Advertisement

Guidance Laws against Towed Decoy Based on Adaptive Back-stepping Sliding Mode and Anti-saturation Methods

  • Ji-Peng Dong
  • Jing-Guang Sun
  • Yong Guo
  • Shen-Min Song
Regular Papers Control Theory and Applications
  • 42 Downloads

Abstract

In order to meet the needs of high-precision guidance for missile-guided maneuvering targets in the presence of towed bait interference, this paper proposes a new guidance strategy based on heading angle method and parallel approaching method. Its main idea: a suitable angle is determined by heading angle method which of the missile trajectory is above that of the towing bait. Meanwhile, the accurate interception of missiles to targets is guaranteed by parallel approaching method. Firstly, system models of missile and target with towed decoy are established. Then, considering unknown bounded system disturbances, a controller is given based on sliding mode, back-stepping method. Furthermore, to solve the input saturation problem, an anti-saturation controller is given using adaptive and back-stepping sliding mode methods. Finally, strict proofs of the two controllers are given using Lyapunov stability theory, and simulations are carried out to verify the effectiveness of the two controllers.

Keywords

Adaptive control finite time control guidance law design terminal sliding mode control towed decoy missile 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    W. X. Bai, H Tian, and J. F. T, “Analysis of towed decoy jamming on monopulse radar,” Electronic Information Warfare Technology, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 39–42, 2007.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    W. J. Kerins. “Analysis of towed decoys,” IEEE transactions on aerospace and electronic systems, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 1222–1227, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    D.K. Barton, Radar Evaluation Handbook, Artech House, London, 1991.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    N. B. Benton, “Fiber optic microwave link applications in towed decoy electronic countermeasures systems,” Proc. of SPIE’s 1995 International Symposium on Optical Science, Engineering, and Instrumentation. International Society for Optics and Photonics, USA. pp. 85–92, July 1995.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Y. L. Lu, Z. X. Tong, C. Z. Wang, and J. Jian, “Aerodynamic and dynamic characteristics of aeronautic towed decoy,” Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 395–398, 2011.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    W. D. Bai, A. F. Li, and S. B. Li, “Simulation and analysis of radar decoy jamming,” Electronic Information Warfare Technology, vol. 23. no. 2, pp. 53–57, 2008.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    F. Neri, “Anti-monopulse jamming techniques,” Microwave and Optoelectronics Conference, 2001. IMOC 2001. Proceedings of the 2001 SBMO/IEEE MTT-S International, IEEE, Belem, Brazil vol. 2, pp. 45–50, Aug. 2001.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    S. D. Brierley and R. Longchamp, “Application of slidingmode control to air-air interception problem,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 306–325, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    A. Ilchmann and D. H. Owens, “Adaptive stabilization with exponential decay,” Systems & Control Letters, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 437–443, 1990.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    D. Y. N. Chavez and J. A. Moreno, “Second-order sliding mode output feedback controller with adaptation,” International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing, vol. 30, no. 8–10, pp. 1523–1543, 2016.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    J. H. Song, S. M. Song, and H. B. Zhou, “Adaptive nonsingular fast terminal sliding mode guidance law with impact angle constraints,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 99–114, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    J. H. Song and S. M. Song, “Three-dimensional guidance law based on adaptive integral sliding mode control,” Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 202–214, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Z. X. Zhang, S. H. Li, and S. Luo, “Composite guidance laws based on sliding mode control with impact angle constraint and autopilot lag,” Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 764–776, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    D. Zhou, C. D. Mu, and W. Xu, “Fuzzy adaptive variable structure guidance with application to space interception,” Tsinghua Science and Technology, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 1610–1614, 1999.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    D. Zhou, C. D. Mu, and W. Xu, “Adaptive sliding-mode guidance of a homing missile,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 589–594. 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    J. C. Holloway and M. Krstic, “A predictor observer for seeker delay in the missile homing loop,” Proc. of 12th IFAC Workshop on Time Delay Systems, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, vol. 48, pp. 416–421, 2015.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    T. R. Oliveira, J. P. V. S. Cunha, and A. Battistel, “Global stability and simultaneous compensation of state and output delays for nonlinear systems via output-feedback sliding mode control,” Journal of Control, Automation and Electrical Systems, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 608–6202, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    S. Lee, Y. Kim, G. Moon, and B. E. Jun, “Adaptive backstepping autopilot design for missiles of fast time-varying velocity,” IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 49, no. 17, pp. 474–479, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    S. F. Xiong, W. H. Wang, X. D. Liu, S. Wang, and Z. Q. Chen, “Guidance law against maneuvering targets with intercept angle constraint,” ISA Transactions, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 1332–1342, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    M. Golestani, I. Mohammadzaman, and A. R. Vali, “Finitetime convergent guidance law based on integral backstepping control,” Aerospace Science and Technology, vol.39, pp. 370–376. 2014.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    S. M. He, W. Wang, and J. Wang, “Three-dimensional multivariable integrated guidance and control design for maneuvering targets interception,” Journal of the Franklin Institute, vol. 353, no. 16, pp. 4330–4350, 2016.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    X. L. Shao and H. J. Wang, “Back-stepping active disturbance rejection control design for integrated missile guidance and control system via reduced-order ESO,” ISA Transactions, vol. 57, pp. 10–22, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    M. P. Ran, Q. Wang, D. H. Hou, and C. Y. Dong, “Backstepping design of missile guidance and control based on adaptive fuzzy sliding mode control,” Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 634–642, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    M. Chen, S. S. Ge, and B. B. Ren, “Adaptive tracking control of uncertain MIMO nonlinear systems with input constraints,” Automatica, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 452–465, 2011.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    X. L. Liang, Z. H. Ming, and G. R. Duan, “Adaptive dynamic surface control for integrated missile guidance and autopilot in the presence of input saturation,” Journal of Aerospace Engineering, vol. 28, no. 5, 2014.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    M. Chen, G. Tao, and B. Jiang, “Dynamic surface control using neural networks for a class of uncertain nonlinear systems with input saturation,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 2086–2097, 2015.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    D. Zhou and B Xu, “Adaptive dynamic surface guidance law with input saturation constraint and autopilot dynamics,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    Q. L. Hu, B. Jiang, and M. I. Friswell, “Robust saturated finite time output feedback attitude stabilization for rigid spacecraft,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 1914–1929, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    G. Y. Zhang, Phased Array Radar Theory, National Defence Industry Press, Beijing, 2009.Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    Y. X. Zhang, M.W. Sun, and Z. Q. Chen, “Finite-time convergent guidance law with impact angle constraint based on sliding-mode control,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 619–625, 2012.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Control, Robotics and Systems and The Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ji-Peng Dong
    • 1
  • Jing-Guang Sun
    • 1
  • Yong Guo
    • 1
  • Shen-Min Song
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Control Theory and Guidance TechnologyHarbin Institute of TechnologyHarbinChina

Personalised recommendations