Is a Machine Realization of Truly Human-Like Intelligence Achievable?
- 685 Downloads
Even after more than a half a century of research on machine intelligence, humans remain far better than our strongest computing machines at a wide range of natural cognitive tasks, such as object recognition, language comprehension, and planning and acting in contextually appropriate ways. While progress is being made in many of these areas, computers still lack the fluidity, adaptability, open-endedness, creativity, purposefulness, and insightfulness we associate with the supreme achievements of human cognitive ability. Reasons for this and prospects for overcoming these limitations are discussed.
KeywordsHuman cognition Open-ended problem solving Computational theory Cognitive architecture Learning algorithms Nurturance Culture Education
- 1.Anderson JR, Lebiere C. The atomic components of thought. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 1998.Google Scholar
- 2.Bengio Y, Lamblin P, Popovici D, Larochelle H. Greedy layer-wise training of deep networks. In: Schölkopf B, Platt J, Hoffman T, editors. Advances in neural information processing systems (NIPS). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2007.Google Scholar
- 3.CBS News Online: IBM and Sun Microsystems hit ‘petaflop’ speed, June 26, 2007. http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2007/06/26/ibm-super.html (2007). Accessed 16 Jan 2009.
- 4.Geisler WS, Perry JS. Contour statistics in natural images: grouping across occlusions. Visual Neurosci. (in press). Google Scholar
- 6.IBM Website: 704 Data processing system. IBM Archives. http://www-03.ibm.com/ibm/history/exhibits/mainframe/mainframe_pp704.html (2008). Accessed 13 Nov 2008.
- 10.Laird JE. Extending the soar cognitive architecture. Memphis, TN: Artificial General Intelligence Conference; 2008.Google Scholar
- 11.Marr D. Vision. San Francisco: Freeman; 1982.Google Scholar
- 12.Martin WA, Fateman RJ. The MACSYMA system. In: Proceedings of 2nd symposium on symbolic and algebraic manipulation. New York: ACM; 1971. p. 59–75.Google Scholar
- 13.Newell A. You cannot play 20 questions with nature and win: projective comments on the papers of this symposium. In: Chase WG, editor. Visual information processing. New York: Academic Press; 1973. p. 283–308.Google Scholar
- 14.Newell A. Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1994.Google Scholar
- 16.Ranzato M, Poultney C, Chopra A, LeCun Y. Efficient learning of sparse representations with an energy-based model. In: Schölkopf B, Platt J, Hoffman T, editors. Advances in neural information processing systems (NIPS). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2007. p. 1137–44.Google Scholar
- 18.Rumelhart DE, McClelland JL, the PDP research group. Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, Volume I. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1986.Google Scholar
- 19.Serre T, Oliva A, Poggio T. A feedforward architecture accounts for rapid categorization. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2008;104(15):6424–9.Google Scholar
- 20.Simon H. Models of my life. New York: Basic Books; 1991.Google Scholar
- 22.Sun R. Duality of the mind. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 2002.Google Scholar
- 23.Vapnik VN. The nature of statistical learning theory. Berlin: Springer; 1995.Google Scholar