Advertisement

Multi-target Tracking and Track Management Algorithm Based on UFIR Filter With Imperfect Detection Probability

  • Chang Joo Lee
  • Sang Kyoo Park
  • Myo Taeg LimEmail author
Regular Papers
  • 23 Downloads

Abstract

This paper proposes an unbiased finite impulse response filter and track management algorithm for multi-target tracking (MTT) with imperfect detection probability. Targets cannot be detected under MTT for various reasons, including sensor failure and screening by other targets. Despite the temporary missed detection, the proposed MTT algorithm robustly tracks targets under MTT conditions by replacing the missed detection with recently detected target measurement. The track is deleted on the track table when consecutive detection failure exceeding missing horizon occurs. Computational time for the proposed MTT algorithm is significantly less than that for existing MTT algorithm based finite impulse response filters due to the proposed track update and track management algorithm. Simulation and experimental vehicle and pedestrian tracking results verify outstanding tracking accuracy and shorter calculation times for the proposed algorithm.

Keywords

Finite impulse response structure imperfect detection probability missing horizon multi-target tracking track management unbiased filtering 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

References

  1. [1]
    D. Song, R. Tharmarasa, T. Kirubarajan, and X. N. Fernando, “Multi-vehicle tracking with road maps and car-following models,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 1375–1386, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Y. T. Tesfaye, E. Zemene, A. Prati, M. Pelillo, and M. Shah, “Multi-target tracking in multiple non-overlapping cameras using constrained dominant sets,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.06196, 2017.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    F. García, A. Prioletti, P. Cerri, and A. Broggi, “PHD filter for vehicle tracking based on a monocular camera,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 91, pp. 472–479, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    G.-Z. Cui, S.-Y. Xu, Q. Ma, Z. Li, and Y.-M. Chu, “Command-filter-based distributed containment control of nonlinear multi-agent systems with actuator failures,” International Journal of Control, vol. 91, no. 7, pp. 1708–1719, 2018.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    L.-N. Long, J.-W. Lu, S.-Y. Xu, and Y.-M. Chu, “Reference model-based containment control of multi-agent systems with high-order dynamics,” IET Control Theory and Applications, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 796–802, 2014.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    J. Li, S.-Y. Xu, Y.-M. Chu, and H. Wang, “Distributed average consensus control in networks of agents using outdated states,” IET Control Theory and Applications, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 746–758, 2010.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Y. Qu, S.-Y. Xu, C. Song, Q. Ma, Y.-M. Chu, and Y. Zou, “Finite-time dynamic coverage for mobile sensor networks in unknown environments using neural networks,” Journal of The Franklin Institute, vol. 351, no. 10, pp. 4838–4849, 2014.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Z.-Q. Zhang, S.-Y. Xu, Y. Guo, and Y.-M. Chu, “Robust adaptive out-feedback control for a class of nonlinear systems with time-varying actuator faults,” International Journal of Control, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 743–759, 2010.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    S. He, H.-S. Shin, and A. Tsourdos, “Multi-sensor multitarget tracking using domain knowledge and clustering,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 18, no. 19, pp. 8074–8084, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    X. Lyu and J. Wang, “Sequential multi-sensor JPDA for target tracking in passive multi-static radar with range and doppler measurements,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 34488–34498, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    D. D. Mu, G. F. Wang, and Y. S. Fan, “Tracking control of podded propulsion unmanned surface vehicle with unknown dynamics and disturbance under input saturation,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 1905–1915, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Y. Bar-Shalom and T. E. Fortmann, Tracking and Data Association, Academic Press, Boston, 1988.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Y. Bar-Shalom, T. Kirubarajan, and X. Lin, “Probabilistic data association techniques for target tracking with applications to sonar, radar and EO sensors,” IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 37–56, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    M. Beard, B.-T. Vo, and B.-N. Vo, “Bayesian multi-target tracking with merged measurements using labelled random finite sets.” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 1433–1447, 2015.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    S. H. Rezatofighi, S. Gould, B. T. Vo, B.-N. Vo, K. Mele, and R. Hartley, “Multi-target tracking with time-varying clutter rate and detection profile: application to time-lapse cell microscopy sequences,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 1336–1348, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    K. Fukunaga and T. E. Flick, “An optimal global nearest neighbor metric,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, no. 3, pp. 314–318, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    T. Fortmann, Y. Bar-Shalom, and M. Scheffe, “Sonar tracking of multiple targets using joint probabilistic data association,” IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 173–184, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    S. S. Blackman, “Multiple hypothesis tracking for multiple target tracking,” IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 5–18, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    R. P. Mahler, “Multitarget Bayes filtering via first-order multitarget moments,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 1152–1178, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    B.-N. Vo and W.-K. Ma, “The Gaussian mixture probability hypothesis density filter,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 54, no. 11, pp. 4091–4104, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    H. Heffes, “The effect of erroneous models on the Kalman filter response,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 541–543, 1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    C. Price, “An analysis of the divergence problem in the Kalman filter,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 699–702, 1968.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    R. Fitzgerald, “Divergence of the Kalman filter,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 736–747, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    K. Samuel and J. W. Choi, “Improved IMM filter for tracking a highly maneuvering target with mixed system noises,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 2763–2771, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    Y. S. Shmaliy, “Linear optimal FIR estimation of discrete time-invariant state-space models,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 3086–3096, 2010.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    J. M. Pak, C. K. Ahn, C. J. Lee, P. Shi, M. T. Lim, and M. K. Song, “Fuzzy horizon group shift FIR filtering for nonlinear systems with Takagi-Sugeno model,” Neurocomputing, vol. 174, pp. 1013–1020, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    S. H. You, J. M. Pak, C. K. Ahn, P. Shi, and M. T. Lim, “Unbiased finite-memory digital phase-locked loop,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II- Express Briefs, vol. 63, no. 8, pp. 798–802, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    J. M. Pak, C. K. Ahn, P. Shi, Y. S. Shmaliy, and M. T. Lim, “Distributed hybrid particle/FIR filtering for mitigating NLOS effects in TOA-based localization using wireless sensor networks,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 5182–5191, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    C. J. Lee and M. T. Lim, “Fuzzy H fir filtering for T-S fuzzy systems with quantization and packet dropout,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 961–971, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    C. J. Lee, J. M. Pak, C. K. Ahn, K. M. Min, P. Shi, and M. T. Lim, “Multi-target FIR tracking algorithm for Markov jump linear systems based on true-target decision-making,” Neurocomputing, vol. 168, pp. 298–307, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    Y. Bar-Shalom and X.-R. Li, Estimation and Tracking: Principles, Techniques, and Software, Artech House, Inc, Norwood, MA, 1993.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    L. Xiuying and S. Sun, “H control for networked stochastic non-linear systems with randomly occurring sensor saturations, multiple delays and packet dropouts,” IET Control Theory and Applications, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 2954–2963, 2017.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    L. Xiuying and S. Sun, “Observer-based H control for networked systems with bounded random delays and consecutive packet dropouts,” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, vol. 24, no. 17, pp. 2785–2802, 2014.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    Y. S. Shmaliy, S. Zhao, and C. K. Ahn, “Unbiased finite impluse response filtering: an iterative alternative to Kalman filtering ignoring noise and initial conditions,” IEEE Control Systems, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 70–89, 2017.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    S. H. You, C. K. Ahn, Y. S. Shmaliy, and S. Zhao, “Minimum weighted Frobenius norm discrete-time FIR filter with embedded unbiasedness,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs, 2018.Google Scholar
  36. [36]
    W. H. Kwon and S. H. Han, Receding Horizon Control: Model Predictive Control for State Models, Springer Science & Business Media, 2006.Google Scholar
  37. [37]
    L. Stanislas and T. Peynot, “Characterisation of the Delphi electronically scanning radar for robotics applications,” Proc. of ARAA Australasian Conference on Robotics and Automation, ARAA, 2015.Google Scholar
  38. [38]
    Y. Bar-Shalom, F. Daum, and J. Huang, “The probabilistic data association filter,” IEEE Control Systems, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 82–100, Dec. 2009.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. [39]
    D. Schuhmacher, B.-T. Vo, and B.-N. Vo, “A consistent metric for performance evaluation of multi-object filters,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 56, no. 8, pp. 3447–3457, 2008.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. [40]
    A. Miron, S. Ainouz, A. Rogozan, and A. Bensrhair, “Cross-comparison census for colour stereo matching applied to intelligent vehicle,” Electronics Letters, vol. 48, no. 24, pp. 1530–1532, November 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. [41]
    J. Mikulski, Activities of Transport Telematics, SpringerVerlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. [42]
    Q. H. Do, H. Tehrani, S. Mita, M. Egawa, K. Muto, and K. Yoneda, “Human drivers based active-passive model for automated lane change,” IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 42–56, Spring 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. [43]
    X. Wei, Z. Guo, M. Guo, and X. Liu, “Disturbance observer-based anti-disturbance control for a class of stochastic systems,” Proc. of Chinese Control Conference (CCC), pp. 2860–2864, 2015.Google Scholar
  44. [44]
    X. Wei, H. Zhang, S. Sun, and H. R. Karimi, “Composite hierarchical antidisturbance control for a class of discrete-time stochastic systems,” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 3292–3202, 2018.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ICROS, KIEE and Springer 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Electrical EngineeringKorea UniversitySeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations