Advertisement

Quadrotor Flight Controller Design Using Classical Tools

  • Tomasz ZubowiczEmail author
  • Krzysztof Arminski
  • Arkadiusz Kusalewicz
Article
  • 3 Downloads

Abstract

A principal aspect of quadrocopter in-flight operation is to maintain the required attitude of the craft’s frame, which is done either automatically in the so-called supervised flight mode or manually during man-operated flight mode. This paper deals with the problem of flight controller (logical) structure and algorithm design dedicated for the man-operated flight mode. The role of the controller is to stabilise the rotational speeds of the Tait-Bryan angles. This work aims to extend the sustainable performance operating range of a proportional-integral-derivative output feedback compensator (PID) based flight controller by exploiting the concepts of feedforward inverse actuator model and the re-definition of input space in order to handle the non-linearity of the system under control. The proposed solution is verified numerically and implemented in the form of a discrete-time domain algorithm, obtained by emulation, using a physical quadrocopter model.

Keywords

Attitude control drone inverse model PID 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

References

  1. [1]
    G. Cai, B. M. Chen, and T. H. Lee, Unmanned Rotorcraft Systems, Springer Science & Business Media, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    M. Ryll, H. H. Bülthoff, and P. R. Giordano, “Modeling and control of a quadrotor UAV with tilting propellers,” Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 4606–4613, May 2012.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    K. Arminski and T. Zubowicz, “Robust identification of quadrocopter model for control purposes,” Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics (MMAR), pp. 337–342, August 2017.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    G. Hoffmann, H. Huang, S. Waslander, and C. Tomlin, “Quadrotor Helicopter Flight Dynamics and Control: Theory and Experiment,” Proc. of the 2007–6461 AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit, Jun 2007.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    J. Li and Y. Li, “Dynamic analysis and PID control for a quadrotor,” Proc. of the 2011 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation, pp. 573–578, August 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    H. Bolandi, M. Rezaei, R. Mohsenipour, H. Nemati, and S. M. Smailzadeh, “Attitude Control of a Quadrotor with Optimized PID Controller,” Intelligent Control and Automation, vol. 4, pp. 335–342, August 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Y. Wang, P. Li, Z. Lan, B. Li, and C. Li, “Quadrotor Aircraft Design based on the K60 Controller,” Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Review, vol. 10, pp. 21–30, December 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    S. Bouabdallah, A. Noth, and R. Siegwart, “PID vs LQ control techniques applied to an indoor micro quadrotor,” Proc. of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37566), vol. 3, pp. 2451–2456, September 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    C. Zhang, X. Zhou, H. Zhao, A. Dai, and H. Zhou, “Three-dimensional fuzzy control of mini quadrotor UAV trajectory tracking under impact of wind disturbance,” Proc. of the 2016 International Conference on Advanced Mechatronic Systems, ICAMechS, pp. 372–377, November–December 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    S. Salehfard, T. Abdollahi, C.-H. Xiong, and Y.-H. Ai, “An optimized Fuzzy-Padé controller applied to attitude stabilization of a quadrotor,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 16, pp. 1425–1434, June 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    D. Lee, H. Jin Kim, and S. Sastry, “Feedback linearization vs. adaptive sliding mode control for a quadrotor helicopter,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 7, pp. 419–428, June 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Y. Yang and Y. Yan, “Attitude regulation for unmanned quadrotors using adaptive fuzzy gain-scheduling sliding mode control,” Aerospace Science and Technology, vol. 54, pp. 208–217, July 2016.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    T. N. Dief, S. Yoshida, and M. Abdelhady, “Attitude and altitude stabilization of quad rotor using parameter estimation and self-tuning controller,” Proc. of the AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference, June 2015.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    A. Mokhtari, A. Benallegue, and B. Daachi, “Robust feedback linearization and GH∞ controller for a quadrotor unmanned aerial vehicle,” Proc. of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, IROS, vol. 57, pp. 1009–1014, September 2005.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    A. Tayebi and S. McGilvray, “Attitude stabilization of a VTOLvtol quadrotor aircraft,” IEEE Trans. on Control Systems Technology, vol. 14, pp. 562–571, May 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    A. P. Sandiwan, A. Cahyadi, and S. Herdjunanto, “Robust proportional-derivative control on SO(3) with disturbance compensation for quadrotor UAV,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 15, pp. 2329–2342, October 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    A. Tzes, G. Nikolakopoulos, and K. Alexis, “Model predictive quadrotor control: attitude, altitude and position experimental studies,” IET Control Theory & Applications, vol. 6, pp. 1812–1827, August 2012.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    A. Aswani, P. Bouffard, and C. Tomlin, “Extensions of learning-based model predictive control for real-time application to a quadrotor helicopter,” Proc. of the American Control Conference (ACC), pp. 4661–4666, June 2012.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    A. Zulu and S. John, “A review of control algorithms for autonomous quadrotors,” Open Journal of Applied Sciences, vol. 4, pp. 547–556, December 2014.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    N. S. Özbek, M. Önkol, and M. Ö. Efe, “Feedback control strategies for quadrotor-type aerial robots: A survey,” Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control, vol. 38, pp. 529–554, October 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    A. Kusalewicz, K. Armiński, and T. Zubowicz, “Uz˙ytkowy model matematyczny quadrocoptera do celów sterowania,” Zeszyty Naukowe Wydziału Elektrotechniki i Automatyki Politechniki Gdańskiej, vol. 51, pp. 103–105, 2016. Zastosowanie komputerów w nauce i technice (In Polish).Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    R. W. Beard and T. W. McLain, Small Unmanned Aircraft: Theory and Practice, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    N. S. Nise, Control Systems Engineering, 3rd ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, USA, 2000.zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ICROS, KIEE and Springer 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tomasz Zubowicz
    • 1
    Email author
  • Krzysztof Arminski
    • 2
  • Arkadiusz Kusalewicz
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Electrical Engineering, Control Systems and InformaticsFaculty of Electrical and Control Engineering Gdańsk University of TechnologyGdańskPoland
  2. 2.Department Control Engineering, Faculty of Electrical and Control EngineeringGdańsk University of TechnologyGdańskPoland

Personalised recommendations