scale and time. Vision Res. 2005;45(5):643–59.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Parkhurst DJ, Niebur E. Texture contrast attracts overt visual attention in natural scenes. Eur J Neurosci. 2004;19:783–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Barth E, Zetsche C, Rentschler I. Intrinsic two-dimensional features as textons. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 1998;15:1723–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zetzsche C, et al. Investigation of a sensorimotor system for saccadic scene analysis: an integrated approach. In: Feifer RP, editor. From animals to animats 5. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1998. p. 120–6.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Itti L, Koch C. Computational modelling of visual attention. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001;2(3):194–203.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Navalpakkam V, Itti L. Modeling the influence of task on attention. Vision Res. 2005;45(2):205–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Parkhurst D, Law K, Niebur E. Modeling the role of salience in the allocation of overt visual attention. Vision Res. 2002;42(1):107–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pomplun M, Reingold EM, Shen J. Area activation: a computational model of saccadic selectivity in visual search. Cogn Sci. 2003;27:299–312.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rao RPN, et al. Eye movements in iconic visual search. Vision Res. 2002;42(11):1447–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sun Y, et al. A computer vision model for visual-object-based attention and eye movements. Comput Vis Image Underst. 2008;112(2):126–42.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zelinsky GJ. A theory of eye movements during target acquisition. Psychol Rev. 2008;115(4):787–835.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Koch C, Ullman S. Shifts in selective visual-attention: towards the underlying neural circuitry. Hum Neurobiol. 1985;4(4):219–27.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Treisman AM, Gelade G. Feature-integration theory of attention. Cogn Psychol. 1980;12(1):97–136.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Itti L. A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention. Vision Res. 2000;40:1489–506.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Foulsham T, Underwood G How does the purpose of inspection influence the potency of visual salience in scene perception? 2007.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Einhauser W, Spain M, Perona P. Objects predict fixations better than early saliency. J Vis. 2008;8(14):11–26.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Chen X, Zelinsky GJ. Real-world visual search is dominated by top-down guidance. Vision Res. 2006;46(24):4118–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Foulsham T, Underwood G. Can the purpose of inspection influence the potency of visual salience in scene perception? Perception. 2006;35:236.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Foulsham T, Underwood G. What can saliency models predict about eye movements? Spatial and sequential aspects of fixations during encoding and recognition. J Vis. 2008;8(2).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Henderson JM, Malcolm GL, Schandl C. Searching in the dark: cognitive relevance drives attention in real-world scenes. Psychon Bull Rev. 2009;16:850–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Henderson JM, et al. Eye movements and picture processing during recognition. Percept Psychophys. 2003;65(5):725–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hayhoe M, Land M. Coordination of eye and hand movements in a normal visual environment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40(4):S380.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Land MF, Hayhoe M. In what ways do eye movements contribute to everyday activities? Vision Res. 2001;41(25–26):3559–65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Land MF, Lee DN. Where we look when we steer. Nature. 1994;369(6483):742–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Land MF, McLeod P. From eye movements to actions: how batsmen hit the ball. Nat Neurosci. 2000;3(12):1340–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Yantis S. Control of visual attention. In: Pashler H, editor. Attention. London: Psychology Press; 1998. p. 223–56.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Yantis S, Hillstrom AP. Stimulus-driven attentional capture: evidence from equiluminant visual objects. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1994;20(1):95–107.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Yantis S, Jonides J. Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1984;10(5):601–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Brockmole JR, Henderson JM. Prioritization of new objects in real-world scenes: evidence from eye movements. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2005;31(5):857–68.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Brockmole JR, Henderson JM. Object appearance disappearance, and attention prioritization in real-world scenes. Psychon Bull Rev. 2005;12(6):1061–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Matsukura M, Brockmole JR, Henderson JM. Overt attentional prioritization of new objects and feature changes during real-world scene viewing. Vis Cogn. 2009;6(7):835–55.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Simons DJ. Attentional capture and inattentional blindness. Trends Cogn Sci. 2000;4(4):147–55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Berg DJ, et al. Free viewing of dynamic stimuli by humans and monkeys. J Vis. 2009;9(5):1–15.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Carmi R, Itti L. Visual causes versus correlates of attentional selection in dynamic scenes. Vision Res. 2006;46(26):4333–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Carmi R, Itti L. The role of memory in guiding attention during natural vision. J Vis. 2006;6(9):898–914.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Itti L. Quantifying the contribution of low-level saliency to human eye movements in dynamic scenes. Vis Cogn. 2005;12(6):1093–123.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Itti L. Quantitative modelling of perceptual salience at human eye position. Vis Cogn. 2006;14(4–8):959–84.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Le Meur O, Le Callet P, Barba D. Predicting visual fixations on video based on low-level visual features. Vision Res. 2007;47(19):2483–98.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    t’Hart BM, et al. Gaze allocation in natural stimuli: comparing free exploration to head-fixed viewing conditions. Vis Cogn. 2009;17(6/7):1132–58.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Goldstein RB, Woods RL, Peli E. Where people look when watching movies: do all viewers look at the same place? Comput Biol Med. 2007;37(7):957–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Hasson U, et al. Neurocinematics: the Neuroscience of Film. Proje J Movies Mind. 2008;2(1):1–26.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Marchant P, et al. Are you seeing what i’m seeing? an eye-tracking evaluation of dynamic scenes. Digit Creat. 2009;20(3):153–63.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    May J, Dean MP, Barnard PJ. Using film cutting techniques in interface design. Hum Comput Interact. 2003;18:325–72.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Nyström M, Holmqvist K. Effect of compressed offline foveated video on viewing behavior and subjective quality. ACM Transon Multimed Comput Commun Appl. 2010;6(1):1–16.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Sawahata Y, et al. Determining comprehension and quality of tv programs using eye-gaze tracking. Pattern Recognit. 2008;41(5):1610–26.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Smith TJ, Henderson JM. Attentional synchrony in static and dynamic scenes. J Vis. 2008;8(6):773.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Stelmach LB, Tam WJ, Hearty PJ. Static and dynamic spatial resolution in image coding: an investigation of eye movements. In human vision, visual processing, and digital display II. 1991.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Tosi V, Mecacci L, Pasquali E. Pasquali, scanning eye movements made when viewing film: preliminary observations. Int J Neurosci. 1997;92(1/2):47–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Smith TJ. An attentional theory of continuity editing, in informatics. Edinburgh, UK: University of Edinburgh; 2006. p. 400.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Cristino F, Baddeley R. The nature of the visual representations involved in eye movements when walking down the street. Vis cogn. 2009;17(6–7):880–903.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Tatler BW. The central fixation bias in scene viewing: selecting an optimal viewing position independently of motor biases and image feature distributions. J Vis. 2007;7(14):1–17.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Tseng PH, et al. Quantifying centre bias of observers in free viewing of dynamic natural scenes. J Vis. 2009;9(7):1–16.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Torralba A, Oliva A. Statistics of natural image categories. Netw-Comput Neural Syst. 2003;14(3):391–412.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Palmer SE. Vision Science: photons to phenomenology. Cambridge, Mass: London MIT Press; 1999. Xxii. p. 810. ill. 26 cm.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Murphy BJ. Pattern thresholds for moving and stationary gratings during smooth eye movement. Vision Res. 1978;18(5):521–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Carandini M, Heeger DJ. Summation and division by neurons in primate visual cortex. Science. 1994;264(5163):1333–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Itti L, Koch C, Niebur E. A model of saliency-based visual attention for rapid scene analysis. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 1998;20(11):1254–9.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Bex PJ, Makous W. Spatial frequency, phase, and the contrast of natural images. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2002;19(6):1096–106.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Moulden B, Kingdom F, Gatley LF. The standard-deviation of luminance as a metric for contrast in random-dot images. Perception. 1990;19(1):79–101.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Lee DK, et al. Attention activates winner-take-all competition among visual filters. Nat Neurosci. 1999;2(4):375–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Rosenholtz R. A simple saliency model predicts a number of motion popout phenomena. Vision Res. 1999;39(19):3157–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Einhauser W, Konig P. Does luminance-contrast contribute to a saliency map for overt visual attention? Eur J Neurosci. 2003;17(5):1089–97.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Itti L, Baldi P. A principled approach to detecting surprising events in video. In: SchmidC, Soatto S, Tomasi C, editors. 2005 IEEE computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, Vol 1, proceedings. Los Alamitos: Ieee Computer Soc; 2005. p. 631–37.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Rosin PL. A simple method for detecting salient regions. Pattern Recognit. 2009;42(11):2363–71.Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Park SJ, Shin JK, Lee M. Biologically inspired saliency map model for bottom-up visual attention. In: Bulthoff HH et al., editors. Biologically motivated computer vision, proceedings. Berlin: Springer; 2002. p. 418-426.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Privitera CM, Stark LW. Human-vision-based selection of image processing algorithms for planetary exploration. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2003;12(8):917–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Sobel I, Feldman G. A 3 × 3 isotropic gradient operator for image processing; presented talk at the Stanford Artificial Project 1968. In: Duda RO, Hart PE, editors. Pattern classification and scene analysis. New York: Wiley; 1973. p. 271–2.Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Attneave F. Some informational aspects of visual perception. Psychol Rev. 1954;61(3):183–93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Schmid C, Mohr R, Bauckhage C. Evaluation of interest point detectors. Int J Comput Vis. 2000;37(2):151–72.Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Noble JA. Finding corners. Image Vis Comput. 1988;6(2):121–8.Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Moravec HP. Obstacle avoidance and navigation in the real world by a seeing robot rover, in Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University & doctoral dissertation, Stanford University. 1980.Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Harris C, Stephens M. A combined corner and edge detector. in 4th Alvey Vision Conference. Manchester; 1988.Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Blakemore C, Campbell FW. On existence of neurones in human visual system selectively sensitive to orientation and size of retinal images. J Physiol. 1969;203(1):237–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Hubel DH, Wiesel TN. Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex. J Physiol. 1962;160(1):106–54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Field DJ. Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical-cells. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 1987;4(12):2379–94.Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Anstis SM. Apparent movement. In: Held RH, Leibowitz W, Teuber H-L, editors. Handbook of sensory physiology. New York: Springer; 1977.Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Anstis SM, Mackay DM. The perception of apparent movement. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1980;290(1038):153–68.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Ullman, S., The interpretation of visual motion. The MIT Press Series in Artificial Intelligence. Cambridge, Mass: M.I.T. Press; 1979. Xiii. p. 229. ill. 24 cm.Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Adelson EH, Bergen JR. Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 1985;2(2):284–99.Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Theeuwes J. Abrupt luminance change pops out; abrupt color change does not. Percept Psychophys. 1995;57(5):637–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Moulden B, Renshaw J, Mather G. 2 channels for flicker in the human visual-system. Perception. 1984;13(4):387–400.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Horn BKP, Schunck BG. Determining optical flow. Artif Intell. 1981;17(1–3):185–203.Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Lucas BD, Kanade T. An iterative image registration technique with an application to stereo vision. In Proceedings of the DARPA imaging understanding workshop. 1981. p. 121–130.Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Baddeley R. Searching for filters with ‘interesting’ output distributions: an uninteresting direction to explore? Netw-Comput Neural Syst. 1996;7(2):409–21.Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Green DM, Swets JA. Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley: 1966. Xi. p. 455. illus24 cm.Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Privitera CM, Stark LW. Algorithms for defining visual regions-of-interest: comparison with eye fixations. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2000;22(9):970–82.Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Latimer CR. Eye-movement data: cumulative fixation time and cluster-analysis. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 1988;20(5):437–70.Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Santella A, DeCarlo D. Robust clustering of eye movement recordings for quantification of visual interest. In eye tracking research & application. San Antonio, Texas: ACM Press; 2004.Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    Bishop, C.M., Pattern recognition and machine learning. Information science and statistics. New York: Springer; 2006. xx. p. 738.Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    Torre V, Poggio T. On edge detection. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 1984;8(2):147–63.Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    Mannan SK, Ruddock KH, Wooding DS. The relationship between the locations of spatial features and those of fixations made during visual examination of briefly presented images. Spat Vis. 1996;10:165–88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Mannan SK, Ruddock KH, Wooding DS. Fixation sequences made during visual examination of briefly presented 2D images. Spat Vis. 1997;11:157–78.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Torralba A, et al. Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: the role of global features in object search. Psychol Rev. 2006;113(4):766–86.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Vincent BT, et al. Do we look at lights? Using mixture modelling to distinguish between low- and high-level factors in natural image viewing. Vis Cogn. 2009;17(6/7):856–79.Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    Zacks JM, et al. Human brain activity time-locked to perceptual event boundaries. Nat Neurosci. 2001;4:651–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Speer NK, Swallow KM, Zacks JM. Activation of human motion processing areas during event perception. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2003;3:335–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Zacks JM, et al. Visual motion and the neural correlates of event perception. Brain Res. 2006;1076:150–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Bordwell D, Thompson K. Film art: an introduction, vol. 6. USA: McGraw Hill; 2001.Google Scholar
  113. 113.
    Nyström M, Holmqvist K. Variable resolution images and their effects on eye movements during free-viewing. In human vision and electronic imaging XII. San Jose, CA; 2007.Google Scholar
  114. 114.
    Nyström M, Holmqvist K. Semantic override of low-level features in image viewing: both initially and overall. J Eye Mov Res. 2008;2(2):1–11.Google Scholar
  115. 115.
    Frank MC, Vul E, Johnson SP. Development of infants’ attention to faces during the first year. Cognition. 2009;110:160–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Parag K. Mital
    • 1
  • Tim J. Smith
    • 2
  • Robin L. Hill
    • 3
  • John M. Henderson
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Computing GoldsmithsUniversity of LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Department of Psychological Sciences, BirkbeckUniversity of LondonLondonUK
  3. 3.Department of Psychology, School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language SciencesUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
  4. 4.Department of Psychology and McCausland Center for Brain ImagingUniversity of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations