Optimization of Tool Path Pitch of Spray Painting Robots for Automotive Painting Quality
- 38 Downloads
The spray painting robots with mounted electrostatic rotating bell (ESRB) atomizers have been widely used to maintain high painting quality for various car models in rapid automotive production. The focus of this study is on developing the optimum coating path pitch while considering automobile painting quality. We define a deposition model optimized for the ESRB atomizer and introduce a method to optimize the path pitch with a cost function for painting thickness uniformity, which plays an important role in painting quality. In addition, experimental results are presented to verify the validity of the optimal path pitch simulation results. By using the results of this study, it is possible to improve the painting quality and thus the productivity of spray painting robots.
KeywordsDeposition model ESRB atomizer path pitch optimization spray painting robot thickness uniformity
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- K. Im, M. Lai, S. J. Yu, and R. R. Matheson, “Simulation of spray transfer processes in electrostatic rotary bell sprayer,” Journal of Fluids Engineering, vol. 126, 2004.Google Scholar
- X. Li, B. Zhang, T. A. Fuhlbrigge, O. Landsnes, and S. Riveland, “Paint deposition simulation for robotics automotive painting line,” Proc. of The 4th Annual IEEE International Conference on Cyber Technology in Automation, Control and Intelligent Systems, June 4-7, 2014.Google Scholar
- M. Andulkar, S. Chiddarwar, and A. Paigwar, “Optimal velocity trajectory generation for spray painting robot in offline mode,” AIR’ 15, July 02-04, 2015.Google Scholar
- A. Gasparetto, R. Vidoni, D. Pillan, and E. Saccavini, “Automatic path and trajectory planning for robotic spray painting,” Proc. of 7th German Conference on Robotics, pp. 211–216, 2012.Google Scholar
- S. H. Suh, I. K. Woo, and S. K. Noh, “Development of an automated trajectory planning system (ATPS) for spray painting robots,” Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation, pp. 1948–1955, April 1991.Google Scholar
- W. Persoons and H. Van Brussel, “CAD-based robotic coating of highly curved surfaces,” Proc. of the 24th International Symposium on Industrial Robots, pp. 611–618, November 1993.Google Scholar
- D. C. Conner, P. N. Atkar, A. A. Rizzi, and H. Choset, “Development of deposition models for paint application on surfaces embedded in IR for use in automated trajectory planning,” Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA, Tech. Rep. CMU-RI-TR-02-08, June 2002.Google Scholar
- D. C. Corner, A. Greenfield, P. N. Atkar, A. A. Rizzi, and H. Choset, “Paint deposition modeling for trajectory planning on automotive surfaces,” IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, vol. 2, no. 4, 2005.Google Scholar
- Y. Chen, W. Chen, K Chen, and B. Li, “Motion planning of redundant manipulators for painting uniform thick coating in irregular duct,” Hindawi Publishing Corporation Journal of Robotics, vol. 2016.Google Scholar