Advertisement

Trajectory Tracking Control of a Quadrotor Aerial Vehicle in the Presence of Input Constraints

  • Trong-Toan Tran
  • Shuzhi Sam
  • Wei He
  • Pham Luu-Trung-Duong
  • Nguyen-Vu Truong
Regular Papers Robot and Applications
  • 29 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, we address the control problem of a Quadrotor Aerial Vehicle (QAV) in the presence of the input constraints. For this purpose, a separation principle is applied in the control design. The QAV model is decoupled and constructed as a cascaded structure to handle its underactuated property. By imposing the constraints on the orientation angles, we show that the QAV will be never overturned. Then, a combination of the backstepping method, barrier Lyapunov and saturation functions is used in the control design for each subsystem to deal with both input and output constraints. Our design renders the cascaded system of the QAV into the form in which an Input-to-State Stable (ISS) subsystem is driven by an asymptotic subsystem, and hence the stability of the overall cascaded system of the QAV is ensured. In addition, the tracking errors are guaranteed to converge to the origin. Simulation results are provided to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed control.

Keywords

Bounded control input saturation quadrotor aerial vehicle trajectory tracking 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    K. P. Tee, S. S. Ge, and F. E. H. Tay, “Adaptive neural network control for helicopters in vertical flight,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 753–762, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    S. S. Ge, B. Ren, K. P. Tee, and T. H. Lee, “Approximationbased control of uncertain helicopter dynamics,” IET Control Theory & Applications, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 941–956, 2009.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    B. Ren, S. S. Ge, C. Chen, C. H. Fua, and T. H. Lee, Modeling, Control and Coordination of Helicopter Systems, Springer New York, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    L. R. Garcia Carrillo, A. E. Dzul Lopez, R. Lozano, and C. Pegard, Quad Rotorcraft Control Vision-Based Hovering and Navigation, Springer-Verlag, London, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    P. Castillo, R. Lozano, and A. E. Dzul, Modelling and Control of Mini Flying Machines, Springer-Verlag, London, 2005.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    I. Fantoni and R. Lozano, Non-linear Control for Underactuated Mechanical Systems, Springer-Verlag, London, UK, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    P. Castillo, A. Dzul, and R. Lozano, “Real-time stabilization and tracking of a four-rotor mini rotorcraft,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 510–516, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    G. Raffo, M. Ortega, and F. Rubio, “An integral predictive/ nonlinear H¥ control structure for a quadrotor helicopter,” Automatica, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 29–39, 2010.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    P. Casau, R. G. Sanfelice, R. Cunha, D. Cabecinhas, and C. Silvestre, “Robust global trajectory tracking for a class of underactuated vehicles,” Automatica, vol. 58, pp. 90–98, 2015.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    A. Ailon and S. Arogeti, “Closed-form nonlinear tracking controllers for quadrotors with model and input generator uncertainties,” Automatica, vol. 54, pp. 317–324, 2015.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    H. N. Nguyen, C. S. Ha, and D. J. Lee, “Mechanics, control and internal dynamics of quadrotor tool operation,” Automatica, vol. 61, pp. 289–301, 2015.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Y. Yu and X. Ding, “A global tracking controller for underactuated aerial vehicles: Design, analysis, and experimental tests on quadrotor,” IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 2499–2511, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    V. Mistler, A. Benallegue, and N. Msirdi, “Exact linearization and noninteracting control of a rotors helocopter via dynamic feedback,” Proc. of IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp. 586–593, 2001.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    A. P. Aguiar, J. P. Hespanha, and S. Member, “Trajectorytracking and path-following of underactuated autonomous vehicles with parametric modeling uncertainty,” IEEE Transaction on Automatic Control, vol. 52, no. 8, pp. 1362–1379, 2007.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    T. Madani and A. Benallegue, “Backstepping control for a quadrotor helicopter,” Proc. of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 3255–3260, 2006.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    A. Das, F. Lewis, and K. Subbarao, “Backstepping approach for controlling a quadrotor using lagrange form dynamics,” Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 127–151, 2009.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    W. He and S. S. Ge, “Robust adaptive boundary control of a vibrating string under unknown time-varying disturbance,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 48–58, 2012.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    W. He, S. Zhang, and S. S. Ge, “Adaptive boundary control of a nonlinear flexible string system,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 1088–1093, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Wei He, Shuzhi Sam Ge, Yanan Li, Effie Chew, and Yee Sien Ng, “Neural network control of a rehabilitation robot by state and output feedback,” Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 15–31, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    W. He, H. Huang, and S. S. Ge, “Adaptive neural network control of a robotic manipulator with time-varying output constraints,” IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, vol. 47, no. 10, pp. 3136–3147, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    S. Formentin and M. Lovera, “Flatness-based control of a quadrotor helicopter via feedforward linearization,” Proc. of 50th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference (CDC-ECC), pp. 6171–6176, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    C. Aguilar-Ibáñez, H. Sira-Ramírez, M. S. Suárez-Castañón, E. Martínez-Navarro, and M. A. Moreno-Armendariz. “The trajectory tracking problem for an unmanned four-rotor system: flatness-based approach,” International Journal of Control, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 69–77, 2012.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    P. Castillo, R. Lozano, and A. Dzul, “Stability of a mini rotorcraft with four rotors,” IEEE Control Systems Magazines, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 45–55, 2005.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    A. R. Teel. “Global stabilization and restricted tracking for multiple integrators with bounded controls,” System and Control Letters, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 165–171, 1992.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    T. T. Tran, T. T. Han, and S. S. Ge, “Trajectory tracking control of quadrotor aerial vehicle,” Proc. of 3rd IFAC International Conference on Intelligent Control and Automation Science, vol. 46, no. 20, pp. 274–279, 2013.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    F. L. Lewis, D. M. Dawson, and C. T. Abdallah, Robot Manipulator Control: Theory and Practice, Marcel Dekker INC, New York, 2004.Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    A. Loría and E. Panteley, “Cascaded nonlinear time-varying system: Analysis and design,” Advanced Topics in Control System Theory: Lecture Notes From FAP 2004, vol. 2, pp. 26–64. Springer-Verlag, New York, USA, 2005.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    T. T. Tran, S. S. Ge, and W. He, “Adaptive control of a quadrotor aerial vehicle with input constraints and uncertain parameters,” International Journal of Control, vol. 91, no. 5, pp. 1140–1160, 2017.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    K. Alexis, G. Nikolakopoulos, and A. Tzes, “Model predictive quadrotor control: attitude, altitude and position experimental studies,” IET Control Theory and Applications, vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 1812–1827, 2012.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    S. K. Armah, S. Yi, and W. C. Choi, “Design of feedback control for quadrotors considering signal transmission delays,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 1395–1403, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    S. H. Jeong and S. Jung, “Cartesian space control of a quadrotor system based on low cost localization under a vision system,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 549–559, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    E. Aguinaga-Ruiz, A. Zavala-Rio, V. Santibanez, and F. Reyes, “Global trajectory tracking through static feedback for robot manipulators with bounded inputs,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 934–944, 2009.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    D. Angeli, Y. Chitour, and L. Marconi, “Robust stabilization via saturated feedback,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 50, no. 12, pp. 1997–2014, 2005.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    H. K. Khalil, Nonlinear Systems, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 2002.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    K. P. Tee, S. S. Ge, and E. H. Tay, “Barrier Lyapunov functions for the control of output-constrained nonlinear systems,” Automatica, vol. 47, no. 11, pp. 2511–2516, 2009.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    T. T. Tran, S. S. Ge, and W. He, “Adaptive control for an uncertain robotic manipulator with input saturations,” Control Theory and Technology, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 113–121, 2016.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    M. Chen, S. S. Ge, and B. Ren, “Adaptive tracking control of uncertain MIMO nonlinear systems with input constraints,” Automatica, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 452–465, 2011.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    E. Panteley and A. Loria, “On global uniform asymptotic stability of nonlinear time-varying systems in cascade,” Systems & Control Letters, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 131–138, 1998.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Control, Robotics and Systems and The Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Trong-Toan Tran
    • 1
    • 6
  • Shuzhi Sam
    • 2
  • Wei He
    • 3
  • Pham Luu-Trung-Duong
    • 4
  • Nguyen-Vu Truong
    • 5
  1. 1.Graduate University of Science and Technology (GUST)VASTHanoiVietnam
  2. 2.Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, and the Social Robotics Lab, Interactive Digital Media Institute (IDMI)National University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
  3. 3.School of Automation and Electrical EngineeringUniversity of Science and Technology BeijingBeijingChina
  4. 4.Engineering Product Development (EPD) PillarSingapore University of Technology and DesignTampinesSingapore
  5. 5.Institute of Applied Mechanics and InformaticsVietnam Academy of Science and TechnologyHanoiVietnam
  6. 6.Institute of Applied Mechanics and Informatics (IAMI)VASTHanoiVietnam

Personalised recommendations