Advertisement

Quantitative analysis of critical limitation in using extended state observer

  • Yi Li
  • Mingwei Sun
  • Zenghui Wang
  • Zengqiang Chen
Article

Abstract

Active disturbance rejection control (ADRC) has been successfully widely applied. The extended state observer (ESO) is a crucial component of ADRC to deal with uncertainties in many control systems. Although the nominal stability of ADRC was proved by adopting a sufficiently fast observer with a performance recovery principle, it is difficult to be employed in practice because severe oscillation or even instability might be triggered if the fast observer was used. This paper investigates the reason behind this phenomenon within the framework of input time-delay sensitivity for a typical first-order system, which can provide an insightful understanding of ADRC. The positive root of the polynomial which determines the maximal input time-delay maintaining closedloop stability is quantitatively analyzed and the relationship among the bandwidth of ESO, other control parameters and the allowable input time-delay is thoroughly studied. Finally, numerical examples are presented to validate the corresponding theoretical results.

Keywords

Active disturbance rejection control extended observer input time-delay robustness 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Z. Gao, “On the centrality of disturbance rejection in automatic control,” ISA Transactions, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 850–857, July 2014. [click]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    J. Han, “From PID to active disturbance rejection control,” IEEE Trans. on Industrial Electronics, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 900–906, March 2009. [click]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    L. B. Freidovich and H. K. Khalil, “Robust feedback linearization using extended high-gain observers,” Proc. of the 45th Conf. Decision and Control, pp. 983–988, 2006. [click]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Q. Zheng, Z. Chen, and Z. Gao, “A practical approach to disturbance decoupling control,” Control Engineering Practice, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 1016–1025, September 2009. [click]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    S. Li, J. Yang, W. Chen, and X. Chen, “Generalized extended state observer based control for systems with mismatched uncertainties,” IEEE Trans. on Industrial Electronics, vol. 59, no. 12, pp. 4792–4802, December 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    M. Sun, Z. Wang, Y. Wang, and Z. Chen, “On low-velocity compensation of brushless DC motor in the absence of friction model,” IEEE Trans. on Industrial Electronics, vol. 60, no. 9, pp. 3897–3905, September 2013. [click]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    C. Huang, D. Li, and Y. Xue, “Active disturbance rejection control for the ALSTOM gasifier benchmark problem,” Control Engineering Practice, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 556–564, April 2013. [click]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    X. Wen, L. Guo, and P. Yan, “Composite hierarchical antidisturbance control for robotic systems with multiple disturbances,” International Journal of Control, Automation, and Systems, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 541–551, June 2014. [click]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    D. Qiu, M. Sun, Z. Wang, Y. Wang, and Z. Chen, “Practical wind disturbance rejection for large deep space observatory antenna,” IEEE Trans. on Control System Technology, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 1983–1990, September 2014. [click]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    H. Sira-Ramirez, J. Linares-Flores, C. Garcia-Rodriguez, and M. A. Conteras-Ordaz, “On the control of the permanent magnet synchronous motor: an active disturbance rejection control approach,” IEEE Trans. on Control System Technology, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 2056–2063, September 2014. [click]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    A. N. Atassi and H. K. Khalil, “A separation principle for the stabilization of a class of nonlinear systems,” IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, vol. 44, no. 9, pp. 1672–1687, September 1999. [click]MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    L. B. Freidovich and H. K. Khalil, “Performance recovery of feedback-linearization-based designs,” IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, vol. 53, no. 10, pp. 2324–2334, October 2008. [click]MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    J. P. Richard, “Time-delay systems: an overview of some recent advances and open problems,” Automatica, vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 1667–1694, October 2003. [click]MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    K. Gu and S. I. Niculescu, “Survey on recent results in the stability and control of time-delay systems,” Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control-Trans. of the ASME, vol. 125, no. 2, pp. 158–165, June 2003. [click]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    K. Walton and J. E. Marshall, “Direct method for TDS stability analysis,” IEE Proceedings Part. D, vol. 134, no. 2, pp. 101–107, March 1987.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    J. Chen, “On computing the maximal delay intervals for stability of linear delay systems,” IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1087–1093, June 1995. [click]MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    N. Olgac and R. Sipahi, “An exact method for the stability analysis of time-delayed linear time-invariant (LTI) systems,” IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 793–797, May 2002. [click]MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    J. Chen, S. I. Niculescu, and P. Fu, “Robust stability of quasi-polynomials: frequency-sweeping conditions and vertex tests,” IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 1219–1234, May 2008. [click]MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    S. Yi, A. G. Ulsoy, and P. W. Nelson, “Design of observerbased feedback control for time-delay systems with application to automotive powertrain control,” Journal of the Franklin Institute, vol. 347, no. 1, pp. 358–376, February 2009.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    R. Sipahi and I. I. Delice, “Advanced clustering with frequency sweeping methodology for the stability analysis of multiple time-delay systems,” IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 467–472, February 2011. [click]MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    M. Morari and E. Zafiriou, Robust Process Control, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1989.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Z. Gao, “Scaling and bandwidth-parameterization based controller tuning,” Proc. of the American Control Conf., pp. 4989–4996, 2003.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    W. K. Ho, C. C. Hang, and L. S. Cao, “Tuning of PID controllers based on gain and phase margin specifications,” Automatica, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 497–502, March 1995. [click]MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Control, Robotics and Systems and The Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yi Li
    • 1
  • Mingwei Sun
    • 1
  • Zenghui Wang
    • 2
  • Zengqiang Chen
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Computer and Control EngineeringNankai UniversityTianjinChina
  2. 2.Department of Electrical and Mining EngineeringUniversity of South AfricaFloridaSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations