Finite-time Controller Design for Four-wheel-steering of Electric Vehicle Driven by Four In-wheel Motors

  • Qinghua MengEmail author
  • Zong-Yao Sun
  • Yushan Li
Regular Papers Control Theory and Applications


A smooth control method may do not obtain a desired convergence. On the other hand, a no-continuous method may cause a close-loop system to chatter. In order to avoid the aforementioned disadvantages, a non-smooth finite-time control method is proposed and applied on an active four-wheel-steering electric vehicle driven by four in-wheel motors to improve the safety and manoeuvrability in this paper. Based on an ideal electric vehicle steering tracking model, a non-smooth finite-time convergence controller is constructed for controlling the four wheels’ steering angles of an electric vehicle. The front wheel cornering stiffness, rear wheel cornering stiffness and external disturbance of a practical car are regarded as bounded uncertain parameters according to practical conditions. An A-class car model in the Carsim software is utilized to simulate the designed controller. The simulation results show that the controller based on finite-time convergence can track the ideal vehicle steering model better to obtain zero sideslip angle and expected yaw rate even when there exist perturbation of cornering stiffness and disturbance of lateral wind. It means the control system of the electric vehicle is robust with uncertainty. The simulation results also show that the non-smooth finite-time control method is better than the slide mode control method for the active four-wheel-steering system of the electric vehicle.


Electric vehicle finite-time convergence four-wheel-steering stability control 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    G.-D. Yin, N. Chen, J.-X. Wang, and J.-S. Chen, “Robust control for 4ws vehicles considering a varying tire-road friction coefficient,” International Journal of Automotive Technology, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 33–40, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    R. Marino and S. Scalzi, “Asymptotic sideslip angle and yaw rate decoupling control in four-wheel steering vehicles,” Vehicle System Dynamics, vol. 48, no. 9, pp. 999–1019, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    H. Lv and S. Liu, “Closed-loop handling stability of 4ws vehicle with yaw rate control,” Strojniški vestnik-Journal of Mechanical Engineering, vol. 59, no. 10, pp. 595–603, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    M. Li, Y. Jia, and J. Du, “Lpv control with decoupling performance of 4ws vehicles under velocity-varying motion,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 1708–1724, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    C. Qian and W. Lin, “Smooth output feedback stabilization of planar systems without controllable/observable linearization,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 47, no. 12, pp. 2068–2073, 2002.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    B. Mashadi and M. Majidi, “Integrated afs/dyc sliding mode controller for a hybrid electric vehicle,” International Journal of Vehicle Design, vol. 56, no. 1–4, pp. 246–269, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    F. Fahimi, “Full drive-by-wire dynamic control for fourwheel-steer all-wheel-drive vehicles,” Vehicle System Dynamics, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 360–376, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Z. Shuai, H. Zhang, J. Wang, J. Li, and M. Ouyang, “Lateral motion control for four-wheel-independent-drive electric vehicles using optimal torque allocation and dynamic message priority scheduling,” Control Engineering Practice, vol. 24, pp. 55–66, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    R. Wang, C. Hu, Z. Wang, F. Yan, and N. Chen, “Integrated optimal dynamics control of 4wd4ws electric ground vehicle with tire-road frictional coefficient estimation,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 60, pp. 727–741, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    M. Ariff, H. Zamzuri, M. Nordin, W. Yahya, S. Mazlan, and M. Rahman, “Optimal control strategy for low speed and high speed four-wheel-active steering vehicle,” Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences, vol. 8, pp. 1516–1528, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    A. Nasri, B. Gasbaoui, and B. M. Fayssal, “Sliding mode control for four wheels electric vehicle drive,” Procedia Technology, vol. 22, pp. 518–526, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    S. Ding, L. Liu, and W. Zheng, “Sliding mode direct yaw-moment control design for in-wheel electric vehicles,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 64, no. 8, pp. 6752–6762, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    J. Yang, S. Li, and X. Yu, “Sliding-mode control for systems with mismatched uncertainties via a disturbance observer,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 160–169, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    D. Ginoya, P. Shendge, and S. Phadke, “Sliding mode control for mismatched uncertain systems using an extended disturbance observer,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 1983–1992, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    J. Yang, S. Li, J. Su, and X. Yu, “Continuous nonsingular terminal sliding mode control for systems with mismatched disturbances,” Automatica, vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 2287–2291, 2013.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Y. Feng, X. Yu, and F. Han, “On nonsingular terminal sliding-mode control of nonlinear systems,” Automatica, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 1715–1722, 2013.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    H. Li, P. Shi, and D. Yao, “Adaptive sliding-mode control of markov jump nonlinear systems with actuator faults,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 1933–1939, 2017.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    C. Qian and W. Lin, “Almost disturbance decoupling for a chain of power integrators perturbed by a lower-triangular vector field,” in Proceedings of the 38th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 1999., vol. 3. IEEE, 1999, pp. 2082–2087.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    C. Qian and L. Wei, “Homogeneity with incremental degrees and global stabilisation of a class of high-order upper-triangular systems,” International Journal of Control, vol. 85, no. 12, pp. 1851–1864, 2012.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    C. Pukdeboon and P. Siricharuanun, “Nonsingular terminal sliding mode based finite-time control for spacecraft attitude tracking,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 530–540, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    N. Wang, J.-C. Sun, and M. J. Er, “Global adaptive practical output tracking control for a class of genuinely nonlinear uncertain systems: adding an universal power integrator approach,” IEEE Access, vol. 4, pp. 10136–10146, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    S. Li, H. Du, and X. Lin, “Finite-time consensus algorithm for multi-agent systems with double-integrator dynamics,” Automatica, vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 1706–1712, 2011.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    X. Lin, H. Du, and S. Li, “Finite-time boundedness and l 2-gain analysis for switched delay systems with normbounded disturbance,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 217, no. 12, pp. 5982–5993, 2011.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    H. Du, C. Qian, S. Yang, and S. Li, “Recursive design of finite-time convergent observers for a class of time-varying nonlinear systems,” Automatica, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 601–609, 2013.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    Z.-Y. Sun, L.-R. Xue, and K. Zhang, “A new approach to finite-time adaptive stabilization of high-order uncertain nonlinear system,” Automatica, vol. 58, pp. 60–66, 2015.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    D. J. Zhao and D. G. Yang, “Model-free control of quadrotor vehicle via finite-time convergent extended state observer,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 242–254, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    S. B. Stojanovic, D. L. Debeljkovic, and M. A. Misic, “Finite-time stability for a linear discrete-time delay systems by using discrete convolution: An lmi approach,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 1144–1151, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    C.-C. Chen, C. Qian, X. Lin, Z.-Y. Sun, and Y.-W. Liang, “Smooth output feedback stabilization for a class of nonlinear systems with time-varying powers,” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 2017.Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    Y. Wei, J. Qiu, and H. R. Karimi, “Reliable output feedback control of discrete-time fuzzy affine systems with actuator faults,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits & Systems I Regular Papers, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 170–181, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    Y. Wei, J. Qiu, H. K. Lam, and L. Wu, “Approaches to t-s fuzzy-affine-model-based reliable output feedback control for nonlinear ito stochastic systems,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 569–583, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    Y. Wei, J. Qiu, H. R. Karimi, and M. Wang, “New results on h dynamic output feedback control for markovian jump systems with time-varying delay and defective mode information,” Optimal Control Applications & Methods, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 656–675, 2015.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    Y. Wei, J. Qiu, and S. Fu, “Mode-dependent nonrational output feedback control for continuous-time semi-markovian jump systems with time-varying delay,” Nonlinear Analysis Hybrid Systems, vol. 16, pp. 52–71, 2015.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Control, Robotics and Systems and The Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringHangzhou Dianzi UniversityHangzhouChina
  2. 2.Institute of AutomationQufu Normal UniversityQufuChina
  3. 3.College of TransportationShandong University of Science and TechnologyQingdaoChina

Personalised recommendations