Bio-inspired Decentralized Architecture for Walking of a 5-link Biped Robot with Compliant Knee Joints
- 39 Downloads
Animal walking is one of the most robust and adaptive locomotion mechanisms in the nature, involves sophisticated interactions between neural and biomechanical levels. It has been suggested that the coordination of this process is done in a hierarchy of levels. The lower layer contains autonomous interactions between muscles and spinal cord and the higher layer (e.g. the brain cortex) interferes when needed. Inspiringly, in this study we present a hierarchical control architecture with a state of the art intrinsic online learning mechanism for a dynamically walking 5-link biped robot with compliant knee joints. As the biological counterpart, the system is controlled by independent control units for each joint at the lower layer. In order to stabilize the system, these units are driven by a sensory feedback from the posture of the robot. A central stabilizing controller at the upper layer arises in case of failing the units to stabilize the system. Consequently, the units adapt themselves by including online learning mechanism. We show that using this architecture, a highly unstable system can be stabilized with identical simple controller units even though they do not have any feedback from all other units of the robot. Moreover, this architecture may help to better understand the complex motor tasks in human.
KeywordsBiped walking dcentralized control dynamic robot hierarchical control legged locomotion online learning
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- T. Luksch, Human-like Control of Dynamically Walking Bipedal Robots, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, 2010.Google Scholar
- N. M. Bora, G. V. Molke, and H. R. Munot, “Understanding human gait: a survey of traits for biometrics and biomedical applications,” Proc. of International Conference on Energy Systems and Applications, IEEE, pp. 723–728, 2015.Google Scholar
- J. Cronin, R. Frost, and R. Willgoss, “Walking biped robot with distributed hierarchical control system,” Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation (CIRA’ 99), IEEE, pp. 150–156, 1999.Google Scholar
- M. Hardt, K. Kreutz-Delgado, and J. W. Helton, “Optimal biped walking with a complete dynamical model,” Proceedings of the 38th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, IEEE, pp. 2999–3004, 1999.Google Scholar
- A. C. de Pina Filho, M. S. Dutra, and L. Santos, “Modelling of bipedal robots using coupled nonlinear oscillators,” Mobile Robots towards New Applications (A. Lazinica, ed.), ch. 4, pp. 55–78, InTech, 2006.Google Scholar
- T. Buschmann, A. Ewald, A. von Twickel, and A. Büschges, “Controlling legs for locomotion-insights from robotics and neurobiology.,” Bioinspiration and Biomimetics, vol. 10, p. 041001, June 2015.Google Scholar
- E. R. Westervelt and J. W. Grizzle, “Design of asymptotically stable walking for a 5-link planar biped walker via optimization,” Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA’ 02), IEEE, pp. 3117–3122, 2002.Google Scholar
- C. Liu and J. Su, “Biped walking control using offline and online optimization,” Proc. of 30th Chinese Control Conference (CCC), Yantai), pp. 3472–3477, IEEE, 2011.Google Scholar