Feature enhancement of medical images using morphology-based homomorphic filter and differential evolution algorithm
Regular Papers Intelligent and Information Systems
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:
Abstract
In this paper, we present a new morphology-based homomorphic filtering technique for feature enhancement in medical images. The proposed method is based on decomposing an image into morphological subbands. The homomorphic filtering is performed using the morphological subbands. The differential evolution algorithm is applied to find an optimal gain and structuring element for each subband. Simulations show that the proposed filter improves the contrast of the features in medical images.
Keywords
Differential evolution algorithm homomorphic filter image enhancement morphological filterPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- [1]A. Laine, J. Fan, and W. Yang, “Wavelets for contrast enhancement of digital mammography,” IEEE Eng. Med. & Biol. Mag., vol. 145, pp. 536–550, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [2]H. Oktem, K. Egiazarian, J. Niittylahti, and J. Lemmetti, “An approach to adaptive enhancement of diagnostic x-ray images,” EURASIP J. Applied Signal Processing, vol. 2003, pp. 430–436, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [3]J. H. Yoon and Y. M. Ro, “Enhancement of the contrast in mammographic images using the homomorphic filter method,” IEICE Trans. Inf. & Syst., vol. E85-D, no. 1, pp. 298–303, Jan. 2002.Google Scholar
- [4]H. I. Ashiba, K. H. Awadallah, S. M. El-Halfawy, and F. E. El-Samie, “Homomorphic enhancement of infrared images using the additive wavelet transform,” Progress in Electromagnetics Research C, vol. 1, pp. 123–130, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [5]P. Maragos, “Morphological filtering for image enhancement and feature detection,” in The Image and Video Processing Handbook, ed. A.C. Bovik, 2nd ed., pp. 135–156, Elsevier Academic Press, 2005.Google Scholar
- [6]N. Harvey and S. Marshall, “The use of genetic algorithms in morphological filter design,” Elsevier Signal Processing: Image Communication, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 55–72, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [7]M. Paulinas and A. Usinskas, “A survey of genetic algorithms applications for image enhancement and segmentation,” Inform. Tech. & Control, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 278–284, 2007.Google Scholar
- [8]R. Storn, “Differential evolution, a simple and efficient heuristic strategy for global optimization over continuous spaces,” Journal of Global Optimization, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 341–359, Dec. 1997.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- [9]P. Thomas and D. Vernon, “Image registration by differential evolution,” Proc. of the Irish Machine Vision & Image Processing Confer., pp. 221–225, 1997.Google Scholar
- [10]S. Rahnamayan, H. R. Tizhoosh, and M. M. A. Salama, “Image thresholding using differential evolution,” Proc. of Inter. Confer. on Image Processing, Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition, pp. 244–249, Jun. 2006.Google Scholar
- [11]M. Watanabe, T. Endoh, M. Shiohara, and S. Sasaki, “Palm vein authentication technology and its applications,” Proc. of the Biometric Consortium Confer., pp.37–38, Sep. 2005.Google Scholar
- [12]V. Paquit, J. R. Price, R. Seulin, F. Meriaudeau, R. H. Farahi, K. W. Tobin, and T. L. Ferrell, “Nearinfrared imaging and structured light ranging for automatic catheter insertion,” in Medical Imaging 2006: Visualization, Image-Guided Procedures & Display, ed. K. R. Cleary, R. L. Galloway, and Jr., SPIE 6141, pp. 61411T-1–61411T-9, SPIE, 2006.Google Scholar
- [13]J. C. Yang and D. S. Park, “Fingerprint verification based on invariant moment features and nonlinear BPNN,” International Journal of Control, Automation, and Systems, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 800–808, 2008.Google Scholar
Copyright information
© Institute of Control, Robotics and Systems and The Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010