Advertisement

Parameter Selection Procedure for an Amplitude- and Rate-saturated Controller

  • Nehal BaiomyEmail author
  • Ryo Kikuuwe
Regular Papers Control Theory and Applications
  • 35 Downloads

Abstract

This paper presents a selection procedure to obtain parameter values of the authors’ previously proposed amplitude- and rate-saturated controller. This controller employs a state-dependent parameter that enlarges the region of attraction when the state is far from the origin and shrinks the finite-time attractor when the state is close to the origin. The proposed selection procedure involves a set of linear matrix inequalities and also includes iterative computation. Two numerical examples for stable and unstable systems show the effectiveness of the proposed selection procedure.

Keywords

Actuator constraints amplitude limitation linear matrix inequality rate limitation sliding mode 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    N. Baiomy and R. Kikuuwe, “An LMI-based parameter selection procedure for an amplitude-and rate-saturated controller,” Proc. of SICE International Symposium on Control Systems, pp. 54–60, 2018.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    C. Fielding and P. K. Flux, “Non-linearities in flight control systems,” The Aeronautical Journal, vol. 107, no. 1077, pp. 673–696, November 2003.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    F. Garelli, P. Camocardi, and R. J. Mantz, “Variable structure strategy to avoid amplitude and rate saturation in pitch control of a wind turbine,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 35, no. 11, pp. 5869–5875, June 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    H.-T. Chen, S.-M. Song, and Z.-B. Zhu, “Robust finitetime attitude tracking control of rigid spacecraft under actuator saturation,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–15, February 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    V. Kapila, H. Pan, and M. S. de Queiroz, “LMI-based control of linear systems with actuator amplitude and rate nonlinearities,” Proc. of the 38th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 1413–1418, 1999.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    V. Kapila and W. M. Haddad, “Fixed-structure controller design for systems with actuator amplitude and rate nonlinearities,” International Journal of Control, vol. 73, no. 6, pp. 520–530, 2000.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    J. M. Gomes da Silva, S. Tarbouriech, and G. Garcia, “Local stabilization of linear systems under amplitude and rate saturating actuators,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 842–847, May 2003.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    A. A. Stoorvogel and A. Saberi, “Output regulation of linear plants with actuators subject to amplitude and rate constraints,” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 631–657, July 1999.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    S. Galeani, S. Onori, A. Teel, and L. Zaccarian, “A magnitude and rate saturation model and its use in the solution of a static anti-windup problem,” Systems & Control Letters, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 1–9, January 2008.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Z. Lin, “Semi-global stabilization of linear systems with position and rate-limited actuators,” Systems & Control Letters, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 1–11, March 1997.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    A. Bateman and Z. Lin, “An analysis and design method for linear systems under nested saturation,” Systems & Control Letters, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 41–52, January 2003.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    A. H. K. Palmeira, J. M. Gomes da Silva Jr, S. Tarbouriech, and I. M. F. Ghiggi, “Sampled-data control under magnitude and rate saturating actuators,” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, vol. 26, no. 15, pp. 3232–3252, January 2016.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    S. Wang, Y. Gao, J. Liu, and L. Wu, “Saturated sliding mode control with limited magnitude and rate,” IET Control Theory Applications, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 1075–1085, May 2018.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    J. M. Gomes da Silva, D. Limon, T. Alamo, and E. F. Camacho, “Dynamic output feedback for discrete-time systems under amplitude and rate actuator constraints,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 53, no. 10, pp. 2367–2372, November 2008.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    F. A. Bender and J. M. Gomes da Silva, “Output feedback controller design for systems with amplitude and rate control constraints,” Asian Journal of Control, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 1113–1117, December 2012.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    K. Kefferpüz, B. Fischer, and J. Adamy, “A nonlinear controller for input amplitude and rate constrained linear systems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 58, no. 10, pp. 2693–2697, October 2013.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    N. Baiomy and R. Kikuuwe, “An amplitude-and ratesaturated controller for linear systems,” Asian Journal of Control, 2018. DOI: 10.1002/asjc.1851Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    V. Acary and B. Brogliato, “Implicit Euler numerical scheme and chattering-free implementation of sliding mode systems,” Systems & Control Letters, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 284–293, May 2010.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    O. Huber, V. Acary, and B. Brogliato, “Lyapunov stability and performance analysis of the implicit discrete sliding mode control,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 61, no. 10, pp. 3016–3030, October 2016.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Y. Li, J. L. Wang, and G.-H. Yang, “Sub-optimal linear quadratic control for singularly perturbed systems,” Proc. of the 40th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, vol. 4, pp. 3698–3703, 2001.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    Y. Li, J. L. Wang, and G.-H. Yang, “Linear quadratic control for singularly perturbed systems,” Dynamics of Continuous, Discrete and Impulsive Systems Series B: Applications and Algorithms, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 29–39, 2005.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    S. Boyd, L. El Ghaoui, E. Feron, and V. Balakrishnan, Linear Matrix Inequalities in System and Control Theory. SIAM, Philadelphia, 1994.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    M. Chilali and P. Gahinet, “H¥ design with pole placement constraints: an LMI approach,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 358–367, March 1996.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    M. Chilali, P. Gahinet, and P. Apkarian, “Robust pole placement in LMI regions,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 44, no. 12, pp. 2257–2270, December 1999.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    V. Kapila and S. Valluri, “Model predictive control of systems with actuator amplitude and rate saturation,” Proc. of the 37th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, vol. 2, pp. 1396–1401, 1998.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ICROS, KIEE and Springer 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electrical Power and MachinesCairo UniversityGizaEgypt
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical Systems EngineeringHiroshima UniversityHigashi-HiroshimaJapan

Personalised recommendations