Advertisement

Design of type-2 Fuzzy Logic Systems Based on Improved Ant Colony Optimization

  • Zhifeng Zhang
  • Tao WangEmail author
  • Yang Chen
  • Jie Lan
Regular Papers Intelligent Control and Applications
  • 27 Downloads

Abstract

An Improved Ant Colony Optimization (IACO) is proposed to design A2-C1 type fuzzy logic system (FLS) in the paper. The design includes parameters adjustment and rules selection, and the performance of the intelligent fuzzy system, which can be improved by choosing the most optimal parameters and reducing the redundant rules. In order to verify the feasibility of the proposed algorithm, the intelligence fuzzy logic systems based on the algorithms are applied to predict the Mackey-Glass chaos time series. The simulations show that both the IACO and ACO have better tracking performances. The results compared with classical algorithm BP ( back-propagation design) shows the tracking performance of IACO is more precise, the result compared with ACO shows that either the training result or the testing result, the tracking performance of IACO is better, and IACO has a faster convergence rate than ACO, the results compared with the Intelligent type-1 fuzzy logic systems show that both the A2-C1 type FLS based on IACO and ACO have better tracking performance than type-1 fuzzy logic system.

Keywords

Ant colony optimization A2-C1 type fuzzy logic system improved ant colony optimization neural network 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy Logica,” IEEE Comput.Mag, vol. 1, no. 1998, pp. 83–93, 1998.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    G. Y. Lian, K. L. Huang, and J. H. Chen, “Training algorithm for radial basis function neural network based on quantum–behaved particle swarm optimization,” International Journal of Computer Mathematics, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 629–641, 2010.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    D. Y. Zhai, M. S. Hao, and M. Jerry, “Universal image noise remove filter Based–on type–2 fuzzy logic system and QPSO,” International Journal of Uncertainly, Fuzziness and Knowledge–Based Systems, vol. 20, pp. 207–232, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    H. M. Yazdi, “Implement designer’s preferences using fuzzy logic and genetic algorithm instructural optimization,” International Journal of Steel Structures, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 987–995, 2016.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    C. F. Juang and C. Lo, “Fuzzy systems design by clustering–aided ant colony optimization for plant control,” International Journal of General Systems, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 623–641, December 2007.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    C. F. Juang, “A TSK–type recurrent fuzzy network for dynamic systems processing by neutral network and genetic algorithms,” IEEE Trans Fuzzy Systems, vol. 142, no. 2, pp. 157–170, 2014.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    O. Castillo, E. Lizarraga, and J. Soria, “New approach using ant colony optimization with ant set partition for fuzzy control design applied to the ball and beam system,” Information Science, vol. 294, no. 2015, pp. 203–215, 2015.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    O. Castillo, R. Martinez–Marroquin, and P. Melin, “Bioinspired optimization of fuzzy logic controller for robotic autonomous System with PSO and ACO,” Fuzzy Inf. no. 2, pp. 119–143, 2010.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    C. F. Juang and P. H. Chang, “Designing fuzzy rule–based systems using continuous ant colony optimization,” IEEE Trans Fuzzy Systems, vol. 28. no. 1, pp.138–149, 2013.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    O. Castillo, E. Lizarraga, and J. Soria, “New approach using ant colony optimization with ant set partition for fuzzy control design applied to the ball and beam system,” Information Science, vol. 294, no. 2015, pp. 203–215, 2015.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    F. Olivas, F. Valdez, and O. Castillo, “Ant colony optimization with dynamic parameter adaptation based on interval type–2 fuzzy logical systems,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 53, no. 2017, pp. 74–87, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Y. Chen, D. Z. Wang, and S. C. Tong, “Forecasting studies by designing Mamdani interval type–2 fuzzy logic systems: With the combination of BP algorithms and KM algorithms,” Neurocomputing, vol. 174, no. b, pp. 1133–1146, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    O. Castillo, JR. Castro, P. Melin, and A. Rodriguez–Diaz, “Application of interval type–2 fuzzy neural networks in nonlinear identification and time series predication,” Soft Computing, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 1213–1224, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Y. Chen, “Study on weighted Nagar–Bardini algorithms for centroid type–reduction of interval type–2 fuzzy logic systems,” Journal of Intelligent, Fuzzy Systems, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 2417–2428, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    D. Z. Wang and Y. Chen, “Study on permanent magnetic drive forecasting by designing Takagi Sugeno Kang type interval type–2 fuzzy logic systems,” Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 2011–2023, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Y. Chen and D. Z. Wang, “Forecasting by general type–2 fuzzy logic systems optimized with QPSO algorithms,” International Journal Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 2950–2958, 2017.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Y. Chen and D. Z. Wang, “Study on centroid type–reduction of general type–2 fuzzy logic systems with weighted enhanced Karnik–Mendel algorithms,” Soft Computing, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 1361–1380, 2018.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    M. P. Kumar and G. N. Pillai, “Interval type–2 fuzzy logical controller design for TCSC,” Evolving Systems, vol. 5, no. 2014, pp. 193–208, 2014.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Y. Chen, D. Z. Wang, and W. Ning, “Forecasting by TSK general type–2 fuzzy logic systems optimized with genetic algorithms,” Optimal Control Applications, Methods, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 393–409, 2018.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Y. Chen and D. Z. Wang, “Type–reduction of interval type–2 fuzzy logic systems with weighted Karnik–Mendel algorithms,” Control Theory and Applications, vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 1327–1336, 2016.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    R. S. Rama and P. Latha, “An effective torque ripple reduction for permanent magnet synchronous motor using ant colony optimization,” International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 577–584, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Control, Robotics and Systems and The Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of ScienceLiaoning University of TechnologyJinzhouChina

Personalised recommendations