An Efficient Integrated Attitude Determination Method Using Partially Available Doppler Measurement Under Weak GPS Environment

  • Byungjin Lee
  • Young Jae Lee
  • Sangkyung SungEmail author
Regular Papers Robot and Applications


In this paper, we propose a new and efficient method to achieve a three dimensional attitude determination through combining the Doppler measurement with INS (Inertial Navigation System) in a partial GPS (Global Positioning System) coverage environment. First, equations associating raw measurement with user velocity vector and overall filter framework are introduced. Then, this paper presents formulation deriving a reference velocity incremental vector based on the Doppler measurement, which consequentially serve as the measurement of the attitude determination filter. In generating the reference velocity incremental vector, all three cases are taken into account according to the availability conditions of satellite. First, for three or more visible satellites case, a least square method is used to fix the user velocity vector; for other partial satellite cases, a reference velocity incremental vector is generated by devising the best geometric prediction from the respective satellite measurements. In order to verify the performance of this study, flight experiment is carried out with sensor equipment onboard a manned aircraft. For demonstrating the efficiency of the presented algorithm, we examined the proposed algorithm using the onboard flight experimental data. As a result of comparative study with a conventional tightly coupled integration method, the proposed method demonstrated competent performance in both accuracy and computational efficiency under partial satellite visibility.


Attitude determination Doppler efficiency flight experiment INS partial coverage velocity incremental vector 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    K. H. Kim, J. G. Lee, and C. G. Park, “Adaptive twostage extended Kalman filter for a fault-tolerant INS-GPS loosely coupled system,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 125–137, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    J. Guo and M. Zhong, “Calibration and compensation of the scale factor errors in DTG POS,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 62, no. 10, pp. 2784–2794, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    W. Ding and J. Wang, “Improving adaptive Kalman estimation in GPS/INS integration,” The Journal of Navigation, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 517–529, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    G. Blewitt, “Basics of the GPS technique: observation equations,” chapter in book Geodetic Applications of GPS, Swedish Land Survey, pp. 10–54, 1997.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    G. T. Schmidt and R. E. Phillips, INS/GPS Integration Architectures, Massachusetts Inst of Tech, Lexington, MA, pp. 1–18, 2010.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    M. George and S. Sukkarieh, “Tightly coupled INS/GPS with bias estimation for UAV applications,” Proc. of Australiasian Conference on Robotics and Automation (ACRA), 2005.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    C. Hide and T. Moore, “GPS and low cost INS integration for positioning in the urban environment,” Proc. of ION GPS, pp. 13–16, 2005.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    S. Godha and M. E. Cannon, “GPS/MEMS INS integrated system for navigation in urban areas,” Gps Solutions, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 193–203, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    J. A. Farrell, T. D. Givargis, and M. J. Barth, “Real-time differential carrier phase GPS-aided INS,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 709–721, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    J. Wendel and G. F. Trommer, “Tightly coupled GPS/INS integration for missile applications,” Aerospace Science and Technology, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 627–634, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    J. Wendel, O. Meister and R. Monikes, “Time-differenced carrier phase measurements for tightly coupled GPS/INS integration,” Proc. of IEEE/ION PLANS 2006, pp. 54–60, 2006.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Y. Zhao, “Applying time-differenced carrier phase in nondifferential GPS/IMU tightly coupled navigation systems to improve the positioning performance,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 992–1003, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    B. M. Scherzinger, “Precise robust positioning with inertial/GPS RTK,” Proc. of the 13th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation (ION GPS), pp. 115–162, 2000.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    X. Niu, Y. Ban, Q. Zhang, T. Zhang, H. Zhang, and J Liu, “Quantitative analysis to the impacts of IMU quality in GPS/INS deep integration,” Micromachines, vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 1082–1099, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    F. Shen, J. W. Cheong, and A. G. Dempster, “A DSRC Doppler/IMU/GNSS tightly-coupled cooperative positioning method for relative positioning in VANETs,” The Journal of Navigation, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 120–136, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Z. Li, G. Chang, J. Gao, J. Wang, and A. Hernandez, “GPS/UWB/MEMS-IMU tightly coupled navigation with improved robust Kalman filter,” Advances in Space Research, vol. 58, no. 11, pp. 2424–2434, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Y. Li, J. Wang, C. Rizos, and P. Mumford, “Low-cost tightly coupled GPS/INS integration based on a nonlinear Kalman filtering design,” Proc. of ION National Technical Meeting, pp. 18–20, 2006.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    S. Zhao, Y. Chen, and J. A. Farrell, “High-precision vehicle navigation in urban environments using an mem’s IMU and single-frequency GPS receiver,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 2854–2867, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Y. Zhao, “Performance evaluation of cubature Kalman filter in a GPS/IMU tightly-coupled navigation system,” Signal Processing, vol. 119, pp. 67–79, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    B. Lee, S. Yun, H. K. Lee, Y. J. Lee, and S. Sung, “An efficient attitude reference system design using velocity differential vectors under weak acceleration dynamics,” International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 222–231, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Navstar GPS Space Segment / Navigation User Interfaces (ICD-GPS-200C), IRN-200C-004, U.S. Air Force, Apr. 12, 2000. [Online]: icd200/icd200cw1234.pdfGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    J. Zhang, K. Zhang, R. Grenfell, and R. Deakin, “GPS satellite velocity and acceleration determination using the broadcast ephemeris,” The Journal of Navigation, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 293–305, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    M. Petovello, “How does a GNSS receiver estimate velocity?,” Inside GNSS, pp. 38–41, March/April 2015.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    B. Hofmann-Wellenhof, H. Lichtenegger, and E. Wasle, GNSS-global Navigation Satellite Systems: GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, and more, Springer Science & Business Media, 2007.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    M. Ligas and P. Banasik, “Conversion between Cartesian and geodetic coordinates on a rotational ellipsoid by solving a system of nonlinear equations,” Geodesy and Cartography, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 145–159, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Control, Robotics and Systems and The Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Aerospace Information EngineeringKonkuk UniversitySeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations